October 9, 2016

No Image

Creepy Clown Scare Isn't Funny For The Real Clowns

In light of a recent rash of “creepy clown” sightings and incidents across the country, some working clowns say the controversy is negatively affecting their business.

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:

This next story falls under the category of funny-not-funny. If there are school-age children at your house, you’ve probably gotten wind of stories involving creepy clowns. In some two dozen states, police have reported calls claiming that creepy clowns were actually lurking in public places, causing school lockdowns in some cases. Now, most of these reports have since been debunked as hoaxes, but a few arrests have been made. And as NPR’s Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi reports, the creepy clown scare is anything but amusing for those in the funny business.

ALEXI HOROWITZ-GHAZI, BYLINE: When you ask Mr. Rainbow of Durham, N.C. how he became a professional clown, he’ll blame it on his wife.

DAVID BARTLETT: It’s my wife’s fault, yes. She signed me up for a class in balloon sculpting that I didn’t want to go to. And because we couldn’t get our money back, I went to the class.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: David Bartlett, as he’s known off the clock, quickly found he had a knack for clowning around, so he quit his job as a schoolteacher to go full-time. Every week, he performs at hospitals, office parties, colleges. And what has working almost 3,000 birthday parties taught him?

BARTLETT: It doesn’t matter what you do. It doesn’t matter what you have in your hands. The art of the clown is to take whatever you do and make people laugh.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Bartlett says he’s used to dealing with coulrophobia, or the fear of clowns. It’s part of the job. And he isn’t too worried about the latest round of scary clown sightings.

BARTLETT: It’s not affecting my business model because I’m a hometown clown in an area where they’ve known me for many years.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: But many working clowns are taking the scare a little more seriously.

MIKE WESLEY: I haven’t done a show since this began.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Mike Wesley is a retired mailman and part-time clown known as Mr. Funny Bunny in central Ohio.

WESLEY: People started calling me up and saying they’ve had second thoughts, and what else can I do?

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: He says that over his three decades in the industry, he’s watched similar panics come and go every few years.

WESLEY: And they are timed to things that involve clowns in the news.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Like the case of John Wayne Gacy in the late 1970s, the serial killer who painted prison portraits of himself dressed as a clown. Or movies like “IT,” based on Stephen King’s novel about an evil clown named Pennywise.

(SOUNDBITE OF FILM, “IT”)

TIM CURRY: (As Pennywise) I am your worst dream come true. I’m everything you ever were afraid of.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Mike Wesley says that past frenzies would typically blow over in a couple weeks, but that social media has spawned copycats around the country. And that’s made things difficult for people who clown to keep the lights on.

LORI HURLEY: I am Half-Pint, my husband is Oscar, and my children are Teaspoon, Little Squirt and Thumper.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Lori Hurley and her family are professional clowns in St. Paul, Minn.

HURLEY: Because I’m a clown, I can see the bright side and the humor in anything. But there is a real problem when people can’t distinguish the difference between the real clowns and people who dress up as clowns with the intent to scare.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: She says business is down around 20 percent since the sightings started.

HURLEY: And when we have people call and cancel bookings, it hurts my family. When I’m driving down the road as a clown and people are looking at me like I’m that bad, evil, scary clown and they’ve just heard on the radio how they should take matters into their own hands, suddenly my safety is jeopardized, as is my children.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Hurley recently came across a photo circulating on social media of a fake clown hunting permit which reads, also valid for al-Qaida, Taliban and Boko Haram.

HURLEY: When you start putting clowns up there with terrorists, then I think people need to take a step back and ask themselves, yeah, maybe it was funny in thought, but is it really funny? Because underneath the makeup – for the real clowns – are real people with real families, with real jobs.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Mr. Rainbow, aka David Bartlett, on the other hand, says this, too, shall pass. And his advice to fellow working clowns?

BARTLETT: Make them laugh. Go back to the basics of what clowning is, and they will know who you are.

HOROWITZ-GHAZI: Well, you heard the clown. Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi, NPR News.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Does Some Birth Control Raise Depression Risk? That's Complicated

The study looked at the relationship between women who used hormonal birth control, and antidepressant use, and diagnoses of serious depression. AJPhoto/Science Source hide caption

toggle caption

AJPhoto/Science Source

When the birth control pill debuted more than 50 years ago, women wanted to know: Is it safe? There wasn’t much evidence to answer that question, but women embraced the Pill as a revolutionary improvement in contraception.

Today, millions of women around the world use hormonal contraceptives that have expanded beyond the Pill to patches, implants, injections and uterine devices. Decades of research support their safety, and serious but very rare side effects such as blood clots are finally much better understood. But other areas of research lag, and we still don’t know as much as we’d like about how these medications affect women’s mental health.

So when a study came out linking hormonal birth control and depression, the headlines went wild. The stories made for good clicks, but not so great science reporting. Insufficient skepticism about a single study makes it easy to imply birth control definitely causes depression when the study shows nothing of the sort.

The study, which was conducted in Denmark and published in JAMA Psychiatry, analyzed 14 years’ worth of health data for more than 1 million women from national healthcare systems and databases not available in most other countries. It also measured depression two ways: diagnosis at a psychiatric hospital, which would be quite severe depression, or filling a prescription for antidepressants. Across the whole study, 2 percent of all women ages 15 to 34, were diagnosed with depression at a hospital and 13 percent began taking antidepressants.

Several news stories reported an 80 percent increase in risk of depression in some groups of women, but few noted that was relative risk, which is an expression of proportional increase. An 80 percent relative risk does not mean that 80 percent of women taking hormonal birth control develop depression. It means that if 10 women not taking hormonal birth control develop depression, then 18 women on the birth control will develop depression.

In this study, that 80 percent increase in relative risk referred specifically to the likelihood that those ages 15 to 19 taking combined oral contraceptives — the pill containing both progestin and estrogen — would begin taking antidepressants after going on birth control.

However, looking at absolute risks conveys a less dire interpretation. Among women not taking hormonal birth control, 1.7 percent took antidepressants and 0.28 percent received a depression diagnosis at a psychiatric hospital. By comparison, 2.2 percent of women who started birth control began taking antidepressants afterward, and 0.3 percent were diagnosed with depression at a hospital. Basically, about 0.5 percent of women who began hormonal contraception developed depression who might not have otherwise.

“Therefore for an individual woman, even one using a method of hormonal contraception, the overall probability of experiencing one of these outcomes in this study was still fairly low, particularly for diagnosis of depression,” explains Chelsea Polis, a senior research scientist at the Guttmacher Institute.

Rates of those filling antidepressant prescriptions were higher for other forms of hormonal birth control: 4.1 percent for the patch and 3.2 percent for the vaginal ring in the first year, for example. Psychiatric depression diagnoses occurred in 0.7 percent of patch users and 0.6 percent of vaginal ring users.

Even in terms of relative risk, though, many of the risk increases were modest: Among all women taking the combined pill, the increased risk was 10 percent for depression diagnosis and 20 percent for using antidepressants after statistically adjusting for women’s age, educational level, weight and history of endometriosis or polycystic ovary syndrome, all factors that could influence depression risk.

Other increased risks ranged from 20 to 70 percent for all women, depending on contraception type. The largest increases — up to triple the likelihood of starting antidepressants — occurred among teens using the ring or patch.

Another thing to consider is that these numbers represent correlations — two things occurring at the same time that may or may not be linked.

“Depression is common. Contraception use is common. So both of those things are commonly going to occur together,” explains Jeffrey Jensen, a professor of reproductive & developmental sciences and director of the Women’s Health Research Unit at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland.

The study used several methods to reduce the possibility that other things could be causing depression. Jensen pointed out that women who are more likely to take hormones for contraception would probably also be more likely to take antidepressants for depression, but the authors did a separate analysis to compare women to themselves before and after beginning contraception and still found a depression risk.

None of this means that birth control does not cause depression, but it doesn’t mean it does, either. Since a half percent of millions of women taking birth control adds up, it’s important to know whether such a large number of women could be more susceptible to depression, which can be a very serious illness, after starting hormonal contraception.

But it’s complicated, and subtle.

For example, the study also found that depression risk peaked six months after women began using contraceptives, but then decreased to the point that women using hormonal contraception for four years actually had lower rates of depression than those not taking it. Though this likely resulted from many women with depression stopping their birth control, those findings match up with a previous large study finding a protective effect against depression with hormonal contraception. But the studies were done differently: The earlier study included only sexually active women, unlike the new study.

“Unfortunately, the analysis did not provide information on the frequency of depression diagnoses or antidepressant use among women using nonhormonal methods of contraception, such as copper IUDs,” says Polis. “Such a comparison would help to clarify whether the associations were related to other factors common to women choosing to use contraception, rather than being specifically related to the hormonal content of certain contraceptive methods.”

For example, those who become sexually active in adolescence have a higher risk for depression and anxiety, as previous research has shown. Even among women in their 20s and 30s, the decision to begin hormonal contraception may accompany various other circumstances in their lives that could potentially increase the risk of depression or anxiety — not a stretch when the study identifies just a half percent of women with the increased risk.

But the possibility that sexual initiation might come with mental health risks baffled study co-author Lidegaard. “Sexual relationships are a good experience for the majority of women, so I cannot see why women would get depressed by starting sexual relationships,” Lidegaard said in an interview. He pointed out that women not in relationships may experience loneliness, a risk factor for depression, but when asked about single women having sex, he said he believes “the majority feel more happy by realizing how wonderful sexual experiences can be. Why should women get depressed from that?”

What this study does do is suggest that women may respond differently to hormones and medical treatments.

“Doctors should perhaps be more careful when they prescribe hormonal contraception to young women and get a history of previous depression first,” Lidegaard says.

There’s no question that women are going to respond differently to hormonal contraception. But those differences are not well understood.

“We’re all very, very different, and we’re moving in the direction of precision medicine,” adds Catherine Monk, an associate professor of psychiatry and director of research at the Women’s Program at Columbia University Medical Center. “There are some women who are just much more sensitive to these hormone changes.”

The higher risk of depression found among teenage girls, both Monk and Lidegaard pointed out, might be biological, since teens may be more sensitive to the hormonal changes happening during puberty.

“You need to know yourself and be really informed,” Monk says. “If I were of an age and reading this article right now, I would want to be thinking, ‘Who am I? Am I sometimes who has moodiness around my periods?’ ” She notes the importance of each woman considering these findings in conjunction with what she knows about her own body and her own circumstances.

Philosophical differences about medicine may also influence how people interpret these findings in the absence of studies showing causation. Jensen, for example, pointed out that women in developed countries no longer see other women dying during childbirth, illegal, unsafe abortions or other devastating health effects of unplanned pregnancy, and have come to places less value the effectiveness of hormonal birth control.

“Women are more skeptical of using hormonal therapy than ever before,” Jensen says. “It’s a tragedy of the riches. If you really want to be depressed, have an unintended pregnancy.”

Toward the other end of the spectrum, Monk believes we may have gone too far in using hormones to control contraception. “Getting away from barrier methods of contraception is getting away from our bodies,” she says, and she would like to see a much larger range of options for contraception for men and women.

The fact that dissent rages over this issue points out a larger question about women’s health research.

“Understanding women’s health has been neglected, and there’s not enough research into understanding our hormones,” Monk says. “This is partially a story about women’s health research and how we need more of it.”

Tara Haelle is the co-author of The Informed Parent: A Science-Based Resource for Your Child’s First Four Years. She’s on Twitter: @tarahaelle

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Let's Play Ball: Who's Who In The Baseball Playoffs

Rachel Martin and Mike Pesca of Slate’s The Gist podcast talk about the trend of under-performing pitchers in baseball’s post-season.

RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:

And it’s time now for sports.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

MARTIN: It’s the playoffs – the baseball playoffs, where heroes and goats are made, or so I’m told. Mike Pesca of “The Gist” joins us from the studios of Slate in New York. Hi, Mike.

MIKE PESCA, BYLINE: Hi. The goats – let us talk of the goats.

MARTIN: The goats. OK, truth be told, I’d never heard of this expression until hours ago, but everyone tells me this is a thing. I don’t even understand what it means. Heroes and…

PESCA: …A goat? Yeah…

MARTIN: …I understand what a goat is, but I don’t understand the relevance in baseball.

PESCA: Scapegoat.

MARTIN: Oh.

PESCA: Oh, there’s so much relevance we can’t even get into. Like, there’s this curse…

MARTIN: …Oh, we can’t even get into it.

PESCA: There’s this curse of the goats with the Cubs. And GOAT is also an acronym for Greatest of All Time. But we’re going to talk about the goats who are the heels, the guys who let their teams down.

MARTIN: OK, so there’s two pitchers who are getting a lot of attention right now. Who are they?

PESCA: Yes, David Price and Clayton Kershaw, two of the best pitchers. I should say that Clayton Kershaw of the Dodgers is just the best pitcher in baseball. He’s 28 years old. He’s going to the Hall of Fame. Right now, he’d probably make the Hall of Fame, actually, even if he quit tomorrow. And David Price is also a great pitcher. To give you some idea of how great they are, Clayton Kershaw gets paid $34 million a year, David Price $30 million a year.

And yet when it comes to the big stage both of these guys, to varying degrees, are disappointing. And it happened in the first game that each of them pitched in the playoffs. Especially David Price, a guy getting paid $30 million dollars a year, you’d hope he could get out of the fourth inning. But he couldn’t, once again letting his team down. Whereas Kershaw just wasn’t his normal dazzling self. But he does have a history in the playoffs of sometimes getting bombed.

MARTIN: So is that just ’cause it’s the playoffs and there’s a lot of pressure? I mean, but – what’s the deal?

PESCA: OK, I think there are two different guys, two different explanations. I think first of all, Kershaw is being compared to his usual regular-season self. And here’s a guy who has, you know, 170 strikeouts in a year and 11 walks – just spectacular. So if he pitches only pretty good in the playoffs in his first game – seven innings, three runs – that’s pretty good. We’re going to say a little disappointing. And the couple of games where he was really bad, which were a couple playoff games against the Cardinals – gave up big home runs – you say, what’s up with Kershaw?

Price, on the other hand, I do think something’s going on. It’s very hard to prove, but if you listen to interviews with other players or ex-players they say he’s maybe playing – trying too hard, gripping his balls a little hard, trying to be perfect. And when you try to be perfect and you aim instead of throw, bad things can happen. I think that there’s maybe enough evidence to say that David Price is mentally taking himself out of games.

MARTIN: And, I mean, these guys – just higher stakes – right? – compared to the hitters. The pitchers have to be good all the time, every time.

PESCA: Well, that’s a good – that’s a good thing to think about. A pitcher starts off with an ERA of 0 and can only get bad from there. A hitter starts off with a batting average of 0 but can only get good from there. So one swing of the bat can rehabilitate or make a hero in terms of a batter, but a pitcher has to be very good and consistent throughout. But to be fair or to be honest with David Price, he just has been a bad playoff pitcher. Although, you know, they’re down two games to nothing. If the Red Sox come back he could, you know, rewrite history. I just doubt we’ll see that. Kershaw can rehabilitate his image without any miraculous comeback. They’re up in their series.

MARTIN: Mike Pesca. He’s our own GOAT. He also hosts “The Gist.”

PESCA: Wait, the good kind, right?

MARTIN: That’s a compliment. The good kind.

PESCA: Yes, OK, thanks.

MARTIN: Greatest of All Time. Thanks so much, Mike.

PESCA: You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)