August 9, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Suicide Squad' With Dogs, Jake Gyllenhaal Stars in Marvel's 'Moon Knight' and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Fake Marvel Show of the Day:

Jake Gyllenhaal stars in a fan-made teaser for the nonexistent Netflix Marvel series Moon Knight (via Live for Films):

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

See a poodle named Mitzy made up to look like Harley Quinn and then inserted into Suicide Squad scenes:

[embedded content]

Musical Mashup of the Day:

Watch the characters from 230 different movies cut together to sing The Offspring’s “Pretty Fly (for a White Guy)”:

[embedded content]

Concert Performance of the Day:

Dr. Teeth and the Electric Mayhem played a live set, including “Can You Picture That” from The Muppet Movie, at the Outside Lands 2016 concert in San Francisco over the weekend (via Neatorama):

[embedded content]

Custom Build of the Day:

Vintage Works turned a motorcycle into a (non-flying) Return of the Jedi style Speeder Bike, as seen in the video below. You can see the test drive video at /Film.

[embedded content]

Perspective of the Day:

See how small Godzilla really was in his original movie with these photos illustrating how he’d look next to the Tokyo buildings of today (via Geekologie):

Movie Trivia of the Day:

CineFix randomly presents seven obscure bits of trivia about the 1990 Tim Burton classic Edward Scissorhands:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Jean-Pierre Jeunet directs Audrey Tautou, who turns 40 today, and Mathieu Kassovitz for a scene in 2001’s Amelie:

Genre Study of the Day:

Frame by Frame looks at the action sub-subgenre known as Gun Fu, highlighting movies by John Woo and those filmmakers he influenced:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 25th anniversary of the release of Double Impact. Watch the original trailer for the action movie, which stars Jean Claude Van Damme as twins, below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

U.S. Women's Gymnastics Team Wins Gold Medal

The U.S. women’s gymnastics team won a gold medal on Tuesday in Rio. The team won convincingly by posting the highest combined score in vault, uneven bars, balance beam and floor exercise.

Transcript

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

Today the world’s best women gymnasts competed in team finals at the Olympics in Rio de Janeiro. Going in, the Americans were ranked No. 1 in everything – vault, uneven bars, balance beam and floor exercise. And here is where we will offer a spoiler alert. Those of you who want to wait for the tape delay tonight on NBC should turn the volume down for the next few minutes. For the rest of you, we are joined by NPR’s Russell Lewis, who is at the vent. Hi, Russell.

RUSSELL LEWIS, BYLINE: Hey there.

SHAPIRO: OK, so spoil this for us. How did the U.S. team do?

LEWIS: Well, is it any surprise if I tell you that they won gold, and they won gold convincingly. It was the largest margin of victory in an Olympic women’s team final since the Soviet Union – remember when we used to call it that?

SHAPIRO: (Laughter) Right.

LEWIS: …Defeated Czechoslovakia – remember when we used to call it that?

SHAPIRO: Oh, that used to be a country.

LEWIS: …Back in 1960. This is how good the U.S. was tonight – the U.S. team. And really, let’s name all of the gymnasts on the team – so Simone Biles, Gabby Douglas, Aly Raisman, Laurie Hernandez and Madison Kocian.

The U.S. posted the highest combined score on each of the four apparatuses. So that’s the vault, the uneven bars, the balance beam and the floor exercise. When you do that, Ari, you’re going to win.

SHAPIRO: We know that seven other teams competed in the team finals. Traditionally Russia and China are gymnastics powerhouses. You said the U.S. win was convincingly. How close were these other teams?

LEWIS: Well, in a word – no, not even close. I mean Russia did end up winning the silver, and China took the bronze. But let’s do some math here. The U.S. scored just shy of 185 points. Russia took the silver eight points behind. China took the bronze.

Eight points behind – Ari, this is a sport that is routinely measured in tenths of a point, in hundredths of a point. And the U.S. won the finals by eight points. That’s how good the U.S. was tonight.

SHAPIRO: Let’s talk about one member of the team specifically – 19-year-old Simon Biles. This is her first Olympics, and before it even started, commentators were calling her the best ever. Did she fulfill expectations?

LEWIS: You know, there are no shortage of superlatives when it comes to Simone Biles. I mean at 19, she’s already a superstar. And there are some who argue that she might be the best gymnast of all time. She’s the reigning three-time world champion. She – you know, she could win five golds this Olympics – five golds. I mean that just sort of says something about, you know, who she is and how good that she is.

In fact when she was on the floor exercise, she was the final competitor tonight. Other athletes from other countries were watching her compete, were standing up, clapping and cheering because that’s how well she did tonight.

SHAPIRO: And many opportunities yet ahead to medal. What’s coming up?

LEWIS: Well, the all-around competition – the individual all-around competition is on Thursday. Simon Biles will be competing along with teammate Aly Raisman. There are individual event finals also for several days this week. Simon will be competing in the individual event finals on vault, on balance beam and on floor exercise.

Biles won’t be alone in the event finals. On the uneven bars – Madison Kocian and Gabby Douglas. On the balance beam – Laurie Hernandez. And on the floor exercise with Simon Biles – Aly Raisman. So, Ari, there is lots more gymnastics to go here in Rio.

SHAPIRO: NPR’s Russell Lewis, who is at the women’s gymnastics team final at the Summer Olympics in Rio – thank you, Russell.

LEWIS: You’re welcome.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Utility Giant PG&E Convicted of Violating Gas Pipeline Safety Laws

A natural gas line lies broken in San Bruno, Calif., after a massive explosion on September 9, 2010. A federal jury found Pacific Gas & Electric Co., California's largest utility, guilty of misleading investigators about how it was identifying high-risk pipelines.

A natural gas line lies broken in San Bruno, Calif., after a massive explosion on September 9, 2010. A federal jury found Pacific Gas & Electric Co., California’s largest utility, guilty of misleading investigators about how it was identifying high-risk pipelines. Noah Berger/AP hide caption

toggle caption Noah Berger/AP

A federal jury found Pacific Gas and Electric Company guilty on five felony counts of failing to adequately inspect its gas pipelines before the blast that incinerated a neighborhood in San Bruno, Calif., in September 2010. The utility was also found guilty of one count of misleading federal investigators about the standard it used to identify high-risk pipelines.

PG&E was acquitted on six other charges of violating pipeline safety laws.

The blast came without warning in the early evening. It killed eight people, seriously injured 38 others and destroyed 58 homes in the suburb just south of San Francisco.

The explosion was caused by a bad internal seam weld in a pipeline installed in the 1950s. According to PG&E records, that weld didn’t exist.

Government prosecutors argued during the trial that PG&E maintained shoddy records and failed to monitor aging pipelines. They said PG&E managers knew that their records were unreliable. One company memo described the database as containing “a ton of errors.

The utility was acquitted on charges of knowingly failing to maintain proper records. But it was found guilty of the most serious charges: failing to identify high-risk pipelines, not prioritizing the most serious hazards, and not using the most accurate means for inspecting pipelines.

The company defense was to portray itself as a collection of hard-working employees who performed to the best of their abilities in the face of ambiguous regulations.

The trial lasted for more than a month and the jury deliberated for over seven days.

The utility faces a maximum penalty of $3 million, or $500,000 for each count. The government originally sought $562 million in potential penalties. That would have been twice the amount of money prosecutors argued that PG&E saved by cutting safety programs. But last week prosecutors shocked many court-watchers by slashing the potential fines.

Prosecutors had no immediate comment following the verdict.

In a statement, PG&E said: “We have made unprecedented progress in the nearly six years since the tragic San Bruno accident and we are committed to maintaining our focus on safety. We want our customers and their families to know that we are committed to re-earning their trust.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Young Inventors Work On Secret Proteins To Thwart Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria

Christian Choe, Zach Rosenthal, and Maria Filsinger Interrante, who call themselves Team Lyseia, strategize about experiments to test their new antibiotics.

Christian Choe, Zach Rosenthal, and Maria Filsinger Interrante, who call themselves Team Lyseia, strategize about experiments to test their new antibiotics. Linda A. Cicero/Stanford News /Courtesy of Stanford University hide caption

toggle caption Linda A. Cicero/Stanford News /Courtesy of Stanford University

Three college-age scientists think they know how to solve a huge problem facing medicine. They think they’ve found a way to overcome antibiotic resistance.

Many of the most powerful antibiotics have lost their efficacy against dangerous bacteria, so finding new antibiotics is a priority.

It’s too soon to say for sure if the young researchers are right, but if gumption and enthusiasm count for anything, they stand a fighting chance.

I met Zach Rosenthal, Christian Choe and Maria Filsinger Interrante in the lower level of the Shriram Center for Bioengineering & Chemical Engineering on the campus of Stanford University.

Filsinger Interrante just graduated from Stanford and is now in an M.D./Ph.D. program. Rosenthal and Choe are rising seniors.

Last October, Stanford launched a competition for students interested in developing solutions for big problems in health care. Not just theoretical solutions, but practical, patentable solutions that could lead to real products.

The three young scientists thought they had figured out a way to make a set of proteins that would kill antibiotic resistant bacteria.

They convinced a jury of Stanford faculty, biotech types and investors that they were onto something, and got $10,000 to develop their idea.

“And we want to see if our proteins are more effective at killing these resistant bacteria than what’s currently available,” says Filsinger Interrante.

Choe says there’s a reason industry hasn’t solved the antibiotic crisis.

Christian Choe seals a plate with E. coli bacteria that contain a ring of genetic material to produce the antibiotic protein.

Christian Choe seals a plate with E. coli bacteria that contain a ring of genetic material to produce the antibiotic protein. Linda A. Cicero/Stanford News /Courtesy of Stanford University hide caption

toggle caption Linda A. Cicero/Stanford News /Courtesy of Stanford University

“Big pharmaceutical companies aren’t that interested in pursuing antibiotics,” he says, “largely because the market size is small, and because bacteria develop resistance relatively quickly.”

But these young entrepreneurs think they’ve licked the resistance problem.

“The way that our proteins operate, that if the bacteria evolve resistance to them, actually the bacteria can no longer live anymore,” says Rosenthal. “We target something that’s essential to bacterial survival.”

Bacteria have managed to evolve a way around even the most sophisticated attempts to kill them, so I was curious to know more about how the proteins these young inventors say they’ve found worked.

“We’re not able to disclose, unfortunately,” says Filsinger Interrante. It’s their intellectual property, she explains, that they hope will attract investors. “We think that our protein has the potential to target very dangerous, multidrug-resistant bacteria.”

“I’ve been working in the field of antibiotics for the past 25 years and this is as good as any an idea as I’ve heard,” says Chaitan Khosla, a professor of chemical engineering and chemistry at Stanford. He’s also the director of a new program called ChEM-H, for Chemistry, Engineering & Medicine for Human Health, that’s supporting the students’ hunt for a new antibiotic.

But Khosla warns that many good ideas fall by the wayside, and even if the team’s proteins clear the initial hurdles, it would be years or decades before there’s a product ready to bring to market.

The trio are aware of the long odds. But for now, Rosenthal says they’re going to give it all they’ve got, even it means working late into the night, after classes and other commitments are finished.

“I lose some sleep, but I love what I’m doing, so it’s worth it,” he says.

The team reports preliminary results for their new antibiotic proteins are looking good, so all that work may be paying off.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Songs We Love: Slavic Soul Party!, 'Bluebird Of Delhi'

Slavic Soul Party!

Slavic Soul Party! Courtesy of the artist hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of the artist

The central equation behind Slavic Soul Party! is self-explanatory: an American black-music spin on the Balkan brass band. The net product is akin to a New-Orleans-style brass band, but with different percussion timbres, horn trills and glissandi. (Also, accordion, because Europe.) It’s the sort of multiculti collision you see forged in major population centers; you may be interested to know the band has a standing Tuesday night gig at a Brooklyn bar which specializes in international music.

The band’s upcoming release adds more stamps to its passport, by proxy — it’s a full re-arrangement of Duke Ellington and Billy Strayhorn‘s late-career masterpiece The Far East Suite, an LP inspired by a trip to the Middle East and South Asia. (“Far East” is a bit of a misnomer.) The cry of an Indian mynah bird birthed the clarinet melody you hear on “Bluebird Of Delhi.” Ellington and Strayhorn then filled in the brooding bass line, the secondary theme and a relaxed swing beat.

Slavic Soul Party!, Plays Duke Ellington's Far East Suite.

Slavic Soul Party!, Plays Duke Ellington’s Far East Suite. Courtesy of the artist hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of the artist

It’s great source material to start with, but what Slavic Soul Party! does with it is the neato trick to watch out for. The bass line becomes an ominous brass blast over which a trumpet blares and folky percussion rumbles (Chris Stromquist on snare, bandleader Matt Moran on a bass-drum-like instrument). Instead of classic big-band swing, parade funk switches on instantly, the high of a lithe clarinet (Peter Hess) against the low of active tuba bass (Ron Caswell). The climax and denouement are almost the same — so as not to mess with a good thing — though the act of reimagination in multiple dialects at once ensures a much different path to its arrival.

In spite of all that’s going on, it totally works. Alternatively, because of everything that goes on, the total package works.

Slavic Soul Party! Plays Duke Ellington’s Far East Suite comes out Sept. 16 via Ropeadope.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)