July 10, 2016

No Image

Work Can Be A Stressful And Dangerous Place For Many

Employers’ efforts to reduce stress get low grades in a new poll by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

In particular, among those working adults who say they’ve experienced a great deal of stress at work in the past 12 months, the vast majority (85 percent) rate the efforts of their workplace to reduce stress as fair or poor.

Overall, 43 percent of working adults who told us their job negatively affects their stress levels. Others said their job negatively affects their eating habits (28 percent), sleeping habits (27 percent) and weight (22 percent).

“The takeaway here is that job No. 1 for U.S. employers is to reduce stress in the workplace,” said Robert J. Blendon, professor of health policy and political analysis at the Harvard Chan School, who directed the survey. It included interviews with 1,601 workers, by landline and cellphone. The margin of error is 2.9 percentage points.

The poll also found that only about half of working adults have workplaces that offer wellness or health-improvement programs. About 1 in 4 rate their workplace as fair or poor in providing a healthy work environment, and more than 4 in 10 rate their workplace as fair or poor in providing opportunities for physical exercise or healthful food options at work.

About 1 in 5 working adults (22 percent) say something at their job may be harmful to their health, with chemicals and contaminants topping the list at 30 percent of those who have concerns about their workplace. We found 43 percent of construction or outdoor workers and 34 percent in medical jobs have health concerns in the workplace.

One of the obvious reasons for stress in the workplace may be overwork.

As is detailed in the poll report, working adults in our sample lived up to America’s reputation for being workaholics, with almost two-thirds of them saying they often or sometimes work overtime or on the weekends. About 1 in 5 say they work 50 or more hours each week in their main job.

Of course, taking breaks and vacations may help relieve stress. But our survey found that even among those who get paid vacations days, less than half use all or most of the days they earned in the past year. And when they do take vacation, 43 percent of high-pay workers say they often or sometimes work on vacation, with 28 percent of average pay workers and 18 percent of low-pay workers saying the same.

Why do Americans work so much? A majority (56 percent) of people working 50-plus hours a week in their main job say they do so because “it’s important for their career to work longer hours.” Half (50 percent) say they do so because they “enjoy it,” and 37 percent say they “need the money.”

These responses may be reflected somewhat in the chart below, where higher-paid workers more frequently say they work 50-plus hours, versus lower-pay workers.

It’s a similar story when it comes to sick leave. A majority of workers who get paid sick days and who did not use them all (73 percent) say they weren’t sick enough to use all of their days. More than one-third (37 percent) say a major reason why they didn’t take all their sick days is that they want to save them for another time, while 28 percent say there wouldn’t be enough people to cover their work.

Twenty percent of those who didn’t use all their sick pay say their workload made it too hard to take sick days, while another 20 percent say working more (and not taking sick leave) would help them get ahead at work.

Overall, just 16 percent of workers have used all of their paid sick days in the past year, while 6 percent used most, 45 percent used only some and 32 percent used none.

And then there are those who get no sick leave at all. While two-thirds of full- or part-time employed workers overall say their workplace offers them paid sick days, just 38 percent of workers in low-pay jobs say they get paid sick leave. Those ranking lowest in paid sick leave were those in construction/outdoor jobs (42 percent) and restaurant jobs (22 percent).

Does reluctance to use paid leave lead workers to go to work sick? A majority of working adults in our survey say they do just that. Of interest: Half of restaurant workers and more than half of workers in medical jobs say they still go to work always or most of the time when they have a cold or the flu.

But the connection between paid leave and going to work is fuzzy. Laura Brown, who studies the issue at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, tells NPR’s Rae Ellen Bichell that their studies don’t show a strong link between the two.

“Forty percent of workers did say to us that they’d worked while sick in the past because they wouldn’t get paid if they didn’t work,” she says. “But when we look at the data statistically, that doesn’t really seem to be a large driving factor in whether or not people actually work when they’re sick.”

Leaving their coworkers short-staffed was a more likely reason for going to work while sick, she says.

In one of the first stories in our series, “The Workplace and Your Health,” we will look at the issue of juggling medical care with work in more depth, and how the lack of paid leave can lead to more medical problems. In another story, we’ll hear more about the stress that people with disabilities experience at work. Over 6 in 10 (62 percent), say their job has a bad impact on their stress level, compared with 41 percent of workers without disabilities.

Our poll found many working adults have concerns about safety at work. As the chart below shows, those in low paying jobs were more likely than those in high-paying jobs to say they often or sometimes face potentially dangerous situations.

And it’s unclear from the survey why so many restaurant and retail outlet workers say they often or sometimes face potentially dangerous situations on the job. But we did find that, overall, 19 percent of working adults have seen or heard of violence against employees in their workplace.

And while shift workers (54 percent) are more likely than day workers (38 percent) to say they face danger, a significant proportion of shift workers say they do so because it is better for their lifestyle (39 percent) and/or it makes it easier to care for the family (38 percent). Half say better pay associated with shift work is the reason they do it.

But it may be that the workplace is getting safer overall. Among those who ever face potentially dangerous situations at work, almost three-quarters (73 percent) believe their workplace is actively working to reduce these dangerous conditions.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article from FiveFilters.org: Most Labour MPs in the UK Are Revolting.


No Image

Portugal Beats France 1-0 In Extra Time To Win 2016 UEFA Euro Cup

Portugal's Eder, centre, celebrates after scoring the opening goal during the Euro 2016 final soccer match between Portugal and France at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, north of Paris, Sunday, July 10, 2016.

Portugal’s Eder, centre, celebrates after scoring the opening goal during the Euro 2016 final soccer match between Portugal and France at the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, north of Paris, Sunday, July 10, 2016. Michael Probst/AP hide caption

toggle caption Michael Probst/AP

Portugal overcame the loss of injured captain Cristiano Ronaldo to beat France 1-0 in the European Championship final on Sunday, with a goal in extra time from substitute Eder securing their country’s first football title.

Just as the final looked destined for a penalty shootout, Eder cut through the French defense and struck a low shot from 25 yards past goalkeeper Hugo Lloris in the 109th minute at the Stade de France.

Twelve years after losing to Greece on home soil in their last final appearance, it was Portugal’s turn to spoil the host nation’s party. And they achieved it by winning only one of their seven games at Euro 2016 inside 90 minutes.

It was dull and stodgy at times but the record books will only show that Portugal went from third-place in its group to champion, with little help from Ronaldo in its last match.

European football’s biggest match lost its biggest name midway through the first half of a cagey final on the outskirts of the French capital.

Ronaldo went down under Dimitri Payet’s ninth-minute challenge and was twice forced off to receive treatment on the touchline.

However determined Ronaldo was to lead Portugal to glory, his left knee could cope no more and he was carried off on a stretcher midway through the first half.

Ronaldo was in tears but he returned just before extra time to address his weary teammates. They seemed to be inspired by Ronaldo’s re-emergence and the Real Madrid forward was soon leaping off the bench in celebrations.

Then he was lying on the turf again at the final whistle, this time in disbelief rather than pain.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article from FiveFilters.org: Most Labour MPs in the UK Are Revolting.


No Image

'Ghostbusters' Is Just As Fun and Goofy As the Original, and Here's Why

Here’s the thing about the original Ghostbusters: the jokes are strong, the ensemble is fantastic and the ghosts perfectly straddle the line between being both amusing and terrifying at the same time. But what really made Ghostbusters such a great movie for its time was the way it reintroduced some of our favorite funnymen in an unfamiliar setting, allowing their already popular comedic sensibilities to play in an environment we weren’t used to seeing them in.

It’s like that 1984 Ghostbusters is a deep-fried Twinkie. You already love Twinkies — I mean, who doesn’t love a good Twinkie? — but when you deep fry a Twinkie it completely reinvents the way you experience that Twinkie. The flavors and essence of that Twinkie are still there, but now it’s got this extra flair that allows you to enjoy it in a new way.

The main reason why the 2016 Ghostbusters is just as strong as the original is because it taps into that same deep-friedishness. Instead of a group of popular male comedians and Saturday Night Live veterans, now we have a group of popular female comedians and Saturday Night Live veterans (and current castmembers) who apply their own hilariously whip-smart sensibilities to a comedy with sci-fi and supernatural elements, allowing us to experience their brand of humor in a whole new way.

As much as the film is full of nods to the original ’84 classic (and cameos from most of its cast), the new Ghostbusters still feels surprisingly refreshing, much in the same way all of director Paul Feig’s recent films feel. From the way he reimagined the wedding movie with Bridesmaids, to the way he reimagined the buddy-cop movie with The Heat, to the way he reimagined the action-comedy with Spy, Feig is a genius when it comes to reinterpreting a genre from a female perspective, and Ghostbusters is just the latest in a string of successful efforts.

[embedded content]

Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones masterfully navigate their way around a ghost-fueled movie that fully embraces their brand of comedy, just as Dan Aykroyd, Harold Ramis, Bill Murray and Ernie Hudson did all those years ago. And Feig — while continuously finding new ways to pay homage to the original — actually elevates his movie above the ’84 version at times by building a bit of a stronger framework around his story, his villain and his science.

Yes, this new Ghostbusters sciences the f**k out. It goes so hard with the nerdy language in an effort to make the film feel more grounded in the real world than the original that you’ll have no idea what they’re talking about at times, but you’ll appreciate the homework done by cowriters Feig and Kate Dippold (The Heat).

The best stuff

I’ve been rambling a bit, so let’s break it down:

— The film’s sense of humor is both modernized for 2016, but also very much rooted in old-school tropes. You’ll have scenes where the women are cracking jokes about nasty YouTube commenters (mirroring the film’s real-life struggles within the online forum) and getting into trouble when one of their ghost videos hits Reddit, but then they also find so many inventive ways to use that old redirection gag. Like in a scene where Kristen Wiig’s Erin is trying to convince the mayor (Andy Garcia) that ghosts are invading the city and there’s a giant rumble outside, only it’s just a garbage truck. The movie is full of those kinds of redirection-based gags.

— Unlike the original where the heart of the movie is found somewhere amidst Venkman’s creepy stalker-ish obsession with Sigourney Weaver’s Dana, this new one scraps any romantic subplot in favor of friendship. The heart of this movie is firmly rooted in the relationship between Wiig’s Erin and McCarthy’s Abby, and so in that regard the new film has a stronger emotional resonance than its predecessor.

— Kate McKinnon is without a doubt the film’s all-star. Her Holtzmann is so eccentric and such an oddball, I don’t even know if McKinnon fully grasps what Holtzmann’s all about. She just goes for it. Even when Holtzmann doesn’t have any dialogue, McKinnon is in the background working for that smile, that laugh, either with a facial expression or a body twitch. You’ll probably have to watch the movie multiple times to catch all of Holtzmann’s idiosyncrasies tucked into a wildly amusing star-making performance from McKinnon.

— Chris Hemsworth is terrific as the Ghostbusters secretary Kevin, perhaps destined to become the most memorable “movie Kevin” since Kevin McCallister in Home Alone. They essentially reverse the stereotypical dumb, but super sexy secretary with Hemsworth rocking this amusing sort of sophisticated moron vibe. He’s almost cocky, but not, and Hemsworth does such a great, subtle job, with many jokes coming at his expense.

Ghostbusters: Answer the Call is quietly the new name of this film now, as they kind of altered the title to differentiate it more from the original but really didn’t tell anyone they did it (think Edge of Tomorrow: Live Die Repeat). And while it may seem tacked-on and a bit of a cop out, the title becomes so much funnier once you’ve seen the film, in part because of a running gag involving the phone not being answered.

— The villain played by Neil Casey has his strengths and weaknesses, but the general concept of him — how he’s just as nerdy about the supernatural as the Ghostbusters foursome, except he’s decided to use his knowledge to exact revenge upon a world that’s forever bullied him — is pretty great and inventive. He’s also an odd one who evolves throughout the film, and though their final confrontation gets super special effects-y and a tad over the top, he might be the strongest, most well-rounded villain we’ve seen yet in a Ghostbusters film.

The worst stuff

— While one or two of the cameos from the original Ghostbusters cast are amusing, they weren’t needed and they sort of jolt you out of the film in places. Not going to ruin any of them here, though make sure you stay till the end of the credits because not only is there a major cameo in the credits, but also a stinger at the end fans of the original will want to stick around to see.

— Not crazy about the updated theme song, and when it’s used in the movie I kept wishing for the original version to be used instead. Embrace those ’80s roots!

— The film takes place in New York City, but it was primarily shot in Boston. If you’re from New York or familiar with the city, it’s pretty easy to notice and doesn’t feel as authentic to New York as the original does.

— Kudos to Feig for trying to work the Ghostbusters logo creation into the film, including a very funny scene where the ladies turn to Kevin for his logo concepts, but the way they get the final version feels pretty forced and eye-roll inducing.

— As is the case way too often these days, unfortunately a lot of the film’s funniest moments are included in the trailers, though they do get funnier once you see everything built in around them.

Look, that first Ghostbusters is a classic, and it will forever be a classic. This new one, while just as strong with its cast, story and humor, may never match its predecessor in terms of how much it’s beloved by movie fans around the world. That’s just a fact.

We have a different relationship with movies now than we did back in the ’80s, and much of our desire to remake and reboot those movies from 30 years ago comes from us wanting to tap back into what made that period in cinematic history so special and memorable.

The new Ghostbusters is a special film, in part because it expertly extracts the essence of what was so fun and goofy about the original, but also because it celebrates female-driven humor in a sci-fi/supernatural movie, which is a rarity. We never see films like this today, just like we never saw films like Ghostbusters when it arrived on the scene in 1984.

Both films are unique to their respective era, and both films will forever be worth celebrating.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
Recommended article from FiveFilters.org: Most Labour MPs in the UK Are Revolting.