Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:
Weirdified Trailer of the Day:
Aldo Jones’s latest Weird Trailer reworks the new spot for Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, and it’s a Halloween special:
[embedded content]
Horror Character Assembly of the Day:
The latest brilliant mashup from Antonio Maria da Silva brings all the icons of horror movies together for “Boogeymen’s Anthology”:
[embedded content]
Poster Mashup of the Day:
The latest great redo of the iconic poster for The Breakfast Club celebrates the cult favorite sequel Halloween III: Season of the Witch (via Kindertrauma):
Supercut of the Day:
For Fandor Keyframe, Daniel Mcilwraith compiled “looks of fear” from movies in an appropriate montage:
[embedded content]
Celebrity Cosplay of the Day:
Actress Mary Elizabeth Winstead dressed up for Halloween as Scarlett Johansson’s character from Under the Skin. Also check out a video reenactment on her Instagram.
Child Actor Cosplay of the Day:
And here’s another celebrity Halloween costume we need to share: it’s little Jacob Tremblay as Marty McFly in Back to the Future (via Collider):
Animal Cosplay of the Day:
Halloween is never complete without some great pet costumes, like this dog dressed up as Jareth from Labyrinth (via Fashionably Geek):
Vintage Image of the Day:
Peter Jackson, who turns 55 today, dressed as a stabby Santa Claus for his cameo opposite Simon Pegg in 2007’s Hot Fuzz:
Movie Trivia of the Day:
Beetlejuice is a great movie to watch on Halloween, so here’s CineFix with a bunch of trivia about Tim Burton’s classic:
[embedded content]
Classic Trailer of the Day:
Everyone’s favorite non-horror Halloween classic these days is Hocus Pocus. Watch the original trailer for the 1993 movie below.
While much of Silicon Valley has supported Hillary Clinton, billionaire investor Peter Thiel is backing Donald Trump. “We’re voting for Trump because we judge the leadership of our country to have failed,” Thiel says. Bloomberg via Getty Imageshide caption
toggle caption
Bloomberg via Getty Images
Silicon Valley is a politically liberal place — and that is reflected in where people are sending their money this election season. Ninety-five percent of contributions from tech employees to the presidential campaigns have gone to Hillary Clinton, according to Crowdpac, a group that tracks political donations.
But one well-known outlier has caused a lot of friction in the Valley.
Peter Thiel is part of what many people in the Valley call “the PayPal mafia,” a group of investors who got very rich by helping to fund PayPal. Thiel was also an early investor in Facebook and he continues to fund startups. In the left-leaning Silicon Valley, he’s a self-identified Libertarian who supported Rand Paul.
Thiel’s outside-the-box thinking is part of what many thought made him a smart investor. Then he came out in support of Donald Trump, and that was a bridge too far for some.
Ellen Pao, who runs Project Include, an organization aimed at diversity, stopped working with the startup incubator Y Combinator because Thiel is a part-time partner. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg faced calls to get Thiel off of his board, though he has refused.
Rachel Payne, a serial entrepreneur who is currently the CEO of FEM Inc., supports those who want to cut off Thiel because Trump is no ordinary candidate. “[Trump] is inciting what I like to call thrashers — violent opposition to the gains that are being made by the formerly dispossessed or the minority populations that are finally gaining rights,” she says.
Thiel once lamented the negative impact of women getting the vote and wrote that democracy and freedom are not compatible in a blog post for the libertarian Cato Institute. In a book he co-authored in 1999, Thiel said a “multicultural rape charge may indicate nothing more than a belated regret.”
Thiel has since walked back on his comments about the vote and they were updated on the blog post. He also apologized for being insensitive about rape.
But, Payne says, if you have someone like Thiel involved in a startup incubator like Y Combinator it can discourage participants.
“So if you have a challenge of getting more women in tech, for example, and attracting more women as startup founders, if women believe that he is hostile to them they wouldn’t be inclined to go there,” she says.
On Monday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., Thiel defended his position. “It’s not a lack of judgment that leads Americans to vote for Trump,” he said. “We’re voting for Trump because we judge the leadership of our country to have failed.”
It’s failed, Thiel said, by getting the U.S. into major costly conflicts around the world and by allowing bubbles that seriously harm the economy. Thiel went on to criticize Hillary Clinton for her hawkishness and took aim at those in Silicon Valley who have made Trump supporters feel unwelcome.
“Many people have learned to keep quiet if they dissent from the coastal bubble,” Thiel said. “Louder voices have sent a message that they do not intend to tolerate the views of one half of the country.”
And while many still don’t agree with Thiel, they see no reason to kick him off a board or refuse to work with him. “I definitely have my own strong opinions about Trump,” says Minnie Ingersoll, a founder and chief operating officer of Shift, a company that uses the Internet to help people get the best prices for their used car. “But I don’t believe that we should say that we wouldn’t have someone on our board who we disagree with politically.”
Ingersoll says supporting Trump may be the minority view in Silicon Valley, but all opinions should be welcome. “There are 300 people who work at Shift,” she says. “And some of them are going to support Trump and I need to find a way to make sure that they feel comfortable having a different opinion than I do. We still need to respect one another and respect differences of opinions.”
Thiel says his political views haven’t cost him financially or cost him any business relationships. In the end, it may be money, not politics, that matters most in Silicon Valley.
Teenagers are most at risk for opioid poisoning, but the rate more than doubled for toddlers from 1997 to 2012. Hero Images/Getty Imageshide caption
toggle caption
Hero Images/Getty Images
Young children and teenagers are increasingly likely to be poisoned by opioid painkillers that are often prescribed for other family members, a study finds.
The rate of children hospitalized for opioid poisoning increased 165 percent from 1997 to 2012, from about 1.40 per 100,000 kids to 3.71 per 100,000.
“Opioids are ubiquitous now,” says Julie Gaither, a postdoctoral fellow at Yale School of Public Health and the study’s lead author. “Enough opioids are prescribed every year to put a bottle of painkillers in every household. They’re everywhere, and kids are getting into them.”
The study, which was published Monday in JAMA Pediatrics, examined more than 13,000 hospital-discharge records from 1997 to 2012 for opioid poisonings and used census data to extrapolate rates. The discharge data was collected by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
The data stops in 2012, so it may not reflect more recent trends in opioid prescribing and public awareness. But the findings track with adult rates of abuse and addiction, which have dropped since 2012 but remain troublingly high, experts say.
The rate of toddlers hospitalized more than doubled, going from 0.86 per 100,000 to 2.62 per 100,000. It’s likely that these very young patients take the drugs because they think they are candy or a treat. Opioids can be dispensed as pills, patches or a flavored lollipop.
Teens are also at risk of overdosing on their parents’ meds. Of all children, this age group is most likely to be hospitalized for opioid poisoning, and teens are more likely to do be poisoned deliberately — likely, the researchers wrote, because teenagers are at a particularly high risk of depression and suicide. In 2012, 10.17 per 100,000 teenagers were hospitalized for opioid poisoning.
The findings, Gaither and her co-authors say, indicate a need for public health approaches that not only address overprescribing, but also try to raise awareness about the need for safe storage of these painkillers.
Doctors need to to talk to patients about ways to store drugs safely, especially if children are in the household, Gaither says.
That’s a good idea in theory, says Jonathan Chen, a physician at Stanford Medicine who has researched how guidelines for prescribing opioids affect primary care. But doctors already face a lengthy list of sensitive subjects they should discuss with patients. And they aren’t always conditioned to consider how a patient’s medications could affect other family members.
“Conceptually, yes, of course that should be part of the conversation,” Chen says. But he notes that doctors have a long list of things to discuss with patients, and “there’s a lot of things we should discuss.” Chen was not involved with the study.
Pediatricians could also play a role by asking parents at well-child and well-baby visits about whether there’s a risk of children being exposed to opioids. But that sort of screening hasn’t traditionally been drilled into doctors the same way as discussing other risks, such as safe storage of cleaning supplies, whether the family has a swimming pool and whether there are guns in the home.
Doctors also may not be conditioned to considering toddlers as particularly at risk of opioid poisoning.
“This is largely seen as an adolescent problem or an adult problem,” says Sharon Levy, who directs the adolescent substance abuse program at Boston Children’s Hospital and is an associate professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. “But this paper really highlights that this really knows no age boundaries.” Levy was also not involved with the study.
It’s also unclear, Levy says, what the long-term health effects, including addiction, are for children who ingest opioids they weren’t prescribed.
And there are serious short-term risks, including death. “Opioids cause respiratory suppression,” she said. “If you are a 30-pound person and getting into the medication that was supposed to be for a 150-pound person, it’s going to be a whopping dose for you.”
The findings also suggest doctors should be more thoughtful in prescribing to children, especially teenagers. About 1 in 10 high school students reports having taken opioids for a nonmedical reason, and close to 40 percent of them say they got those drugs through their own prior prescriptions.
The American Academy of Pediatrics notes that the rate of young patients being prescribed opioids almost doubled between the 1990s and 2000s.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been pushing doctors to prescribe opioids more safely by prescribing for just a few days. That could help reduce the number of leftover pills. Large prescriptions — coupled with the fact that many people don’t know how to dispose of drugs when they no longer need them — can make it easier for children and teens to get ahold of them, Gaither says.
That’s an important factor to consider, Chen says. “Leftover pills aren’t used, but do they get returned to the pharmacy, or thrown in the trash? Nope. They’re stored in the medicine cabinet.”
Smaller prescriptions will likely help, but they won’t solve everything, Chen notes. After all, there are situations where a larger opioid dosage makes sense. For instance, someone suffering long-term cancer probably needs a larger amount of heavy duty painkillers, even if he or she has children in the house.
But the risk to children must be a part of the conversation, Gaither says. “We’ve got to pay attention to children and the toll the opioid crisis is taking on them,” she says. “Kids make up about a fourth of the U.S. population, and they’re suffering from this crisis, too.”