August 1, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Marvel vs. DC Trailer, Boba Fett vs. Predator and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Fake Movie of the Day:

Another fan trailer for a Marvel vs. DC movie, this time with the X-Men included, shows how intense it would be:

[embedded content]

Mashup of the Day:

In this 8-bit animation, we see what it would be like for Boba Fett to battle the Predator in video game form:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

In anticipation of the the Summer Olympics in Rio, Darth Blender compiled a cool montage of athletic competition in the movies:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Sam Mendes, who turns 51 today, directs Kevin Spacey and Annette Bening in a scene for his 1999 directorial debut, American Beauty:

Movie Homage of the Day:

Check out an animated flipbook based on Stranger Things that pays homage to its E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial homage-paying (via io9):

[embedded content]

Movie Comparison of the Day:

Speaking of inspiration, this side-by-side clip makes it clear The Shining was influenced by the silent Swedish film The Phantom Carriage:

inspiration? pic.twitter.com/xkO2rAM4Cw

— Rabih Alameddine (@rabihalameddine) July 31, 2016

Video Essay of the Day:

Speaking of Stanley Kubrick, here’s a BFI video essay on how he used new technology for the period piece Barry Lyndon:

[embedded content]

Film History of the Day:

Now You See It highlights the rises and falls of Hollywood for more than 100 years:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

The Return of the Jedi-inspired Rancor costume showcased in detail in the New York Magazine video below was a favorite at Comic-Con last month:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 30th anniversary of the release of Howard the Duck. Watch the original trailer for the Marvel Comics adaptation below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Olympic Victory And Defeat, Frame By Frame

The triumph of victory at the Olympics

The triumph of victory at the Olympics Scott Pakulski/Flickr hide caption

toggle caption Scott Pakulski/Flickr

It may sound trite, but the Olympic Games truly are a chance to witness what unites us all as human beings: Our joy in triumph and our anguish in defeat.

David Matsumoto believes this truism, but on an entirely different level.

Matsumoto is a professor of psychology at San Francisco State University and a former Olympic judo coach. He has analyzed the behavior of Olympic athletes. He spoke recently with Shankar Vedantam about what his research reveals.

Matsumoto and his colleagues used a high-speed camera to analyze the faces of judo players immediately after the medal matches at the 2004 Olympic games in Athens. They examined 84 athletes from 35 different countries. The study found striking similarities in how athletes responded in the first milliseconds following victory (smiling) or defeat (sadness or no expression). The athletes’ responses eventually diverged in culturally specific ways, but not before displaying consistent expressions. Previous research has shown similar results, but Matsumoto says this was the first study set in such a high-stakes, real-world competitive environment.

The findings suggest humans’ immediate reactions to victory and defeat are universal in nature. But Matsumoto couldn’t rule out the possibility that these consistent reactions were all learned by athletes after watching others.

That is, until he turned his lens to the Paralympic Games. In Paralympic judo, the players are all blind.

Matsumoto and his colleagues did a follow-up study examining the faces of blind judo players in the 2004 Paralympic Games, including those who were born blind. The congenitally blind athletes were unable to have learned expressions through sight.

So when their reactions lined up with all the others athletes’, including the sighted athletes from the previous study, Matsumoto had even stronger evidence to suggest that our spontaneous reactions to winning and losing are simply part of our nature, not nurture.

The Hidden Brain Podcast is hosted by Shankar Vedantam and produced by Kara McGuirk-Alison, Jennifer Schmidt, Maggie Penman, and Chris Benderev. To subscribe to our newsletter, click here. You can also follow us on Twitter @hiddenbrain, @karamcguirk, @maggiepenman, @jennyjennyschmi and @cbndrv, and listen for Hidden Brain stories every week on your local public radio station.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

FDA-Approved Knock-Offs Of Biotech Drugs Could Safely Save Big Bucks

In 2015, the Sandoz unit of drugmaker Novartis won Food and Drug Administration approval of a drug called Zarxio, which is similar to Amgen's Neupogen, a medicine that boosts the production of white blood cells.

In 2015, the Sandoz unit of drugmaker Novartis won Food and Drug Administration approval of a drug called Zarxio, which is similar to Amgen’s Neupogen, a medicine that boosts the production of white blood cells. Sebastien Bozon/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Sebastien Bozon/AFP/Getty Images

Copycat versions of biotech drugs work just as well as the originals and cost a lot less, according to an analysis of studies of the medicines.

The analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health finds that so-called biosimilars — medications that are meant to mimic, and compete with, complex and expensive biotech drugs — perform as well as the brand-name versions.

The researchers looked at data from 19 studies of biosimilar drugs that treat rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis, and found that they were comparable to the originals and would cost less. The findings will appear in the Aug. 2 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Hopefully, this will encourage the brisk adoption of these products,” said Caleb Alexander, the study’s lead researcher, in a release. “There is no question that greater competition in this market will benefit patients, prescribers and society in the long run.”

Biologics include proteins and antibodies that are typically made by living organisms. They’re more difficult to produce than medications made from mixtures of chemicals. It’s also next to impossible to make an exact copy of a biological product, which is why the drugs are often referred to as biosimilars.

There was a provision in the Affordable Care Act meant to encourage development and approval of biosimilars, but progress has been slow. The Food and Drug Administration has approved only two such drugs since the law passed in 2010.

Zarxio, the first biosimilar drug approved in the U.S., is expected to save about $6 billion a year because it costs less than Amgen’s Neupogen, the brand-name product. The medications help boost the immune systems of chemotherapy patients by increasing production of white blood cells.

In April, the FDA approved a second drug that is similar to Johnson & Johnson’s Remicade to treat colitis and Crohn’s disease. That drug, called Inflectra, is one member of the class of biosimilars that the researchers at Johns Hopkins examined. There are several other biosimilar drugs in this class available in Canada, Asia and Europe.

The Johns Hopkins study is important because drugmakers have raised questions about biosimilars since they aren’t identical to the drug they’re supposed to mimic. Many are fighting approval of the drugs, and some argue that they should not be substituted for a brand-name drug without a patient’s consent.

But IMS Health Informatics says there are 50 biosimilars under development. All told, they could save U.S. and European health systems as much at $110 billion over the next five years, the company estimates.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

FDA-Approved Knock-Offs Of Biotech Drugs Could Safely Save Big Bucks

In 2015, the Sandoz unit of drugmaker Novartis won Food and Drug Administration approval of a drug called Zarxio, which is similar to Amgen's Neupogen, a medicine that boosts the production of white blood cells.

In 2015, the Sandoz unit of drugmaker Novartis won Food and Drug Administration approval of a drug called Zarxio, which is similar to Amgen’s Neupogen, a medicine that boosts the production of white blood cells. Sebastien Bozon/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Sebastien Bozon/AFP/Getty Images

Copycat versions of biotech drugs work just as well as the originals and cost a lot less, according to an analysis of studies of the medicines.

The analysis by researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health finds that so-called biosimilars — medications that are meant to mimic, and compete with, complex and expensive biotech drugs — perform as well as the brand-name versions.

The researchers looked at data from 19 studies of biosimilar drugs that treat rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis, and found that they were comparable to the originals and would cost less. The findings will appear in the Aug. 2 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Hopefully, this will encourage the brisk adoption of these products,” said Caleb Alexander, the study’s lead researcher, in a release. “There is no question that greater competition in this market will benefit patients, prescribers and society in the long run.”

Biologics include proteins and antibodies that are typically made by living organisms. They’re more difficult to produce than medications made from mixtures of chemicals. It’s also next to impossible to make an exact copy of a biological product, which is why the drugs are often referred to as biosimilars.

There was a provision in the Affordable Care Act meant to encourage development and approval of biosimilars, but progress has been slow. The Food and Drug Administration has approved only two such drugs since the law passed in 2010.

Zarxio, the first biosimilar drug approved in the U.S., is expected to save about $6 billion a year because it costs less than Amgen’s Neupogen, the brand-name product. The medications help boost the immune systems of chemotherapy patients by increasing production of white blood cells.

In April, the FDA approved a second drug that is similar to Johnson & Johnson’s Remicade to treat colitis and Crohn’s disease. That drug, called Inflectra, is one member of the class of biosimilars that the researchers at Johns Hopkins examined. There are several other biosimilar drugs in this class available in Canada, Asia and Europe.

The Johns Hopkins study is important because drugmakers have raised questions about biosimilars since they aren’t identical to the drug they’re supposed to mimic. Many are fighting approval of the drugs, and some argue that they should not be substituted for a brand-name drug without a patient’s consent.

But IMS Health Informatics says there are 50 biosimilars under development. All told, they could save U.S. and European health systems as much at $110 billion over the next five years, the company estimates.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)