July 19, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Ultimate Honest 'Batman v Superman' Trailer, Matt Damon Teaches How to Fight and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Movie Takedown of the Day:

Just when you think nobody can beat the movie up more than it has been, here’s Honest Trailers v Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice: The Ultimate Edition:

Mashup Fan Build of the Day:

What if you want a time machine but love Back to the Future and Hot Tub Time Machine equally? You make a hot tub (time machine) out of a Delorean:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

We have to keep the little girl Ghostbusters cosplay going or the haters win (via Fashionably Geek):

She asked for this costume to be made when she was 3 1/2, so she’s literally waited half her life for a new GB! pic.twitter.com/kpz4dDKU8p

— Joyce Chin (@TJoyceChin) July 17, 2016

Supercut of the Day:

With a new Ghostbusters in theaters, Slate presents a chronological evolutionary supercut of slime in the movies:

[embedded content]

Filmmaking Lesson of the Day:

In anticipation of Jason Bourne, Matt Damon shows us how to pull of a fake fight (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Benedict Cumberbatch, who turns 40 today, is pictured below at age 12, which is when he made his debut on the stage as Titania in a school production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream.

Actor in the Spotlight:

The new (NSFW) episode of No Small Parts focuses on late character actor Pete Postlethewaite:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Jorge Luengo showcases Pedro Almodovar’s obsession with art with a side by side look at shots and the paintings they pay homage to:

[embedded content]

Genre Study of the Day:

Frame by Frame looks at Japanese horror cinema and explains how those specific movies scare us:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 25th anniversary of the release of Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey. Watch the original trailer for the excellent sequel below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Sources: Murdochs Moving To Oust Roger Ailes After Sexual Harassment Allegations

Negotiations are underway to oust Fox News Channel Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes, NPR's David Folkenflik reports.

Negotiations are underway to oust Fox News Channel Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes, NPR’s David Folkenflik reports. Wesley Mann/Fox News/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Wesley Mann/Fox News/Getty Images

The Murdoch family is moving to oust the chairman of Fox News Channel after multiple women have accused him of sexual harassment, NPR’s David Folkenflik reports.

Roger Ailes is the co-founder, chairman and CEO of the news channel. Multiple sources at Fox News tell David that the Murdochs, who are controlling owners of parent company 21st Century Fox, are moving to push Ailes out of his prominent, powerful role.

21st Century Fox released this statement: “Roger is at work. The review is ongoing. The only agreement that is in place is his existing employment agreement.”

As we’ve reported, former Fox news anchor Gretchen Carlson sued Ailes for sexual harassment earlier this month. Ailes has denied the allegations.

Carlson says in the suit that she attempted to complain to Ailes about sexist treatment from her colleagues on Fox & Friends, to which Ailes replied, “I think you and I should have had a sexual relationship a long time ago.”

She alleges that Ailes repeatedly ogled her and commented on her body and that she was punished professionally for refusing Ailes’ advances.

David describes the charges as “a textbook example of quid pro quo sexual harassment.”

[embedded content]

Ailes denies the charges and accuses Carlson of retaliating against the end of her contract, as David reported last week. Ailes maintains that Carlson’s contract ended because of her ratings — not because she resisted his sexual overtures.

In her lawsuit, Carlson implied that other women at Fox News have been treated similarly and remained silent to protect their careers. Since her lawsuit became public, a half-dozen have come forward with similar allegations, which Ailes also denies.

New York Magazine reports that high-profile Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, too, may have been harassed and might be involved with an outside investigation into Ailes’ behavior.

“If Megyn Kelly is testifying to this outside inquiry conducted by a major New York City law firm, Paul, Weiss, and she says he sexually harassed her, I think it’s ballgame over,” David said on NPR’s Here and Now earlier Tuesday.

David has more on the major players involved in the negotiations over Ailes’ future:

“Ailes, 76, is the visionary behind the channel’s winning formula. It is an Ailesian alchemy of conservative ideology, fast-paced reporting, highly sexed and confrontational presentation of debate, patriotic fervor and grievance.

“Rupert Murdoch is the man who founded it, and he is in the slow process of transitioning the control of the parent company over to his sons. Lachlan and James serve as News Corp. co-chairman and CEO of 21st Century Fox, respectively, and they have little affection for Ailes, who treated them with contempt earlier in their careers. …

“There is no clear successor to run the network once Ailes leaves. Shine, the senior programming executive, does not command the same level of respect from the Murdochs, while the former top news executive, Michael Clemente, was recently sidelined by Ailes. James Murdoch in particular is known to favor a model more like the Murdochs’ Sky News in Britain, which is lively but less openly political. And the Murdoch sons would like the company to reflect what they believe are more 21st century values.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Maryland Switches Opioid Treatments, And Some Patients Cry Foul

A demonstration dose of Suboxone film, which is placed under the tongue. It is used to treat opioid addiction.

A demonstration dose of Suboxone film, which is placed under the tongue. It is used to treat opioid addiction. M. Spencer Green/AP hide caption

toggle caption M. Spencer Green/AP

Maryland Medicaid officials have made what appears to be a small change to the list of preferred medications to treat opioid addictions. The agency used to pay for the drug in a dissolvable film form. Now it’s steering patients to tablets, which some doctors say are not as effective for their patients.

Those doctors say the change is having a profound effect on some people struggling to stay clean.

Starting on July 1, Maryland’s Medicaid program removed Suboxone film — a drug that can be used by people addicted to opioids to keep their cravings at bay — from the state’s list of preferred drugs and replaced it with a tablet form of the medication called Zubsolv.

State officials say the change was made to stop the illicit flow of the drug into jails and prisons.

“Those Suboxone strips were diverted and smuggled into jails and later were sold or traded in criminal activity that was happening in jails,” says Shannon McMahon, deputy secretary of Maryland’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. “The numbers were frankly staggering, the amount of diversion that was happening in the jails.”

So far this year more than 2,300 hits of Suboxone have been seized in Maryland jails and prisons, according to Gerald Shields of the state’s Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. That’s about 40 percent more than at this time last year, Shields says.

The drug helps people control their opioid habit. But it is also an opioid itself. It doesn’t produce a high as strong as many opioid painkillers that have turned into popular street drugs, but it does stave off cravings and can create a mild sense of euphoria.

It comes as a tiny, dissolvable film — about the size of a Listerine breath mint strip — that’s transparent and easy to hide.

“They have been cut up into multiple different pieces,” McMahon tells Shots. A single strip can be worth as much as $50 on the street and they are often divided into several “hits” that are sold individually, she says.

“They were coming into prisons through letters — backs of stamps, corners of folks’ eyeglasses,” she says. McMahon says the strips were causing problems in prisons because of illegal sales and trade.

So at the recommendation of the Department of Corrections, along with a panel that advises the state’s Medicaid program on medications, officials decided to replace the Suboxone strip with Zubsolv, made by a Swedish company called Orexo AB.

The choice is raising eyebrows because Maryland’s health secretary Van Mitchell used to work for Manis Canning & Associates, the lobbying firm that represents Orexo. Mitchell’s spokeswoman says he left the firm before Orexo became a client.

Mitchell and Steven T. Moyer, Maryland’s secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services, argued in an article in the Baltimore Sun that the change would save lives. They said Maryland’s correctional system, since 2010, “has seen 13 fatal overdoses.” However, a spokeswoman for the state’s health department acknowledged that those were overdoses on opioids in general, and not specifically overdoses on Suboxone film.

Doctors say Suboxone film, as well as the Zubsolv pill that replaces it, actually protect against overdoses because they contain both the opioid Buprenorphine and a drug called naloxone that reverses the effects of an overdose. Naloxone is used by emergency responders to revive people who overdose.

The change has drawn broad opposition from doctors who treat people with substance abuse problems and from advocates for people who are recovering from addictions. Those include the Behavioral Health System of Baltimore, a nonprofit that oversees the city’s behavioral health system, and the Maryland Association for the Treatment of Opioid Dependence.

The change has wreaked havoc on some people with substance abuse problems who, until a few days ago used Suboxone film, says Adrienne Breidenstine, vice president for policy and communications at the Behavioral Health System of Baltimore.

One of them is Nicole, a mother of two who has been in recovery for about eight years. Nicole became addicted to painkillers after she was injured in a car accident. She was stable on Suboxone strips but switched to Zubsolv 10 days ago. She asked NPR not to use her full name because her history of addiction is not common knowledge.

“When I got on Suboxone I didn’t even have custody of my son,” she says. “After I got clean, I got put on Suboxone. I’ve got both my kids now, we have our own house, I’m working, they’re doing good in school, I finished school, and that’s why it’s so scary to me that they completely switched me over.”

Since the change, she says, she’s been feeling sick, having trouble sleeping, having cravings and symptoms of withdrawal.

“It hasn’t been working for me,” she says. “I don’t know what I’m going to do if they don’t cover it again. I just don’t want to go back to that life and I don’t want my kids to go there.”

Nicole’s doctor, Michael Fingerhood, has a primary care practice at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in Baltimore. His practice, which overlooks downtown Baltimore from across the water, welcomes people with substance abuse problems. The group treats about 450 patients who, until this month, were using Suboxone strips.

He says just two weeks into the change many of his patients, like Nicole, are struggling.

“This is taking patients who are stable, who are doing really well, and saying we’re going to do something to disturb how well you’re doing,” he tells Shots.

Fingerhood says Zubsolv is supposed to be the equivalent of Suboxone. But not all patients react the same to different medications. Many, like Nicole, have been clean for years and for the first time, they’re feeling sick again and some, he says, are in real danger.

Feeling even the slightest bit of withdrawal symptoms can be awful for someone in recovery, he says.

“In the midst of addiction people are searching for a high, they’re having withdrawal, they’re running the streets. Their lives were horrible,” Fingerhood says. “Having withdrawal brings back all those memories of how terrible life had been and it’s a terrible feeling to be in withdrawal.”

Shaking up all the Suboxone patients across the state to keep a relatively safe drug away from a handful of inmates doesn’t make sense, Fingerhood says. And the numbers are indeed pretty small.

If those 2,300 Suboxone hits seized in prison were whole strips — and prison officials say they weren’t — that’s still only the equivalent of about 10 prescriptions from January through last week.

Instead, Fingerhood says, “We should be providing treatment in the prison system.”

He says if someone who was on Suboxone gets arrested, it makes sense that family members or friends would try to get them the drugs in prison.

The only place in Maryland that inmates can legally get any medication to help get or keep them off opioids is in the Baltimore City Jail, according to Shields, the Department of Corrections spokesman. He says the system provides methadone to some inmates to help wean them off opioids before moving them to another prison.

State officials say Medicaid patients can still get Suboxone if they really need it. Doctors just fill out a form requesting a waiver, known as a prior authorization, and get an answer the next day.

Fingerhood made that request for Nicole. Five days later, he still had no response.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Report: Russia Used 'Mouse Hole' To Swap Urine Samples Of Olympic Athletes

Russian cross-country skier Alexander Legkov, who won a gold and a silver at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, speaks at a news conference in May to deny allegations that dozens of Russian athletes were part of a state-run doping program. A detailed report by the World Anti-Doping Agency on Monday said the doping program was in place for years before and during the Olympics.

Russian cross-country skier Alexander Legkov, who won a gold and a silver at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, speaks at a news conference in May to deny allegations that dozens of Russian athletes were part of a state-run doping program. A detailed report by the World Anti-Doping Agency on Monday said the doping program was in place for years before and during the Olympics. Vasily Maximov/AFP/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Vasily Maximov/AFP/Getty Images

After a subpar showing at the 2010 Winter Olympics, the Russians devised an elaborate, clandestine plan to ensure a stellar performance at the 2014 games they were hosting in Sochi.

Here’s how it worked: In the dead of night, Russian officials exchanged the tainted urine from their athletes who had been doping with clean samples by passing them through a “mouse hole” drilled into the wall of the anti-doping lab. When the urine was tested the next day, there were no signs of doping, according to a detailed new report.

The Russian results in Sochi were spectacular. The Russians won 33 medals, more than any other country, compared with a disappointing 15 medals in Vancouver four years earlier, a count that put them in sixth place, just behind Austria.

The report released Monday was produced by Canadian professor Richard McLaren, on behalf of the World Anti-Doping Agency.

The Russian actions have been so egregious, and the doping so pervasive, that the anti-doping agency recommended the unprecedented step of banning the entire Russian team from the Summer Olympics next month in Brazil.

The International Olympic Committee, which has already barred the Russian track and field team, held an emergency meeting Tuesday to consider the recommendation. The IOC said it would “explore legal options” but put off a final decision, though the games start in less than three weeks.

The Russians have repeatedly denied the existence of a state-run doping program.

“Today, we see a dangerous return to this policy of letting politics interfere with sport,” President Vladimir Putin said in a lengthy statement on Monday.

The Russian operation in Sochi was first reported at length by The New York Times in May, and McLaren’s findings provided additional details as it looked at Russian efforts that apparently began ramping up after the poor showing in 2010.

The key source for both McLaren and The Times is Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov, the former head of Russia’s anti-doping agency, who fled the country after he was implicated last November. Rodchenkov, who is now in Los Angeles, has estimated that 100 urine samples were swapped out during the Olympics, including those of at least 15 Russian medal winners.

Tight security at the lab

The new report said the widespread Russian doping efforts included a special operation set up specifically for the Sochi Games.

Security was extremely tight at the anti-doping lab for the Olympics, but Russian officials were among those with access. In an adjacent room, Rodchenkov said, he had clean samples from the Russian athletes. The athletes had produced them months earlier, when they temporarily stopped taking a three-drug cocktail the doctor said he developed. Those clean samples were frozen.

A small hole in the wall of the lab, near ground level, was covered during the day. But at night, it was opened so the urine samples could be exchanged with Evgeny Kurdyatsev, a Russian official who worked inside the lab, according to the latest report and the earlier one in the Times.

“At a convenient moment, usually around midnight when no one else was in the room, Kurdyatsev would pass the protected athletes’ A and B samples through the mouse hole in the [lab] to the operations room where Dr. Rodchenkov and others were waiting,” the report said.

“Once the samples were passed through, they were given to [Russian intelligence agent Evgeny] Blokhin, who had a security clearance to enter the laboratory under the guise of being a sewer engineer employed by engineering company Bilfinger.”

However, the exchange of urine was complicated because the dirty samples, produced by the athletes shortly after competition, were in marked bottles with seals that were supposed to be tamperproof.

The Russians managed to open the bottles without detection, disposing of the dirty samples. They then replaced them with the old, defrosted, clean samples and resealed the bottles.

Investigators checked a representative set of 11 bottles and found that all 11 “had scratches and marks on the inside of the bottle caps representative of the use of a tool used to open the cap,” the report said.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)