January 3, 2017

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Captain America: Civil War' Sweded, Shia LaBeouf in 'Batman v Superman' and More

Here’s everything you need to know about the last week in movie news:

Remade Movie Trailer of the Day:

Check out the latest sweded trailer from CineFix as they recreate the action of Captain America: Civil War:

[embedded content]

New Year Greeting of the Day:

Batman and Robin wish you a happy new year in this extra teaser for The Lego Batman Movie:

[embedded content]

Meme Resurrection of the Day:

Speaking of DC superhero movie treats, Shia LaBeouf returns to torment and motivate Supermand in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

Disney artist Brian Kesinger drew a new Calvin and Hobbes-style Star Wars cartoon, this one of Jyn and K-2SO from Rogue One:

I’m auctioning off this original drawing on Instagram right now! Check out @briankesinger to place your bid pic.twitter.com/9gErm2T5Wi

— brian kesinger (@briankesinger) January 3, 2017

Movie Takedown of the Day:

Honest Trailers is not very excellent to the historically lenient and appropriately dated Bill & Ted’s Excellent Adventure:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Mel Gibson, who turns 60 today, is directed by Richard Donner on the set of Lethal Weapon in 1986:

Cinematographer in Close-up:

Arrival director of photography Bradford Young is the cinematographer to watch right now, so here’s a video analyzing his work (via Film School Rejects):

[embedded content]

Puzzle of the Day:

See if you can figure out this year’s new Criterion Collection titles based on their annual teaser cartoon:

They Live by Night is easy. Others from @Criterion‘s annual tease? (Count the candles.) pic.twitter.com/iuPDXVTKo0

— Sam Adams (@SamuelAAdams) December 31, 2016

Supercut of the Day:

Have you fully recovered from New Year’s Eve yet? Either way, check out this great supercut of movie hangovers:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 20th anniversary of the wide release of Rob Reiner’s Ghosts of Mississippi. Watch the original trailer for the historical drama below.

[embedded content]

and

This article passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article: The Guardian’s Summary of Julian Assange’s Interview Went Viral and Was Completely False.


No Image

For French Law On Right To 'Disconnect,' Much Support — And A Few Doubts

The new law was prompted by concerns over the intrusion of work into private lives. Carlina Teteris/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Carlina Teteris/Getty Images

Ah, to work in France: plenty of vacation and a 35-hour workweek. And, as of Jan. 1, a new law that gives French employees the right to disconnect. Companies in France are now required to stop encroaching on workers’ personal and family time with emails and calls.

The law was part of an overall labor bill that provoked months of street demonstrations and divided the country. The controversy was mostly over a single provision that made it easier for French companies to fire people. But nearly everyone supports the provision allowing workers to walk away from emails and ignore their smartphones when they’re out of the office.

French Labor Minister Myriam El Khomri commissioned a 2015 study that warned of the health impact of what she called “info-obesity.” It showed that more and more French people could not get away from work — even when they weren’t there.

Labor lawyer Patrick Thiebart argues that burnout and other health-related issues are on the rise because of an overload of digital demands on employees.

“If an employee receives emails during all their weekends and at night until 11 p.m., then I can assure you that at a certain point in time, it can negatively impact his health,” he says.

Article continues after sponsorship

French Labor Minister Myriam El Khomri commissioned a 2015 study that warned of the health impact of what she called “info-obesity.” It showed that more and more French people could not get away from the office, even when they weren’t there. Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images

The new law stipulates that companies with more than 50 workers must negotiate with employees and unions and agree on a policy to reduce the intrusion of work into private lives.

“Of course your boss shouldn’t send you emails on a Sunday when you’re at lunch, enjoying a leg of lamb and a good Bordeaux,” says Bernard Vivier, who runs the Higher Institute of Work, a think tank that focuses on the French workplace.

“It’s so French to throw a law at every kind of problem,” he says. But he doesn’t think a law can fix this one. Such ills must be changed by management and through new practices, he says.

It’s a complicated issue, notes Thiebart, the lawyer, because digital culture also offers employees freedom and flexibility.

“Everybody is happy with the smartphones and the new technology,” Thiebart says, “because employees can work at home and don’t have to spend time and money in commuting. And for companies, they can save money because they don’t need all the staff on the premises.”

Many large European companies and government departments already recognize the right of their employees to disconnect from work. Companies such as Volkswagen and Daimler, and French insurer Axa, have taken steps to restrict out-of-hours messaging — including Volkswagen’s limited email server connections on evenings and weekends.

Thiebart says that isn’t such a good idea, since many businesses operate across several time zones. But he says his clients, many of them large corporations, are not hostile to the new French law. They believe a lack of downtime decreases the productivity of their workforce.

At a Paris gym where people are working up a sweat after a day at the office, many are still attached to their devices. Jean Luc Bauché is lifting weights, wearing white earbuds connected to a smartphone in his pocket.

He says it’s a great idea to be able to disconnect. But he doesn’t think it’s possible.

“You can pass laws to protect people from dangers like speeding,” he says, “but this law won’t work because it’s counter to the way society is evolving.”

Bauché says he’s the only person he knows who turns his phone off at night when he sleeps.

“Most people don’t dare,” he says. “They’re afraid they’ll miss something.”

This article passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article: The Guardian’s Summary of Julian Assange’s Interview Went Viral and Was Completely False.


No Image

Republicans Plan To Repeal Affordable Care Act In New Session

Congress is expected to take up repeal of the Affordable Care Act this week. The plan is still sketchy, but some details are starting to emerge.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Let’s talk more now about how Republicans are planning to repeal and possibly replace the Affordable Care Act. NPR health policy correspondent Alison Kodjak is here. Hi, Alison.

ALISON KODJAK, BYLINE: Hi, Ari.

SHAPIRO: What are you hearing Republicans are likely to do?

KODJAK: Well, what they’re looking to do, at least they tell me, is that they want to gut the law essentially by removing all the taxes that pay for subsidies for people to buy insurance. There’s a whole bunch of taxes in Obamacare, taxes on medical devices, taxes on health insurance companies. Wealthy people pay a surtax. And all the money used by those taxes goes to subsidies so that lower- and middle-income people can buy insurance at an affordable price.

SHAPIRO: If those subsidies and those taxes go away, are people who are currently getting their insurance through the Affordable Care Act going to lose their coverage?

KODJAK: Well, that’s unclear. Republicans say they don’t want millions of people to suddenly lose their coverage. They want to sort of allow a transition period so that they can come up with a replacement for Obamacare after they vote on this repeal.

So what they would do is phase out the parts of the law that they want to repeal over time, probably a two-year period or something. We don’t know exactly how that’s going to work. The best model we have is a law that they passed a year ago that President Obama vetoed where they phased out most of the law over two years.

But one thing they did was they got rid of the individual mandate that requires people to buy insurance immediately, and that could undermine their whole plan if that is in the new version of the bill.

SHAPIRO: Because if they get rid of the individual requirement that everybody buy insurance, then healthy people won’t buy it. Sick people will, and it costs the insurance company a whole lot more money.

KODJAK: Right, exactly because, you know, then they raise premiums, and healthy people are even less likely to buy insurance – just this spiral that goes out of control.

SHAPIRO: So we know that Republicans say they don’t want people to lose their insurance, but if it looks like a repeal vote will come as far as two years before a replace vote and we don’t know what the replace vote looks like, sounds like it’s hard to say for sure whether people will lose their insurance or not.

KODJAK: It is. It – there’s just so much up in the air. And you know, what you have is people not sure if they’re going to lose their insurance, less motivated to buy insurance. Plus, you have the insurance market, which is a big wildcard here. Insurance companies haven’t been making a lot of money or have been losing money on the Obamacare market over the last few years. They’ve remained committed because the law was there, and they were trying to figure out how to make a product that would be profitable.

If they know the law is going away, there’s not a lot of motivation for them to continue trying to sell insurance into this market. And so what you’ll have is Republicans trying to keep this market going while they come up with a replacement, but they can’t always get the insurance companies to cooperate. They can’t force them to sell insurance into the market.

SHAPIRO: If Republicans in Congress have known for years that repealing and replacing Obamacare was one of their top priorities – and this is one of Donald Trump’s top priorities for the entire year-plus of the presidential campaign – why wouldn’t they have a replacement model all set up and ready to go the minute they took power?

KODJAK: You know, that’s a good question. There’s been a lot of talk about why over six to eight years they haven’t come up with a plan. There have been a lot of proposals out there. They’re details vary. And I think the issue is that there’s different motivations behind different Republican plans.

Some want to keep as many people covered as are covered now. Others want to give people the option of having insurance and the option of not having insurance. Others are really focused on lowering health care costs.

So what you’re finding now – what we’re seeing is the variety of different policies out there seem to be focused on universal access to insurance, making insurance available to everybody but getting rid of that mandate that Republicans can’t stand which is requiring people to have insurance.

SHAPIRO: Alison, open enrollment in these insurance exchanges is happening now and scheduled to continue through the Trump inauguration and beyond. What happens to that?

KODJAK: Well, the Trump administration will have to at least see this open enrollment through, which, you know, will last a few weeks after he’s inaugurated. And then depending on how long it takes for the Republicans to come up with a replacement plan if they want to keep Obamacare going while they – through this transition, they may be into another open enrollment period next fall.

SHAPIRO: NPR’s Alison Kodjak, thank you.

KODJAK: Thanks, Ari.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

This article passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article: The Guardian’s Summary of Julian Assange’s Interview Went Viral and Was Completely False.


No Image

Fan Sings About Buffalo Bills Missing The Playoffs, Again

Greece native Jennie Fagen, who graduated from the University of Rochester, wrote a parody of “Sixteen Going on Seventeen” from The Sound of Music. The Bills haven’t made the playoffs in 17 years.

DAVID GREENE, HOST:

Good morning, I’m David Greene. I’m going to spare the Cleveland Browns today because this happened.

(SOUNDBITE OF VIDEO)

JENNIE FAGEN: (Singing) Bills are 16 going on 17 years out of the playoffs.

GREENE: Buffalo Bills fan Jennie Fagen made a video about her team missing the playoffs again. It’s a sports version of a “Sound Of Music” song.

(SOUNDBITE OF VIDEO)

FAGEN: (Singing) But we can tailgate better in upstate and willingly, we Bill-ieve (ph).

GREENE: Bill-ieve it, get it? It’s MORNING EDITION.

Copyright © 2017 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

This article passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article: The Guardian’s Summary of Julian Assange’s Interview Went Viral and Was Completely False.