April 17, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' Parodies and Easter Eggs, 'Inception' Score at Coachella and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Trailer Reaction of the Day:

Darth Blender had Darth Vader watch the new Star Wars: The Last Jedi trailer. He had some expected responses:

[embedded content]

Movie Poster Parodies of the Day:

Speaking of The Last Jedi, fans are having a lot of fun changing the poster, including one for Masters of the Universe II below. See more at the designated hashtag.

DC and Warner, thank me later. #MakeTheLastJediPosterBetter pic.twitter.com/cib5BBxLkg

— Audel Ross Almazan (@Aurozan) April 15, 2017

Easter Eggs of the Day:

Also, here’s Mr. Sunday with the essential look at Easter eggs and other things you may have missed in the Last Jedi trailer:

[embedded content]

Movie Comparison of the Day:

Also, here’s the Last Jedi trailer side by side with similar imagery from Star Wars: The Force Awakens:

[embedded content]

Reworked Trailer of the Day:

Finally, here’s the obligatory Lego version of the Last Jedi trailer from Huxley Berg Studios:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Olivia Hussey, who turns 66 today, rides a bicycle in costume on the set of Franco Zeffirelli’s Romeo and Juliet:

Cosplay of the Day:

Now for something related to another Star Wars movie, here are some cosplayers at Star Wars Celebration spontaneously re-creating the final Darth Vader scene in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (via Fashionably Geek):

Fans at @SW_Celebration do a most impressive recreation of THAT scene from #RogueOnepic.twitter.com/HiZpsK9igg

— Star Wars UK (@StarWarsUK) April 15, 2017

Live Music Performance of the Day:

Hans Zimmer and an orchestra performed his music from the score for Christopher Nolan’s Inception (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Craftwork of the Day:

Ironhead Studio founder Jose Fernandez shows off costumes they did for Batman v Superman, Goosebumps and more:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 25th anniversary of the release of The Babe. Watch the original trailer for the classic biopic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

New Trump Order Extends 'Buy American' And 'Hire American' Rules

Wipro Ltd. employees walk inside the company’s compound in January during a break at their headquarters in Bangalore, India. Top Indian IT companies are in the crosshairs of proposed changes to U.S. H-1B visas, including an executive order President Trump is expected to sign Tuesday.

Aijaz Rahi/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Aijaz Rahi/AP

President Trump is trying to put more muscle into his campaign slogan of “Buy American and Hire American” and is preparing to sign an executive order Tuesday aimed at strengthening existing government policies to support domestic products and workers.

Trump is expected to sign the order during a visit to the Snap-on tool company in Kenosha, Wis.

“The capability of the American middle class to make things and keep them running has been at the base of our nation’s strength since its founding,” Snap-on CEO Nicholas T. Pinchuk said in a statement. “We believe the President’s visit emphasizes the need to nurture such manufacturing strength.”

The “Buy American” portion of the executive order calls for stricter enforcement of laws requiring the federal government to buy American-made products when possible. Administration officials complain that those laws have been watered down over the years and often are sidestepped with government waivers.

“Buy American” provisions also may run afoul of free trade agreements, though the White House wants to conduct a full review before seeking adjustments to those trade agreements.

The “Hire American” part of the order aims to crack down on what the administration calls “abuses” of government guest-worker programs. The biggest target is the H-1B visa program, which is designed to help technology firms fill jobs requiring special skills but which critics say often is used to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign competitors.

“The H-1B visa program is commonly discussed as being for when employers have a labor shortage,” said Daniel Costa, director of immigration law and policy research at the Economic Policy Institute. “The reality of it is that employers are not required to recruit and try to hire U.S. workers before they hire an H-1B worker.”

The government issues 85,000 H-1B visas annually. In recent years, many of those visas have been snapped up by outsourcing firms that offer low-cost IT support to American corporations.

“A very big share of the visas are actually going to IT outsourcing companies,” Costa said. “We do know that many of the companies that have this business model are the ones that are paying the lowest wages to H-1Bs.”

The executive order calls on the departments of Commerce, Labor, Homeland Security and State to more strictly police the visa program. It also proposes changes, such as awarding H-1B visas to guest workers with the best skills and highest potential wages, rather than through a random lottery as is done now.

“The latest data that I’ve seen showed that 80 percent of the H-1Bs who were coming in came in below the local average wage,” Costa said.

Some of the changes the White House wants would require cooperation from lawmakers.

“There’s some things that the Trump administration could do at the margins that might help clean up some of the worst abuses in the program,” Costa said, but “legislation is going to be required to really fix the program.”

Although H-1Bs are the main focus of the order, other guest worker programs could also come under scrutiny.

The president himself has relied on guest workers with a different kind of visa — H-2B — to help staff his Mar-a-Lago resort, according to the Palm Beach Post. During the campaign Trump defended his use of foreign workers, saying it’s difficult to find Americans willing to accept seasonal employment.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

First Woman To Wear A Boston Bib Races Again, 50 Years Later

In 1967, Kathrine Switzer was spotted early in the Boston Marathon by race director Jock Semple, who tried to rip the number off her shirt and remove her from the race. Switzer’s friends intervened, allowing her to make her getaway to become the first woman to “officially” run the Boston Marathon.

Paul Connell/Boston Globe via Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Paul Connell/Boston Globe via Getty Images

Kathrine Switzer, the first woman to officially enter the Boston Marathon, returned to the course 50 years after she made history — finishing in 2017 with a time of 4:44:31.

When Switzer ran in 1967, she was 20, and entered as “K.V. Switzer” — so none of the race organizers would know she was a woman. When she was discovered, after the marathon had already started, the race director tried to rip her bib numbers off her back.

Switzer finished anyway, and came back eight more times. In her later races, no subterfuge was necessary. And in 2017 Switzer, now 70, was cheered, not met with rage.

[embedded content]

At the point where she was once confronted by that race official, she posted a Facebook Live video — smiling as she ran, with her bib number, 261, pinned safely in place.

Before the race, Switzer spoke with NPR about the day she made history.

She noted that a woman had already run the course once — without entering. Bobbi Gibb hid in the bushes by the starting line and snuck into the mass of runners as they passed, finishing in 3:21:40.

Still, despite proof that women could clearly complete marathons, the athletic world generally assumed that women “couldn’t run and didn’t want to run” that far, Switzer says.

The longest distance women were allowed to run in the Olympics at that time was 800 meters.

“It was feared that anything longer was going to injure women, that they wouldn’t be able to have children or they somehow turned into men,” she told NPR.

” ‘You’ll never have children,’ they said. ‘You’re going to get big legs. You’re going to grow hair on your chest.’ It was hilarious, the myths.

“And, of course, when people hear myths, they believe them — because to try otherwise might mean damaging yourself. So people were afraid and they just went about their lives that way and restricted themselves.”

Switzer’s coach in 1967 was a 15-time Boston Marathoner and didn’t think a woman could do it — which energized Switzer to try. (She changed his mind as she was training for the race, when she ran 31 miles during one session, SB Nation reports.)

So she entered the marathon, following all the proper procedures and just, well, neglecting to mention she was female.

Switzer told NPR’s Lulu Garcia-Navarro what happened when she was discovered:

“At about a mile and a half into the race, the press truck went by us, and they saw that I was a woman in the race wearing numbers and they began taking pictures. And alongside of the photographer’s truck came the officials’ press truck. And the race director [Jock Semple] was on the truck and the guys were teasing him.

“And he got so angry that there was a girl in the race that he stopped the bus and jumped off it and ran after me and attacked me in the race and tried to pull off my bib numbers, screaming at me, ‘Get the hell out of my race and give me those numbers.’

“And I was just blindsided by this. I was terrified. I was scared. And my boyfriend came along with a full streak and gave the official a cross-body block and sent him out of the race instead. You know, we laugh about it now because it’s so funny when a girl is saved by her burly boyfriend. But … I said to my coach immediately after the incident: ‘I have to finish this race now because if I drop out of this race, nobody’s going to believe that women are serious.’ “

Switzer finished the race in four hours and twenty minutes.

As the years went on she advocated for women to be admitted as full competitors — and kept running more and more marathons. She won the New York City marathon in 1974. And she competed in Boston several more times, placing second in the women’s race in 1975 with a time of 2:51, her personal best.

Spitzer said her return to the race in 2017 was a way to, “celebrate the fact, first of all, that I can run — that I’m capable of doing it, amazingly enough, and I’m very, very grateful for that.

“And I’m also very grateful for the opportunity to thank a city and the streets that changed my life,” she said, “and help to empower millions of women all around the world and change the face of the sport.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Home-Based Drug Treatment Program Costs Less And Works

Hannah Berkowitz in her parents’ home in West Hartford, Conn. Getting intensive in-home drug treatment is what ultimately helped her get back on track, she and her mom agree.

Jack Rodolico/NHPR

hide caption

toggle caption

Jack Rodolico/NHPR

Hannah Berkowitz is 20 years old. When she was a senior in high school her life flew off the rails.

She was getting high on whatever drugs she could get her hands on. She was suicidal. Berkowitz moved into a therapeutic boarding school to get sober, but could only stay sober while she was on campus during the week.

“I’d come home and try to stay sober really hard — really, really hard,” says Berkowitz. “Sometimes I’d make it through the weekend, and sometimes I just couldn’t make it. It was white-knuckling it, just holding on.”

The transition back home always triggered a relapse for Berkowitz.

“I thought it was just my fault and there was no hope,” she says.

No hope — but Berkowitz did have luck. She had private health insurance and she lived in Connecticut, where a startup company, Aware Recovery Care, had begun treating clients in the very environment where Hannah was struggling to stay sober: her home.

A chronic disease approach

Treating addiction is a growing business, but a lot of the treatment that’s available is expensive and patients often relapse. Fortunately, there is a way to help some people pay less for better results, says Matt Eacott, vice president of Aware Recovery Care.

“Ninety-nine percent of the industry really treats addiction as an acute problem — like a rash on your arm that you rub lotion on and you’re done,” says Eacott.

Instead, Aware treats addiction as a chronic illness — it doesn’t disappear just because symptoms are temporarily under control. The approach is a cost-effective way of treating addiction, Eacott says, with better results than most competitors achieve.

Aware comes into clients’ homes and connects them with a nurse, a primary care doctor, a therapist, peer support, 12-step meetings and a case manager. Clients hooked on opioids can get medication-assisted treatment. They can also submit to urine screening and GPS tracking, if that helps them stick with the program.

Hannah’s mother, Lois Berkowitz, says the program is intense at first. But as Hannah built coping skills the supports faded into the background.

“It’s not like they’re doing the work for the addict,” says Lois Berkowitz, “they’re just basically taking them by the hand and saying, ‘Here are the places you need to go that will help you. And I’m going to go with you to start, so it doesn’t feel that uncomfortable. And then we’re going to let you fly.’ “

Before they “fly,” Aware clients have a pretty long runway. The treatment lasts for a full year.

Benefits worth the initial cost, insurer says

Aware has now expanded from its base in Connecticut into New Hampshire. The program is expensive. It costs $38,000 a year. As of now, it’s only available to private-pay clients and people insured through Anthem health insurance in New Hampshire and Connecticut.

Anthem became the first insurer to pay Aware, because the treatment is based on hard science that’s yielding solid results for clients, says Dr. Steven Korn, Anthem’s behavioral health medical director. Science and results are rare in addiction treatment, he says.

“There are old, old notions that have hung pretty tough,” says Korn. “When I was young — when I was in training — as soon as substance abuse was mentioned, the response of physicians was, ‘Well, go to AA. That’s not our problem. We don’t treat that.’ “

For a year of treatment, Anthem says it’s paying Aware about the same as the cost of a month or two of inpatient treatment. Anthem also says 72 percent of Aware clients are either sober at the end of one year or still in active treatment.

That’s about twice the sobriety rate of people who check in to a facility for a month and then get no follow-up care, says Dr. Stuart Gitlow, past president of the American Society of Addiction Medicine.

Treating addiction at home makes sense because it’s the exact place where people learned all their bad habits, Gitlow says.

“It’s all based on this concept that addiction is not about the substance use,” he says, “but is about what led to the substance use in the first place. And you can’t really get there without getting to know the patient.”

Aware says it’s in negotiations with four more major insurers. The program hopes to have a couple hundred clients in New Hampshire by the end of the year.

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with New Hampshire Public Radio and Kaiser Health News.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)