February 16, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'La La Land' Parody, 'Moonlight' Dance Interpretation and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Parody of the Day:

If you thought the audition scene in La La Land was a little too unrelastic, Above Average shows us the true boring version:

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

Speaking of La La Land, here is a very cool neon-style animation of one of the movie’s colorful musical numbers:

‘La La Land’ (2016)

Great Movies in Animated Neon! @pipevicioso@TheCinegogue@EvaArriagaD@mistofeles@filmdialogueone@WrongReelpic.twitter.com/5R8hEiEYO3

— Nathally Carvalho (@nathyscarvalho) February 14, 2017

Dance Interpretation of the Day:

Speaking of Oscar nominees for Best Picture, here’s a dance interpretation of the score for Moonlight by The Fits director Anna Rose Holmer (via Film School Rejects):

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

Who would win in a race between Justice League‘s The Flash and X-Men: Apocalypse‘s Nightcrawler? Kyle Hill has the scientific answer:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Documentary pioneer Robert J. Flaherty, who was born on this day in 1884, has a seat during the making of the Oscar-nominated docudrama Louisiana Story:

Filmmaker in Focus:

For Fandor Keyframe, Bill Rwehera shows how people falling from high places was a signature trademark of Alfred Hitchcock films:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

Here’s a recap of the entire Harry Potter franchise reduced to just every uttering of “Harry” and “Potter” (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Everyone loves Deadpool cosplay and everyone loves cat cosplay, so here’s some Deadpool cat cosplay:

Movie Trivia of the Day:

Do you love The Shawshank Redemption? See if you know all the trivia about the movie in this video from ScreenCrush:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 60th anniversary of the Swedish theatrical debut of The Seventh Seal. Watch the original trailer for the Ingmar Bergman classic via Criterion below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Republican Health Care Proposal Would Cover Fewer Low-Income Families

Rep. William “Bill” Huizenga, R-Mich., says House Republicans “know the direction we want to go and sort of the destination” with replacing Obamacare.

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images

House Republicans are debating a plan to replace the Affordable Care Act that would give consumers tax credits to buy insurance, cut back on Medicaid and allow people to save their own money to pay for health care costs.

The outline plan is likely to take away some of the financial help low-income families get through Obamacare subsidies, and also result in fewer people being covered under the Medicaid health care program for the poor.

“In general this is going to result in fewer people covered nationwide,” says Caroline Pearson, a senior vice president at Avalere, a health care consulting group.

Republican leaders distributed the skeleton proposal at a meeting of the House Republican Conference in the Capitol on Thursday. Lawmakers now have an outline to bring with them to their districts for the Presidents Day holiday weekend, where they may face constituents with questions about what is going to happen to their health care. The plan is based on one outlined last summer by House Speaker Paul Ryan.

Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., called the 18-page outline “guideposts and a road map.”

Article continues after sponsorship

“We know the direction we want to go and sort of the destination,” Huizenga said outside the meeting.

Lawmakers who attended the meeting said the plan is to repeal the Affordable Care Act with a bill similar to one that passed in 2015 but was vetoed by then-President Barack Obama. That proposal would have repealed all the taxes and subsidies associated with the health care law and would have killed the mandate for individuals to buy health insurance by getting rid of the tax penalty used to enforce it.

This Congress could either first pass a repeal bill and then a replacement bill, or include replacement elements in the repeal.

The meeting Thursday centered on “principles and goals on where we’re going in patient-centered care,” said House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, R-La., after the meeting.

“We’re talking about repealing, replacing and starting to return control of health care and restoring the free market,” he said.

Most of the plan is silent on how much money lawmakers want to put behind their proposals, so it’s impossible to know exactly how generous the plan is and how many people it would cover.

The elements of the plan include replacing the subsidies that help people buy insurance through Obamacare exchanges with fixed tax credits to buy coverage on the open market.

The major difference between the two is that the Obamacare subsidies increase as premiums rise so that consumers are responsible for the same premium amount, which is tied to their income. The tax credits proposed by Ryan are not tied to income but rise as a person ages and insurance rates increase.

“The important thing on the tax credits is that they’re not income adjusted and we don’t know how big they are,” Pearson says.

She says it’s unlikely they’ll be as generous as the Obamacare subsidies.

“This likely means that low-income people will have difficulty affording individual insurance,” she says.

The outline distributed by Republicans repeatedly mentions that people will be able to buy so-called catastrophic coverage, which has limited day-to-day benefits but protects people when they have a serious illness or accident that requires a lot of health care.

The plan also calls for expanding health savings accounts, which allow people to save their own money tax-free to pay for health care costs. It calls for the limits on HSA savings to rise from $6,750 per family to $13,100.

HSAs are a favorite among conservatives because they encourage people to save and plan for their health spending and to shop around for price.

Democrats have criticized the focus on HSAs because they only help people who have extra money to put away and give a bigger tax cut to people with higher incomes.

The Republicans’ plan also calls for a major restructuring of the Medicaid health care program for the poor. It would repeal the Medicaid expansion that most states adopted under the Affordable Care Act, which allowed able-bodied people with incomes just above the poverty line to become eligible for Medicaid coverage.

And it would cap how much the federal government spends per person per year. Right now, Medicaid pays all health care costs for those who are eligible.

“This is a potentially significant incentive for states to get serious about efficiency,” says Paul Howard, director of health policy at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank.

Howard says states currently have an incentive to increase their spending on Medicaid, because it boosts the amount of federal money they get.

Ryan’s plan would make Medicaid either a block grant program, where states receive a fixed amount of money, or it would be a per capita benefit, where the federal government would give the states a set amount for each beneficiary.

States could still offer Medicaid to those who became eligible under expansion, but the states’ share of the costs would be higher than it is under the Affordable Care Act, likely making it too expensive for many states to do so.

Finally, the Republican plan would offer states pools of cash to come up with ways to expand insurance access to more people.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Boeing CEO Reportedly Listened In On Trump's F-35 Calls With Lockheed

NPR’s Robert Siegel speaks with Bloomberg reporter Anthony Capaccio about Trump’s calls to the general responsible for the Lockheed fighter jet program, with the Boeing CEO reportedly listening in.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

The F-35 is the most expensive weapon ever. It’s a fighter jet made by Lockheed Martin. President Trump has made it his personal mission to reduce its cost. Well, Bloomberg News reports today on one tactic the president has used. It’s the element of surprise. Last month, Trump made a phone call to the program’s manager, and listening in from Trump’s side was the CEO of Boeing, Lockheed Martin’s chief rival for military contracts.

Bloomberg Pentagon reporter Tony Capaccio joins us now having come from a hearing about the F-35 on Capitol Hill. Welcome to the program.

TONY CAPACCIO: Thank you.

SIEGEL: And tell us what you’ve learned about that phone call from Donald Trump.

CAPACCIO: Well, for one thing, the program manager, Air Force Lieutenant General Chris Bogdan – he confirmed to members that he did in fact receive two calls…

SIEGEL: At the hearing today.

CAPACCIO: …At the hearing today. And then afterwards, he talked to reporters. And what I picked up on was that he didn’t feel that the Boeing CEO’s listening in on the conversation – which was on speakerphone, by the way – was not inappropriate because nothing was discussed that was a decision point or that hadn’t already been publicly available.

SIEGEL: So General Bogdan says he didn’t find that inappropriate. What about Lockheed Martin?

CAPACCIO: We gave them the opportunity a couple times, and they declined to comment.

SIEGEL: You’ve been following the F-35 from its conception. I mean was it unusual for the CEO of the rival contractor to be on the room with the president – or the president-elect, in this case – talking to the person running the project?

CAPACCIO: I thought it was unusual, but given Trump’s operating style, he seems fairly impulsive. This was an example of an impulsive call.

SIEGEL: You’re saying the standard for unusual has moved in Washington.

CAPACCIO: It has. Now, I’ve been covering defense for about 30 years, and presidents do not call program managers.

SIEGEL: Yeah.

CAPACCIO: Defense secretaries do. Service secretaries do, but presidents don’t.

SIEGEL: Trump has taken credit for reducing the cost of the contract for the F-35 by $600 million. And in a press release earlier this month, Lockheed Martin said that Trump’s personal involvement in the program – this is a quote – “sharpened their focus on driving down the price.” Is Trump’s direct involvement making a big difference here, or was the price going to come down with or without him?

CAPACCIO: The price was going to come down with or without him. That contract – it was moving kind of like food through a snake. It was lurching over a year, and they were in the end game. Lockheed was agreeing to a lower price.

I can see where Mr. Trump’s involvement pushed it along because it became a national issue, whereas before, it was quietly negotiated behind closed doors. And the final Pentagon savings was $728 million, not 600. So I think he jumped on a train already moving, and he’s taking credit for probably pulling it into the station.

SIEGEL: Donald Trump was elected on the promise to drain the swamp. He ran as a disruptor. When he looks at defense contracting for big projects – I was going to say like the F-35, although I guess there is nothing quite like the F-35 – does he have a swamp in his sights when he talks – when he looks at these things?

CAPACCIO: The overall trend of weapons program overruns has decreased over the last four or five years. But this isn’t – you know, eternal vigilance is a good thing because companies and the Pentagon – sometimes they get a little too incestuous with each other, and they don’t – the Pentagon doesn’t oversee enough. They don’t slap the companies around enough, penalize them enough.

So a fresh set of eyes coming in is always a good thing. But you have to remember, as the president-elect and president, that these acquisition programs and the – who gets picked are governed by rules and regulations that can be challenged in court if the loser thinks…

SIEGEL: Yup.

CAPACCIO: …They were treated unfairly.

SIEGEL: That’s Tony Capaccio, a Pentagon reporter for Bloomberg News. Thanks for talking with us.

CAPACCIO: Thank you.

(SOUNDBITE OF NATE SMITH SONG, “BOUNCE: PARTS 1 + 2”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Recipe For New Sports? Just Add A Drone

Snowboarders are pulled by a drone on a lake near Cesis, Latvia, in January.

Ilmars Znotins/AFP/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Ilmars Znotins/AFP/Getty Images

You may have heard of drone racing, but people keep coming up with new ways to enjoy these flying machines.

One of the latest twists on drone sports comes from Latvia.

A company called Aerones has developed a drone to use for droneboarding, a new sport that’s just what it sounds like — a snowboarder being pulled through the snow by a powerful drone.

When the company first tried droneboarding last year, as a way to test the strength of its drones, the sport didn’t even have its name. “We didn’t call it like that in the beginning, but somebody, somewhere said droneboarding, and that’s how it took off,” Aerones CEO Janis Putrams says.

The company posted a video online, which Putrams says had 5 million views in the first couple of weeks.

He says the company wanted to use drones to wakeboard as well, so it built a larger, more powerful drone capable of lifting 145 kilograms (about 320 pounds).

So when the AFP news agency approached Aerones about a year later and asked to do a story on the sport, the company decided to go big — four times bigger.

“When we do this kind of a test, we want to do something new — something that we haven’t done before,” Putrams says. “So we thought, ‘Well, the drone is four times bigger than last time, so let’s try four snowboarders.’ “

AFP and Aerones released videos of the feat.

Latvian engineers have developed a giant drone able to tow snowboarders and lift people pic.twitter.com/1YlE5iR2G7

— AFP news agency (@AFP) January 23, 2017

Putrams helped to pilot the drone using remote controls, but he said the professional snowboarders who were towed were very excited about the way it felt.

Article continues after sponsorship

In another instance of droneboarding caught on camera, a child in a January 2016 video gives it a try, albeit at a much slower pace. And if you want to feel like you’re really a part of the action, take a look at this 360-degree video of droneboarding.

[embedded content]
YouTube

Putrams says droneboarding — and the use of drones in sports — probably isn’t going away. “In terms of sports, I think it’s here to stay for sure,” he says. “We did it last year, and it went viral, and we did this winter, and it went viral again.”

He says the company may try to integrate the control in the handlebar so there would be no need for a pilot to operate the drone.

Drones have been used for other sports too.

The Drone Racing League has attracted participants from around the world. Using remote controls and virtual reality glasses, pilots race drones through courses with a variety of obstacles. In September, the league signed a deal to be broadcast on ESPN.

And in activities leading up to this year’s NFL Pro Bowl, players participated in a “drone drop” skill challenge — catching a football dropped by a flying drone.

Check out the Drone Drop at the #ProBowlSkills Showdown!

Thursday night at 7 pm ET on @ESPNNFL. https://t.co/0kjPPJDonW

— NFL (@NFL) January 25, 2017

It’s worth noting that for recreational use, the Federal Aviation Administration restricts drones from flying above 400 feet as well as flying over sporting events or stadiums.

Putrams says his company isn’t just interested in drones for sports. Aerones’ biggest goal, he says, is to use them for firefighting and human rescue. The company has figured out a way to have a drone pick up a hose and point it toward a burning building, reaching areas too high for a ladder. A power cable can be added so the drone is not limited by time or batteries, Putrams says.

And because of the lifting power of the drones, Putrams says they could be used to rescue people trapped on a roof or on an icy lake.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)