May 1, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Guardians of the Galaxy' Meets 'The Goonies,' the Whimsy of Wes Anderson and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Promo of the Day:

Ahead of the release of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, Chris Pratt shows off some props from the movie, and you’ll never guess which is his favorite:

[embedded content]

Poster Tribute of the Day:

Speaking of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, here’s a new poster for the movie paying homage to the poster for The Goonies:

Trivia of the Day:

Also speaking of Guardians of the Galaxy, here’s a bunch more trivia about the first movie and its sequel via CineFix:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

We know thanks to Descendants that at least some Disney characters had children, so it’s about time we got a pregnant Disney princesses cosplay photoshoot. See their solo pics at Fashionably Geek.

Influential Movie of the Day:

For Fandor, Bill Rwehera showcases the influence of Seven Samurai on such movies as Star Wars, A Bug’s Life and Mad Max: Fury Road:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

In honor of Danielle Darrieux, who turns 100 today, here is one of her glamorous Universal Pictures publicity images circa 1938:

Filmmaker in Focus:

Today is also Wes Anderson’s birthday, so here’s a Fandor video essay by Philip Brubaker on the childhood whimsy of his films:

[embedded content]

Screenwriting Lesson of the Day:

Lessons from the Screenplay looks at the scripts for Star Wars: The Force Awakens and Rogue One: A Star Wars Story with focus on their flaws and imperfections and why the former is a better movie:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

Speaking of Rogue One, here’s a supercut of the sounds of the Star Wars spinoff edited by Zackery Ramos-Taylor:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 65th anniversary of the premiere of High Noon in England. Watch the original trailer for the classic Western below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Airbnb Settles Suit With San Francisco, Aims To Smooth Host Registration

Airbnb's logo displayed on a computer screen in Paris.

Lionel Bonaventure/AFP/Getty Images

The city of San Francisco has settled with Airbnb and HomeAway, concluding a lawsuit brought by the two short-term home rental companies by agreeing to new registration procedures for prospective hosts. The case, which had been heard in federal court, hinged on how the companies comply with a recently instituted city law.

“This agreement helps protect the city’s precious housing supply by obligating these companies to ensure that all their listings are legal and properly registered,” City Attorney Dennis Herrera said Monday in a statement. “This is a game changer.”

In Airbnb’s federal lawsuit — which the company filed in June last year, and which HomeAway later joined — the companies objected to the steep fines they faced if their hosts failed to register with the city as short-term rentals. The city’s board of directors had decided to introduce those fines as a means of adding teeth to a 2015 law mandating the registration.

Herrera’s office estimates that about 2,100 short-term rental hosts have registered in San Francisco — in other words, only about a quarter of the number of listings for Airbnb in the city.

But with the settlement, both sides have agreed to streamline the registration process, automatically sending new host applicants from the companies’ websites straight to the city’s Office of Short-Term Rentals. The agreement also requires the companies to provide the office with listings on a monthly basis, so that San Francisco officials can compare these listings with its own registration records.

“Similar to other agreements we have established with cities all around world, this agreement puts in place the systems and tools needed to help ensure our community is able to continue to share their homes,” Airbnb spokesman Christopher Nulty said in a statement, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. “Once fully implemented, every host in San Francisco will be registered and compliant with home-sharing rules the city put in place in 2014.”

The paper reports that “within six months, Airbnb and HomeAway will require all new hosts to be registered with San Francisco before they can post a rental listing on either site.”

Yet San Francisco is not the only city with whom Airbnb has shared some friction. TechCrunch notes the other cities the company has sued:

“In Anaheim, Airbnb filed a lawsuit, which has since been dismissed because Anaheim ‘pulled back their law,’ [Airbnb Head of Global Policy Chris] Lehane said. In Miami, a judge ruled last week in Airbnb’s favor and there’s a bit of a grey area in Santa Monica, Lehane said. Last year, Airbnb settled its lawsuit with New York City.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

President Trump Promotes Revised Version Of GOP Health Care Bill

President Trump is promising great things from the revised version of the Republican health care bill. He said it would lower premiums, increase competition and protect people with pre-existing conditions “beautifully.”

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

President Trump is promising great things from this health care bill. He said it would lower premiums, increase competition and protect people with preexisting conditions beautifully, as he put it. Well, joining us to talk about what exactly the bill would do is NPR health policy correspondent Alison Kodjak. Good to see you.

ALISON KODJAK, BYLINE: Good to see you, too, Robert.

SIEGEL: The president promised an awful lot here. Can he deliver?

KODJAK: Well, probably not with this bill as it stands now. The basics of the bill are very similar to what they were in March when they didn’t pass in the House. And at that time, the Congressional Budget Office, which determines how much the bill costs, said that it could end up with 24 million fewer people having insurance after 10 years than would under the Affordable Care Act. And in addition, the way this bill is written – people’s benefits could also deteriorate.

SIEGEL: This bill is an update of the American Health Care Act that was proposed by Speaker Ryan and the White House a few weeks ago. Remind us what’s in it.

KODJAK: Yeah, so the bill first of all gets rid of the individual mandate, which is the thing that most Republicans hate most about the – about Obamacare – is that it requires people to buy insurance or pay a fine. It replaces the income-based subsidies that Obamacare has in place to help people buy insurance with age-based tax credits. And that means that lower-income people might get a little less help buying insurance, and higher-income people may get a little bit more. It also requires people to keep their coverage constantly, and if they drop their coverage, they’ll have to pay a big penalty to buy into the insurance system again. That’s a way of keeping healthy people in.

SIEGEL: It’s awfully close to the individual mandate, actually.

KODJAK: Very similar, yes. And then the last thing it does is it rolls back the expansion of Medicaid over time so that people who now got Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act may lose it over the next few years.

SIEGEL: Well, if so much in the new bill is the same as in that bill, why is the White House more optimistic about the current bill’s chance of passage?

KODJAK: Well, in the old bill, no one was really happy because the conservatives – they thought it kept too much of Obamacare. The more moderate Republicans thought too many people would lose insurance. So this was a deal to try to bring them together. And so what it ended up doing was sort of splitting the baby.

It allows states to opt out of the federal regulations by getting a waiver and so that they can offer insurance plans with fewer benefits and also get rid of protections for people with preexisting conditions. It allows insurance companies to charge them more or not cover them. But if they were to do that, then the states would have to come up with another plan that would cover those people. Most people think that they would go with high-risk pools, which is a way for the state to backstop the cost of their higher-cost patients so that they get that their coverage.

SIEGEL: Using public tax funds, in effect…

KODJAK: Yeah.

SIEGEL: …To pick up where the insurance company can no longer pay. If this were to become law and states were permitted to opt out of federal regulations and not offer all of the services that Obamacare mandated, would companies in those states be able to sell health insurance across state lines? Would that be a back door to deregulating all health insurance?

KODJAK: No, they don’t have that specifically in this bill – the across state lines. What they do have is this ability to waive the essential health benefits. They don’t have to include as many benefits in the policy. And that they can also get rid of what’s called community rating, which means they can charge people more based on their health status rather than just charge them based on where they live and their age.

SIEGEL: During the earlier debate in March, a lot of lawmakers were worried about people who gained coverage under the Medicaid expansion as part of Obamacare losing it. Do any of the changes in this bill address Medicaid?

KODJAK: Not the newer changes. The bill pretty much stands as it did in March, which means that there’s going to be an eventual rollback of the expansion of Medicaid, and millions of people could lose their coverage – their Medicaid coverage, which has a lot of more moderate Republicans worried.

SIEGEL: NPR’s Alison Kodjak, Thanks.

KODJAK: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF SHARON JONES AND THE DAP-KINGS SONG “LET THEM KNOCK”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)