May 26, 2016

No Image

Pittsburgh Stops Tampa Bay In Game 7, Will Face San Jose For Stanley Cup

Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray makes a kick save Thursday against Brian Boyle of the Tampa Bay Lightning during the third period in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals in Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh Penguins goalie Matt Murray makes a kick save Thursday against Brian Boyle of the Tampa Bay Lightning during the third period in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals in Pittsburgh. Matt Kincaid/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Matt Kincaid/Getty Images

Sharks vs. penguins is not typically an even matchup in the wild. Then again, the feathery penguins don’t have Sidney Crosby.

The Pittsburgh Penguins star says his team used “desperation level” effort in Game 7 of the Eastern Conference Finals on Thursday, claiming a 2-1 win and a matchup against the San Jose Sharks for the championship.

Bryan Rust scored a pair of second-period goals and Matt Murray stopped 16 shots to lift the Penguins over the Lightning and send the franchise to the Stanley Cup Final for the first time since 2009.

Pittsburgh will host Western Conference champion San Jose in Game 1 of the final at 8 p.m. ET Monday night, with the game broadcast on NBC.

Jonathan Drouin scored his fifth goal of the playoffs for the Lightning and Andrei Vasilevskiy made 37 saves, but it wasn’t enough to send Tampa Bay back to the Cup Final for a second straight year. Captain Steven Stamkos had two shots in his return from a two-month layoff while dealing with a blood clot.

Pittsburgh had dropped five straight Game 7s at home, including a 1-0 loss to Tampa Bay in 2011 in a series in which both Crosby and Evgeni Malkin missed due to injury. That loss had become symbolic of the franchise’s postseason shortcomings following that gritty run to the Cup in 2009 that culminated with a Game 7 win in Detroit that was supposed to be the launching pad of a dynasty.

Seven long years later, with an entirely new cast around mainstays Crosby, Malkin, Kris Letang, Chris Kunitz and Marc-Andre Fleury, the Penguins are finally heading back.

Joel Ward of the San Jose Sharks celebrates after scoring his second goal Wednesday in San Jose against Brian Elliott and the St. Louis Blues in the Western Conference Finals.

Joel Ward of the San Jose Sharks celebrates after scoring his second goal Wednesday in San Jose against Brian Elliott and the St. Louis Blues in the Western Conference Finals. Ezra Shaw/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Ezra Shaw/Getty Images

They’ll face a San Jose team that wrapped up the Western Conference Finals on Wednesday with 5-2 win over St. Louis. It’s the 25-year-old franchise’s first Stanley Cup Finals, and comes a year after the team missed the playoffs entirely.

Captain Joe Pavelski scored an early goal, Joel Ward added two of his own, Logan Couture had an empty-netter and Joonas Donskoi also scored for the Sharks, while Martin Jones made 24 saves.

With the loss, the Blues’ postseason woes continue as the franchise still seeks its first championship and first trip to the Stanley Cup Final since 1970. Coach Ken Hitchcock’s second goalie change of the series did not work as Brian Elliott allowed four goals on 26 shots in his return to the net.

Vladimir Tarasenko, a 40-goal scorer in the regular season, got his first points of the series when he scored twice in the third period but it was too late for the Blues.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Bryan Singer Says 'X-Men: Apocalypse' Is Not the End of a Trilogy

When X-Men: Apocalypse hits theaters on May 27, it might feel very much like a conclusion to the story that was first introduced in 2011’s X-Men: First Class, capping off a trilogy that also featured the hit X-Men: Days of Future Past as its centerpiece. Those who’ve been following the series since First Class will definitely find certain character and story arcs twisting towards an inevitable (but temporary) conclusion, but those who’ve been tuning in since 2000’s X-Men may find even more.

Fandango recently sat down with X-Men: Apocalypse director Bryan Singer for a sprawling conversation about Apocalypse, as well as the five other X-Men films that have dazzled audiences for almost two decades. In Singer’s mind, Apocalypse doesn’t just wrap up a story that began five years ago — instead it caps off a journey that began long before that.

“To me this is not the end of a trilogy. To me this is the climax of six movies, including X-Men 1, 2 and 3,” he says. “It incorporates pieces and homages and reflections back on those previous movies. I don’t call it a sequel or a prequel – I call it an in-betweenquel. It harks upon all of those movies, and because it’s ultimately about the formation of the X-Men, it’s the beginning of endless possibilities with these characters.”

Endless possibilities, you say?

Fandango spoke to Singer about some of those possibilities (think outer space-y), as well as what the future may hold for Wolverine, and we’ll dole out some of those details as we inch closer to Apocalypse‘s release. But what it does point to is the fact that while Apocalypse may feel like the end of a six-film series (or “sixology,” as Singer calls it), the larger X-universe is just starting to find its groove.

[embedded content]

In addition to Apocalypse, Fox is also working on a third Wolverine sequel (now in production), a New Mutants movie, a solo Gambit film and a Deadpool sequel. And that’s just on the big screen. On the small screen, they’re already hard at work on two X-related shows, Hellfire and Legion, which Singer says will eventually cross over to the bigger budgeted big-screen properties.

“The idea is to do something very new and very different with Legion,” he explains. “Since it’s television, you can’t do the same level of visual effects [as a big movie], so you have to find other dramatic ways of telling the story. What’s great about these universes and particularly the X-Men universe is it’s very grounded in its characters and its themes, so even if the tone is different or the show is smaller than a movie, it can still have very strong characters and bring in a supernatural element in a very tasteful and fun way,” he says. And when the time is right you can cross over and remind people that they’re part of a bigger universe.”

Singer, who in many ways is the godfather of the modern superhero genre, says that the success of films like Deadpool and these upcoming TV shows is what’s crucial when it comes to the continuing success of the superhero genre.

“I think the individual characters have to be discovered and exploited for their own kinds of tonality, like Deadpool, which is a good example,” Singer explains. “To make lesser known characters relevant to the general public. The X-Men universe is enormously expansive – it’s every bit as large as the remaining Marvel universe or DC universe. It just takes the right hands and right cast to find the story in these characters, whether they’re the famous ones or the lesser known characters. That may make for some event pictures, like Apocalypse, or it’ll lend itself to smaller fare.”

When it comes to Apocalypse, the great thing about the movie, according to Singer, is that it both functions as the culmination of six movies, as well as an origin story for people who’ve never even seen an X-Men movie before.

In fact, it’s those people who the director most hopes to see in theaters come May 27.

“I hope that audiences who’ve never seen an X-Men movie show up with the confidence that they don’t have to have seen any other X-Men movie because this one introduces the universe, introduces the X mansion, introduces the old characters, as well as the new characters, who are all playing characters in their beginnings. So if you’ve never seen an X-Men movie, you will not be lost and you will have a great time. I’m hoping that audience shows up.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

GOP Congressman Defends House Zika Funding Package

NPR’s Audie Cornish talks with Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma about why the House funding package is enough for now to confront the spread of the Zika virus in the U.S.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said today that he hopes Congress does the right thing to support fighting the Zika virus without diverting money from other efforts, including Ebola. And Congress is having trouble getting on the same page about Zika. The Senate passed a bill last week that would provide $1.1 billion for mosquito control and vaccine research.

The House version provides around $620 million, which would be redirected from an Ebola fund, among other sources. Now, this split comes as we learned in the last week that nearly 300 pregnant women in the U.S. and its territories have the Zika virus. Republican Congressman Tom Cole of Oklahoma is a cosponsor of the House bill.

Welcome to the program.

TOM COLE: Hey, it’s great to be with you.

CORNISH: Earlier this week, we heard from Ron Klain, who led the White House response to Ebola. And he said this, it’s not a question of whether babies will be born in the U.S. with microcephaly as a result of Zika. It’s a question of when and how many? And he said for years to come, these children will be a human reminder of the cost of absurd wrangling in Washington.

What is your response to that?

COLE: Well, frankly, I think he’s misinformed. The $600 million has already been appropriated. That somehow gets lost in the process. And the moment the president declared emergency, he was informed by the House Appropriations Committee, spend whatever you need. You’ve got plenty of money in various funds. We will backfill and replace that money as needed.

This bill is an additional $620-odd million, so roughly two thirds of the $1.9 billion that the president’s requested. The rest will be provided in the normal appropriations process. The only real dispute here is do you simply charge this to the national credit card, that is, not offset it – just go borrow additional money?

Or do you use existing funds and the normal funds and appropriations to take care of what’s genuinely an emergency and ought to get top priority in terms of funding?

CORNISH: Do you have any concerns about appropriations being held up this fall and holding up this effort?

COLE: Not in terms of this because first of all, the administration literally has billions of dollars, unobligated dollars, set aside to use and the assurance that the money, as used, will be replaced as needed.

CORNISH: There’s been some talk of a public health emergency response fund, sort of like a FEMA for public health emergencies. We’ve had the head of the CDC, Tom Friedan, say that he’s heard from both Republicans and Democrats that this could be helpful in cases like this where time is of the essence. Where do you stand on that idea?

COLE: I think there’s considerable merit in that proposal. We have that with FEMA, and it’s big enough to take care of, quote, “an average disaster.” It’s not big enough, for instance, to take care of something like a Hurricane Sandy or Katrina. So I think that’s something we ought to look at. We are looking at it, and I would just ask people to look at the track record here.

We’ve put more money in CDC than the president asked for, more money in NIH than he asked for. We will do that again this year, and we will take care of Zika. As a matter of fact, we’ll now start negotiations with the Senate. We had that vote today in the House of Representatives to begin what’s called a conference.

So we sit down with our colleagues in the Senate and come to a common agreement.

CORNISH: Oklahoma has had four Zika cases so far. These are all travel related. What are you hearing from your constituents? What are your concerns about that?

COLE: Well, the concerns are real. Sooner or later, we’re going to have a local outbreak – probably won’t have anything as massive as the affected countries because this mosquito isn’t as prevalent. But there’s certainly plenty of mosquitoes. And my constituents, I think, honestly have pretty good confidence when they’re not alarmed unduly by a lot of demagoguery that the government will do the right thing in the end.

And I think it will. It has – it certainly did in Ebola, it’s done in other outbreaks. But doing it prudently, using the money that you have, replacing it in future accounts that are not going to be spent for years seems like the wise thing to do.

CORNISH: Republican Congressman Tom Cole of Oklahoma, thank you for speaking with us.

COLE: Oh, thank you. It was my great pleasure.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

After Departure Of Uber, Lyft In Austin, New Companies Enter The Void

Earlier this month, voters in Austin, Texas, rejected an effort to overturn the city’s rules for ride-hailing companies. Uber and Lyft tried to prevent fingerprinting of their drivers, and now both have left town. A few other ride-share companies have popped up to help fill the void. NPR explores how people are getting around town without Uber and Lyft.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

Austin, Texas, is known for its great bars and great music but not for its great public transportation. Up until recently, if you didn’t want to drink and drive in Austin, you took a ride-hailing service like Uber or Lyft. Now Uber and Lyft have left Austin after voters made fingerprinting a requirement for drivers. Audrey McGlinchy of member station KUT reports on how Austin residents are getting around.

(CROSSTALK)

AUDREY MCGLINCHY, BYLINE: Tom Atchity and his wife, Juliet, are sitting outside bar Cheer Up Charlie’s away from the noise of a three-band lineup. Atchity and his wife drove to the bar, but drinking and driving is always a concern, and Atchity tells me he would’ve taken an Uber or Lyft had one been available.

TOM ATCHITY: I certainly have kind of kept all of my going out and drinking very local – you know, within walking distance around our house. We’re lucky enough in Austin, at least in our neighborhood, that we can do that, but I definitely kind of changed our plans a couple times for it.

MCGLINCHY: Austin’s not known for its public transportation. Bus stops are infrequent and routes limited. A small number of cabs have trouble servicing the city, and wait times are notoriously long, and fares are high.

Without Uber and Lyft, newer ride-hailing companies are scrambling to fill the gap. Here at Cheer Up Charlie’s, only one of the nearly dozen people I approach has tried a new service. But all seem curious, both riders and drivers.

CARLTON THOMAS: I’m looking for the next four people that are interested Wingz, Wingz.

MCGLINCHY: Carlton Thomas is with the Austin Transportation Department, and he’s trying to connect former Uber and Lyft drivers with new companies at a city-run fair. Dana Lillard was there early – nearly an hour before the fair opened at 10 a.m. Lines were already long, confusion high.

DANA LILLARD: What do we do? You know, where do we go? How do we handle this?

LILLARD: I’m now in Lillard’s car with her in between pickups. She worked full-time for Uber and Lyft before they left town. Now she drives for Fare, one of the many newcomers. We stare at her phone, looking for a ride request to pop up. We sit, and we wait.

LILLARD: We’ve been sitting here for probably 10 minutes now, and no requests have popped up since I’ve been signed on to the app.

MCGLINCHY: Lillard discovers that her app was silent because of a technical glitch, and that’s characteristic of these ride-hailing newbies. Companies have jumped to fill the void, trying to scale up to the size of Uber and Lyft in a matter of weeks. Among them are Wingz, Get Me and Fasten plus a local effort called RideAustin.

But riders complain about long wait times or needing to schedule rides hours in advance. As a result, some have started soliciting rides on craigslist or a local Facebook group. Responding drivers post their now-defunct Uber or Lyft profiles, trying to create order in a city thrust into commuter chaos.

Back at the bar, Danielle Garza says she drove her car downtown, but she’s planning on having a few more drinks.

DANIELLE GARZA: I honestly, until this moment, haven’t really thought about how I’m going to get home. That’s a great question.

MCGLINCHY: I called Garza the next morning to see how she got home.

(SOUNDBITE OF RINGBACK TONE)

GARZA: Hello.

MCGLINCHY: Hey, is this Danielle?

Garza left the bar before midnight and hailed a cab on the street. But she says she called it an early night knowing a cab would be more available at that time. Will she try any of these new apps? Maybe, she says.

In the meantime, two more ride-hailing companies have arrived, and as riders grasp for a new service, these recent startups are also on the lookout for former Uber and Lyft customers. For NPR News, I’m Audrey McGlinchy in Austin.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)