November 21, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Fantastic Beasts' Easter Eggs, 'Rogue One' Set Up and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Easter Eggs of the Day:

Mr. Sunday Movies is here to explain all the Harry Potter references and point out the Easter eggs in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them:

[embedded content]

Movie Set Up of the Day:

Get ready for Rogue One: A Star Wars Story by learning 51 things revealed in the new book Catalyst: A Rogue One Novel (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

This Darth Talon cosplay is pretty amazing, but we’re betting on little Rey to win this battle. See more of Darth Talon at Fashionably Geek.

Supercut of the Day:

Get ready for Thanksgiving with the family by watching this supercut of dinner table conflicts (via Film School Rejects):

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

Find your favorite sci-fi characters, including RoboCop and the Predator, in this mashup illustration by artists Josan Gonzalez and Laurie Greasley (via /Film):

Movie Comparison of the Day:

See parts of The Thing side by side with similar shots and scenes from The Hateful Eight in this video from Kino:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Goldie Hawn, who was born on this day in 1945, with director Steven Spielberg on the set of The Sugarland Express in 1973:

Movie Homages of the Day:

Candice Drouet is the master of finding homages in movies, and here’s her latest video showing master works of art side by side with the movie shots they clearly inspired:

[embedded content]

Movie Meme of the Day:

The latest trailer meme is to rework other movies “Logan style,” as seen with the moody Iron Man rework titled “Stark” below. See it done for Superman and Batman at Geek Tyrant.

[embedded content]

Classic Movie Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 40th anniversary of the release of Rocky. Watch the original trailer for the Best Picture winner below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Trump Airs Grievances, Fields Questions In Meeting With Top TV News Figures

Media executives and anchors met from the top five TV networks met with the president-elect at Trump Tower on Monday. Mark Lennihan/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Mark Lennihan/AP

Earlier Monday at Trump Tower in New York City, President-elect Donald Trump, top aides and advisers including Kellyanne Conway, Reince Priebus and Sean Spicer met with executives and anchors from five major television networks. Trump used the opportunity to admonish the network’s journalists and executives for what he said was the networks’ unfair coverage of him. But he also said he wanted to re-frame his relationship with the press and took extensive questions about policy and his intentions in office.

This account is largely based on an interview with an attendee who took detailed notes.

Among the participants from the news side were ABC’s George Stephanopoulos and David Muir, NBC’s Lester Holt and NBC news president Deborah Turness, CBS’s John Dickerson, Gayle King, and Norah O’Donnell, Fox News’ Bill Shine and Jay Wallace, MSNBC’s Phil Griffin, and CNN’s Wolf Blitzer and Jeff Zucker. The meeting’s content was to be off-the-record but many participants were photographed as they entered through the Trump Tower lobby. The New York Post’s Page Six gossip site had a detailed version that appeared to put the event in the most contentious light possible.

Article continues after sponsorship

Trump started the meeting by saying how great it was for so many network news anchors to be there, calling it unprecedented and citing it as a reflection of the importance of his election. Ultimately, Blitzer noted that such meetings were a fairly common annual ritual between presidents and anchors ahead of State of the Union addresses. Trump then said the presence of the executives made the meeting unprecedented.

Trump lit out after Zucker, criticizing his former business partner (Zucker was head of NBC during Trump’s Apprentice franchise on the network) for CNN. He turned then to NBC, saying it was the worst, criticizing its reporters, and saying it could not even come up with a flattering picture to broadcast. His complaint: the network’s photographs showed him with multiple chins. NBC President Deborah Turness replied that wasn’t true – NBC right now is using a photograph that shows Trump in very flattering way, she said. Trump also criticized a reporter who he said was in the room who had moderated a debate but who he had been told was very upset when Clinton lost. Presumably that was a reference to ABC’s Martha Raddatz or NBC’s Lester Holt.

Conway interceded to say that the new Trump administration appreciated the press corps’s hard work during the campaign and wanted a reset on its relationship to the press. Trump concurred and repeated the point, though he said he disliked the phrase “reset” because it reminded him of Hillary Clinton’s initial outreach to the Russians when she was starting as Secretary of State.

Trump said he wanted a relationship with the press that was “cordial and productive.” CBS’s Gayle King asked what would constitute such a relationship but it wasn’t clear what that meant beyond off the record meetings such as that one.

After that first 10 to 15 minutes, according to this attendee, Trump invited questions about his policies, appointments, and intentions, showing an interest in detail and implications.

The participant who spoke to NPR said Trump appeared as though he was irritated but working the refs, as when then President George W. Bush complained the press was acting as the filter of his remarks and policies. However a second source – a network official debriefed by colleagues who attended – said it did not feel like a reset of the relationship to them.

The off-the-record meeting lasted about an hour. And Trump posted a video on social media – bypassing the conventional press – to explain to the public, on the record, how the presidential transition was proceeding.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Raiders Beat Texans, 27-20, In Monday Night NFL Game In Mexico City

An Oakland Raiders fan poses at the NFL Fan Fest inside the Chapultepec Park in Mexico City. The Oakland Raiders beat the Houston Texans, 27-20, at a sold-out Mexico City Azteca Stadium on Monday. Dario Lopez-Mills/AP hide caption

toggle caption

Dario Lopez-Mills/AP

Updated at 12:31 a.m. ET Tuesday:

The Oakland Raiders scored two touchdown in the fourth quarter to beat the Houston Texans, 27-20, at Azteca Stadium in Mexico City on Monday night.

Both teams grappled with a major challenge: playing at an elevation 2,000 feet higher than the players have ever confronted.

The game is only the second-ever regular-season NFL game in Mexico. The first was in 2005, also at Azteca Stadium — and at the time, set a record for regular-season attendance.

In the decade since, NFL games have been played in Toronto and London, but not at any other international venues.

“This game is the first of a three-year contract for the NFL to play in Mexico City,” The Associated Press notes, “and the league would like it to become an annual event” — just like it is in London.

USA Today notes that the game might be rough on the players. The elevation at Azteca Stadium is some 7,200 feet (compared to the highest NFL stadium, Denver’s Sports Authority Field, which is aptly called the Mile High Stadium — at 5,280 feet). And pollution can make the thin air even harder to deal with. Soccer player Eric Wynalda told the newspaper that Azteca was “the worst place ever to play.”

But at least both teams — equally unfamiliar with the venue — will be on equal footing. And the thin air will make long-distance field goal attempts easier, reports SB Nation.

The game sold out within minutes, and Mexico City residents — famous for their love for fùtbol — have enthusiasm to spare for American football, too. Over at ESPN, Carlos Alvarez Montero documented a few of the game-celebrating getups of Mexican megafans.

NPR thanks our sponsors

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Iowa Insurance Commissioner Outlines Potential Effects Of Repealing Obamacare

NPR’s Audie Cornish talks to Republican Iowa Insurance Commissioner Nick Gerhart on what a GOP push to repeal the Affordable Care Act could mean for the insurance market and the U.S. economy.

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

One of the first things Donald Trump says he’ll do as president is repeal the Affordable Care Act. That’s made a lot of people nervous about what might come next, including some Republicans who aren’t keen on Obamacare. Iowa Insurance Commissioner Nick Gerhart is one of them. Welcome to the program.

NICK GERHART: Thanks for having me.

CORNISH: Now, you wrote in a blog post about this on LinkedIn. You said people were coming up to you in church, asking about Obamacare and whether it will be repealed. What do you say to them?

GERHART: Well, you know, I tell people to take a deep breath. Nothing’s going to happen overnight. And then I also inform them that, you know, even if it’s unwound, it’s not going to happen in a quick order. It’s going to probably have a transition period.

And then finally I tell them, you know, the law is still in place today, so go and get coverage that meets your needs, still go out and find coverage that makes sense for you and your family.

CORNISH: But you still have Vice President-elect Mike Pence out there saying, yes, this will happen quickly.

GERHART: Yeah, I think they’re going to act quickly in the sense of a law. I think they’re going to either have a replacement, or I’ve read today they’ll have to a two-year transition period, you know? In my blog, I talk about, you know, if you’re going to repeal this, I hope that there’s a replacement stapled to that bill. I think I actually use those words.

And then I also talk about, you know, the need for a transition period. So I wrote the piece hoping that people would read that and, you know, hear from somebody on the ground that has been working on the Affordable Care Act for many years.

CORNISH: Right. You’ve said that an immediate repeal could have devastating consequences. What do you mean by that?

GERHART: Well, I mean folks here in Iowa and across the country are using these plans for their care for their loved ones. Some may be going through some treatments now that require that care to be in place and that coverage in place.

You know, the average Iowan doesn’t have, you know, a hundred thousand dollars sitting in a bank account to write out a check for something in these cases that could impact them, so – and what I meant by that is, you know, insurance is there to lay off or mitigate your risk that you can’t assume yourself. That’s why you buy insurance. You buy it and hope you never use it to be honest with you. But when you want and need it, you want it to work for you.

And so if people lose their health coverage and their affordable tax credits and things like that, it will cause massive disruption, and you’ll have folks that, you know – they won’t know where to turn, so they’ll go to the ERs. They’ll go for free care. It would just be – have disastrous consequences potentially for a lot of people.

CORNISH: So can there be any kind of partial repeal, or does it have to have, as you say, something stapled to it to replace it?

GERHART: Well, again, we got to keep in mind, the Affordable Care Act – 2,700 pages – right? – there’s – I don’t know – anywhere from 20,000 to 30,000 pages of regulations probably behind it. So you know, I think you have to look at what you’re looking to fix.

In my world, we spend a lot of time on the insurance piece of it obviously because that’s what I deal with. I’m the insurance commissioner. But like I’ve said time and time again here in Iowa, I don’t think really matters if we call it repeal, replace or transform. It needs a lot of work, and it needs to have some quick changes put in place because it’s not going to be sustainable on its current trajectory no matter what.

CORNISH: In your piece, you talk about this Manhattan-style project. What would that look like?

GERHART: I think if you were to put everything aside and say, we want to have the smartest people that understand medical devices, payment systems for hospitals, providers, insurers, consumers – I think would be good to have in there as well – and have a robust dialogue around what has worked with the Affordable Care Act and what hasn’t worked – you know, I think you need to look at everybody as part of this ecosystem. It’s not just the insurers. It’s the drug manufacturers. It’s the providers, the doctors, the device makers.

Everybody got a little piece of it, in my opinion, from Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act. They all got the ability, you know, to have different things in there. But I don’t think we actually addressed the cost, which is really what’s driving it. At the end of the day, the insurers are required to pay out 80 percent of every dollar towards health care.

And so from my perspective, I think we need to look at, what is driving cost? You know, it’s the chronic conditions. It’s the lifestyle choices, end of life. You know, a lot of decisions go into this. And if we don’t get our arms around it, you know, we’re going to have depressed wages. We’re going to have a drag on GDP growth. And I think we’re going to have a real problem with Medicare and Medicaid.

CORNISH: Iowa Insurance Commissioner Nick Gerhart, thank you for speaking with us.

GERHART: My pleasure. Thanks for having me.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)