March 27, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Deadpool Reacts to New 'Spider-Man' Poster, The Avengers React to New 'Justice League' Trailer and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Poster Parody of the Day:

You’ve seen the new Spider-Man: Homecoming poster, now here’s the Deadpool 2 reaction poster, via BossLogic:

This is my house πŸ˜€ @TomHolland1996 x @vancityreynolds@deadpoolmovie@SpiderManMoviepic.twitter.com/7WH34Z2blI

β€” BossLogic (@Bosslogic) March 25, 2017

Trailer Reaction of the Day:

What would the Avengers think of the Justice League movie? Watch them watch the new trailer and discuss what it means for them (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Reworked Movie of the Day:

What if Marvel movies were like DC movies? Here’s The Avengers marketed in the style of the new Justice League trailer:

[embedded content]

Reworked Trailer of the Day:

What if Rogue One: A Star Wars Story came out in the era of VHS? Here’s a retro trailer for that (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

Speaking of Rogue One, here is a reworking of one sequence using footage from the animated series Avatar: The Last Airbender (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Quentin Tarantino, who turns 54 today, directs Harvey Keitel on the set of Reservoir Dogs in 1991:

Filmmaker in Focus:

Paul Thomas Anderson’s philosophy as it comes through in his movies is explored in this video essay from Jack’s Movie Reviews (via Film School Rejects):

[embedded content]

VFX Breakdown of the Day:

Learn about how the visual effects by Industrial Light & Magic were done for Kong: Skull Island in this Wired video (via GeekTyrant):

[embedded content]

Controversy of the Day:

You’ve likely heard about the complaint about Ghost in the Shell‘s non-Asian casting, so here’s a video by LJ Frezza for Fandor Keyframe on the issue of whitewashing:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 25th annniversary of the release of White Men Can’t Jump. Watch the original trailer for the sports comedy below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Republican Blake Farenthold On Changing His Position On GOP Health Care Bill

David Greene speaks with Republican Rep. Blake Farenthold of Texas. He originally didn’t like the GOP health care bill, but has changed his position after meeting with the president.

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

And the other big story we are covering this morning – a moment of truth for President Trump and his party. Republicans have talked about repealing the Affordable Care Act for a long time and today comes a vote in the House on a possible replacement but it is not clear if the party will have the votes it needs. President Trump has made last minute appeals to some GOP lawmakers to come around. One member who has and plans to vote for the bill despite earlier reservations is conservative Congressman Blake Farenthold, a Republican from Texas. And I asked the Congressman, what changed his mind?

BLAKE FARENTHOLD: Well, I’ve – still don’t believe it’s the perfect solution, but one of the things I’ve learned in Congress is the perfect is the enemy of the doable. And this looks like the vehicle to repeal Obamacare, which is something I promised to do when I first ran in 2010, and looks like we’re finally going to get around to it.

GREENE: Well, if it’s not perfect, but it’s gotten to a place where you can support it, was there something critical that happened that brought you there?

FARENTHOLD: Well, the president called about a dozen of us over to the White House, and he personally asked me to vote for it. They added some provisions that give more control to the states with respect to block grants and giving the states the authority to add a work requirement for able-bodied adults with no children. And, you know, we’re just moving it towards a more conservative solution. The problem still remains, though, that there’s a lot still to be done in these other pieces of legislation that are going to require 60 votes in the Senate. And the president said he was going to really help turn up the heat on those senators to get the 60 votes when we need them.

GREENE: But I hear you saying that he turned up the heat on you, and it worked.

FARENTHOLD: Listen, I was – I’m committed to repealing Obamacare. And the only vehicle that’s going to get us there is a vehicle that the president supports and is going to sign. You know, again, nothing’s perfect, but the fact that the president told me he was behind it 100 percent – actually he said 1,000 percent – and was going to be an advocate for making it better, that’s what it took for me. I’m taking Donald Trump at his word.

GREENE: I understand it this week he told many Republicans that they risked losing their seats if they didn’t get behind this bill. Did he say that to you?

FARENTHOLD: He said it in the House Republican Conference, and I think that’s true. Every single one of us ran on repealing Obamacare, and this is the bill that’s going to move forward to repeal Obamacare. I would hate to go back home and have my constituents tell me, Blake, you had the opportunity to get rid of Obamacare, and you didn’t do it. Why are you still in Washington?

GREENE: I mean, if I may, that sounds like putting politics, in a way, ahead of substance. I mean, if you don’t think the bill is perfect, why not spend some more time getting to a place where you feel good about a bill? This is making it sound like, you know what? I got to get rid of Obamacare. Maybe the law is not something I like, but I got to do it to make sure I keep my seat.

FARENTHOLD: Well, it’s about keeping promises. The situation we’re in right now is – my conservative friends and the folks in the tea party say the bill doesn’t go far enough. And the more moderates, whether they’re liberals back in the District or whether they’re more moderate Republicans here in Washington, are saying the bill goes too far. So we really are very close to the sweet spot on this, and it’s going to take some pressure from President Trump to move anything forward.

GREENE: I want to ask you about one of the specific changes that you and some of your colleagues were pleased about and helped you come around. Under the previous law, if you were getting a tax credit that was actually more than the premium you were paying, you got to keep that money and maybe put it in a health savings account. You wanted to get rid of that provision because you were worried that some people might use some of those tax credit dollars for abortions. Is that right?

FARENTHOLD: Well, there’s a provision in there that was added that says you cannot use those excess dollars for an abortion. That’s long-standing Republican policy. But the idea is you need to have more options available, and we’re increasing the health savings account, but we don’t want to do it at a point that breaks the bank.

GREENE: But if I may, as I understand, I mean, there would be relatively few people who would actually get a tax credit that was more than their premium and even far fewer people who would actually decide to use that money for an abortion. So we’re talking about very few Americans here. Is that fair?

FARENTHOLD: I think the issue is whether – for those of us who are extremely pro-life, like I am, just saving one unborn baby is a big deal.

GREENE: So I’m hearing you say that a big part of this is not just making health care better for Americans, but you needed to be able to sleep at night and feel like you were supporting a law that remained true to your conservative values on issues like abortion.

FARENTHOLD: That’s 100 percent correct. And again, as I say, this bill is not perfect. President Trump has said he’s going to continue to work to make it better. We’re treading on thin ice here in the House because we don’t want to send something over to the Senate that is going to go afoul of the Byrd rule and not be able to pass with 51 votes. So we’re giving them a framework, and we’re counting on the president and the senators to make it even better.

GREENE: You mentioned how there are people in your party who are more conservative, who are more moderate, kind of on both sides who have some real concerns about this replacement bill. Are you talking to them? Are you going to them and saying, you know, we really should come around here? And if so, what are you telling them?

FARENTHOLD: My message to my colleagues, whether they’re to the left of me or to the right of me, is you ran on repealing Obamacare. If you can show me a path that’s going to get us there other than this, I want to hear it. And none of them have been able to come up with a path to getting rid of it other than this bill that the president says he’s 1,000 percent behind and that’s going to come up for vote.

GREENE: All right, Congressman, thanks so much for taking the time. We really appreciate it.

FARENTHOLD: Thank you very much.

GREENE: Blake Farenthold is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

Copyright Β© 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Raiders Set To Split For Las Vegas, Leaving Oakland … In A Year Or Two

A fan celebrates Monday in Las Vegas, after NFL team owners approved the Raiders’ move to the city.

John Locher/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

John Locher/AP

By an overwhelming 31-1 vote, NFL owners have approved the Raiders’ move from Oakland to Las Vegas β€” though the team will still remain in the Bay Area for at least the 2017 season and possibly longer.

“My father always said, ‘the greatness of the Raiders is in its future,’ ” Raiders owner Mark Davis said in a statement Monday, “and the opportunity to build a world-class stadium in the entertainment capital of the world is a significant step toward achieving that greatness.”

Raiders owner Mark Davis discusses the decision to relocate the team to Las Vegas. https://t.co/9uIHq8FslE

β€” NFL (@NFL) March 27, 2017

The move β€” whenever it should inevitably take place β€” will end the Raiders’ on-again, off-again relationship with the team’s longtime home. Founded in 1960, the Raiders spent their first two decades as a club in Oakland, notching two Super Bowl titles before they left town for Los Angeles in the early 1980s.

That southern sojourn ended in 1995, when the team returned to the waiting embrace of the city it left more than a decade earlier.

But recently, Davis had appeared to be itching to leave the city once more, going in on a bid with the Chargers to move both teams to Los Angeles β€” a bid that voted down by NFL owners early last year. The Chargers ultimately did complete a deal to move to LA earlier this year, though.

Now, the Raiders will be joining the Vegas Golden Knights β€” an expansion ice hockey team recently also approved by the NHL β€” as the shiny new professional franchises in a city that long had none to call its own.

“It truly is an exciting time to be from Las Vegas,” Golden Knights chairman and CEO said in a statement, according to ESPN. “There is only a select group of cities in North America that are home to both an NHL and an NFL franchise and Vegas is now one of them. This alone should be a great source of pride for our community and our fans.”

ESPN noted that the Raiders’ star quarterback, Derek Carr, tweeted a statement thick with mixed feelings about the move.

pic.twitter.com/098jyV4zmW

β€” Derek Carr (@derekcarrqb) March 27, 2017

Still, Carr and Co. will have a little while longer to get their things packed β€” likely years, in fact.

As The Wall Street Journal reports, “The Raiders have previously said they plan to remain in Oakland until at least 2020” β€” partly because the stadium the team intends to share with University of Nevada, Las Vegas, is not expected to be ready until then. And The Washington Post points out the Raiders have a lease on their Oakland stadium that gives them one-year term options for the 2017 and 2018 seasons.

The jury’s out on how well this long goodbye will play with the team’s Bay Area fan base.

An Oakland Raiders fan looks on in sadness during the team’s playoff loss to the Texans at Houston’s NRG Stadium in January. As it turns out, that may be the same expression many fans are wearing now, as well.

Tim Warner/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Tim Warner/Getty Images

“I just hope that in the future, as we play in Oakland this year, that they understand that it wasn’t the players, it wasn’t the coaches that made this decision. It was me that made it. And if they have anybody to talk to about it, it should be me,” Davis said at a news conference.

“And I will, in the coming days, try to explain to them what went into making this difficult decision.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

AP Calculates North Carolina's 'Bathroom Bill' Will Cost More Than $3.7 Billion

The “We Are Not This” slogan is posted at the entrances to Bull McCabe’s Irish Pub in May 2016 in Durham, North Carolina. The sign is protesting a law that has been in place for a year now; the AP estimates it will cost the state some $3.7 billion in business over 12 years.

Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

The Associated Press has tallied up business lost in North Carolina because of the controversial “bathroom bill,” and estimates the total cost is at least $3.76 billion over 12 years.

That estimate is probably low, the wire service says.

The law in question, HB2, was passed just over a year ago. It blocks local jurisdictions from passing protections for gay and transgender people, and requires transgender people in government facilities to use bathrooms that match the sex on their birth certificate.

The bill has prompted a backlash from businesses and sports organizations, from Paypal to the NCAA. In December, the state and the city of Charlotte struck a deal to repeal the law, but it fell apart amid accusations of bad faith, and the law remains in place.

To estimate how much the bill has cost the state, the AP drew on interviews and public records to tally up canceled relocations, conventions, projects, concerts and sporting events.

“A business project was counted only if AP determined through public records or interviews that HB2 was why it pulled out,” the wire service writes. Some business leaders are concerned that decisions might be made “quietly,” where HB2 is a factor but not publicly discussed as such, AP notes.

You can read the full piece from the Associated Press here, and see the full list of events and projects here.

The largest loss is also the highest profile one: $2.66 billion from Paypal backing out of plans to expand a center in Charlotte, creating some 400 jobs.

Other major blows, according to the AP’s estimates: a half a billion dollars from Deutsche Bank canceling plans in Cary, N.C., a quarter of a billion from CoStar opening a research center in Virginia instead of North Carolina and $100 million from an NBA All-Star Game being moved out of Charlotte.

The AP notes that North Carolina is, in general, doing well economically:

“The vast majority of large companies with existing operations in the state – such as American Airlines, with its second-largest hub in Charlotte – made no public moves to financially penalize North Carolina.

“Shortly after he signed the law, Republican then-Gov. Pat McCrory issued a statement assuring residents it wouldn’t affect North Carolina’s status as ‘one of the top states to do business in the country.’

“HB2 supporters say its costs have been tiny compared with an economy estimated at more than $500 billion a year, roughly the size of Sweden’s. … Lt. Gov. Dan Forest, one of the strongest supporters, accused news organizations of creating a false picture of economic upheaval.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)