February 2, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Billy Crystal and Daniel Stern Return to 'City Slickers,' Buzz Lightyear vs. Darth Vader and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Character Reunion of the Day:

Billy Crystal and Daniel Stern reprise their City Slickers roles and crossover into Westworld in this Funny or Die parody:

Movie Character Battle of the Day:

Since Toy Story‘s Emperor Zurg seems modeled after Darth Vader, it’s not weird to see Buzz Lightyear fight the actual Star Wars villain (via Fashionably Geek):

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

Speaking of characters battling, here’s an animated mashup of all the great movie action heroes in an epic gladiatorial match (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Video Essay of the Day:

Fandor Keyframe looks at the power of the replay in Groundhog Day and other movies like it that have come before and after:

[embedded content]

Film History Lesson of the Day:

Ever wonder why many cartoon characters, including Mickey Mouse, wear gloves? Vox Pop has the historical answers:

[embedded content]

Adorable Cosplay of the Day:

Hidden Figures stars Taraji P. Henson and Janelle Monae have both shared this photo of three young girls dressed like the movie’s main characters (via THR):

Movie Comparison of the Day:

With Rings out in theaters this week, Couch Tomato shows why It Follows is basically the same movie as The Ring:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Mr. Nerdista looks at the work of Arrival director Denis Villeneuve and how the filmmaker explores humanity:

[embedded content]

Oscars Montage of the Day:

Appreciate this year’s contenders for the Academy Award for Best Director in Art of the Film’s showcase of the nominees:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This weekend is the 75th anniversary of the release of Woman of the Year. Watch the original trailer for the Hepburn/Tracy classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Snapchat, All Grown-Up: 5 Things We Learned From Snap's IPO Filing

Snap co-founder and CEO Evan Spiegel is taking the parent company of the Snapchat app public. Jae C. Hong/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Jae C. Hong/AP

When a 2014 Forbes cover featured a grinning cofounder of Snapchat, the accompanying text described CEO Evan Spiegel as “the 23-year-old who told Zuckerberg to take his $3 billion and shove it.” Snapchat had just turned away Facebook’s acquisition offer, which was triple the amount the social network paid for Instagram in 2012.

The thing Spiegel was holding out for is happening now, after much anticipation: Snapchat’s parent company, Snap, is going public, hoping to raise at least $3 billion.

By most reports, this is slated to be the biggest tech initial public offering in years. The listing is expected to value Snap between $20 billion and $25 billion — the highest valuation of an American tech company since Facebook.

Snap’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission presented the first chance for outsiders to review the company’s financials. Here’s a quick summary from Reuters:

“Snap had $404.5 million in sales in 2016, up from $58.7 million in 2015. However, it had a net loss of $514.6 million in 2016, up from a net loss of $372.9 million in 2015. … Snap had 158 million active users in 2016, up 48 percent from 2015.”

The filings also had a few interesting tidbits. Below are five things we gleaned.

Snap may be the first company to discuss “sexting” in a stuffy SEC initial public offering filing.

That’s because the history of Snapchat as a popular social app starts with parents worried about how their children were using the self-deleting photographs.

Article continues after sponsorship

“Many people didn’t understand what Snapchat was, and said it was just for sexting — even when we knew it was being used for so much more,” the IPO documents say.

In the past five years Snap has become a social mainstay for its users, the majority of whom are between 18 and 34 years old. It has popularized funky selfie filters, as well as telling stories through a sequence of photos and videos — imitated later by Instagram. Last year Snap launched camera glasses called Spectacles; in Thursday’s filings, Snap describes itself as a “camera company.”

“We believe that the camera screen will be the starting point for most products on smartphones,” the company says in its SEC filing.

Snap makes virtually all of its money through advertising.

For the past two years, advertising revenue accounted for an average of 97 percent of Snap’s revenue. The company says most advertisers don’t have long-term advertising commitments with Snap, something the company hopes to achieve.

As The Economist points out, this poses a new kind of challenge for the relationship Snap is building with its users:

“Although Snap encourages users to be silly on its app, it hopes to be taken seriously as a business. It will need to decide what approach it should take when using information about users to target ads. Mr Spiegel has called the practice ‘creepy’ in the past. Yet Snap may need to share more data about its users; Mr Spiegel has indicated that he may be willing to do this.”

Unlike Facebook and Twitter, which pushed to keep growing users, Snap is focused on increasing the time and energy each user puts into the app.

In outlining risks related to its business, Snap repeatedly points out that its operations are best in places with affordable and abundant Internet access that’s strong enough to constantly load video:

“Unlike many other free mobile applications, the majority of our users tend to be located in markets with high-end mobile devices and high-speed cellular internet,” the filings read. These also happen to be the markets where advertisers pay the biggest bucks.

But these are also markets that eventually will run out of new users for Snapchat. So Snap says its strategy is to keep innovating the camera platform “in an effort to drive user engagement, which we can then monetize through advertising.”

Snapchat’s cofounders — CEO Spiegel and CTO Robert Murphy — will keep control of all stockholder decisions.

The two Stanford fraternity brothers have had this control because they own the majority of voting stock, and the IPO is structured to keep it that way — which Reuters points out is extraordinary:

“Existing investors will have one vote for each of their shares, while new investors will have no voting rights.

“Keeping tight control is common in companies closely associated with their founders, who often prefer to grow their business without being questioned by a broad array of investors. Still, offering a class of stock with no votes in an IPO is unprecedented.”

Snap runs on Google.

For the vast majority of computing, data storage and other needs that go into running an Internet service, Snap says it relies on the cloud services of Google. Though the deal is not exclusive, Snap says it has committed to spend $2 billion with Google Cloud in the next five years.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Health Savings Accounts Are Back In The Policy Spotlight

Are health savings accounts worth it? Katie Edwards/Ikon Images/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Katie Edwards/Ikon Images/Getty Images

They are just three little words — “health savings accounts” — but they are generating a lot of buzz as Republicans contemplate plans to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.

Expanding the use of these accounts, based on a long-held conservative view that consumers should be more responsible for their health care spending, is a part of almost every GOP replacement plan under consideration on Capitol Hill.

Here’s the theory behind HSAs: Making consumers bear a bigger upfront share of medical care – while making it easier to save money tax-free for that purpose – will result in more judicious use of the health system that could ultimately slow rising costs.

While the details of the current proposals differ, they all generally seek to allow larger tax-free contributions to the accounts and greater flexibility on the types of medical services for which those funds can be used. Some include tax credit subsidies to help fund the accounts.

Supporters say premiums for the insurance linked to an HSA are lower, and they like HSAs’ trifecta of tax savings: no taxes on contributions, the growth of the funds in the account or on their withdrawal if spent on medical care. But skeptics note the tax break benefits wealthy people more than those who earn less.

Still, expect to hear a lot more about HSAs in the coming months. Here’s a rundown of some of the basics:

How do HSAs work?

HSAs currently must be paired with qualifying health insurance plans that have annual deductibles of at least $1,300 for individuals or $2,600 for a family, although surveys show average deductibles are generally higher than those minimums. Unlike some other types of insurance, the consumer pays the full cost of most doctor visits, drugs or hospital stays until the deductible is met. There are some exceptions for services deemed preventive, such as certain vaccines, prescription medications or cancer screenings.

Article continues after sponsorship

To pay for those deductibles and other medical costs, consumers can make tax-free contributions to the HSA account. This year, that allowable amount maxes out at $3,400 for individuals or $6,750 for families, and unused portions can roll over to the following year. The amounts in the HSA grow tax-free, similar to retirement accounts. Some employers who offer HSA-coupled insurance contribute to the accounts on behalf of their employees.

Money in the funds moves with the policyholders, even if they change jobs or insurers, similar to how workers can take their 401(k) retirement fund to a new employer. Still, polls have shown that most Americans already have little or no money saved for an emergency, so skeptics say they are not likely to embrace medical accounts.

“Americans who are struggling to afford health insurance right now don’t have the money to set aside,” said Maura Calsyn, managing director, health policy, at the Center for American Progress. “Raising the limits is essentially just providing high-income individuals with a greater tax benefit and doesn’t do anything to increase coverage.”

Critics also point out that older or sicker people could blow through their entire fund every year and never accumulate any savings.

How would they change under GOP proposals?

Several proposals – including the Better Way white paper authored by House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., would increase HSA contribution limits. Ryan’s plan would allow the tax-free contributions to total as much as the insurance plan’s annual deductible and out-of-pocket maximum. For families, that could be more than $14,000 a year.

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul’s Obamacare Replacement Act would get rid of the upper limit on contributions entirely. It would also allow the accounts to be coupled with any type of insurance, not just high-deductible plans.

What services can HSA funds cover?

Currently, money in the accounts can be used only for certain health costs, such as deductibles, copayments for doctor visits, hospital care and other out-of-pocket costs. The funds cannot be used to pay premiums on health insurance plans. Both the Ryan proposal and one from Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., the physician nominated to head the Department of Health and Human Services, would allow the funds to be used to pay fees directly to doctors, for “concierge care,” which refers to arrangements in which consumers pay annual or monthly fees for special coverage that provides quicker access, longer visits or, in some cases, all primary care services.

Christopher Condeluci, an attorney and former counsel to the Senate Finance Committee, said Republicans might seek to loosen the rules around what services are exempt from the deductible, potentially to incorporate medical care important to people with chronic illnesses, such as annual eye exams for people with diabetes. “That would recognize that there are individuals who are high medical utilizers and high-deductible plans just are not appealing to them … unless you can change the definition to make them more appealing,” he said.

How common are HSAs?

An estimated 26 million Americans — policyholders and their dependents — are covered by some type of HSA-eligible plan. That’s a small share of the overall 178 million who have coverage through their jobs or purchased on their own, but it has steadily grown since HSAs first became available in 2003. Among employers who offered insurance last year, about 24 percent had HSA-eligible plans, with average annual deductibles of $2,295 for single policies and $4,364 for families, according a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the foundation.)

Paul Fronstin, with the Employee Benefit Research Institute, noted that the slow ramp-up is similar to most trends in health benefits. Now, he said, with the GOP focus on changing the health system, “we could see an acceleration of that trend.”

How much do they cost and what are the advantages?

Eligible health plans may have lower premiums than other types of insurance because of their higher deductibles. Policy experts and economists say the accounts might make people better consumers of health care because they have more “skin in the game” and are more likely to shop for the best prices on drugs, medical care or hospitalizations — and avoid running to the doctor with the sniffles. “It makes people more conscious that the health care they are getting is being paid for with real dollars and not coming out of the ether,” said Joe Antos with the American Enterprise Institute.

What are the disadvantages?

For one thing, it isn’t easy for people to comparison shop on the prices for medical care. And, consumers don’t always make good choices. Among those with HSAs, overall spending on medical care does indeed go down, Fronstin and other researchers have reported. But they also uncovered a disturbing trend: at least in the first year or two, policyholders cut back on everything, including high-value services they should really seek. ER visits go up. And many even forgo screening exams – such as mammograms or other cancer tests – even though they are specifically excluded from the deductible and are therefore “free” to the consumer. Bypassing preventive or other care could lead to higher costs in the future.

Follow Kaiser Health News’ Julie Appleby on Twitter: @Julie_appleby.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)