February 23, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Pixar's 'Pulp Fiction,' Romantic 'La La Land' Superfans and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Reimagined Movie of the Day:

Samuel L. Jackson voices a character in Pixar’s The Incredibles, so he’d gladly return to the studio for an animated Pulp Fiction, right? See more of Pixar artist Josh Cooley’s children’s book versions of classic movies, including The Terminator, Fight Club and The Big Lebowski at Konbini (via Design Culture).

Movie Comparisons of the Day:

Speaking of Pixar, see how their movies are altered for international distribution in Oh My Disney’s side-by-side comparisons:

[embedded content]

Video Essay of the Day:

In the latest episode of Frame by Frame, Kyle shows how much Vincente Minnelli influenced Oscar nominee La La Land:

[embedded content]

Trailer Mashup of the Day:

Speaking of La La Land, almost 20 years ago, Titanic won Best Picture. Now see how easily that movie fits with this year’s Best Picture frontrunner:

[embedded content]

Engagement Photos of the Day:

Ellen Wleklinski and Corey Collins are such fans of La La Land that they reenacted scenes from the musical for their recent engagement photo shoot. See more at BuzzFeed.

Alternate Ending of the Day:

Now let’s switch to another Best Picture nominee with a parody of the diner scene from Moonlight:

[embedded content]

Vintage Images of the Day:

The disaster movie Volcano starring Tommy Lee Jones and Anne Heche turns 20 later this year, but here’s reason to celebrate the anniversary early:

I randomly found these publicity shots for Volcano and now you have too pic.twitter.com/bQvgURcha6

— Joannes Truyens (@playthroughline) February 16, 2017

Actress in the Spotlight:

Oscar nominee Isabelle Huppert, one of the frontrunners for Best Actress, gets a career-spanning supercut (via IndieWire):

[embedded content]

Fake Movie of the Day:

In anticipation of her new movie Get Out, Allison Williams stars in a fake trailer for College Humor for a horror movie about being awkward at parties:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This weekend is the 40th anniversary of the release of Slap Shot. Watch the original trailer for the hockey comedy classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Private Prisons Back In Mix For Federal Inmates As Sessions Rescinds Order

New Attorney General Jeff Sessions is rescinding an Obama-era memo that directed the Justice Department to reduce the use of private prisons, NPR’s Carrie Johnson reports

Sessions writes in the order that returning to the Bureau of Prisons’ earlier approach would provide flexibility.

“The memorandum changed long-standing policy and practice, and impaired the Bureau’s ability to meet the future needs of the federal correctional system,” Sessions writes.

Outside companies currently house about 21,000 inmates for the Justice Department, the agency reports, down from a peak of 30,000. The overall federal prison population has been falling in recent years because of changes in how some low-level offenders are sentenced.

In announcing a phasing out of private-prison use in August, then-Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates wrote that the outside companies’ facilities were less safe, more expensive, and “simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs and resources.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Major League Baseball Poised To Change Intentional Walk Rule

Pittsburgh Pirates catcher Chris Stewart grabs an intentional walk throw in a game between Arizona and Pittsburgh last year in Phoenix.

Ross D. Franklin/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Ross D. Franklin/AP

In baseball, if a pitcher wants to intentionally walk a batter, he has to actually lob the four pitches outside the strike zone. It’s a technique often used to bypass a particularly strong batter, or to set up a double play.

But that rule now appears poised to change.

The Major League Baseball commissioner’s office has proposed a rule change to have the pitcher forgo actually throwing four balls — instead, the bench would simply signal to the umpire that the batter will be intentionally walked.

The head of the players union, Tony Clark, has signaled that it is amenable to the change, according to The Associated Press.

“As part of a broader discussion with other moving pieces, the answer is yes,” Clark told the wire service. “There are details, as part of that discussion, that are still being worked through, however.”

Mike Teevan, vice president of communications for Major League Baseball, tells The Two-Way that the change is currently under consideration. Any rule change involves many parties, he explains, and “that process is not yet complete.”

Article continues after sponsorship

MLB.com has reported that we could see the change as early as this upcoming season.

This is part of a larger push to ramp up the pace of the game, and it comes after Commissioner Rob Manfred told reporters on Tuesday afternoon that there would be no “meaningful” rule changes for the upcoming season after they were not accepted by the players union.

“We didn’t make a deal; we couldn’t make a deal,” he said, sounding frustrated.

Among the proposed changes: introducing a pitch clock to reduce the time between pitches, and capping the number of times a catcher can conference with a pitcher. Manfred argued that these changes would have “little effect of the competitive character of the game” but would “take dead time out of the game” and “keep fans engaged.” These remain on the table, he said.

The changes would benefit the fans and respond to the ways the game has changed, Manfred said:

“I think it’s a mistake to stick our head in the sand and ignore the fact that our game has changed and continues to change. Since 1980, home runs are up 32 percent. And strikeouts are up 67 percent. Last year, balls in play were at a record low, and we all know that things like the use of relief pitchers has changed dramatically in the last 30 years. I’m firmly convinced that our fans — both our avid fans and casual fans — want us to respond to and manage the change that’s going on in the game.”

Not all fans are happy. As some social media users pointed out, intentional walks are not currently automatic — and that means exciting and unexpected things sometimes happen. For example, a wild pitch over a catcher’s head can provide a memorable opportunity to steal a base. And occasionally, a batter actually manages to hit the pitch. Here’s a compilation posted on Twitter of some of those exciting moments (h/t Washington Post):

•The MLB has approved to change the intentional walk rule. Which now will be granted following dugout signal. Take a look at these classics. pic.twitter.com/g3iyEW5kB3

— Dylan (@DylansFreshTake) February 22, 2017

“You’re changing or altering the essence of the sport under the guise of speeding it up minimally,” ESPN host Michael Smith argued. “The object of the game is to pitch to a batter — you should still have to execute those pitches.”

Some players aren’t happy, either. Blue Jays catcher Russell Martin made this sarcastic point, as quoted by Sportsnet columnist Shi Davidi:

“My thing is, if they really want to speed up the game, then when a guy hits a home run, to speed up the game should a guy, just like in softball, when he hits it, should he just walk to the dugout? It’d be quicker. I’m just wondering, at what point do we just keep the game, the game?”

It’s also worth noting that intentional walks don’t happen all that often. According to statistics provided by MLB, there were 932 intentional walks during the 2016 regular season. That’s about 1 every 3 games.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

What's Next For The Affordable Care Act? Your Questions Answered

The one thing that’s certain is that there will be changes in the Affordable Care Act.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, health care under the Affordable Care Act is going to change in the next few years. The Republican-led Congress has vowed to “repeal and replace” the health law known as Obamacare.

That has left many people anxious and confused about what will happen and when. So NPR’s Morning Edition asked listeners to post questions on Twitter and Facebook, and we will be answering some of them here and on the radio in the weeks ahead.

Many of the questions so far have to do with timing.

For example, Steva Stowell-Hardcastle of Lewisburg, Penn., says: “I’m confused about what parts of the ACA have been repealed and when those changes take place.”

First, despite social media headlines, nothing substantive has been changed in 2017. That’s because making these changes is harder than it looks.

In January, Republicans in Congress passed a budget resolution that called for major changes to the law to be made in a subsequent bill.

Even though that process would allow them to pass a bill without Democratic votes, they haven’t been able to agree on what those reforms should look like.

Article continues after sponsorship

And there are several other obstacles.

First of all, they won’t be able to repeal everything in one go, which counters a lot of the rhetoric coming out of the election. And they would be limited in what parts of the law they can replace.

That said, the Trump Administration has taken some action, but no concrete changes – yet. In January, Trump signed an executive order calling for federal agencies to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the act” that would “impose a fiscal burden” on states, individuals, healthcare providers, and others in the health industry.

While that could be widely interpreted, so far the only federal action in response to that order has come from the IRS. The IRS says it will not strictly enforce the “individual mandate” that requires most Americans to have health insurance. The agency noted, however, the requirement is still law.

A related question comes from Kathryn Henry of Iowa City, Iowa. She asks “if it is repealed, what happens to people like me who currently have insurance through it and when?”

Both President Trump and GOP congressional leaders have insisted that they want a smooth transition from the current system to a new one, particularly for the 11 million or so people who purchased coverage on the federal or state health insurance exchanges since the law took effect.

“We don’t want to pull the rug out from under people while we’re replacing this law,” said House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., in January. Trump has insisted that repealing the law and replacing it be done “essentially simultaneously,” so as not to leave people without insurance.

Unless something unexpected happens, people who purchased insurance for 2017 should be covered through the remainder of the year.

The bigger question is what happens in 2018. The uncertainty alone is prompting some insurers to pull out of the individual insurance market the market in which people don’t get insurance through their employer. The individual market is the most affected by the health law.

For example, the insurance company Humana has already said it won’t participate in the health insurance exchanges next year, and the CEO of Aetna told reporters that his company might drop out, too. If Congress deadlocks over how to overhaul the health law, more insurance companies could follow suit.

Insurers were supposed to tell the federal government if they planned to participate in the insurance exchanges by May 3, but the Trump Administration has now given them until the end of June.

Got more questions about what’s happening to the ACA? I’ll be back next week with answers. Just tweet @MorningEdition using the hashtag #ACAchat.

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)