June 29, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Steven Spielberg's Universal Studios Tour, 'Fantastic Four' Franchise Parody and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Studio Tour of the Day:

Steven Spielberg guides us on a fascinating tour of the Universal Studios backlot, with focus on his history there and the remaining sets from his movies (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Superhero Franchise Parody of the Day:

The Fantastic Four face their greatest nemesis, the Fox studio executive, in this sad animated parody from Dorkly:

[embedded content]

Experiment of the Day:

Vanity Fair had people describe criminal characters from Pulp Fiction, Heat, and Pineapple Express to a forensic sketch artist to see how well he’d draw them:

[embedded content]

Casting Interpretation of the Day:

With Kellan Lutz rumored to be up for He-Man in Masters of the Universe, here’s BossLogic’s depiction of what that could look like from a few months ago (via Twitter):

Fan Art of the Day:

Did you love the otters in Finding Dory? Then you’ll love the papercraft tribute to the adorable characters shown being made here:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Ruth Warrick, who was born on this date 100 years ago, shares the frame with Orson Welles for a publicity still from Citizen Kane:

Industry Craftsman of the Day:

In the latest Academy Originals showcase, meet makeup effects artist Howard Berger, who won an Oscar for The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Jorge Luengo put together a supercut of Martin Scorsese’s close-up shots and it’s a collage of time, money, drugs, guns, religion, and art:

[embedded content]

Production Company Celebration of the Day:

Kartemquin Pictures, one of the most notable producers of documentaries in America (including Hoop Dreams) turned 50 this year. Here’s a great anniversary highlight reel (via Indiewire):

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 15th anniversary of the releaes of Spielberg’s A.I. Artificial Intelligence. Watch the first teaser for the sci-fi film below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Veteran Swimmer Michael Phelps And Newer Names Headed For Olympics

Michael Phelps celebrates qualifying for his fifth Olympic Games, after winning the men's 200-meter butterfly at the U.S. Olympic swimming trials Wednesday in Omaha, Neb.

Michael Phelps celebrates qualifying for his fifth Olympic Games, after winning the men’s 200-meter butterfly at the U.S. Olympic swimming trials Wednesday in Omaha, Neb. Mark J. Terrill/AP hide caption

toggle caption Mark J. Terrill/AP

Swimming superstar Michael Phelps made history again Wednesday night. At the U.S. Olympic swimming trials in Omaha, Neb., Phelps qualified for a record fifth Olympic games. He’s the first American male swimmer to do that.

But Phelps is one of the few veterans having success so far at the trials. That’s because a batch of young, first-time Olympians is stealing the show.

Youth Winning Out

Many swimming fans have come to Omaha to cheer the familiar – Phelps, Ryan Lochte, Missy Franklin all are multiple Olympic medal winners. But as races finish and everyone looks to the jumbotron high above the pool in the CenturyLink Center, they’re seeing relatively unfamiliar names with a “1” next to them. Names like Townley Haas, Kelsi Worrell and Ryan Murphy.

Murphy won the men’s 100-meter backstroke in a time of 52:26, a mere 32 hundredths of a second off the world record. Murphy is one of eight swimmers, so far, to win at the trials and qualify for their first Olympic team.

The 20-year-old Murphy beat two 30-somethings in the final, including 31-year-old Matt Grevers, who is the reigning Olympic champion in the 100 backstroke.

“Yeah, I mean both those guys have either kids or kids on the way,” Murphy said. “I don’t even have a girlfriend! They’re definitely a lot more mature than me, but sometimes youth wins out.”

At these trials, it’s more than sometimes. The average age of the eight rookie winners is 21. They’ve been dominant in the water, but sometimes a bit uncertain out of the pool. Grand old man Michael Phelps, who turns 31 on Thursday, says some of the newbies have approached him with newbie questions.

“This guy asked me today, ‘What do you think about before you swim,’ ” Phelps said on Tuesday. “I was like, ‘Nothing!’ ” He was like, ‘Are you kidding?’ ” I said, ‘No — I don’t think about anything.’ “

An empty mind served Phelps well again Wednesday night. He raced to victory in the 200-meter butterfly, and made the Olympic team for a fifth time.

A Swimming Cycle

Phelps insists Rio will be his final games. He understands the natural cycle – he’s on the way out while this new crop, emerging in Omaha, is on the way in. In the U.S., it seems to be a constant regeneration. American Olympians have won more swimming medals than any other country, by far and the country has an endless supply of young, talented swimmers. As time goes on, they get better coaching and learn better techniques. And the ones excelling often embrace the grind, the extraordinary number of hours of work necessary to succeed.

“Yeah, I do really enjoy the process,” says American star Katie Ledecky.

Hoping To See The Feet

Such is the nature of these trials that Phelps shared the spotlight with 19-year-old Ledecky, who is expected to dominate in Rio like — Michael Phelps. Ledecky won the 200 meter freestyle Wednesday night. It was her second win in a freestyle race in Omaha. She isn’t an Olympic rookie. She won a gold medal at the 2012 Summer Games in London. But Ledecky is the leader of this next generation. Most of the time she competes against the clock because her opponents are too far behind.

“We’ve never had someone dominate events as she has,” says U.S. Swimming’s national team director Frank Busch. Busch coached swimming for decades before taking his current job in 2011. “In my lifetime in the sport,” Busch says, “I’ve never seen anyone like Katie.”

Despite that dominance, there was a race before the trials when competitor Leah Smith made a rare Ledecky sighting.

“I had never been [close enough] to see her feet before, and so that was pretty exciting,” Smith said Monday in Omaha.

Smith had a smile on her face because she saw those feet again in her second place finish to Ledecky in that night’s 400-meter freestyle. Smith finished less than two seconds behind. It earned the 21 year old her first Olympic berth – she became another of the first-timers.

Rio A Breeze?

It’s a group that may be somewhat unknown now, but come August in Brazil, that may change.

The pressure at the trials is crushing — there are so many good swimmers and so few make the Olympic team. Those who do often talk about being more relaxed at the Olympics, where U.S. swimmers historically are dominant. According to U.S. Swimming’s Frank Busch, 65 percent of the performances by American swimmers at the 2012 games in London were better than they were at that year’s Olympic trials.

Meaning, the competition in Rio may be lucky to see the bottoms of some new American feet.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Heat On White House To Scrap Redo Of Human Research Rules

HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission.

HeLa cells, commonly used in research, were derived from cervical cancer cells taken in 1951 from Henrietta Lacks without her permission. Science Source hide caption

toggle caption Science Source

An influential federal panel has taken the unusual step of telling the Obama administration to withdraw a controversial proposal to revise regulations that protect people who volunteer for medical research.

The proposal is “marred by omissions, the absence of essential elements, and a lack of clarity,” according to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The conclusions are part of a 283-page report released Wednesday.

The regulations are known collectively as the Common Rule. They were put in place decades ago to make sure medical experiments are conducted ethically.

But the rules haven’t been updated in nearly a quarter century. So last year the Department of Health and Human Services proposed a major revision.

But the proposal prompted a wide range of criticism. Some argued the revisions were too vague, complex and confusing. Others attacked specific changes.

One especially contentious requirement would oblige scientists to obtain explicit consent from patients before using their blood or tissue for research.

The requirement aims to prevent a repeat of what happened to Henrietta Lacks. She was an African-American woman who died of cervical cancer in 1951. Tumor cells taken from her were used without her consent to produce a research cell line that has been kept alive in labs around the world ever since.

But many researchers feared the new requirement would create unnecessary red tape and significantly hinder important research.

The academies report appears to agree. It concludes that “much of this research does not involve physical risk to participants; rather, risks are limited to the more remote possibility of informational harm resulting from the inadvertent release of confidential information.”

The report recommends that the proposal be withdrawn. Instead, it says the president should appoint an independent national commission modeled on the President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical And Behavioral Research to essentially start from scratch in revising the regulations.

HHS says it is reviewing the report, along with more than 2,100 public comments on the proposed revision.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Facebook Brings New Changes To Its Newsfeed

Facebook announced on Wednesday it will de-emphasize content posted by publishers in users’ newsfeeds, shifting the emphasis to material posted by friends. Though publishers are accustomed to the company making tweaks to newsfeeds, this change has the potential to affect traffic for news organizations.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

Facebook says it is again tweaking the algorithm that drives its news feed. They say people will see more posts from and about their families and friends rather than posts from media organizations. But what might be good news for people who use Facebook might also be making some media executives uncomfortable. To talk about this we have NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik on the line from New York. Hi there.

DAVID FOLKENFLIK, BYLINE: Hey, Kelly.

MCEVERS: So what exactly does Facebook say that it is doing?

FOLKENFLIK: Well, in a sense, Facebook is saying it’s going back to basics. There was a post yesterday from Adam Mosseri. He’s a vice president who helps to oversee the famous and vaunted news feed. If you think about how Facebook started, it was, you know, a bunch of kids in college. It grew to include people outside the college years, but they wanted to connect with friends and family. And that’s what they say they are receiving as a message from their users.

Now, a lot of, you know, publishers, news organizations, media outlets have really come to rely on Facebook in a lot of way. And we should say NPR has a financial arrangement with Facebook. The Wall Street Journal has reported that it’s to the tune of $1.2 million a year to produce what are called Facebook Live, these live-stream videos. So there are ways in which there’s these entanglements, and people have come to rely on Facebook in the media world.

MCEVERS: So you say that, you know, this comes as people were demanding that Facebook go back to what Facebook originally was, but why now? Why has Facebook made this change now?

FOLKENFLIK: Well, I don’t know that people were demanding it, but they were noting it that they were getting that kind of feedback. I think the reason there’s this disclosure now is this comes just a few weeks after we’ve been talking about – the questions were raised about bias. That is that whether human error – editors at Facebook were putting a thumb on the scale to what was called the trending topics. If you’re looking on a desktop computer terminal, that would be on the right hand column. It’s not the news feed, but these are stories and subjects that are surfaced by people as well as algorithms that you might be interested in.

And Facebook is making an attempt to be more transparent in what it’s doing and why it’s doing. And I think we should point out these tweaks happen all the time. Facebook doesn’t always announce them.

MCEVERS: Right, and so I can understand why news organizations would not be happy with the fact that a lot of their stories aren’t getting out there, but why are still – why else do they feel threatened by this move?

FOLKENFLIK: Well, the real threat is to the kinds of stories that are posted in the official Facebook accounts and pages of the news organizations. So take NPR’s, we’ve got just shy of 5 million people who have liked the page. That means they receive notifications when we post things. And that’s going to be pushed down in the list of priorities.

Now, all of that taken into account, you know, media executives I spoke to about – to executives at about six different media companies today, and they say, look; our stories are still going to be built to be as viral as ever. If your cousin Millie shares a story, that story is going to be very much in your feed. It’s that if NPR shares it, it will not be quite as prominently placed. They used to perhaps over-promote it. Now they’re going to reduce it back that. You know, what Facebook giveth, it can taketh away.

MCEVERS: Any sense that, you know, the algorithm could be tweaked further and we would either know or not know about it?

FOLKENFLIK: I think there’s going to be a roller coaster ride. I think this is – you know, we used to hear about apps or programs being in beta form – that is being tested and figured out. I think there is – this is the land of the eternal beta where Facebook is going to be overwhelmingly testing and retesting, seeing what will keep users on their pages.

And they’re – you know, they’re not dispensing with what professional media companies are doing. They’re kind of sending them to things like the Facebook Live, what we here at NPR call the NPR Live, live streams. There are instant articles where it’s an immediate flow of content done, but it’s within very specified, almost gardens of Facebook as opposed to just the postings and innovations done by the media companies themselves.

MCEVERS: That’s NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik. Thank you very much.

FOLKENFLIK: You bet.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)