August 10, 2016

No Image

This Is the Moment That Saved 'Sausage Party,' According to Seth Rogen

Typically a movie starring insanely funny people like Seth Rogen, Kristen Wiig, Nick Kroll, Danny McBride, and Craig Robinson wouldn’t need to be saved. Moviegoers would see those names, realize the combination of all those people will certainly produce something funny (and perhaps even magical), and they’d happily head out to the theater to check it out.

Not the case with Sausage Party, which is inherently risky because it’s the rare R-rated animated comedy. We haven’t seen an R-rated animated comedy in wide release since 2007’s Aqua Teen Hunger Force, and to find the only memorable and reasonably successful R-rated animated comedy in recent years, we have to go all the way back to 1999’s South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut. What both of those have that Sausage Party doesn’t is a built-in audience full of people who are fans of the pre-existing television shows. In the case of Sausage Party, we’re looking at a completely original animated movie that needs to work a little harder to convince people to take a chance on it.

Back in March, the folks from Sausage Party (including cowriters Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg) took a big chance when they brought a highly unfinished version to the SXSW Film Festival. When Fandango spoke to Rogen in advance of the film’s release this week, he said this was the moment that changed everything for the movie.

“It was a very risky move, honestly,” he said. “To show a really unfinished version of the movie so early. Because if that went bad, it would’ve just destroyed us from the get-go. The studio probably would’ve rightfully just bailed on it.”

[embedded content]

In recent years, SXSW has debuted upcoming studio comedies like Forgetting Sarah Marshall, Get Hard, Spy and even Rogen’s own Neighbors, but Sausage Party was a completely different story mainly because it’s an animated movie and it wasn’t even close to being done at the time.

“We knew it was our only shot,” Rogen said. “We knew that the only way we could prove to the people we needed to prove ourselves to was to just show it as soon as we could to an audience who we thought would appreciate it. We just hoped that if it goes well, it would set us on a course that would lead us to the victory we all hope we get. And if it doesn’t, then we took our swing. It was the only idea we had. We couldn’t just hope that people accept this. We knew it was so strange, we had to get people behind it early and hopefully get people talking about it.”

Amusingly, Rogen fully admits the concept behind Sausage Party sounds really stupid on paper, and just trying to sell that without any assistance from people who’ve seen it and believe in it would’ve been an uphill battle the film may not have been able to endure.

“We were also aware that a movie called Sausage Party about a talking hot dog is potentially the stupidest f***ing movie on earth, and I’m sure many people will say it is the stupidest f***ing movie on earth,” Rogen joked. “But the fact that the first few things that were said about it actually seemed to get what we were going for was hugely beneficial to us and is the reason why the studio put a lot behind it and why it’s getting more attention than what potentially could be a 90-minute sketch. To us, that’s part of the fun of the challenge — is to take these ideas that seem unmakeable and try to make them.”

Sausage Party hits theaters on August 12.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

'Because I Can': Cyclist Kristin Armstrong Wins Third Gold Medal At Age 42

Time trial champion Kristin Armstrong of the U.S. calls her life as a working mom the "secret weapon" that helped her win Olympic gold Wednesday.

Time trial champion Kristin Armstrong of the U.S. calls her life as a working mom the “secret weapon” that helped her win Olympic gold Wednesday. Bryn Lennon/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Bryn Lennon/Getty Images

Cyclist Kristin Armstrong has a regular job and a son. And as of today, she also has three Olympic gold medals. After becoming the only cyclist – male or female – to win three consecutive golds in the same discipline, Armstrong, who turns 43 Thursday, said she hopes to inspire other moms.

After calling this victory at Rio’s Summer Olympics “the most gratifying” of her three individual championships, Armstrong urged other female athletes not to let negative ideas seep into their minds about what they’re capable of.

She said:

“I think that for so long we’ve been told that we should be finished at a certain age. And I think that there’s a lot of athletes out there that are actually showing that that’s not true.

“For all the moms out there, I hope that this was a very inspiring day.”

She then discussed the importance of balance in her life as a world-beating athlete:

“Working at a great hospital in Boise, Idaho, and being a mom has been my secret weapon. It provides me balance and it keeps me on track and it keeps me super focused.”

Focus is always important in a time trial, but on Thursday, it was as much about survival as success: While yesterday’s sunny weather would have been ideal for a ride, conditions turned nasty overnight, with a soaking rain forcing Armstrong and the other riders – who start time trials at intervals and ride without any teammates – to deal with slippery road conditions on a hilly, technical course.

Armstrong said she relied on her experience today to average nearly 25 mph over the course. She was close to the lead throughout — but she said she found another burst of energy toward the end, when her coach radioed to tell her, “You’re in the medals. Now it’s up to you what color you want to bring home.”

As Armstrong recalled, “That hit me really hard. All of a sudden, I think my speed went from about 48k an hour (nearly 30 mph) to 53k an hour (nearly 33 mph).”

A two-time world champion in the time trial, Armstrong has real stature in the cycling world. But if you’re not familiar with her, it could be because she doesn’t have glitzy endorsement deals that make her a household name. Armstrong and her family live in Idaho, where she works at a hospital and trains when she finds time to ride her bike.

After today’s race, Armstrong told reporters that she has repeatedly faced questions about why she’s come out of retirement and still wants to compete at an elite level despite her age and the several hip surgeries she underwent back in 2013.

A clever answer would be nice to have, Armstrong said, but she adds that she has only one reply: “Because I can.”

As for her job, Armstrong works at St. Luke’s hospital in Boise, where she’s the director of community health. She was allowed to cut her hours down to 16 hours a week last fall, she said, so her family’s health insurance would remain in effect while she trained for the Rio Summer Games. Her son, Lucas, was born in 2010.

Armstrong said she spends her says working with non-profit groups, bridging a gap between physicians and disease prevention programs.

“It’s a dream job,” she said. “I love it.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Social Security Data Errors Can Turn People Into The Living Dead

Bad data in means bad data out.

Bad data in means bad data out. Gary Waters/Ikon Images/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Gary Waters/Ikon Images/Getty Images

A few months ago, when Dr. Thomas Lee logged in to his patients’ electronic medical records to renew a prescription, something unexpected popped up. It was a notice that one of them had died.

Lee, a primary care doctor at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, was scheduled to see the patient in three days.

“I was horrified,” he says. The patient had been in his 80s, and his wife had died a few months before. “And everyone in medicine knows that when someone dies, there’s an increase in risk of death for their spouse over the next six months.”

He wanted to know what had happened, but he couldn’t find anything in the medical records or in a Web search. “I just felt really guilty that I had not pushed harder to get him in sooner,” says Lee. When he couldn’t find out anything, he decided to phone the man’s house to offer condolences — maybe even to apologize.

“So I called, and to my shock he answered,” says Lee. It was the patient, a retired professor living in Boston.

“I assume you’re calling about my death,” the man said.

“It gave me goose bumps,” says Lee. “I said, ‘Yeah, I guess I am.’ And then he explained to me what had happened.”

The professor explained that he’d been dealing with his own death for the past two weeks. It all started when he went to the ATM, only to find that he no longer had access to his bank account. When he went to the pharmacy to pick up his medicine, he found he no longer had health insurance.

Soon after, he got a letter in the mail from the Social Security Administration offering condolences about his recent loss of life and informing him that his monthly payments would end and that payments made since his “death” a few months prior would be removed from his bank account.

Because of a clerical error, the Social Security Administration believed he had died in December. That information had quickly spread to banks, pharmacies, hospitals. His doctor’s appointments had been wiped out and other patients had taken his place. Essentially, he’d been locked out of his life.

“It was a major nuisance, let’s put it that way,” he says. And to add insult to death, says the professor, “Social Security actually gave my date of death as the same date as my wife’s, which was really creepy. Not pleasant to see.”

He spent weeks on the phone trying to correct it all. In the process (which was reminiscent of a certain Monty Python skit), the man learned that because he had supposedly died, all his information — his full name, Social Security number, birthday and supposed death date — had been released to the public in a document called the Death Master File.

The publication of the file is a measure taken to prevent fraud, such as someone taking out a credit card in a deceased person’s name. But for those who are still living, the file is a recipe for identity theft. (That’s why we’re not naming the man.)

“I’m keeping an eye out fairly carefully to see if anything goes awry,” he says. “But it’s also somewhat amusing to know that you really are alive when everybody thinks you’re dead.” He even got a hug from a surprised doctor who didn’t expect him to show up for his canceled appointment, let alone in relatively good health.

It took about two months to resurrect him in the federal system.

And as Lee wrote this week in the New England Journal of Medicine, what happened to the professor happens to thousands of people each year.

“When we called the information system folks to bring him back to life, the response that we got was, ‘Oh no! Not another one,’ ” says Lee. There’s even a frequently asked question about it on the Social Security Administration’s website.

“And this is where I made the transition from thinking about this as something funny to something important,” says Lee. “We have a society where information travels quickly and there are many great things about it, but what if that information is wrong? There just is no process in most information systems for saying ‘Oops, we were wrong.’ “

In 2011, an audit found that about 1,000 people a month in the U.S. were marked deceased when they were very much alive. Rona Lawson, who works in the Office of the Inspector General at the Social Security Administration, says that number has gone down. It’s now around 500 people a month.

“But for those 500 people, it’s still a big impact on their lives, so we’d like to see the number even lower,” she says. Because most of them are Social Security clients, she says, they likely tend to be retired and over the age of 60.

Lawson says 90 percent of the time, the cascade of misinformation starts with an input error by Social Security staff — a regular mistake on a regular office day that just happens to kill a person off, at least on paper.

And she says the professor’s case, where someone is given the death date of their spouse, is fairly common.

“Oh, yes,” says Lawson. “That was a very common cause for the errors that we saw.”

In 2011, Congress passed legislation to remove a few pieces of information from the Death Master File – the state, county and ZIP code where a person lives or lived. And in 2013, based on recommendations by Lawson and her colleagues, Congress passed another piece of legislation to keep a person’s information from becoming public until 3 years after their death date. The change will kick in in late November.

“So, that’s an improvement — more time to get it right before it gets into the public domain and starts spreading to all the different websites and so forth,” says Lawson.

She says the information would still go to authorized users like banks and credit reporting agencies, so while the change might keep back identity thieves, it wouldn’t do much to prevent the headache that the retired academic went through.

“At least we can keep the information restricted to those who have a right to know it and not just everybody that has an Internet access point,” says Lawson.

But wait a minute. Putting aside the headache of having to convince everyone you’re still alive just so you can withdraw cash from an ATM, or pick up your prescriptions, might a fake death be seen as an opportunity? Maybe to disappear to a tropical island and start a new life?

“I never thought of that,” says the professor. “But that might have been an interesting way to proceed.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Slaughterhouses Often Face Meager Safety Violations, Critics Say

Hundreds of thousands of people go to work each day preparing the beef, pork and poultry that ends up on our dinner tables. Their workplace is among the most hazardous in the country. Slaughterhouses — while safer than they were decades ago — can exact a steep price from workers. As it tries to enforce safety rules, the government fines the businesses for violations, but one former official calls those fines ineffective and “embarrassingly low.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)