June 9, 2017

No Image

The First Trailer for Marvel's 'Black Panther' Has Arrived!

It’s still almost a year away, but Black Panther has just debuted its first teaser trailer well in advance. Just in case we were going to forget about one of the most anticipated installments of the MCU so far? Hey, we can’t complain. This movie is going to be great, and different. We wish it was here now, but it’s not even the next Marvel movie. Or the next next one. Watch the new spot below.

[embedded content]

When it comes out: February 16, 2018

Who is in it: Chadwick Boseman, Lupita Nyong’o, Michael B. Jordan, Angela Basset, Daniel Kaluuya, Forest Whitaker, Sterling K. Brown, Phylicia Rashad, Danai Gurira, Winston Duke, Martin Freeman, Andy Serkis

What it’s about: Black Panther, who made his big screen debut in Captain America: Civil War gets a new kind of origin story in his own solo piece of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Boseman reprises his role as the superhero, also known as T’Challa, newly crowned king of Wakanda. He faces challengers to his throne and villains including Man-Ape (Duke), teams up with a CIA agent (Freeman) and defends his country and his position as its leader.

How is the trailer: For such a short spot, there’s a lot packed in here, more than was expected this early. Of course, the CG is probably what is most unfinished, and that’s fine. It’s still fascinating that that’s what Wakanda looks like. Who knew this movie was going to be so sci-fi? This doesn’t look like any other MCU movie, and that’s very exciting, as is the fact that this is a black superhero done right and respectably, surrounded mostly by other people of color. The only bad thing is the long wait we have until it arrives.

In addition to the new trailer, Marvel release this new poster for the movie:

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

FDA Asks Drug Maker To Pull Opioid Opana ER Off The Market

The Food and Drug Administration requested drug maker Endo Pharmaceuticals stop selling Opana ER, which is an opioid. NPR’s Robert Siegel speaks with Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, about the decision.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

Yesterday the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asked the drug maker Endo Pharmaceuticals to stop selling the prescription drug Opana ER. It’s a potent opioid painkiller, and like OxyContin, it’s been heavily abused. Joining us now to talk about the FDA’s move is Janet Woodcock. She is director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Welcome to the program.

JANET WOODCOCK: Thank you.

SIEGEL: The FDA came to this decision after determining that the risks of Opana ER outweigh the benefits. Can you elaborate on that finding? What are the risks?

WOODCOCK: The risks that this decision was made on have to do with the risk of abusing the product. And people who were abusing Opana ER developed several serious problems. One was we had outbreaks of HIV and Hepatitis C from sharing the drug after it was extracted by abusers. Second, there was a outbreak of a serious blood disorder.

SIEGEL: And when you say the way in which it was used, you mean it was being injected, actually.

WOODCOCK: That’s right. It was being injected, and you were injecting those materials that were added to try to make it more abuse-deterrent. But I will add, the FDA never granted the finding that Opana ER was abuse-deterrent because it didn’t meet our standards.

SIEGEL: And I should just – just to state the obvious in case I’m getting the obvious wrong here, people who used to just crush these pills to abuse them then were confronted with a coating that made that much more difficult. But it seems they were going ahead, crushing, melting and shooting up with this substance. That’s where the problem comes in. Do I have that right?

WOODCOCK: Yes. This – we’re not saying that Opana ER, when it was taken as directed, would cause these problems. These problems were due to people who were injecting the drug.

SIEGEL: Your agency has asked Endo Pharmaceuticals to take Opana ER off the market. What does that actually mean? Is it an outright ban of the drug or not?

WOODCOCK: Well, FDA does not have the authority for drugs to immediately remove them from the market. Generally we ask companies to voluntarily pull their drug off the market. If they are not willing to do that, we will issue a notice of a hearing, and we have to go through a judicial type of process.

SIEGEL: What so far has been the response from the company?

WOODCOCK: Well, they’re evaluating this request. So we did have an advisory committee meeting on this issue in March of this year, and the independent scientists voted 18 to 8 that the benefits of this drug no longer outweigh its risks.

SIEGEL: Dr. Woodcock, critics would say the FDA hasn’t been tough enough on the drugs that are out there and that people are abusing. Does yesterday’s action on Opana ER seem like perhaps a little too little too late?

WOODCOCK: The opioid crisis is a very serious problem, and we are exploring every avenue that we can to try to deal with this. This action has to do with a specific adverse event that is associated with abuse. The overall societal consequences of the abuse of these drugs is tremendous and terrible, and more definitely needs to be done. At the same time, of course the FDA – we have to keep pain medicines available, say, for people who have terminal cancer and so forth. So there’s a balance that has to be kept there.

SIEGEL: Well, Dr. Woodcock, thank you very much for talking with us about it today.

WOODCOCK: You are most welcome.

SIEGEL: That’s Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Got Cancer Questions? This Little-Known Hotline Is Here To Help

Jill Wiseman answers questions for the Contact Center based at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Robert Hood/Fred Hutch News Service

hide caption

toggle caption

Robert Hood/Fred Hutch News Service

If you were worried you had cancer, who would you call for information? Chances are a federally-funded cancer helpline isn’t the first place that pops into your mind.

But for 40 years, a helpline funded primarily by the National Cancer Institute has been answering people’s questions about cancer.

It’s a source of information for people who have been called back for a follow-up after routine screenings and are worried they might have cancer. And it can also help cancer patients get information about participating in clinical trials and help them figure out questions to ask their doctors.

The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle runs the Contact Center, which is funded mostly by the National Cancer Institute with some support from the Veteran’s Administration. Last month, the NCI awarded Fred Hutch a $24 million, three-year contract to continue operating the helpline.

“There will be about 1.7 million Americans diagnosed with cancer this year. For many of them, access to good information can be the difference between life and death,” says Peter Garrett, a spokesperson for the National Cancer Institute.

More than 91,000 people reached out to the Contact Center via phone, email or social media in 2016 — a total of about 250 inquiries per day. This year, more people have been contacting the center through a live chat, email or social media than with a phone call, says the center’s director, Nancy Gore.

“Over the years, call volume has declined although the complexity of the calls has increased,” says Gore. “People seek information via the Internet, so [they] can often find answers to basic questions such as general cancer symptoms, a common call before the Internet became pervasive.”

Now, people more often need technical information about clinical trials and gene therapies, she says.

But the helpline remains relatively little-known by the general public. About 10 percent of those inquiries were from repeat clients, according to data provided by the center.

Back in the 1980s, more than 20 cancer call centers operated around the country. Now there’s just one.

Assuming that the cancer center spends about $8 million this year to handle a similar number of inquiries, by our very rough calculation that adds up to a cost of about $87.14 per inquiry.

There’s no limit on the amount of time a helpline staffer can spend on the phone with a client. Eric Suni, a cancer information specialist at the center, says he has occasionally spent more than an hour on the phone with a caller during the seven years he’s worked there.

“Sometimes people will call and say they have one quick question, but answering that one quick question requires a much more in-depth discussion because you can only answer that question by explaining some other concept,” Suni says. “Even those that seem like, oh, this should take two minutes to answer is actually a much more involved conversation. So you never really know until it actually starts to unfold.”

Hotline staffers, who are required to have a four-year college degree, spend six to seven weeks in initial training. The center calls this process “the metamorphosis from civilian into a Cancer Information Specialist,” in a training overview document.

It’s hard not to think that the call center had become less necessary in an era when people can Google symptoms and get advice in patient groups on Facebook, but Gore says there’s still a need.

“In fact, it is such a common, common comment that is shared with us that they [the clients] wish they had known we were here when they were first diagnosed, or when their mother was diagnosed,” Gore says.

Gore’s husband died of melanoma when he was 34. She didn’t know much about his disease at the time of his diagnosis, she says.

“Until a cancer diagnosis is part of someone’s family or close friend situation people are aware of it, but until it hits home you’re not that in tune to it,” Gore says. “Once it actually hits home, then people have intense interest and a thirst for knowledge because they want to understand.”

Doctors may explain information to patients, but sometimes the shock of a cancer diagnosis can make it tough for a patient to focus.

“For most people, you don’t hear anything after the diagnosis. You’re just processing the words,” Gore says.

The NCI estimates that about 4 in 10 people in the U.S. will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives, according to data from 2010 to 2012.

Callers to the hotline ask most frequently about breast cancer, according to 2016 data, followed by other more common cancers including lung and prostate.

And more people called with questions about a spouse, friend or relative than about themselves.

The people who reach out to the center in English tend to be in their 50, 60s and 70s, but those who seek a conversation in Spanish are generally younger – most are in their 30s, 40s or 50s.

Other sources of information about cancer also exist, such as a 24-hour hotline run by the American Cancer Society, which received about 744,000 inquiries last year.

Dr. Deanna Attai, a clinical professor of surgery at the University of California Los Angeles, participates in the weekly Breast Cancer Social Media chats known as #bcsm. She says she got involved after she noticed a Twitter conversation where a breast cancer patient was asking for treatment advice. Attai started a private conversation with the patient, offering her advice about reliable surgeons.

She calls it her Twitter “ah-ha” moment.

“Just by stumbling across a conversation in the middle of the night, you could really have a big impact,” Attai says. “That was for me, when I started to realize where my voice is among the community, that I could act as kind of like a guide.”

Attai doesn’t see social media making the NCI Contact Center obsolete. Instead, the cancer institute could use social media to point people to the NCI as a source of up-to-date, unbiased information.

“I think they should be using social media to promote themselves,” Attai says. “People don’t really understand what the NCI does, unless you’re a researcher or physician or maybe someone that’s participated in a clinical trial.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Saudi Soccer Apologizes After Team Skips Tribute To London Rampage Victims

Australian soccer players (in yellow) observe a moment of silence for the victims of last week’s London attacks prior to a 2018 FIFA World Cup qualifier against Saudi Arabia’s national team on Thursday in Australia.

Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images

The Saudi Arabian Football Federation issued an apology after its national team provoked outrage in Australia by not formally participating in a moment of silence for London rampage victims.

Ahead of a World Cup qualifying match on Thursday in North Adelaide, the Australian players lined up in a row, put their arms around one another and stood silently in memory of the eight people killed on Saturday.

Members of the Saudi team largely appeared to disregard the tribute, with some milling around the field. One player appeared to bend down and tie his shoe, which can be seen in a video from Euronews.

[embedded content]
YouTube

Saudi Arabia’s federation hasn’t specifically explained why its team did not participate. But in a statement carried by The Associated Press, Football Federation Australia said it was told by the Saudi team prior to the game that its players did not plan to take part for cultural reasons.

“Both the (Asian Football Confederation) and the Saudi team agreed that the minute of silence could be held,” the FFA said in a statement, as quoted by the AP. “The FFA was further advised by Saudi team officials that this tradition was not in keeping with Saudi culture and they would move to their side of the field and respect our custom whilst taking their own positions on the field.”

This has drawn sharp criticism. As Australian politician Anthony Albanese told Channel Nine’s Today Show: “That was a disgraceful lack of respect not just for the two Australians killed, one of whom was a young South Australian, but also all of those victims of that terror attack in London.”

In a statement, the Saudi Arabian Football Federation said it “deeply regrets and unreservedly apologises for any offense caused by the failure of some members of the representative team of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to formally observe the one minute’s silence.”

It added that the “players did not intend any disrespect to the memories of the victims or to cause upset to their families, friends, or any individual affected by the atrocity.”

FIFA has said it would not discipline the team over the controversy, as Reuters reported. Soccer’s governing body said, “After reviewing the match report and images of the said match, we can confirm that there are no grounds to take disciplinary action.”

The Saudi team lost the Thursday night game against Australia, 3-2.

Since the incident, several examples have emerged of Saudi teams appearing to participate in similar tributes.

In Doha, Qatar, in December, Al-Ahli Saudi FC joined FC Barcelona in observing a moment of silence honoring members of a Brazilian soccer team killed in a plane crash, according to the BBC.

Before a 2016 match in Qatar, members of Saudi club Al-Ahli Saudi FC (right) did join FC Barcelona in observing a moment of silence.

AK BijuRaj/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

AK BijuRaj/Getty Images

The broadcaster also reported that “Saudi male handball players also held a minute’s silence before a match against Germany in January 2015 to remember the late king, Abdullah bin Abdulaziz.”

So is this kind of commemoration actually against Saudi culture?

Shadi Hamid, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, tells The Two-Way that ultraconservative Salafi clerics like those in Saudi Arabia “would be opposed to minutes of silence since they’d consider it a bida’a or ‘innovation’ ” to the way early Muslims practiced the faith.

He adds: “That doesn’t mean the Saudi football team has to follow suit, but it’s hard for me to imagine a state-sponsored activity of any sort directly contradicting the state’s religious establishment’s ultraconservative version of Islam.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Watch A Buoyant, Bubbly New Video From Ibeyi

Nearly three years ago, the twin artists Lisa-Kaindé and Naomi Díaz burst onto the music scene with their haunting songs “Oya” and “River,” which were soon followed by remarkable eponymous debut. That first album was lovely, aching, and suffused with a melancholy spirit and Afro-Cuban plays of shade and light.

However, for the first single from the 22-year-old sisters’ highly anticipated sophomore album, expected later this year on XL, the duo has spun away from brooding into unbridled happiness.

“Away Away” still bears the hallmarks of their sound: Lisa-Kaindé’s sweet vocals laid atop Naomi’s deeper voice and percussion; haunting electronics; and English lyrics eventually giving way to Yoruba chant.

But “Away Away” is a song about joy, through and through. The audio version of the song begins with the sound of wailing sirens — a tragically commonplace harbinger of chaos in 2017 — before the buoyant beats kick in; it’s a conscious turn away from grief and worry. By contrast, those warning notes are barely audible in the video; instead, it’s all sweetness and sunshine.

Directed by Christian Beuchet, the “Away Away” video has a loose, spontaneous and intimate feel, with the artists simply dancing and goofing around in the studio; it’s like the best selfie footage ever. (It doesn’t hurt that the Díaz women are absolutely stunning — a fact that has not escaped the notice of Beyoncé, who had them appear on Lemonade, or the house of Chanel, who cast them in the 2016/17 cruise show.)

And yet, Ibeyi acknowledges that happiness has its own, inverted twin of sorts. As the song concludes, they shift into the Yoruba language of their Afro-Cuban heritage to sing a chant to the orisha Aggayu. Aggayu is often depicted as a ferryman, the strength-giving figure who provides support in life’s hard moments. In nature, Agayu is also the volcano — and the seething, destructive fiery lava that also provides incredibly fertile soil. And Ibeyi’s recognition of life’s dualities is part of what makes their music such a pleasure.

Ibeyi goes on a European tour starting this fall.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)