March 2, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Why X-23 is Better Than Wolverine, Alternate 'Rogue One' Ending and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Science of the Day:

Just in time for Logan, here’s Kyle Hill with a scientific explanation of why X-23’s claws are deadlier than Wolverine’s:

[embedded content]

Movie Comparison of the Day:

You hate Green Lantern but love Doctor Strange? Well, Couch Tomato shows 24 reasons they’re the same movie:

[embedded content]

Fan Build of the Day:

Lego builder Iain Heath constructed this awesome cartoony Lego depiction of Leia killing Jabba the Hutt in Return of the Jedi (via Geekologie):

Alternate Ending of the Day:

Speaking of Star Wars, if you thought the ending of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was a bummer, check out these animated alternate conclusions:

[embedded content]

Alternate Posters of the Day:

Back to the Future prints are always awesome because they always come in threes and they tend to just be really well-thought-out, like this set by Ian Glaubinger (via /Film):

Vintage Poster of the Day:

Jennifer Jones, who was born on this day in 1919, appears on the original Norman Rockwell-designed poster for The Song of Bernadette. She won an Oscar for her performance in the movie.

Actor in the Spotlight:

He didn’t get enough attention during the Oscars on Sunday night, so here’s a supercut of Matt Damon looking in the mirror in all his movies:

[embedded content]

Movie Food of the Day:

Learn how to make the ratatouille from Ratatouille with the latest episode of Binging with Babish:

[embedded content]

Film History Lesson of the Day:

See the evolution of CGI faces in movies, from The Curious Case of Benjamin Button to Rogue One: A Star Wars Story:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 10th anniversary of David Fincher’s Zodiac. Watch the original trailer for the classic serial killer movie below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Rick Perry Sworn In As Energy Secretary

Energy Secretary Rick Perry was sworn in Thursday, apparently having come to terms with heading the agency he once wanted to abolish.

Andrew Harnik/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Harnik/AP

Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry is now the 14th U.S. Secretary of Energy, despite having once pledged to eliminate the Department of Energy.

Or at least, he tried to pledge to eliminate the department — including once when he couldn’t think of its name.

Perry was confirmed Thursday by the Senate in a 62-37 vote.

During his confirmation hearing, Perry said, “My past statements made over five years ago about abolishing the Department of Energy do not reflect my current thinking.”

That was not the only thing that Perry appeared to have changed his mind about. As NPR’s Jeff Brady has reported, “At various times, Perry has questioned the role of human activity in climate change. At one campaign event, he accused scientists of manipulating data to continue gaining funding on research.”

During his confirmation hearing, though, he said he believed that both natural and man-made activity were contributing to climate change.

That hasn’t reassured environmental group 350.org. Executive Director May Boeve said in a statement: “Trump just added one more unqualified fossil fuel shill and climate-denier to his cabinet. As governor, Perry doled out millions to oil corporations while silencing the science that tells us our future depends on keeping fossil fuels in the ground.”

Other statements Thursday night were supportive though. The American Wind Energy Association praised Perry’s “leadership on wind energy infrastructure” as governor of Texas.

There was plenty of “color,” according to the press pool at the swearing in ceremony. Vice President Pence noted that it was an important day for Texas, “the country,” being Texas Independence Day.

Perry mentioned the new Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke’s arrival at work Thursday on horseback, and joked that Perry would be commuting Friday on a “single-stage rocket… what could go wrong.” Perhaps doubting that the press pool would have a sense of humor, he added that he would, in fact, just “quietly drive over and go to work.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

One Democrat's Hunt For The Hidden Obamacare Replacement Bill

Rep. Frank Pallone still hasn’t been given a chance to see the Republicans’ bill that would replace the ACA. “I think they’re afraid,” the Democrat from New Jersey said of his Republican colleagues. “I think they’re afraid that it will show that it really doesn’t cover most of the people that receive coverage under the Affordable Care Act.”

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call Inc./Getty Images

U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone, a Democrat from New Jersey, has been trying to get a look at the Republicans’ bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

He’s the top-ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which will have to approve the bill before the whole House can vote on it.

But as of Thursday afternoon, Pallone still couldn’t get his hands on a copy.

“We have no idea right now what they’re considering,” he said of his Republican colleagues.

Rep. Greg Walden, a Republican from Oregon and the Energy and Commerce Committee’s chairman, made draft legislation available to Republicans on the panel Thursday, but they had to read it in a private room and weren’t allowed to make copies.

When the location of that room leaked on Twitter late Thursday morning, reporters filled the hallway outside the room’s door on the first floor of the U.S. Capitol. Pallone, along with his Democratic House colleagues Jan Schakowsky, from Illinois, and Joseph Crowley, from New York, also stopped by.

But when they went in, the room was empty.

INSIDE THE ROOM They have let us in to see there is nothing here pic.twitter.com/E9HPEdKy9A

— Peter Sullivan (@PeterSullivan4) March 2, 2017

“We were looking for the bill but there’s no one there,” Pallone said.

That room was just down the hall from House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s office, so Pallone went in to ask McCarthy where he could see the legislation. McCarthy directed him to Walden’s office.

Luckily, Walden had a Capitol “hideaway” office just down the hall.

Pallone led his colleagues, a string of reporters and even a couple of Capitol Police officers to the unmarked door, knocked and waited.

“It’s locked,” he said after trying the handle. “This is ridiculous.”

He paused and looked at the crowd. “Do you want to go to Rayburn?”

He was referring to the Rayburn House Office Building, across Independence Avenue from the Capitol. It’s where Walden’s personal office and the Energy and Commerce Committee offices are.

Everybody wanted to go.

As we strolled the halls of the Capitol, down elevators and through the underground tunnel that leads to the House office buildings, Pallone reflected on why his Republican colleagues were keeping the legislation under lock and key.

The bill is not here. Rep House: “We cannot find the bill.” pic.twitter.com/9tqrKEoDal

— Paul McLeod (@pdmcleod) March 2, 2017

“I think they’re afraid,’ he said. “I think they’re afraid that it will show that it really doesn’t cover most of the people that receive coverage under the Affordable Care Act.”

Even many Republicans weren’t invited to view the latest draft; Sen. Rand Paul from Kentucky condemned the GOP leadership Thursday for not making it more widely available.

Last week, an earlier draft of the bill, dated Feb. 10, was leaked to Politico.Most analysts said that legislation would lead to millions of people losing coverage. And members of the House Freedom Caucus, considered the most conservative wing of the Republican Party, said they would oppose the bill because it includes refundable tax credits for people who are too poor to pay any federal income tax.

Pallone said he was pushing to get a copy of the most recent draft of the bill because he had heard Walden intends to have the committee vote on it next Wednesday — a timeline that wouldn’t give the Democrats and the public much time to analyze the legislation.

He compared what the Republicans are doing this week with what theDemocrats did with their draft of the Affordable Care Act several years ago; Democrats posted the text of the ACA online 30 days before it went to members for a vote.

“The reason why Republicans were able to comment on the ACA — and of course many of them commented negatively — was because the bill was out there,” Pallone said.

At Walden’s personal office in the Rayburn building, Andrew Malcolm, Walden’s deputy chief of staff, told Pallone he would be better off directing questions about the bill to the Energy and Commerce Committee office. It was an awkward conversation as Pallone asked repeatedly whether Walden would be there, and Malcolm refused to answer.

“That’s not helpful,” Pallone said. “He’s probably ducking us.” Still, Pallone headed to that committee office, as Malcolm suggested.

And just as Pallone walked in, Walden came down the hall walking very quickly, trailed by some of his staff. He scowled at Pallone and the crowd of reporters in his lobby, then headed out a back hallway toward the hearing room next door. He didn’t say a word.

“Well, obviously he doesn’t want to talk,” Pallone said. “I’m not going to keep chasing him. I’m tired of chasing him around. Obviously he doesn’t want us to see the bill.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)