February 11, 2017

No Image

Malnutrition Is Killing Nigeria's Children Because Of Food Shortage

International groups warn of a looming food crisis in parts of Nigeria due to civil conflict. Children are the most vulnerable in these conditions, but up to 9 million people could be affected.

LAKSHMI SINGH, HOST:

Turning now to West Africa. The United Nations is warning this week of what it calls catastrophic famine conditions in northeastern Nigeria. It threatens men, women and children who have already lost so much to an insurgency that has stretched seven years. The extremist group Boko Haram has killed thousands of people, displaced more than 2 million others. Relief workers fear children, especially those who are under the age of 5, are most at risk of dying from starvation.

NPR’s Ofeibea Quist-Arcton regularly reports from Nigeria and joins us now. Hello, Ofeibea.

OFEIBEA QUIST-ARCTON, BYLINE: Greetings.

SINGH: The situation for refugee kids affected by the fallout from Boko Haram violence in pockets of northeastern Nigeria – we know it’s serious, but could you give us a better idea of just how serious it has become?

QUIST-ARCTON: Well, children, of course, are the most vulnerable, as you have said, Lakshmi. But the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization is predicting that this biggest humanitarian crisis in Africa country, in northeastern Nigeria will probably get worse because the lean food and farming season is coming up between June and August. So they’re talking about 120,000 people facing famine, 2 million in an emergency, and forecasting that 9 million people are in crisis in this region.

And aid agencies such as Medecins Sans Frontieres, Doctors Without Borders, that has been dealing with malnourished children says there is a whole slice of children, the under-5s, who are most at risk. They say they see their big brothers, their big sisters, but it seems that malnutrition is killing these young children. When I was in Nigeria I saw it for myself, pin-thin children being taken care of because there isn’t the food to feed them.

SINGH: It appears that a dispute between the Nigerian government and relief agencies, that has in some way hampered the humanitarian crisis.

QUIST-ARCTON: Well, last year there were allegations that government officials and even soldiers and some of those who are in charge of these refugee displaced people’s camp were stealing food aid which was meant for those who have been displaced by Boko Haram. And then in December, President Muhammadu Buhari accused United Nations agencies of – exaggerating, I think, was the word he used – Nigeria’s crisis when they were appealing to donors for about a billion dollars.

Then Kashim Shettima – and he’s the governor of Borno State, the northeastern state hardest hit by the violence – accused some aid agencies of using his state as, quote, “a cash cow.” The governor apologized to the U.N. last month. And he said his anger was directed at local NGOs he said had been aimed to defraud donors. But, you know, when the government and aid workers aren’t all pulling together it can mean bureaucratic hold-ups. And that’s why people say this has also affected an already catastrophic humanitarian crisis in northeastern Nigeria.

SINGH: So President Buhari was voted in just a couple of years ago, so I suspect there’s growing skepticism of his ability to handle all of these problems now facing northeastern Nigeria.

QUIST-ARCTON: Muhammadu Buhari is actually away from the country at the moment. He is in Britain. He has been receiving medical treatment. And just last week, he asked Parliament to extend his medical leave. So people want somebody strong at the helm. When President Muhammadu Buhari came to power almost two years ago now, he said he was going to vanquish Boko Haram, he was going to end corruption, he was going to make Nigeria a better place to live for all Nigerians. Many people will say that there has been some progress, but there have also been steps backward.

SINGH: That was NPR’s Africa correspondent, Ofeibea Quist-Arcton, speaking to us from Johannesburg. Ofeibea, thank you.

QUIST-ARCTON: Always a pleasure. Thank you.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

DJ Betto Arcos Shares His Musical Finds From The Panama Jazz Festival

The Caribbean-inflected ensemble The Beachers is among Betto Arcos’ picks from the Panama Jazz Festival.

Courtesy of the artist

hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of the artist

When he’s not a guest of weekends on All Things Considered, Betto Arcos is traveling the world discovering new music. On this episode, he returns from the Panama Jazz Festival to share songs representing the jazz, folk and calypso influences thriving in Panama’s local music scenes. Hear the conversation at the audio link, and listen to his picks below.

Hear The Tracks

The Beachers

Courtesy of the artist

hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of the artist

03Mosaico Calypso

2:43

  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/514339038/514497772" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">

The Beachers

  • Song: Mosaico Calypso
[embedded content]
YouTube

Gustavo Salamin

Courtesy of the artist

hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of the artist

13La Peninsula De Azuero

3:45

  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/514339038/514510449" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">

Gustavo Salamin

  • Song: La Peninsula De Azuero
[embedded content]
YouTube

Afrodisíaco

Courtesy of the artist

hide caption

toggle caption

Courtesy of the artist

01Viene de Panamá

2:42

  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/514339038/514512908" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">

Afrodisíaco

  • Song: Viene de Panamá
[embedded content]
YouTube

Violeta Green

Youtube

hide caption

toggle caption

Youtube

01The Joker

2:31

  • <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/514339038/514513670" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">

Violeta Green

  • Song: The Joker
[embedded content]
YouTube

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Best of the Week: Jack Nicholson Is Coming Out of Retirement, DC Movies Are Turning a Corner and More


No Image

Some New England Patriots Players Say They Won't Attend White House Ceremony

Several New England Patriots players say they won’t attend the White House ceremony to honor their Super Bowl victory. NPR’s Scott Simon talks with ESPN.com’s Howard Bryant about this ritual.

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

Finally, time for sports.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

SIMON: Winners go to the White House – or will they? Only their agents may know for sure. I’m joined now as always by Howard Bryant of espn.com. Howard, thanks so much for being with us.

HOWARD BRYANT: Good morning, Scott. How are you?

SIMON: I’m fine, thank you. The New England Patriots won the Super Bowl this week in the most spectacular fashion on Sunday. They’ve been invited to the White House, as major sports champions are. I was there just three weeks ago with the Chicago Cubs.

BRYANT: Who?

SIMON: I knew you’d say that. I knew you’d say that. That’s why I paused. But now six or seven Patriots say they’re not going on principle. What do you make of all this?

BRYANT: Well, this is where we are. And I think it’s an important thing to remember that the New England Patriots didn’t start this trend. This has really been going on for about 25 years. Let’s not forget that Tom Brady did not go to the White House when the Patriots beat the Seahawks. And then Tim Thomas, the Bruins goaltender, when the Bruins beat Vancouver, had his Facebook screed against the Obama administration and chose not to go. James Harrison from the Steelers didn’t go for either Super Bowl victory when George Bush was in the White House or when President Obama was in the White House. So this is where we are.

On the one hand, we say that we don’t want our athletes to be bland. We say we don’t want the canned cliches. And so this is the price for that. Now you have athletes expressing themselves and expressing their politics. And I would like to think, Scott – I would like to think that there is a respect for the office of the presidency regardless of who’s in it, that that office means something to all of us. However, we’re at a point right now where it really doesn’t. That – those days seem to be gone.

SIMON: Here’s a hypothetical that’s not so hypothetical. If either the Golden State Warriors or Cleveland Cavaliers win the NBA title this year, I don’t see Coach Steve Kerr of the Warriors or LeBron James of the Cavs wanting to shake hands with President Trump and perhaps vice versa. Is it time for just – just to retire this event?

BRYANT: Well, on the one hand, I think so simply because you can’t have it both ways. You say that you don’t want politics. People always say stick to sports. But this is a political time. This is a – it’s a political event when you care about who’s in the White House. And these times are very, very, very different. We’re in an extremely incendiary, divisive moment. We have a divisive person in the White House. We have a moment where the decision to put that person in the White House was very different in a lot of ways from elections past. And maybe we have to change with the times.

But once again, I like the citizenship of these players. I like the fact that we’re getting – that we’re getting these athletes – what did we always say about the players over the years? Too rich to care. And now you see ballplayers out there and they’re protesting and they’re expressing themselves. And this latest – this latest trip with Michael Bennett, one of the NFL players who was asked to go on this trip to Israel, came out and said that he’s not going to go and a lot of NFL players aren’t going on this trip because they don’t want to be used. They want to see both sides. And this is, I think, what citizenship is. I appreciate it, actually.

SIMON: Yeah. I was struck by Tom Ricketts, owner of the Cubs. He’s got a sister who’s a big liberal activist, a brother, Republican governor of one state, and one coming to work for the Trump administration. He says, look, we’re a typical American family. We’re all over the ballpark. No pun intended – or maybe pun intended.

BRYANT: Not all going to agree on things. But I can say one thing, Scott.

SIMON: Yeah?

BRYANT: This is where we are, and I don’t think it’s going to change at all. It’s going to intensify.

SIMON: Howard Bryant, thanks so much. You’re listening to WEEKEND EDITION from NPR News.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Trump, GOP At Odds Over “Border Adjustment” Tax

President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary nominee Wilbur Ross and senior advisor Jared Kushner attend a meeting with Senate and House legislators, in the Roosevelt Room at the White House, February 2, 2017 in Washington, D.C. Lawmakers included in the meeting were Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX), Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA).

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

hide caption

toggle caption

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

On Thursday, President Donald Trump told airline executives visiting the White House that tax relief for corporate America is on the way.

“We’re going to be announcing something, I would say over the next two or three weeks,” said Trump, adding that it would be “phenomenal.”

But there’s at least one big issue that stands in the way. It’s called the border adjustment tax. House Republican leaders want it, but the President and some other Republicans are skeptical.

There’s no doubt that President Trump and House Republican leaders are interested in a border tax. The question is what kind. Trump wants to tax imports to punish individual countries, like Mexico, and pay for his border wall.

House Republican leaders have a much more dramatic idea. They would levy what they call a “border adjustment tax” of 20 percent on imports from all countries.

Texas Rep. Kevin Brady, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, is a big supporter of this approach. In an interview with NPR, Brady said that right now, “American companies and workers are competing with one hand tied behind their backs, because our tax code is so outdated.”

Article continues after sponsorship

Brady says many of our trading partners use a value-added tax (VAT) that taxes U.S. goods and services, while subsidizing their own exports. Brady argue that unfairly penalizes U.S. products.

Many leading economists, from President Reagan’s former White House adviser, Martin Feldstein, to liberal economist Paul Krugman, say that’s a mistaken understanding of how the VAT tax works. They say U.S. companies are not disadvantaged.

Nevertheless, Brady and House Speaker Paul Ryan have proposed a 20 percent “border adjustment tax” that they believe is necessary to level the playing field.

“Foreign products shouldn’t get a tax break in our tax code.” says Brady. “Our proposal eliminates those tax incentives and creates true competition in the U.S.”

And here’s the bonus … and one of the keys to tax reform. A 20 percent tax on all imports would produce an estimated $1.2 trillion dollars over 10 years, enough to offset much of the loss in revenue from the big reduction in tax rates that Republicans want, including dropping from a 35 percent rate to 20 percent for corporations.

But, rate cuts without that revenue, would mean a major increase in federal deficits, causing heartburn for the party’s deficit hawks.

Now critics, including some aligned with big Republican contributors like the Koch brothers, say, ‘Wait a minute.’ To a great extent, U.S. consumers will bear the brunt of a tax on imports. They’ll end up paying higher prices for things like imported cars, clothes and food. Businesses that import products could also be hurt, including businesses from retailers and petroleum refineries, including those owned by Koch Industries.

Rep. Brady disagrees.

He points to economic theory that suggests the U.S. dollar would rise and offset the added cost for U.S. consumers. But another heavyweight critic, former Republican presidential candidate Steve Forbes, scoffed at that idea in an interview this week on CNBC.

He expressed disbelief at “the idea that these guys in Washington know what the dollar is going to do in the exchange market,” when there are “zillions of factors” determining exchange rates. “I mean the volumes … in currencies each day is over $5.3 trillion,” said Forbes. “These guys are going to figure that out in its intricacies?”

And, Forbes said, the border adjustment tax is raising unnecessary divisions among Republicans and threatening the effort to cut taxes.

“So drop it,” Forbes says. “Do a straight vanilla tax cut. We’ve done that before and it works.”

Most important among the skeptics is President Trump. He has said he “doesn’t love the border adjustment tax,” calling it “too complicated.”

Brady believes he’s making progress on winning over the President. But he acknowledges if he can’t convince Trump to accept the border adjustment tax, with its $1.2 trillion dollars in revenue, the big tax cuts Republicans want for businesses and individuals could be in danger.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Surprise! Marvel Just Dropped a Hype Reel for 'Avengers: Infinity War'

Avengers: Infinity War is going to be one of the biggest movies ever. It’s going to bring together pretty much every single major character we’ve seen in the Marvel movies so far. Yes, that means that The Avengers will cross over with the Guardians of the Galaxy, who will cross over with Spider-Man, who will cross over with….who knows. The point is, everybody is meeting everybody. It’s going to be insane.

The movie, from Captain America: Civil War directors Joe and Anthony Russo, recently started film in Atlanta, Georgia. And while most productions would wait quite a while to release anything from their sets, Marvel and Disney know that Infinity War is going to be a big, big deal. So they put together a teaser trailer of sorts from day one of production, which includes a bunch of new concept art, as well as a final tease of Thanos prepping to bring some real chaos to the Avengers.

We don’t actually know if that last bit will be in the final movie or if it was created just for this video, but either way, good luck not geeking out about it.

[embedded content]

Avengers: Infinity War hits theaters May 4, 2018.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)