January 25, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: A Perfect Companion to 'La La Land,' Retro 'Power Rangers' Trailer and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Comparison of the Day:

For Fandor Keyframe, Dominick Nero suggests La La Land and Martin Scorsese’s New York, New York are companion films:

[embedded content]

Redone Trailer of the Day:

The new Power Rangers trailer has been re-edited to fit the format and theme song of the old Mighty Morphin Power Rangers TV show (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Prank of the Day:

See electronics store shoppers freak out when Samara from The Ring climbs out of one of the televisions on display (via Fashionably Geek):

[embedded content]

Reenacted Movie Scene of the Day:

The person who redid scenes from Psycho and Titanic with cats is back with an iconic scene from The Empire Strikes Back (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Mary Tyler Moore, who just passed away, directed by Robert Redford on the set of 1980’s Ordinary People:

Cosplay of the Day:

See how to make an awesome giant DIY costume for the ED-209 robot from RoboCop (via Fashionably Geek):

[embedded content]

Franchise Recap of the Day:

Go back through the entire Back to the Future trilogy as it’s recapped with a rap song:

[embedded content]

Movie References of the Day:

All of the movies Shrek references and parodied are showns side by side with the movie in this video by Bora Barroso (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

Villains are often the best part movies, so here’s a lot of them in a very well-edited supercut titled The Death Squad by Cory Stevens:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This week is the 20th anniversary of the Sundance debut of Kevin Smith’s Chasing Amy. Watch the original trailer for the indie classic below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Facebook Tweaks Its 'Trending Topics' Algorithm To Better Reflect Real News

The Facebook logo is displayed at a startup gathering in Paris on Jan. 17. Thibault Camus/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Thibault Camus/AP

An article in an online publication accusing Facebook of suppressing the Women’s March in its trending topics caused a little tempest on social media over the weekend. Facebook says it did not intentionally block any story and is revealing a new way its trending-topics algorithm will now operate.

Paul Bradley Carr, writing for online outlet Pando, on Saturday posted what he said were screen shots of his Facebook pages at the height of the worldwide marches, which brought more than a million people into the streets around the globe to protest the agenda of the Trump administration.

Despite images and stories from the marches filling many people’s personal Facebook feeds and the day’s media coverage, Carr’s screenshots showed no signs of the march in Trending Topics — a feature supposed to reflect popular discussed topics.

And Carr says he discovered he was not the only one who didn’t see the Women’s March reflected on Trending Topics, accusing Facebook of trying to cozy up to the Trump administration. A very unscientific poll by this reporter found that among people in my Facebook and Twitter network most did see the Women’s March or something related trending on their page. However, a few did not.

According to Facebook, the Trending Topics — seen to the right of the main news feed on desktop and in search on mobile — are “based on a number of factors including engagement, timeliness, Pages you’ve liked and your location.” (Facebook pays NPR and other leading news organizations to produce live video streams.)

Article continues after sponsorship

Facebook representatives told NPR that the reason why some people did not see the march as trending had to do with the algorithm behind the feature. Although it took into account major news events and what’s popular on the site, it also accounted for the preferences of each person. It’s possible that Carr’s algorithmic profile indicated he wouldn’t be interested in the Women’s March.

In addition, some people may have seen trending topics they didn’t realize were about the Women’s March. For example, Ashley Judd and Madonna were trending — both women gave speeches at the main march in Washington, D.C.

And, Facebook says, none of this will happen in the future.

As of Wednesday, the company has once again changed its trending algorithms. Personal preferences are now out of the equation. “Facebook will no longer be personalized based on someone’s interests,” Facebook says in a press release. “Everyone in the same region will see the same topics.” For now, a region is considered a country, so everyone in the U.S. should see the same topics.

The latest algorithm changes are part of Facebook’s ongoing effort to curtail the spread of fake news. Some fabricated stories show up in Trending Topics, despite often originating on sites with no history of visitors and getting no coverage from legitimate news media. It’s a lucrative business, explored by NPR in November, when we tracked down one notorious fake-news creator.

The new algorithm would make hoax articles less likely to trend because it will look at “the number of publishers that are posting articles on Facebook about the same topic,” accounting for coverage by multiple news outlets, Facebook says.

According to Facebook the new algorithms will also make it easier for those who did not realize that the trends for “Ashley Judd” or “Madonna” were related to the marches to understand the context around those posts. Trending topics will now feature a headline below each topic name.

One of the updates to Trending Topics will be a display of a headline from a publisher. Facebook hide caption

toggle caption

Facebook

The company says the changes are not a response to complaints about trending during the Women’s March. Facebook says they have been in the works because its users — like Carr — actually expect and want to see trending topics related to the most talked-about real-world events.

Of course, algorithms are programs. While Facebook may hope that its new approach will appease critics such as Carr, the proof will be what happens in the real world of people’s Facebook pages.

“I do give them credit for acknowledging, at least, users’ concerns over this,” says Carr, who called Facebook’s change “a positive step.” But, he added, “we’ll see how it works in practice.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

GOP Lawmakers Look To Shape Health Care Strategy At Philadelphia Retreat

Republicans have many ideas on how to replace the Affordable Care Act, but little consensus on how exactly to do it. Lawmakers are hoping to shape that strategy at a 3-day policy retreat in Philadelphia.

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

Congressional Republicans have gathered in Philadelphia for the party’s annual retreat. President Trump and Vice President Pence will join them tomorrow. Republicans say they’ll use the meeting to decide the party’s strategy to repeal and replace Obamacare. NPR congressional correspondent Susan Davis has more on that effort.

SUSAN DAVIS, BYLINE: Republicans have a plan to replace Obamacare. In fact, they have several. The latest came this week from Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. They say it meets the requirements for replacement outlined by President Trump. Here’s Cassidy.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BILL CASSIDY: That he wishes all to be covered, that he wishes those with pre-existing conditions to continue to have coverage, that there not be mandates and that we make it lower cost. I think – and I think Senator Collins would agree – that there’s not many ways to get there, and as far as we know, none better than this.

DAVIS: The Cassidy-Collins plan would give states three options – keep Obamacare as is, enact their own insurance expansion or opt out of federal assistance entirely. It’s unique in that it’s the only plan so far that could keep Obamacare partially intact. Collins admits it’s a work in progress. But she says Republicans need to nail down their plan to calm down the public.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

SUSAN COLLINS: But if we do not start putting specific legislation on the table that can be debated, refined, amended and enacted, then we will fail the American people.

DAVIS: It’s also a non-starter for many conservatives, who believe anything less than full repeal would be breaking a fundamental campaign pledge. A bloc of conservatives in the House introduced their own plan earlier this month. That one would repeal the individual mandate and replace it with a system that gives people tax credits if they choose to buy insurance. North Carolina Republican Mark Walker is a co-sponsor.

MARK WALKER: It’s something that’s a good base. I’ve said this the other day. It’s round one of a 15-round engagement.

DAVIS: Other key players, like Senate Health Chairman Lamar Alexander, are taking things off the table. Here’s Alexander in an exchange with Georgia Congressman Tom Price, Trump’s nominee for Health and Human Services secretary, at a recent hearing.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

LAMAR ALEXANDER: Let me ask you this. Is this the bill – any effort to replace and repeal Obamacare – is this the bill to reform Medicare?

TOM PRICE: Absolutely not.

DAVIS: Medicare may be off the table, but Medicaid is on it. The health care program for the poor was expanded under Obamacare. Trump administration officials have said their upcoming plan will include a longstanding conservative proposal to overhaul Medicaid from a guaranteed benefit to a block grant system. That would give states authority on how to spend that money.

But that plan would likely run into a democratic blockade in the Senate, where Democrats oppose pretty much everything Republicans are trying to do to repeal Obamacare, which means Republicans are also strategizing on how to go it alone like Democrats ultimately did seven years ago. Here’s Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

MITCH MCCONNELL: We anticipate no cooperation from the other side. And so it – you know, it would be incumbent upon us, us meaning Republicans, to come up with a replacement.

DAVIS: All of these concerns will be aired out at the retreat by key stakeholders, says House speaker Paul Ryan.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PAUL RYAN: We’re going to work with all of our committees that are in charge of health care legislation – the Education and Workforce Committee, the Ways and Means Committee, the Commerce Committee – and we’re going to have a full, exhausting conversation at our retreat to go through all of these things.

DAVIS: And Walker, a sponsor of the House conservatives’ plan, says Republicans are acutely aware of the challenges presented by their repeal and replace plans.

WALKER: This is something that I believe if we don’t get right Democrats will do their best to make the key focal point in the 2018 elections. So there is some motivation. It’s not just the fact – we want to do the right thing. This is something very sensitive when it comes to people’s health care. But from a political side, there’s a benefit to get it right as well.

DAVIS: And huge political risks if they don’t – just ask Democrats. Susan Davis, NPR News, the Capitol.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Aging Giants Of Tennis Reach Australian Open Semi-Finals

NPR’s Ari Shapiro speaks with Sports Illustrated senior writer Jon Wertheim about the performances of Roger Federer and Venus Williams at the Australian Open.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

What’s old is new again in tennis. We’ve reached the semifinals of the Australian Open, and some of the sport’s aging giants are still in the running. Venus Williams, 36 years old, is playing through an autoimmune disorder that causes fatigue. Her sister, Serena, is still alive in this tournament, too. And on the men’s side, both Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal are through to the semis. Fans are crossing their fingers for a throwback final.

Jon Wertheim is a senior writer with Sports Illustrated and has been watching the first Open tennis season in person. Hi there.

JON WERTHEIM: Hi, Ari.

SHAPIRO: In your coverage, you noted that the Williams sisters combined age is 71. Serena’s been dominant in recent years. Venus has been struggling. How has she looked so far this tournament?

WERTHEIM: Venus has looked fantastic. The benefit for these major events, these Grand Slams is that you have a day off in between. You referenced the autoimmune disorder, and I think the fact that Venus has a day in between her matches has been a big benefit. It also hasn’t been oppressively hot here the way it has in past years. But this – I mean it’s just extraordinary. Six of the 8 players remaining as we speak are 30 or over.

SHAPIRO: What do you attribute that to?

WERTHEIM: The game has become so physical that I think durability and strength are absolutely essential. I mean the days of sort of the waifish teenage burnout candidate are laughably obsolete. I think these are pros’ pros. These are professionals. They have nutritionists. They have teams.

And I also think these are just extraordinarily good tennis players. I mean Roger Federer could be, you know, 50 years old and still have terrific tennis talent and hand-eye coordination. I mean I think, especially in the case of Federer, Nadal and the Williams sisters, these are just extraordinary, extraordinary athletes.

SHAPIRO: So I’m trying to figure out whether we’re looking at one of the greatest generations of tennis players of all time or a tennis game where now, for some reason, people in their 30s have the advantage over people in their 20s.

WERTHEIM: Why choose?

SHAPIRO: (Laughter).

WERTHEIM: I think it’s a little bit of both. I mean I think that, you know, we’re going to be telling our grandkids about the Williams sisters, Federer and Nadal. I also think this is ultimately to tennis’s virtue. I mean sports – we all like young and fresh and the new flavors.

But I think it also speaks really well of tennis that these careers now can span – you know, in Serena’s case, she won her first major when Bill Clinton was president. We were joking. She’s going for her Grand Slam title under her fourth different president. And you know, two of them in the middle had two terms. So I think it’s great for tennis that these career shelf lives are so long now.

SHAPIRO: What do you think the chances are that we will see a throwback final between the Williams sisters on the women’s side and between Federer and Nadal on the men’s side?

WERTHEIM: I think in the case of the Williams sisters, the odds are pretty good. Both of them are playing opponents that are ranked lower than they are. I think we’ve still got a ways to go on the men’s side – especially Federer plays Stan Wawrinka, (unintelligible), fellow Swiss player who’s won three major titles of his own. It’s a little bit I think hard overhead. I mean I think from a sentimental standpoint, we would all love to see both of those finals.

SHAPIRO: We, the older generation of tennis watchers (laughter).

WERTHEIM: Yeah, I was going to say. We don’t root in the press box. We say this not out of partiality but simply rooting for the story. But no, I mean I think that it would be great for this event and great for tennis, but I don’t want to diminish the other players remaining.

SHAPIRO: That’s Jon Wertheim, senior writer for Sports Illustrated, speaking with us from Melbourne, Australia. Thanks so much.

WERTHEIM: Thanks, Ari.

(SOUNDBITE OF SHANNON AND THE CLAMS SONG, “OH LOUIE”)

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)