December 17, 2016

No Image

University Of Minnesota Football Team Ends Boycott, Will Play Bowl Game

The University of Minnesota’s football team had refused to take part in any preparations for their upcoming bowl game, after 10 players were suspended. The school’s stadium is seen here in a 2012 file photo. Paul Battaglia/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Paul Battaglia/AP

Ending a boycott that was sparked by the suspension of 10 players over an alleged sexual assault, the University of Minnesota’s football team says they’ll play in the Dec. 27 Holiday Bowl. The team relented after meeting with school administrators Friday.

In addition to promising to play in the game in San Diego later this month, the team sought to clarify its position.

“Let me first state so there is no misperception: sexual harassment and violence against women have no place on this campus, on our team, in our society, and at no time is it ever condoned,” said senior wide receiver Drew Wolitarski.

The team’s statement, delivered by Wolitarski, also faulted the school’s leaders for not giving them any advance notice about the suspensions.

Full statement from gopher players pic.twitter.com/FxKe9vcjTu

— Peter Cox (@peterncox) December 17, 2016

The players had earlier complained that several of the athletes had already been punished with multiple-game suspensions because of the case, and that the new suspensions — and in some cases, potential expulsions — levied by the university’s Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action had come without due process.

Article continues after sponsorship

From St. Paul, Minnesota Public Radio’s Tim Nelson reports:

“The University of Minnesota suspended 10 members of the football team this week in the wake of an incident in September, when a student reported she’d been sexually assaulted by a number of young men in a player’s Minneapolis apartment. Authorities declined to press criminal charges, and the woman later agreed not to seek any civil action. But the University said it was considering discipline on its own.

“Players announced a boycott because of the suspensions. But after a meeting with school president Eric Kaler and other school officials last night, the players changed their minds.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Donald Trump Ordered For Deposition In D.C. Hotel Restaurant Case

Hotel employees watch then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump following a ribbon cutting ceremony at the new Trump International Hotel October 26, 2016 in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

In five weeks, President Donald Trump’s inauguration parade will roll past his new luxury hotel near the White House. But just over two weeks from now, Trump has to sit down with several lawyers and give a sworn deposition in a lawsuit involving the hotel.

What’s the lawsuit about?

Trump is suing two chefs who bailed out on the hotel after his declaration of candidacy in June 2015 — the speech in which he said Mexican immigrants are “bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” Chefs Jose Andres and Geoffrey Zakarian, who had been building signature eateries in the historic Old Post Office building, cited the speech. Trump says they breached their contracts and is seeking $10 million from each of them.

What’s a deposition, and how important is it?

A deposition, unlike a trial, is seeking information, not determining truth. They serve as a basis for trial questions, often to see if a witness’s story changes. Witnesses at depositions have less leeway than trial witnesses in refusing to answer questions.

Article continues after sponsorship

Veteran Washington lawyer William Taylor III said, “Depositions are taken by the other side for purposes of showing the person being deposed is either a liar or a crook.”

There’s usually no judge present at a deposition. Federal civil-trial rules, which apply in District of Columbia courts, allow depositions as long as seven hours. Trump’s attorneys asked that the upcoming deposition be just two hours; D.C. Superior Court Judge Jennifer Di Toro turned them down.

Trump has already been deposed in the Zakarian case. Trump’s attorneys asked the judge to prevent those questions from being repeated next month. She refused.

Doesn’t Trump have presidential work to attend to?

Clearly yes, but his lawyers didn’t convince Judge Di Toro that it warranted postponing the deposition. They said Trump “is extremely busy handling matters of very significant public importance.” She responded that the restaurant lawyers were working around his schedule, that Trump’s own statements are crucial to the case and, besides, his company Trump LLC had started the legal action.

Have other presidents-elect or presidents been deposed?

Sitting presidents who have been deposed are Ulysses Grant, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Only one of their depositions has major historical significance.

Clinton was deposed in 1998, in a sexual harassment suit by Paula Jones, a one-time government employee in Arkansas. It was the first time he was questioned about former White House intern Monica Lewinsky and their relationship. The deposition fueled investigations by independent counsel Kenneth Starr and House Republicans. In less than a year, House Republicans impeached Clinton. The Senate later voted to acquit him.

Will the deposition be videotaped?

Yes. Trump has been through many depositions, and video of the Zakarian session showed him to be a skilled witness, spare with his words and gestures. In other words, pretty much the opposite of his campaign persona. But whenever the video becomes public, his critics are certain to comb through it, examining both what he said and how he came across — looking for the kind of video moments that quickly flow into social media.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Study: Communities Most Affected By Opioid Epidemic Also Voted For Trump

Voting patterns show that areas where Donald Trump did well were also places where opiate overdoses and deaths occurred. NPR’s Scott Simon speaks with Shannon Monnat who led the study.

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

Shannon Monnat was watching election returns last month when she thinks she noticed a pattern. Professor Monnat’s an assistant professor of rural sociology and demography at Penn State University, and she’s been studying drug and alcohol mortality rates. She joins us now from Lowville, N.Y. Thanks very much for being with us.

SHANNON MONNAT: Thanks, Scott.

SIMON: What did you look at, and what did you find?

MONNAT: Well, so this was part of a larger project where I’ve been trying to understand the common characteristics of places with high rates of mortality from drugs, alcohol and suicide – these kinds of deaths of despair. And as you mentioned, I was watching the returns come in on election night and sort of noticed that the states where Trump was performing more strongly than expected, like Pennsylvania and Ohio and Michigan, were states that have seen major upticks in drug overdoses and other deaths of despair over the past decade.

So I started looking at the data, especially within regions of the country where the opiate epidemic has received a lot of attention. And what I found was that Trump outperformed the previous Republican candidate Mitt Romney the most in counties with the highest drug, alcohol and suicide mortality rates.

SIMON: And to take the chance of getting you a little bit out of your area of academic expertise for a moment, do you infer a lot of people who live in these areas heard a message of hope in Mr. Trump?

MONNAT: You know, I think in many of the counties where he did the best, economic distress has really been building, and social and family networks have been breaking down for several decades. And so I think these findings reflect larger economic and social problems that sort of go beyond drug and alcohol abuse and suicide. It’s really about downward mobility and the dismantling of the American dream at a larger community level. And Trump really has sort of capitalized on and exploited the feelings of the people in these communities. In a lot of these places, good-paying jobs and the dignity that goes along with those good-paying jobs has been replaced by suffering and hopelessness and the belief that people in power don’t really care about them or their communities.

SIMON: So on top of everything else, those of us who report politics and live in a bubble – we missed the importance of the opioid epidemic?

MONNAT: I’m not so sure that it was missed, per se. I think it’s been there at the forefront of the news for a really long time. I just don’t think that we saw the potential that it would impact the election in the way that it did, insofar as it’s tied up in these other economic and social struggles that are occurring within the same communities.

SIMON: And to be clear again, you’re not saying that people that have a problem with opioids or drug or alcohol voted for Donald Trump so much as people who live in those communities that have been affected by it statistically in your study voted for Donald Trump.

MONNAT: Well, that’s right. And I can’t say necessarily who voted for Donald Trump, but we have to remember that addiction and depression and these diseases and deaths of despair go far beyond the individuals themselves who are affected by them. They affect friends and family members and coworkers and first responders and service providers and employers in communities who are dealing with the struggles of these and experience the same sort of frustration and anxiety that are associated or wrapped up within diseases and deaths of despair.

SIMON: You conclude your study by – I believe the quote is community level well-being played an important role in this election.

MONNAT: Yeah, that’s right. So I think what we’re seeing is the consequence of this perfect storm of decades of decline in these decent-paying jobs and benefits, especially for folks without a college degree, and little hope that those kinds of jobs will ever come back mixed with really easy access to pain pills and cheap and potent heroin. And on top of that, there’s a lack of comprehensive and affordable health care services, including mental health and substance abuse treatment.

SIMON: Professor Monnet, what do you hope a President Trump can do to help people who live in communities like this?

MONNAT: Well, it seems to me that the policies really need to reflect the economic and health challenges of rural and small city America in the same ways that they’ve tried to target large urban cities. And that includes good-paying stable jobs, especially for those without a college degree. That needs to be the staple of any economic policy. What people really want is to be able to support themselves and their families.

SIMON: Shannon Monnat, assistant professor of rural sociology and demographics at Penn State University, thanks so much for being with us.

MONNAT: Thanks for having me, Scott.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)