July 3, 2016

No Image

Few Young Doctors Are Training To Care For U.S. Elderly

Mary Mullens, age 93, in her room at Edgewood Summit Retirement Community in Charleston, W.Va. Mullens is a patient of Dr. Todd Goldberg, one of only 36 geriatricians in the state.

Mary Mullens, age 93, in her room at Edgewood Summit Retirement Community in Charleston, W.Va. Mullens is a patient of Dr. Todd Goldberg, one of only 36 geriatricians in the state. Kara Lofton/West Virginia Public Broadcasting hide caption

toggle caption Kara Lofton/West Virginia Public Broadcasting

At Edgewood Summit retirement community in Charleston, W.Va., 93-year-old Mary Mullens is waxing eloquent about her geriatrician, Dr. Todd Goldberg.

“He’s sure got a lot to do,” she says, “and does it so well.”

West Virginia has the third oldest population in the nation, right behind Maine and Florida. But Goldberg is one of only 36 geriatricians in the state.

“With the growing elderly population across America and West Virginia, obviously we need healthcare providers,” says Goldberg.

That includes geriatricians — physicians who specialize in the treatment of adults age 65 and older — as well as nurses, physical therapists, and psychologists who know how to care for this population.

“The current workforce is inadequately trained and inadequately prepared to deal with what’s been called the silver tsunami — a tidal wave of elderly people — increasing in the population in West Virginia, across America, and across the world really,” Goldberg says.

The deficit of properly trained physicians is expected to get worse. By 2030, one in five Americans will be eligible for Medicare, the government health insurance for those 65 and older.

Goldberg also teaches at the Charleston division of West Virginia University, and runs one of the state’s four geriatric fellowship programs for medical residents. Geriatric fellowships are required for any physician wanting to enter the field.

For the past three years, no physicians have entered the fellowship program at WVU-Charleston. In fact, no students have enrolled in any of the four geriatric fellowship programs in West Virginia in the past three years.

“This is not just our local program, or in West Virginia,” says Goldberg. “This is a national problem.”

The United States has 130 geriatric fellowship programs, with 383 positions. In 2016, only 192 of them were filled. With that kind of competition, Goldberg laments, why would a resident apply to a West Virginia School, when they could get into a program like Yale or Harvard?

Adding to the problem, the average medical student graduates with $183,000 in debt, and every year of added education pushes that debt higher.

Dr. Shirley Neitch, head of the geriatrics department at Marshall University Medical School in Huntington, W.Va., says students express interest in geriatrics almost every year. But, “they fear their debt,” she says, “and they think that they need to get into something without the fellowship year where they can start getting paid for their work.”

This trend troubles many people, including Todd Plumley, whose mother Gladys has dementia, and lives in West Virginia.

“It’s kind of scary that [older patients] don’t have the care that they really need to help them through these times, and help them prolong their life and give them a better life,” Plumley says.

There are no geriatricians in the family’s hometown of Hamlin, so Plumley drives his mother almost 45 minutes to another town, Huntington, to see one. He says seeing this specialist has helped stabilize his mother’s symptoms.

“Right now, if we didn’t have the knowledge and resource,” he says, “I believe my mother would have progressed a lot further along, quicker.”

Plumley is in his 50s. He worries that if he needs the care of a geriatrician as he gets older, driving even 45 minutes may not be an option.

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with West Virginia Public Broadcasting and Kaiser Health News.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Irked By Broadcast Coverage, Gymnastics Sites Aim To Raise The Bar

Simone Biles took first place overall in the U.S. women's gymnastics championships on June 26 in St. Louis. Biles is expected to win several gold medals in the Olympics.

Simone Biles took first place overall in the U.S. women’s gymnastics championships on June 26 in St. Louis. Biles is expected to win several gold medals in the Olympics. Jeff Roberson/AP hide caption

toggle caption Jeff Roberson/AP

There are two types of people in this world: those who know their Stalder Shaposhnikovas from their Pak Saltos — and those who have absolutely no idea if the first half of this sentence was even written in English.

For the group that does know though — the hardcore gymnastics fans — a set of blogs, podcasts and resources have been emerging to fill a gap in the major broadcast coverage of women’s gymnastics. Call it the “gymternet,” an alternative group of sites that are shaking up the ways the sport is covered.

Specifically, these superfans are moving to correct what they see as condescension in broadcast coverage of the sport.

“It was very much focused on these ‘little girls dancing on a playground.’ That’s a cliche you would hear on NBC over and over again,” says the reporter and gym fan Elspeth Reeve, who wrote about the gymternet in the New Republic. “Even at the 2012 Olympics, you had the Russian gymnasts referred to as ‘divas’ and ‘temperamental.’ It was honestly a bit sexist.”

Reeve points to one example in particular, when an NBC commentator compared a gymnast’s injury to getting a tear in her wedding dress right before walking down the aisle.

McKayla Maroney, unimpressed — possibly with the state of broadcast coverage of women's gymnastics.

McKayla Maroney, unimpressed — possibly with the state of broadcast coverage of women’s gymnastics. Ronald Martinez/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Ronald Martinez/Getty Images

But starting around 2008, Reeve says, blogs began popping up to give gymnastics addicts the in-depth coverage they craved. The gymternet was born around the same time as Tumblr — the site popular for sharing animated GIFs — perhaps because watching a gymnast do a backflip works out to be a good GIF length.

Sites like The Gymternet and the site and podcast GymCastic “provide the real necessary pushback that’s not about the sparkles and the girlishness,” Reeve tells host Ray Suarez on All Things Considered. “It’s about the crazy workouts, the incredible athletics, the injuries, coming back from injuries.”

The Gymternet website covers gymnastics from all over the world, not just the U.S. You’ll find results from competitions in South Korea, South Africa, Turkey, Russia and more.

But here in the U.S., the big action is the upcoming Olympic trials in San Jose on July 8 and 10, which will determine the members to represent the country in the Olympic Games in Brazil next month.

Nineteen-year-old Simone Biles leads the way, and is expected to rack up gold medals in Rio de Janeiro. Last weekend she won a fourth consecutive national title at the P&G Championships in St. Louis. She’s already a three-time world champion.

5 videos of @Simone_Biles‘s amazing gymnastics routines to get you excited for the Olympics: https://t.co/VCIQxdck9Z pic.twitter.com/bOKs2eKj7J

— The Cut (@TheCut) June 27, 2016

“If she stays mentally healthy and physically healthy, she could walk away with five golds,” Reeve says.

The athletes embrace the clout of the gymternet too. Biles has almost half a million followers on Instagram, and more than 57,000 on Twitter. Reeve writes that McKayla Maroney, a gold medalist, announced her retirement on the GymCastic podcast instead of a major network.

Women’s gymnastics qualifying in the Olympics starts Aug. 7 — and there’s a good chance the gymternet will have full coverage.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

If Some Homeowner Trends Continue, Signs Of Another Housing Bubble Ahead

Double-digit price rises, easy credit and no money down — these all led to a housing bubble a decade ago. NPR’s Rachel Martin asks UCLA economist Stephen Oliner if we are headed for disaster.

Transcript

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #1: I think most people hate to think of themselves as middle class.

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN #2: Have what you need, but maybe not everything you want.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: We have a car but we live in an apartment. That’s middle class.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #2: If you add a boat, then you’re not middle class anymore. That’s what changes it right there.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #3: The middle class are families who are earning six figures.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #4: Thirty thousand, $35,000 probably.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN #5: That means me, and it means I’m in trouble (laughter).

RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:

This is Hanging On, our continuing series about the American middle class, looking at the economic pressures of American life in 2016. And today we’re talking about the housing bubble. What bubble, you say? Wasn’t that the thing that caused the Great Recession? And isn’t it over now?

Yes, all that is true, but our next guest says there are signs another housing bubble may be on the horizon. Stephen Oliner used to be with the Federal Reserve Board. Now he’s at UCLA, where he analyzes real estate markets, and he’s here now. Thanks so much for being with us.

STEPHEN OLINER: Thanks, Rachel. I’m really happy to be with you.

MARTIN: You track housing market indicators. What are you seeing right now?

OLINER: So we’re seeing worrying signs of building excesses again in the housing and the mortgage markets. It’s not that we’re in a crisis today or in a bubble today, but there are trends underway that, if they’d run for a very long time, will put us back into a situation that will look a little bit like what we had in the last crisis.

MARTIN: That’s unbelievable because we went through all kinds of collective strife over this, and there was legislation passed. So before we get into what didn’t work in all those changes, what specifically are you seeing? What are the indicators?

OLINER: So there are really two types of indicators. The first concerns the risk that’s in the mortgage loans that are being made today. So at the American Enterprise Institute, where I have a position as well as at UCLA, we analyze about 80 percent of the individual home mortgage loans made every month to purchase homes. And many of these loans are very risky, subprime-style loans that are now being made with government guarantees rather than being held by private investors. But nonetheless, they’re quite risky.

MARTIN: How can this be possible? I mean, the whole problem, as I understand it, was that people who could not afford these mortgages were being enticed into signing on the dotted line, and the lenders knew it.

OLINER: Right, so the element of fraud that was rampant during the financial crisis in the lead-up to the bubble, that’s basically gone. But there still are other ways for loans to be risky in many dimensions, and that is still happening. So let me give you just a couple of specifics. Now, we normally think that people in a prudent lending situation will put down 10 or 20 percent. That’s so old-school. That’s not happening now. The median down payment for a first-time buyer in the United States is 3 and a half percent.

If they were to turn around and need to sell the house, they wouldn’t get enough money to repay the mortgage. So they’re actually underwater on day one of the mortgage. There are other ways in which the mortgages are risky. One is that people are still stretching to buy bigger houses with larger monthly payments than is really safe given their incomes, and that is completely allowable under our current mortgage regulations.

MARTIN: Which is good and bad, right? After the housing crisis, people were so scared that nobody wanted to buy anything. And now you’re saying we’ve overcompensated and people are living beyond their means again.

OLINER: Yes, that is what I’m saying. And we tend to think that a very strict, regulatory framework was put in place that would prevent this from happening again. And the problem is the following – 80 percent or so of the loans that are being made in the United States today are loans that have a government guarantee of some kind, federal government guarantee, and those loans are exempt from the regulations.

MARTIN: So what do you say, Stephen, to someone who is looking to get into the market right now and might be enticed by the fact that they only have to put 3 and a half percent down?

OLINER: Right. So I would say a couple of things. First, I think homeownership is a great thing. And if you want to become a homeowner, that’s fantastic. Don’t do it, though, because you think it’s going to be a great investment. In most cases, it’s not. The second thing is don’t stretch. Be honest about how much you can really afford to buy given your other expenses and how you predict your income will change over the next couple years.

And the third thing would be if possible, finance the purchase with a 15 or a 20-year mortgage so that you build up equity quickly and be much less likely to be in a situation where you’re underwater at some point in the future.

MARTIN: Beware of the bubble. Stephen Oliner is an economist with the Ziman Center for Real Estate at the University of California, Los Angeles. Thanks so much, Stephen.

OLINER: You’re very welcome.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)