December 28, 2016

No Image

Trump Reverses Obama Criticism, Touts New Jobs In Brief Remarks

President-elect Donald Trump speaks to reporters at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., on Wednesday. Evan Vucci/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Evan Vucci/AP

President-elect Donald Trump and @realDonaldTrump are contradicting each other.

Wednesday afternoon, Trump emerged from his Mar-a-Lago resort to tell reporters that he and President Obama had spoken on the phone and had “a very nice conversation.”

“I appreciate that he called me,” Trump said.

The comment came hours after Trump blasted Obama on Twitter.

Doing my best to disregard the many inflammatory President O statements and roadblocks.Thought it was going to be a smooth transition – NOT!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 28, 2016

But asked by reporters Wednesday afternoon how that transition was going, Trump said, “I think very, very smoothly. Very good. You don’t think so?” (A “not” was not forthcoming in real life.)

The Obama tiff — or non-tiff, depending on which Trump you listen to — is the latest sign of a disparity between Trump’s public statements and his social media statements.

There’s long been a serious personal rift between the two, but with Trump set to take the oath of office in less than a month, the stakes are higher. Presidents’ words move markets and can create global tension.

Take Trump’s recent tweet about nuclear weapons, which quickly ricocheted around the world despite Trump aides’ efforts to minimize the importance of the statement.

On Wednesday Trump also highlighted a Japanese tech mogul’s plans to create 8,000 new jobs in the U.S.

Article continues after sponsorship

Trump had previously appeared with Masayoshi Son at Trump Tower, to announce Son’s promise to invest $50 billion in the U.S. and create 50,000 new jobs.

Wednesday, Trump offered what appeared to be more specifics as part of that plan: 5,000 jobs that Sprint will bring back into the U.S. from overseas. Son’s company, SoftBank, owns about 80 percent of Sprint.

“They’re taking them from other countries. They’re bringing them back to the United States,” Trump said.

In a statement on its website, Sprint said it “anticipates these jobs will support a variety of functions across the organization, including its customer care and sales teams.” But the jobs aren’t finalized yet — the company said it will “begin discussions immediately with its business partners” and aims to fill the positions by the end of the 2017 fiscal year.

“We are excited to work with President-Elect Trump and his Administration to do our part to drive economic growth and create jobs in the U.S.,” Sprint CEO Marcelo Claure said in the statement. “We believe it is critical for business and government to partner together to create more job opportunities in the U.S. and ensure prosperity for all Americans.”

The additional 3,000 jobs come from a $1 billion SoftBank investment in OneWeb, a Virginia company that will set up a factory in Florida to manufacture satellites to provide broadband Internet access.

Trump said the jobs are being created “because of what’s happening and the spirit and the hope” around his election. He had previously taken credit for the Carrier Corp.’s keeping hundreds of jobs in Indiana — which came with tax concessions from the state where Trump’s incoming vice president, Mike Pence, currently serves as governor.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Russia Now Disputes 'Times' Report On Olympic Doping

Russia now says it does not admit a doping conspiracy involving its Olympic athletes. The denial follows a New York Times article in which a Russian official was quoted as saying a conspiracy exited.

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Russia now says, no, it does not admit to a vast doping conspiracy involving its Olympic athletes. This denial follows yesterday’s New York Times article in which a Russian anti-doping official was quoted as saying indeed there was an institutional conspiracy. It was the first such admission to come out of Russia. The New York Times is standing by its story.

Joining us to discuss this foggy situation is NPR’s Tom Goldman. Hey, Tom.

TOM GOLDMAN, BYLINE: Hi, Ari.

SHAPIRO: So yesterday’s Times story seemed like a breakthrough. After months of denying reports of widespread doping, Russia finally said, yes, it happened. And now the Russians are backtracking. What are they saying today?

GOLDMAN: Yeah, well, the woman who’s the acting head of RUSADA – that’s the Russian Anti-Doping Agency – she says her quotes in the article were taken out of context. They were changed by The New York Times reporter. She says she was merely quoting from the second part of the McLaren report. Now, that was the report released earlier this month. It provided lots of evidence and facts showing widespread doping in Russia from 2011 to 2015.

And the report uses the language – and I’m quoting here – “an institutional conspiracy existed across summer and winter sports athletes.” The head of RUSADA says she was just quoting that and not asserting it herself. And in fact, RUSADA said in a statement – and I’m quoting here – “it does not have and cannot have the authority to admit or deny such facts.” And the whole thing is under investigation in Russia.

SHAPIRO: How does The New York Times respond to that?

GOLDMAN: Well as you mentioned, sticking by its story, the reporter says all the quotes were accurate.

SHAPIRO: So then what is the impact of Russia essentially going back to where it was before yesterday’s Times article, rejecting any notion that the doping was widespread or state-sponsored or, as the McLaren report says, an institutional conspiracy?

GOLDMAN: Yeah, well, basically a glimmer of good will appears to be lost. You know, there was a feeling by those in the anti-doping community that even though Russians were still disputing the state-sponsored element of the doping allegations – and there’s a lot of evidence to show it was state-sponsored – they were making an admission in the Times article, and that could help put them in a better light and help them get back into the fold of international sport.

Remember, Ari; the Russians had been pariahs recently in sport. Athletes were banned from both the Olympics and the Paralympics in Rio. There have been events taken away from Russia this month. There are proceedings underway right now to determine whether more than two dozen Russian athletes who competed in the Sochi Winter Olympics in 2014 were doping and need to be sanctioned. So with today’s denial, it seems to reaffirm Russian sports’ pariah status.

SHAPIRO: Why would this Russian official backtrack, especially if yesterday’s article seemed to put them in a better light?

GOLDMAN: Far be it for me to know what goes on in the mind of Russian officials, Ari.

SHAPIRO: (Laughter).

GOLDMAN: You know, the Russians truly feel aggrieved by this doping story. Now, in The New York Times article yesterday, one of the officials quoted brings up the Fancy Bear computer hacking incident of several years.

SHAPIRO: This is a Russian group of hackers.

GOLDMAN: Yes, exactly, and the hacking revealed this widespread use of exemptions by many of the world’s athletes, including Americans – basically athletes getting the OK to use banned drugs because of medical conditions. Now, these exemptions are legal, but the Russians believe those exemptions allowed all those athletes to cheat, and the Russians simply needed to stay up with all of the people they call cheaters.

SHAPIRO: That’s NPR sports correspondent Tom Goldman. Thanks, Tom.

GOLDMAN: You’re welcome, Ari.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

For Many, Fewer Obamacare Choices Doesn't Mean Higher Prices

Ron Ellis of Augusta, Ga., hugs Monica Baldwin, a navigator with Christ Community Health, after she helped him sign up for insurance through the Affordable Care Act. Phil Galewitz/KHN hide caption

toggle caption

Phil Galewitz/KHN

People in Columbia, S.C., had their pick of four health insurers last year when they shopped for policies during the Affordable Care Act’s open enrollment.

This time they have just one: Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina, which had the most Obamacare enrollees in Richland County in 2016 due to its low prices.

It’s a change that’s been repeated around the country after big health insurers such as Aetna, Humana and United Healthcare pulled out of dozens of Obamacare marketplaces that they judged unprofitable.

Almost a third of all counties in the United States have just one insurer in the marketplace for people buying individual coverage for 2017. In 2015, just 7 percent had one insurer, according to a Kaiser Family Foundation analysis. Twenty percent of Obamacare consumers will choose 2017 plans in counties served by a single insurer, according to the government.

But there’s a surprising bottom line: Although prices are going up in almost all areas, they’re not significantly higher than they are for people living in areas served by multiple insurers, according to data reviewed by consulting firm Avalere Health.

Article continues after sponsorship

“A lack of competition is bad for the insurance market in the long term, but in counties that have only one plan it hasn’t proven to be catastrophic for consumers for 2017,” says Caroline Pearson, a senior vice president with Avalere. “We expected to see the biggest price hikes in areas without competition.”

She suggests that didn’t happen because insurers had to file their initial 2017 rates to regulators earlier this year, before they knew exactly where competitors were dropping out.

“Those rates could be adjusted, but broadly the pricing was set in the absence of full competitive information,” Pearson says. When open enrollment for 2018 begins next fall, “you could see big price increases in regions without competition.”

Uncertainty surrounds the future of the exchanges after the Trump administration and Republican-led Congress take power. Worries about the future of Obamacare may be spurring a burst in enrollments, which were up by 400,000 to 6.4 million from Nov. 1 to Dec. 19, compared with the same period last year, the government reported.

Even in Richland County, where premium increases exceeded the average rate hike nationwide, individuals and the navigators who help them enroll say they have found good deals especially for people with lower incomes that make them eligible for subsidies.

Open enrollment for 2017 ends Jan. 31, with a few exceptions.

Richland was one of 74 counties that dropped from at least four insurers in 2016 to just one in 2017, according to a Kaiser Health News analysis of federal data for the 39 states that enroll people through healthcare.gov. In 66 of those counties, the Blue Cross and Blue Shield affiliated plan was the sole survivor.

Blue Cross plans generally dominated the individual insurance market before the 2010 health law was passed, and they have recaptured their place in many cities and counties, says Pearson. That helped them outlast insurers such as UnitedHealthcare and Humana, which lacked that experience when they began selling individual plans under Obamacare in 2014. Even so, Blue Cross plans have withdrawn from Nebraska and Minnesota for 2017, as well as from densely populated counties in Arizona and Tennessee.

“In some ways the individual market looks today much like it did before the ACA, from a competitive standpoint,” Pearson says.

Stephanie Hickman, 29, of West Columbia, S.C., feared the worst when she began shopping for 2017 coverage on the exchange with help from a federally funded navigator at the downtown library. Hickman was uninsured most of the year, and paid $200 a month for her prescription drugs.

After sorting 20 options, the certified nursing assistant was stunned to find a subsidized plan that would cost her $22.30 a month and not more than $700 a year out-of-pocket in co-pays and deductibles. She would pay nothing to see a primary care doctor.

“Wow, it seems almost too good to be true,” says Hickman, who makes about $16,000 a year.

Sharita Moultrie, left, a navigator with the Palmetto Project, helps Stephanie Hickman enroll in an Obamacare plan in Columbia, S.C. Phil Galewitz/KHN hide caption

toggle caption

Phil Galewitz/KHN

The impact of subsidies makes Hickman’s case “pretty typical,” says Shelli Quenga, director of programs for the nonprofit Palmetto Project, which hires navigators to help enroll people in Obamacare.

More than 80 percent of the nearly 13 million people who enrolled for coverage on the marketplace last year qualified for subsidies, which are pegged to the price of the second-lowest silver premiums. That means that as the cost of the silver plans rise, so do the subsidies.

But that doesn’t help the millions of people with higher incomes who don’t qualify for subsidies and are facing higher premiums. For them, the loss of insurance competition and higher rates has been a double blow, according to insurance agents. “People are getting slammed and having to pay through the nose,” says Jocelyn Boland, an insurance agent in the Columbia, S.C., area who is handling about 500 Obamacare clients this year. “I have a lot of upset people.”

Despite the higher prices and promises by president-elect Donald Trump and GOP leaders to repeal the health law in 2017, most are still signing up, she says.

Seventy miles south of Columbia, Augusta, Ga., is also down to just one Obamacare insurer after having four in 2016. Among those who have signed up for the remaining Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia plan, some are thrilled at low rates and others, not so much.

Dorothy Johnson, 57, a caterer who lives in a mobile home with her disabled husband, was disappointed that the lowest Obamacare premium would still cost her $56 a month, even with a subsidy.

Dorothy Johnson of Augusta, Ga., worries about the high cost of health coverage, but decided to enroll in the end. Phil Galewitz/KHN hide caption

toggle caption

Phil Galewitz/KHN

Sitting with navigator Monica Baldwin inside a converted storage room just big enough for a desk and two chairs at Christ Community Health Services, Johnson broke down in tears when told that if she did not enroll, she would owe the IRS the higher of $695 or 2 percent of her income under the health law’s individual mandate. She and her husband live on $1,400 a month, mostly from his disability check and her part-time job, Johnson says. She gets around in a 1994 car and after paying the electric bill, trash, food, gas and car insurance, there is little left.

“Well, just go ahead and enroll me because there’s no way I want to pay the government that penalty,” Johnson told Baldwin.

She and her husband had been shopping for life insurance, but they’ve decided they can’t afford it as well as health insurance.

The Augusta area lost Humana, Cigna and Coventry health plans for next year. Humana was the most popular plan because of its price and its inclusion of University Hospital, one of four major area hospitals which Blue Cross Blue Shield of Georgia does not cover.

But so far, Baldwin says, most people are switching to the Blue Cross plans without complaint. Joel Caceres, 27, of Augusta, said he is pleased that his monthly premium for the same subsidized Blue Cross plan that he had in 2016 will drop to $40 from $43 and his annual deductible will stay at $250. The pastry chef says subsidized coverage is vital for him because the insulin and other medications he takes will only cost him $15 a month after insurance. “Having the insurance really helps ends meet,” he says after Baldwin helped him find a plan.

Ron Ellis, 55, another Obamacare customer aided by Baldwin, says he voted for Trump despite his pledge to repeal the law. “I didn’t like Hillary (Clinton),” he says.

His subsidized monthly premium for his Blue Cross policy will be $65 next year, up slightly from the $63.30 he paid this year. Ellis says he went without health insurance for many years before Obamacare. With high blood pressure, arthritis in his knees and a potential need for another hip replacement, he says, “It’s been great for me.”

Elizabeth Lucas contributed to this report. Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent news service supported by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)