June 8, 2017

No Image

Penguins Dominate Game 5: Trounce Predators 6-0 In NHL Stanley Cup Final

Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray (30) and teammates celebrate their 6-0 win over the Nashville Predators in Game 5 of the Stanley Cup Final Thursday night in Pittsburgh.

Bruce Bennett/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Bruce Bennett/AP

The Pittsburgh Penguins are one game away from a second consecutive Stanley Cup championship.

Six different players scored goals in the Penguins’ rout of the Nashville Predators Thursday night in Pittsburgh.

The 6-0 score tied for the seventh-biggest blowout in Stanley Cup Final history.

Justin Schultz, Bryan Rust, Evgeni Malkin, Conor Sheary, Phil Kessel and Ron Hainsey scored for the defending champions. Sidney Crosby had three assists, and goaltender Matt Murray had 24 stops in the shutout.

Predators goaltender Pekka Rinne was pulled after allowing three goals in the first period. Backup Juuse Saros didn’t fare much better, giving up three goals in relief.

After the game, Rinne told The Associated Press:

“Obviously not the start you want to have. It seemed hard for us to get anything going. Right now we’ve just got to focus on Game 6 at home and put all our energy in that one.”

Predator coach Peter Laviolette, who talked to The AP, didn’t put all the blame on Rinne.

“We’ve got to be better in front of him. I don’t think that necessarily they were bad goals. Our guys have a tremendous amount of confidence him. We just have to do a better job in front of him.”

The Penguins were clearly fired up in front of the home crowd. Losing the two previous games in Nashville gave them something to think about on the trip home.

Heading into Nashville, Pittsburgh was leading the series 2-0 but the Predators won Games 3 and 4 and tied the series 2-2.

Game 6 will be played Sunday night in Nashville, where the Penguins will try to be the first team to repeat as Stanley Cup champions since the Detroit Red Wings in 1997-98.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Terrence Malick's 'Wonder Woman,' 'John Wick 2' Kill Count and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Alternative Universe Movie of the Day:

Here’s a recut trailer for Wonder Woman to make it look like it was made by To the Wonder and Tree of Life director Terrence Malick:

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

Kyle Hill scientifically discusses how Mary Poppins explains the power of Yondu’s arrow in the Guardians of the Galaxy movies:

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

Speaking of Yondu and Mary Poppins, ya’ll, here’s another mashup of them from BossLogic parodying the latest Entertainment Weekly cover:

Had to do it XD @Guardians@JamesGunnpic.twitter.com/q6UKE6t9sr

— BossLogic (@Bosslogic) June 7, 2017

Cosplay of the Day:

While we’re talking MCU, here’s a video on how to make your own cheap Spider-Man: Homecoming-inspired Spidey suit:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Jerry Stiller, who turns 90 today, poses for a photos on the set of the original 1974 version of The Taking of Pelham One, Two, Three:

Character Celebration of the Day:

In this video essay, Pop Culture Detective explores the “fantastic masculinity” of Newt Scamander from Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them:

[embedded content]

Kill Count of the Day:

See all 128 of John Wick’s kills in John Wick: Chapter 2 in this very violent supercut:

[embedded content]

Movie Trivia of the Day:

Celebrate the existence of The Usual Suspects with this bunch of trivia from ScreenCrush:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

Today is National Best Friends Day, so IMDb made a supercut for the occasion featuring clips from Thelma and Louise and more:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This weekend is the 35th anniversary of the release of Steven Spielberg’s E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial. Watch the original trailer for the sci-fi classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

House Passes Bill Aimed At Reversing Dodd-Frank Financial Regulations

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, authored and championed the Financial Choice Act.

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Jacquelyn Martin/AP

House Republicans voted Thursday to deliver on their promise to repeal Dodd-Frank — the massive set of Wall Street regulations President Barack Obama signed into law after the 2008 financial crisis.

In a near party-line vote, the House approved a bill, dubbed the Financial Choice Act, , which scales back or eliminates many of the post-crisis banking rules.

The legislation is the brainchild of House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas.

“Dodd-Frank represents the greatest regulatory burden on our economy, more so than all the other Obama-era regulations combined,” Hensarling told reporters Wednesday. “There is a better way: economic growth for all; bank bailouts for none.”

Rolling back regulations

Hensarling’s nearly 600-page bill would defang Dodd-Frank by repealing the so-called Volcker Rule, which prevents government-insured banks from making risky bets with investments. It would also scrap a requirement, which goes into effect Friday, that retirement advisers put their clients’ interests ahead of their own.

In perhaps the biggest partisan flashpoint, the bill aims to scale back the authority of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to regulate large banks and payday lenders.

The CFPB was created under Dodd-Frank and is designed to operate as an independent watchdog with a single director. Hensarling considers its structure to be undemocratic.

“To think in a democracy that one un-elected individual can functionally decide what credit cards go in our wallets, what mortgages we can have on our home, whether or not we even have a checking account. I mean, that’s just anathema to me to the founding principles of this republic,” Hensarling said while speaking last month at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute.

Financial reform advocates argue the Choice Act would leave the U.S. economy vulnerable to another financial crisis.

“It is bad for consumers, it is bad for investors, and it’s bad for the stability of the American economy — which is bad for all of us,” said Lisa Donner, executive director of Americans for Financial Reform. “People believe there should be more — not less — regulation of Wall Street. They’re worried about regulators being too weak and being too afraid to take on the big guys. Not about their being tough.”

“The bill even specifically exempts payday and car title lenders — notorious for springing devastating debt traps for their already vulnerable customers — from any regulation,” added Yana Miles, senior legislative counsel for the Center for Responsible Lending.

The top lobbyist for the banking industry — which supports parts of the Choice Act — says the bill would bring relief to community banks, which many say have been overburdened by Dodd-Frank’s onerous, one-size-fits-all regulations.

“We are not seeking to roll back all of the policy response, all of Dodd-Frank,” said Rob Nichols, president and CEO of the American Bankers Association. “That’s not our intention. Our intention is to acknowledge what many regulators and legislators will tell you both publicly and privately, which is aspects of Dodd-Frank overshot.”

The Senate has been working on a separate bill that is more focused on loosening regulations on community banks. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellin has endorsed efforts to “mitigate the regulatory burden” when it comes to small banks.

Frank: “You don’t get everything 100 percent right the first time”

Former Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts agrees — despite having his name attached to the regulations, alongside that of former Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.

“Anytime you pass a very complicated piece of legislation, you don’t get everything 100 percent right the first time,” said Frank, who is the former Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

Frank says his namesake financial reform law has been too restrictive on smaller banks. He also believes the threshold used to identify other banks “as too big to fail” should be higher.

“Beyond that what you have are Republicans — including the chairman of the committee, Mr. Hensarling, who is a very honorable, very pleasant, deeply rigidly ideological conservative who is essentially against any regulation.”

Democratic opposition can stop the bill in the Senate

Even though some Democrats recognize there are some problems with Dodd-Frank, they are unified in opposing the Choice Act.

“The Wrong Choice Act is a vehicle for Donald Trump’s agenda to get rid of financial regulation and help out Wall Street. It’s an invitation for another Great Recession, or worse,” said California Rep. Maxine Waters, currently the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee.

Hensarling’s bill is a revised version of legislation he proposed last year, which stalled in Congress. Waters says it’s no surprise that Republicans see success in their sights this time around.

“With the majority that they have in the House and the Senate and President Trump, this is their big opportunity to deregulate, deregulate, deregulate — and they’re going to go for it,” she said.

But the GOP will run into obstacles in the Senate, because Republicans in the upper chamber don’t have the 60 votes needed to pass the legislation.

Hensarling says he’s undeterred.

“If I live my life thinking that something might not pass the Senate, I would never even get up and bother to go to work,” he said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

CDC Reveals Sharper Numbers Of Zika Birth Defects From U.S. Territories

Michelle Flandez’s son Inti Perez — pictured at home in Bayamon, Puerto Rico, in 2016 — was born with microcephaly linked to the mosquito-borne Zika virus.

Carlos Giusti/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Carlos Giusti/AP

Zika is a scary virus because of the terrible birth defects it can cause. Now scientists have a clearer sense of the size of that risk.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified 2,549 pregnant women with the Zika virus in Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories between Jan. 1, 2016 and April 25, 2017. The CDC found that 122 of these women — about 5 percent — gave birth to babies with birth defects such as small heads (known as microcephaly).

The federal health agency, which has been struggling to get clear information out of Puerto Rico about Zika, declined to say how many of those birth defects came from Puerto Rico.

But Dr. Anne Schuchat, acting director of the CDC, said she is confident that health officials in the territory are now fully reporting its cases to the federal health agency. Puerto Rico is not required to use the CDC definition when publishing its own figures, which have appeared to be out of step with expectations.

CDC will blend the Puerto Rico numbers with any cases reported from the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Federated States of Micronesia and Marshall Islands for “an assurance of privacy,” Schuchat told reporters. The upshot is that the public will not be able to identify risks specific to any of these areas. Puerto Rico’s population accounts for more than 90 percent of the total of these territories.

Earlier this week, Puerto Rico, which has been struggling to attract tourists during the Zika outbreak, declared that the epidemic had ended. Schuchat agreed that the number of cases has fallen sharply since the peak of the epidemic. But in a telephone news conference Thursday, she said, “We don’t feel the period of risk is over.”

Another mosquito season is on the way, she noted.

Scientists have had trouble pinning down the risk of Zika to pregnant women. Estimates of birth defects have ranged from 1 percent of pregnancies to more than 10 percent. This latest study, published Thursday in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, provides a sharper answer.

The study found that even infected women without symptoms of the disease were at risk of giving birth to babies with abnormalities.

Women whose infections were identified in the first trimester of pregnancy had a somewhat higher risk — 8 percent overall. The study found that women whose infections were identified later in pregnancy were also at significant risk for having a baby with birth defects.

Not all birth defects are immediately recognized at birth, Schuchat said, so it’s important for doctors to follow up with these babies. In addition to microcephaly, the children may have other brain malformations, eye problems and neurological damage.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)