May 12, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: The Rock Remakes Iconic Movie Scenes, Weird Al's 'Captain Underpants' Theme and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Fake Sequels of the Day:

Iconic scenes from Goodfellas, Home Alone, The Revenant and Napoleon Dynamite are reworked with Dwayne Johnson in this GQ sketch about other franchises he can join:

[embedded content]

Remade Movie of the Day:

This summer you can see Terminator 2: Judgment Day in 3D in theaters, and right now you can see the sequel remade using Grand Theft Auto footage and the Russian dub audio (via Game Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Alternate Concept Art of the Day:

Here’s a very different concept for how Mantis could have looked in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 (via /Film):

Music Video of the Day:

“Weird” Al Yankovic did the theme song for Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie, and here’s its video:

[embedded content]

Movie Takedown of the Day:

Deadpool joins the robots from Mystery Science Theater 3000 to watch and heckle the Deadpool parts of X-Men Origins: Wolverine:

[embedded content];

Vintage Image of the Day:

Katharine Hepburn, who was born on this day 110 years ago, rides a bike between takes while making Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner in 1967:

Actor in the Spotlight:

See George Clooney in animated form as he tells of his Uncle Chick in this adaptation of an Esquire interview from 2011

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Alejandro Jodorowsky is celebrated in this video essay titled “Mad Cinema of the Sacred Heart”:

[embedded content]

Filmmaking Rule of the Day:

Fandor illustrates the importance of the 180 degree rule and when it’s been broken well in this video essay:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 30th anniversary of the Cannes premiere of Dirty Dancing. Watch the original trailer for the classic musical drama below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Episode 771: When India's Cash Disappeared, Part Two

People line up outside a bank to exchange old currency notes with new ones on November 10, 2016 in New Delhi India.

Shams Qari/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Shams Qari/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

This part two of a two part series. Listen to part one here.

A couple of years ago, a mechanical engineer met with Narendra Modi, who would later become India’s Prime Minister. The engineer proposed a bold and radical idea that he said would completely change the Indian economy. The idea is called demonetization, and it happened six months ago. The government suddenly declared most of the paper money in circulation worthless. Citizens had a short time to turn in their stashes of cash for new bills. It was an effort to flush out corruption, get people to join the banking system and in the process, help the poor of India.

In part one of this two-part series, we met the man behind demonetization, the engineer, Anil Bokil. Now in part two, we ask, did demonetization work?

Modi had three problems he wanted to solve if the country relied less on cash:

  • Corruption. Without cash, it’s harder to hide money from the taxman. It’s also harder to ask for a bribe or run a black market business.
  • Businesses could be more competitive and grow faster by using banks and electronic payments.
  • More people would have to use banks, and not keep all their life savings in a drawer. This would keep their money safer.
  • Indian farmers talk beneath a fig tree. Since people couldn't use cash, many farmers couldn't sell their crops.

    Indian farmers talk beneath a fig tree. Since people couldn’t use cash, many farmers couldn’t sell their crops.

    Stacey Vanek Smith/NPR

  • Empty apartment buildings loom tall in the New Delhi suburbs. High rises like these are where most of India's black money is stored.

    Empty apartment buildings loom tall in the New Delhi suburbs. High rises like these are where most of India’s black money is stored.

    Stacey Vanek Smith/NPR

  • Gurdeep Sagoo had missed the deadline to exchange his mother's bills. His mom was in a coma at the time. But the bank said it was too late to exchange it. And there went his mom's life savings.

    Gurdeep Sagoo had missed the deadline to exchange his mother’s bills. His mom was in a coma at the time. But the bank said it was too late to exchange it. And there went his mom’s life savings.

    Stacey Vanek Smith/NPR

1 of 3

But, suddenly removing most of the cash in an economy, is very messy. It hurt. Demonetization has affected different people in a variety of a ways. We talked with farmers who don’t trust credit cards, small shop owners who had to find new ways to sell their goods, and high tech companies trying to cash in.

Today on the show, we evaluate Modi’s demonetization plan … report card style. How did this shock to a cash-dependent economy play out for a country of a billion people?

Music: “Cheeky Tongues,” “Yada Yada,” and “Miss You.” Find us: Twitter/ Facebook.

Subscribe to our show on Apple Podcasts or PocketCast.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Bob Ryan Reflects On Nearly 3 Decades Of ESPN's 'The Sports Reporters'

NPR’s Robert Siegel talks to Bob Ryan what he will do Sunday mornings now that The Sports Reporters roundtable on ESPN is off the schedule.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

There are several Sunday morning TV roundtables that feature journalists parsing the week’s events and arguing about them – “Meet The Press,” “Face The Nation.” I tend to watch them joylessly as a form of homework, but there has been one Sunday morning roundtable that I’ve watched faithfully and happily, until last weekend when it aired for the last time.

(SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, “THE SPORTS REPORTERS”)

SIEGEL: ESPN’s “The Sports Reporters” mixed a kid’s passion for sports with appropriate adult-sized doses of insight, realism and cynicism about the industries that thrive at the expense of gifted athletes. There was a host and a cast of familiar sportswriters, three of them each Sunday. Last week, Mitch Albom, Bill Rhoden and Bob Ryan joined host Mike Lupica for the last go-round.

And as I was wondering what I’m going to be doing without “The Sports Reporters” on Sunday mornings, the question occurred to me – what are they going to be doing? So we’ve called up “Sports Reporters” regular Bob Ryan of The Boston Globe, who joins us from Sarasota, Fla. Hi. Sorry to hear about it.

BOB RYAN: Oh, thank you very much. Well, in the short run, I think we plan on feeling sorry for ourselves.

SIEGEL: (Laughter).

RYAN: That’s – we’ll spend a good portion of Sunday mornings reminiscing and being nostalgic about all the good times we had, and, man, we did have many of them over the course of, in my case, 28 years.

SIEGEL: Twenty-eight. This week you weren’t scheduled to be on the show had there been one, but next Sunday morning?

RYAN: Oh, that is – I’m certain that that is when the withdrawal symptoms will become real.

SIEGEL: This Sunday, they I think would have been talking about perhaps an amazing win by the San Antonio Spurs on the road without their best player playing. Do you miss the chance to hold forth on these things?

RYAN: Positively. We would undoubtedly be marveling at the stunning development in Houston when the Spurs beat them by 39 points on their home court in an epic game 6.

SIEGEL: How different is the beat and the discussion that can be held by, you know, four sportswriters today than it was 30 years ago?

RYAN: So many of the people out there, the public, has access to information that was once our exclusive province, and so it’s easier to misspeak and be called on it than it was 30 years ago.

SIEGEL: (Laughter). And has the range of subjects – has the number of times that you found yourself talking about doping and domestic violence, is it radically different today than it was 30 years ago?

RYAN: Yes. The social issues are a part of the deal, especially in the fall when the National Football League goes about its business, and there is such a disproportionate number of miscreants, people who are unfortunately in the papers for the wrong reasons. I’m not saying that’s the only league where that happens, but I think anyone knows that you don’t get too far away without discussing who’s being suspended in that league.

SIEGEL: The show is unique on ESPN. Do you think it would be harder today to pitch a show where four people talk intelligently and, you know, not always shouting about sports? Is that considered just not an apt idea anymore?

RYAN: What is not considered an apt idea is agreement. What is considered an apt idea is conflict. We weren’t in it to seek conflict. If we had differing opinions, wonderful. It was organic. That was fine. But I have to tell you, and I’m a part of another program on the network, that sometimes we do manufacture issues for the sake of entertainment. And I don’t think for one second we ever thought that way on “The Sports Reporters.”

SIEGEL: By the way, why was “The Sports Reporters” canceled? Was it expensive to bring everybody up to Connecticut every week to do or just low ratings? Or what did they tell you?

RYAN: The only reason we were given – and I am not making this up, and I’m not being hyperbolic, I’m being – quoting verbatim – “we’re going in another direction,” unquote, unquote. So you can take a look at the drift of the nature of some of the programs on the network now, it will tell you what direction that is in. But I don’t see it that I have much of a right to complain about the opportunity that ESPN gave me and as well as the rest of us to have this forum for the last 28 years.

SIEGEL: Well, Bob Ryan, thanks for lots of wonderful Sunday morning half-hours that you and your colleagues and friends provided for me. Good luck, and I’ll be missing you.

RYAN: It’s nice to hear from you. Thank you, Robert.

SIEGEL: Bob Ryan of The Boston Globe was a regular on ESPN’s “The Sports Reporters” which aired for the last time last Sunday.

(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “PUT ON YOUR SUNDAY CLOTHES”)

UNIDENTIFIED SINGER: (Singing) Put your Sunday clothes. There’s lots of world out there.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Elizabeth Lesser: Why Is It So Hard To Ask For — And Offer — Forgiveness?

[embedded content]

Part 3 of the TED Radio Hour episode Forgiveness.

About Elizabeth Lesser’s TED Talk

Before donating bone marrow to her sister — Elizabeth Lesser and her sister undertook a process of seeking forgiveness from each other. She says forgiveness is hard but necessary for our well-being.

About Elizabeth Lesser

Elizabeth Lesser is the co-founder of Omega Institute, where she focuses on holistic education, meditation, and cross-cultural understanding. Lesser is also the co-founder of Omega’s Women’s Leadership Center.

She has written several bestselling books. Her latest book is Marrow: A Love Story, a memoir about Elizabeth and her younger sister, Maggie, and the process they went through when Elizabeth was the donor for Maggie’s bone marrow transplant.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)