May 25, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Original 'Revenge of the Jedi' Teaser, 'X-Men' Parodies an '80s TV Classic and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

TV Show Parody of the Day:

Robin Leach takes part in the latest viral video promoting X-Men: Apocalypse, a parody of the 1980s reality show Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous:

Get an exclusive look at the home of the world’s prominent mutant expert – Professor Charles Xavier. #XMenApocalypsehttps://t.co/8YOJswH5ge

— X-Men Movies (@XMenMovies) May 25, 2016

Movie Comparison of the Day:

In honor of Alice Through the Looking Glass coming out this week, Couch Tomato shows 24 reasons Disney’s animated Alice in Wonderland is the same movie as The Hangover:

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

See Kirk, Spock, and Bones as if the Enterprise from Star Trek was an old sea ship instead of a spaceship:

Truly Awesome. If the #StarTrekTOS Crew Members were in 19th Century British/American Navy’s. pic.twitter.com/x6Y248OK1Z

— Pete Flower (@scifigeekpete) May 25, 2016

Supercut of the Day:

For Fandor Keyframe, Candice Drouet highlights paintings in movies in this supercut video essay:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

The following video by Jorge Luengo highlights Pedro Almodovar’s obsession with the color red:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Sir Ian McKellen, who turns 77 today, with Sandy Dennis in a promotional still for his big screen debut, A Touch of Love, in 1938:

Adorable Reimagined Movie of the Day:

The Pet Collective remade Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles with kittens playing the Turtles:

[embedded content]

Adorable Cosplay of the Day:

Earlier this week, a Star Wars themed “Pug Crawl” took place in Portland and it was the cutest thing ever. See more photos at Fashionably Geek.

Star Wars Fan Film of the Day:

Speaking of Star Wars fan stuffs, check out a cool aerial battle shot mostly from the POVs of the X-wing and TIE fighter pilots in “Attack of the Drones” (via Geekologie):

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today, on the 33rd anniversary of the release of Return of the Jedi, the Academy Film Archive unearthed and shared this early teaser for the Star Wars sequel, then titled Revenge of the Jedi:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

We Don't Know How Many Workers Are Injured At Slaughterhouses. Here's Why

Beef sides hang in a chilling room at a slaughterhouse in Nebraska.

Beef sides hang in a chilling room at a slaughterhouse in Nebraska. Nati Harnik/AP hide caption

toggle caption Nati Harnik/AP

A slaughterhouse is a safer place to work than it used to be, according to a new government report. But data gathered by federal regulators doesn’t likely capture all the risks faced by meat and poultry workers.

In an update to a 2005 report criticizing safety conditions for workers in the meat industry, the Government Accountability Office says injuries and illnesses are still common. From 2004 to 2013, 151 meat and poultry workers died from injuries sustained at work. The injury rate for meat workers is higher than the rest of the manufacturing industry.

But injuries in the meat industry are also likely to be underreported.

The GAO found several situations that may keep reported numbers from packing plants lower than reality. Here are some examples:

  • Sanitary workers who clean machinery in meat plants have suffered amputated limbs and severed fingers. Some have died on the job. But their cases are not always counted with meat and poultry industry data because many work for third-party contractors.
  • Medical staff at on-site clinics have encouraged workers to return to the line without seeing a doctor for pain. GAO cited a case where a worker made 90 visits to a nursing station before being referred to a physician.
  • Meat and poultry workers are often immigrants or refugees. They may downplay or not report injuries to protect their jobs and livelihoods. Language barriers can also prevent workers from receiving proper safety training.

“These limitations in [the Department of Labor’s] data collection raise questions about whether the federal government is doing all it can to collect the data it needs to support worker protection and workplace safety,” the GAO report said.

The GAO says safety researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should do more to study sanitation worker injuries and regulators should count those injuries alongside those sustained by other meat workers.

Worker advocates say they have long been suspicious of the injury rates reported by meat companies. For instance, a recent study at a Maryland poultry plant by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) found that one-third of workers had injuries that meet the definition of carpal tunnel, but only a handful of injuries had been reported to OSHA.

When injuries aren’t reported and treated, advocates say, they get worse.

“It has profound consequences for the workers,” says Celeste Monforton, an occupational health researcher at George Washington University. “Their injuries are exacerbated, some beyond repair.”

In recent years, groups like Nebraska Appleseed and the Southern Poverty Law Center have highlighted working conditions that they say continue to put people at risk, such as fast line speeds that can cause repetitive motion injuries. And Oxfam found that poultry workers are often denied mandatory bathroom breaks during the workday. Workers said they ended up wearing adult diapers.

The North American Meat Institute, a trade group, issued a statement defending the meat industry’s record on worker safety record. It said that OSHA has reviewed injury recordkeeping and did not find underreporting to be a regular problem at meatpacking facilities. NAMI also said that the rate of reported injuries is at an all-time low.

In an interview before the report was released, NAMI safety director Dan McCausland said the meat industry has made strides in safety over the last few decades.

“If you go back to the late 80s, early 90s – particularly in slaughtering facilities – it was not uncommon to have a third of the employees have an injury significant enough to wind up on the OSHA 300 log every year,” McCausland said, referring to the OSHA form used to report workplace injuries. “Now it’s down in the 10 percent and below [range]. We have many facilities running 3 percent or less.”

McCausland says the industry continues to look for ways to automate packing plants to take some of the load off of workers’ shoulders.

This story comes to us from Harvest Public Media, a reporting collaboration focused on food and agriculture.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Sports Commentary: Russia Clinches Gold Medal For Cheating

If Russian athletes are allowed to compete in Rio without proper vetting of doping allegations, it’ll be history repeating itself when Soviet athletes were suspected of doping in the 1970s and ’80s.

Transcript

RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:

The Olympics are coming up. And if there were a gold medal for the country that has the most performance-enhanced athletes, commentator Christine Brennan knows which one she’d present it to.

CHRISTINE BRENNAN, BYLINE: The facts and allegations have taken on the rhythm of an almost daily drumbeat marching towards this summer’s Rio Olympic Games. Have Russia’s Olympic sports already clinched the gold medal for cheating? The world track and field association thinks so. They banned Russia’s track and field athletes last November over widespread use of performance-enhancing drugs. There’s one last meeting in June to decide whether they stay suspended or are allowed back in time for Rio.

Detailed allegations of massive state-sponsored cheating during the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi led many of us to wonder – if the Russian’s rigged winter sports, why would they stop there? Why not the summer sports too? If news reports are true, at Sochi, tamper-proof containers were opened in the middle of the night to switch urine samples for Russian athletes, allowing cheaters who should have been caught to instead win medals and allowing Russia to win the overall medal count at those Winter Olympics. An intense investigation is underway to find out if Vladimir Putin’s big Russian coming-out party was simply one massive charade.

Meanwhile, perhaps you’ve heard of meldonium. That’s the heart medication tennis star Maria Sharapova and so many other young, healthy Russian athletes were taking for years, a medication with the wonderful side effect of increasing one’s endurance. It wasn’t banned before January 1, but it is now, meaning that until this year, Russian athletes have been using a performance-enhancing drug for years with no punishment. Russian officials have apologized and say they have cleaned up their act. One actually said a mouse would not be able to slip past us now. We’re not so sure about a mouse on steroids, though.

The natural reaction of any fan is to notice a pattern here and want to kick the bums out as a kind of lifetime achievement award. Problem is – time is running out to investigate the Russians. It took the doping police several years to catch Lance Armstrong, and he was just one person. How do you investigate an entire nation of athletes in a couple of months? And does the International Olympic Committee really want to kick out its pal Putin after he dropped $51 billion to put on the Winter Games two years ago? And what about the sponsors – or the TV networks? USA-Russian Olympic showdowns still draw big ratings.

That said, it will be an outrage if cheating athletes are allowed to compete in Rio. It will also be historic, as in history repeating itself. Back in the 1970s and ’80s, the Russians were called the Soviet Union. They ran an extensive doping program. And they had accomplices, the East Germans. Neither of those countries survived the end of the Cold War, but the cheating apparently did.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Online Eye Exam Site Makes Waves In Eye Care Industry

A startup called Opternative offers online vision tests using a computer and a smartphone.

A startup called Opternative offers online vision tests using a computer and a smartphone. Coutesy of Opternative hide caption

toggle caption Coutesy of Opternative

All sorts of health information is now a few taps away on your smartphone, from how many steps you take — to how well you sleep at night. But what if you could use your phone and a computer to test your vision? A company is doing just that — and eye care professionals are upset. Some states have even banned it.

A Chicago-based company called Opternative offers the test. The site asks some questions about your eyes and overall health; it also wants to know your shoe size to make sure you’re the right distance from your computer monitor. You keep your smartphone in your hand and use the Web browser to answer questions about what you see on the computer screen.

Like a traditional eye test, there are shapes, lines and letters. It takes about 30 minutes.

“We’re trying to identify how bad your vision is, so we’re kind of testing your vision to failure, is the way I would describe it,” says Aaron Dallek, CEO of Opternative.

Dallek co-founded the company with an optometrist, who was searching for ways to offer eye exams online.

“Me being a lifetime glasses and contact wearer, I was like ‘Where do we start?’ So, that was about 3 1/2 years ago, and we’ve been working on it ever since,” Dallek says.

He says 65,000 patients have signed up for the test. It’s free but costs $40 to have a doctor in the person’s home state review the online results and email a prescription for glasses or contacts.

Eye care professionals, like Atlanta optometrist Minty Nguyen, have concerns. She took the test and likes that it asks patients health questions. But she says there’s no substitute for going to an eye doctor.

“And again, it’s not for me to make any more money as an optometrist. It just kind of encourages patients to neglect the health portion of their exam, which is key,” she says. “You don’t want to go blind. It’s one of your most important senses.”

Eye health exams look for problems like glaucoma and cataracts.

Opternative is available in at least 34 states. But the company is under scrutiny. This year, Indiana outlawed the test and Michigan sent the company a cease-and-desist order.

Earlier this month, Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal signed a law to ban the test here. The sponsor, state Rep. Earl Ehrhart, ridiculed Opternative while speaking to a House committee.

“They’re required to use their computer and measure a certain distance away from their computer using their shoe. That’s why the company claims for the exam to be accurate. That’s fairly difficult to believe,” he said. “I think our trained optometric doctors under their current protocols and our ophthalmologists go a little bit further than the shoe standard.”

Dallek says the company was never meant to replace a full eye exam. But he says state lawmakers shouldn’t decide who gets to take medical tests.

“We recommend patients get a comprehensive eye health exam every two years, and for some people maybe they choose to get it less often, but that’s their choice. That’s part of the free market, for patients to be able to kind of choose what’s best for them,” he says.

The American Academy of Ophthalmology says the test may be suitable for 18- to 39-year-olds who just want to update their prescription, but only as a complement to regular visits with an eye doctor.

The American Optometric Association has asked the Food and Drug Administration to pull Opternative off the market.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)