March 31, 2017

No Image

Mississippi State Drops Powerhouse UConn, Will Face South Carolina For Title

Gabby Williams of the Connecticut Huskies battles for the ball against Dominique Dillingham of the Mississippi State Lady Bulldogs in the first half Friday night during the semifinal round of the 2017 NCAA Women’s Final Four in Dallas.

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

Before Friday night’s national semifinal game, the Mississippi State women’s basketball coach gave an unusual motivational speech.

“I will not be scared,” Vic Schaefer told his players. “There is no reason to be scared. You are one heck of a basketball team.”

The tactic makes more sense in light of the opponent: 36-0 University of Connecticut, riding a 111-game winning streak that included a 60-point thrashing of Mississippi State in last year’s Sweet 16. At the time, it was the worst defeat in tournament history.

On Friday night, Mississippi wiped all that away, prevailing 66-64 on Morgan William’s overtime buzzer-beater. Connecticut hadn’t lost since Nov. 17, 2014.

The Lady Bulldogs came right at the Huskies from the start, doubling up Connecticut 27-13 early in the second quarter and taking a 36-28 lead into halftime. That was just the second time all season, and the fourth time in the Huskies’ lengthy winning streak, that the team had trailed at the half.

It was Connecticut that was playing scared, coach Geno Auriemma told his players at halftime, junior forward Gabby Williams said.

Auriemma, making his 10th straight appearance in the Final Four, said earlier in the day that this year’s team lacked killer instinct, KERA’s Gus Contreras reported.

“They haven’t become what I hoped they would become — you know, like, edgy,” he said. “They just have this attitude like, ‘Everything will be fine, don’t worry about it.’ And yet they keep winning.”

Mississippi State leading scorer Victoria Vivians shoots against Napheesa Collier of Connecticut in Friday night’s NCAA tournament semifinal.

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

Connecticut recovered quickly after halftime, taking their first lead within three minutes. But that momentum dissipated, leading to a back-and-forth game the rest of the way and tie scores after the third and fourth quarters.

Mississippi State had a chance to win at the end of regulation, but Lady Bulldogs guard Morgan William passed up a wide-open three-pointer for a drive to the basket that was smothered by Connecticut’s Gabby Williams.

A flagrant foul with less than 30 seconds left in overtime let Connecticut tie the score and have a chance for the last shot, but a turnover gave William the second chance she needed.

The 5-foot-5 William — hero for the second game in a row after scoring 41 against Baylor — ended the game with 13 points, six assists and three steals. Junior guard Victorian Vivians led the Lady Bulldogs with 19 points. Gabby Williams led Connecticut with 21 points on 7-12 shooting, as well as eight rebounds and four blocks. Sophomore guard Katie Lou Samuelson added 15 points and five rebounds.

After the game Auriemma said the outcome didn’t surprise him, and suggested the team might not have been mature enough for the intensity of the Final Four.

“We talk about it all the time how hard it is to win in this environment,” he said. “At this time of the year you start thinking about what’s at stake. Maybe we just weren’t ready for this.”

He said his message to the Huskies after the game was that “college basketball has given them a log, you know? They’ve sent a lot of kids to the locker room over the years feeling the way they’re feeling.”

Erica McCall of the Stanford Cardinal drives against Tyasha Harris and A’ja Wilson of the South Carolina Gamecocks in the second half Friday during the semifinal round of the 2017 NCAA Women’s Final Four in Dallas.

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

In the first game of the night, South Carolina, a 1-seed, pulled away in the fourth quarter to avoid an upset against Stanford, a 2-seed, 62-53. It’s the Gamecocks’ first trip to the championship game.

South Carolina was led by junior guard Allisha Gray, who scored 18 points on 7-14 shooting and had 8 rebounds. Junior forward A’ja Wilson, an Associated Press first-team All-American, added 19 rebounds and 13 points. Stanford’s senior forward Erica McCall and sophomore forward Alanna Smith each scored 14 points and pulled down more than a dozen rebounds in the losing effort.

Stanford had led 29-20 at halftime, but South Carolina dominated the second half, The State newspaper of Columbia, S.C., reports, scoring 42 after being held to 20 in the first, and holding Stanford to a season low of 24 second-half points:

“Staley said she could tell during halftime that her team would be fine.

” ‘The looks in their faces weren’t looks of defeat. It was looks of, “Ok, we’re going to figure it out,” ‘ she said. ‘We couldn’t play that sleep time basketball. We were allowing Stanford to put us to sleep, and we knew they were going to do that. We just had to get to halftime and make our adjustments. No matter how much we were down I felt like we were going to make a comeback.’ “

Mississippi State and South Carolina, both members of the Southeastern Conference, played twice this year, with South Carolina winning both games by scores of 64-61 and 59-49.

The title game will be 6 p.m. ET on Sunday in Dallas, and will air on ESPN.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Filings Show Just How Complex Ivanka Trump's And Jared Kushner's Finances Are

President Trump’s daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner are both employees at the White House.

Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

In 54 pages of a financial disclosure, President Trump’s son-in-law and key White House adviser, Jared Kushner lists assets and debts owned by him and his wife, Trump’s daughter Ivanka. Pages and pages are devoted to the family’s massive real estate investments.

The couple has emerged as influential advisers in Trump’s White House, unpaid to avoid triggering anti-nepotism rules. Kushner was cleared for the job in January, while Ivanka Trump announced this week that she would assume an official role.

Friday’s financial disclosures show that Trump’s daughter and son-in-law have assets valued at more than $200 million. According to the The New York Times, they “will remain the beneficiaries of a sprawling real estate and investment business still worth as much as $741 million, despite their new government responsibilities.”

The documents show Kushner divested dozens of businesses and investments to avoid conflicts of interest with his public service. He has also resigned from more than 260 posts at various organizations and corporations.

According to the AP, Kushner’s lawyers, “in consultation with the Office of Government Ethics, determined that his real estate assets, many of them in New York City, are unlikely to pose the kinds of conflicts that would trigger a need to divest.”

In the documents, Ivanka Trump also reports a stake in the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., with her share valued between $5 million and $25 million. The filing says she made between $1 million and $5 million in profit off this stake in 2016 and part of 2017.

Given Ivanka Trump’s recent decision to become an official White House employee, her financial disclosures and ethics agreements are expected to be filed later. The Times reports that Ivanka Trump will maintain her stake in the Trump hotel in Washington even as she takes on official government duties.

Kushner’s financial disclosure was one of roughly 180 that the White House said it would make available late on Friday as it begins to provide a picture of the wealth of Trump’s appointees. Others include disclosures for Steve Bannon, former Breitbart executive chairman and Trump’s chief strategist at the White House, and Gary Cohn, National Economic Council director who is a former Goldman Sachs president.

Bannon “earned at least $1.4 million in the last year and held assets valued between $10.7 million and $48.6 million when he joined the administration,” according to a tally by The Wall Street Journal.

Cohn, one of the wealthiest members of Trump’s team, reported assets worth at least $254 million and income of at least $48.3 million over 2016 through early 2017, according to Bloomberg.

The disclosed documents provide a snapshot of each appointee’s holdings as they took office. Many of the records showing subsequent divestitures or resignations will be released later this year. The White House says some appointees are still in the process of divesting assets.

Typically, appointees in a new administration hash out their financial agreements and divestitures before assuming public office. However, the Trump administration has announced a number of appointees before these negotiations took place. Data from the Office of Government Ethics has shown that compared with the Obama administration, the Trump White House has been much slower to submit its nominees’ financial arrangements for review by OGE.

As Trump has appointed numerous hyper-wealthy individuals, the White House points out that its ethics lawyers have been working through highly complex financial arrangements. Estimates for the cumulative wealth of the Trump Cabinet by various media organizations have ranged from $6 billion to $14 billion.

The release of the financial disclosure forms is in compliance with a federal ethics law that requires high-ranking executive branch appointees to disclose their financial holdings and reach agreements with ethics officials. These agreements aim to ensure that none of the appointee’s holdings conflict with his or her duties. Often, the agreements require a sale of assets, resignations from posts or recusals from handling particular matters.

The president and vice president, as elected officials, do have to file financial disclosures, but at a later time. The two of them are also exempt from many conflict-of-interest and ethics laws that apply to their staff.

NPR’s Peter Overby and Tamara Keith contributed to this report.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

In Wyoming, One Insurer Offers Plan On State Exchange

NPR’s Ari Shapiro talks with Tom Glause, the commissioner of the Wyoming Department of Insurance, about how the Affordable Care Act has worked in the state and what can still be improved.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

The Republican plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act has failed for now, and we’ve been looking at how Obamacare, as it’s known, is doing in different states. Yesterday we heard from California, a state where consumers have options and the marketplace seems to be thriving. But as the president has pointed out, that’s not true everywhere.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Many Americans lost their plans and doctors altogether. And one-third of the counties – think of it – one-third only have one insurer left. I mean the insurance companies are fleeing. They’re gone, so many gone.

SHAPIRO: In fact, at least five whole states have just one insurer offering plans on the state exchange. One of those is Wyoming. Tom Glause is the commissioner of the Wyoming Department of Insurance. He says there are a lot of reasons why things are different in his state.

TOM GLAUSE: First of all, we do not have that population to attract a lot of people to the exchange. I think that it’s also – as a rural state, our citizens do not like being told what they have to purchase. We are a frontier state, and that doesn’t sit well with a lot of our people. The other problems that we’ve experienced is the cost. The cost of insurance on the exchange is high. The deductibles are high.

SHAPIRO: And so do you think this is a law that was designed for densely populated states that could just never work in a state like Wyoming, or do you think there are things that could attract more insurers to the marketplace?

GLAUSE: There are certainly things that can attract more insurers to the marketplace. Right now the uncertainty makes it nearly impossible.

SHAPIRO: You mean uncertainty about the future of the law, whether it’ll remain intact, be repealed and replaced, or just collapse on itself or what.

GLAUSE: The uncertainty surrounding all of it right now – whether the administration will continue to appeal the decision in the House versus Burwell suit regarding cost-sharing reductions. The insurance companies don’t know right now, and insurance companies do not react well to uncertainty.

SHAPIRO: Yesterday when we spoke to an insurance official in California, he told us that one of the big reasons for the success in his state is advertising and other programs that the state put in place to get people to enroll which keeps costs down, which keeps more insurers in the marketplace. Do you think Wyoming has done all it could in that respect?

GLAUSE: I read that with interest that he had stated that California spent $100 million in advertising. Interestingly, $100 million would fund all of the subsidies or the advance premium tax credits that the Wyoming consumers received for a year. However, I don’t think that was a shortfall in Wyoming. Enroll Wyoming was very well-positioned to advertise and get the word out regarding the marketplace and the ACA.

SHAPIRO: Do you think any national plan can fit both the demographics of Wyoming and the demographics of a state like California? Or in your opinion, would a state-by-state approach be better?

GLAUSE: Whatever we wind up with, I think it’s going to have to have a state-by-state approach. What works in California probably will not work in Wyoming. They’ve got 30 million people compared to our low population of 600,000.

SHAPIRO: What would you like to see from leaders in Washington right now?

GLAUSE: I would like to see them attack the root of the problem, and that is the delivery of health care services in the United States. We’re trying to do this through insurance, and that will have limited success until we actually attack the problem head-on.

SHAPIRO: Tom Glause is Wyoming’s insurance commissioner. Thank you for joining us.

GLAUSE: Thank you very much for inviting me, Ari, and the interest you have shown in Wyoming.

(SOUNDBITE OF KENDRICK LAMAR SONG, “HUMBLE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)