May 16, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Dolph Lundgren as Cable, Johnny Depp in Disguise at Disneyland and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

In-Character Promo of the Day:

Watch Alice Through the Looking Glass star Johnny Depp surprise fans at Disneyland as a Mad Hatter poster come to life (via Nerd Approved):

[embedded content]

Casting Illustration of the Day:

With Dolph Lundgren saying he’d be into playing Cable in Deadpool 2, BossLogic shows what that could look like (via ComicBook.com):

Movie Trivia of the Day:

You’ve likely seen Captain America: Civil War by now, so here’s some extra trivia about the sequel to keep you in the know:

[embedded content]

Movie Truths of the Day:

A lot of urban legends about Star Wars have circulated over the decades, so here’s WhatCulture breaking down fact from fiction:

[embedded content]

GIF of the Day:

We’ve been led to believe that Rey is not related to the Skywalker family, but this mashup of Star Wars: The Force Awakens and Revenge of the Sith makes us see a family resemblance:

Woah. pic.twitter.com/CcjdffAl3Z

— Trey Mitchell (@TheTreyinator) May 15, 2016

Actor in the Spotlight:

Speaking of The Force Awakens, the latest episode of the character actor showcase No Small Parts profiles the career of Oscar Isaac:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Henry Fonda, who was born on this day in 1905, shaves with an electric razor on the set of The Grapes of Wrath in 1939:

Filmmaker in Focus:

This Quentin Tarantino movie supercut shows us the first and last appearances of all his characters side by side (via Cinematic Montage Creators):

[embedded content]

Reimagined Movie of the Day:

Mashable shows us what John Woo’s Face/Off would look like sold as a Western:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 30th anniversary of the release of Top Gun. Watch the original trailer for the blockbuster that shot Tom Cruise to full fledged stardom below.

[embedded content]

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Crowdfunding For Small Businesses Gets Kick-Start

President Obama signs the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act in 2012. Crowdfunding, long used by charities, could become a popular way for small businesses and startups to raise money.

President Obama signs the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act in 2012. Crowdfunding, long used by charities, could become a popular way for small businesses and startups to raise money. Carolyn Kaster/AP hide caption

toggle caption Carolyn Kaster/AP

Starting today, small companies can raise up to $1 million from ordinary investors through what are called “crowdfunding portals.” These portals are different from sites like Kickstarter. As one of the portal sites SeedInvest explains on its website:

“Kickstarter promises rewards for successful projects in the form of anything that is not monetary, whereas equity crowdfunding, as its name suggests, promises a financial slice of the pie when it comes to startup and small-business investment.”

So in other words, instead of just getting, say, a t-shirt, by investing through one of these portals, you get an actual equity stake in a small company that’s looking to raise money and grow. You own a piece of the company. And you can make money by selling that stake down the road if it appreciates in value.

It used to be that to buy shares in a company that’s too small or young to be publicly traded, you needed to be what’s called an “accredited investor.” That means you had to be pretty wealthy.

But as part of the JOBS Act in 2012, Congress decided there should be a way for ordinary Americans to invest in small businesses or startups too. To protect investors though, there are new rules surrounding the process.

If you’re a small business owner looking to raise money this way, you have to go through a registered broker dealer or a funding portal that’s been approved by regulators. Some of these new portals include NextSeed, SeedInvest, and Wefunder.

Of course there are risks for investors. The self-regulatory industry group FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) has posted advice for ordinary people interested in investing in an early-stage company through crowdfunding here.

For businesses, crowd-funding promises to expand the world of options for raising capital. It’s possible that businesses could raise money more cheaply and/or easily by crowdfunding than through traditional bank loans or professional investors. But, fees appear to be a question mark at this point. If the fees are too high, either for investors or businesses, that might stop crowdfunding from really taking off.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Supreme Court Sends Obamacare Contraception Case Back To Lower Courts

The Supreme Court Monday punted on the constitutional merits of a religious freedom challenge to the Affordable Care Act. The court said it was feasible to satisfy religious groups and women seeking contraception and sent the case back to the lower courts.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Today the U.S. Supreme Court avoided making a decision on birth control coverage for employees. This is the coverage guaranteed under the Affordable Care Act. Instead of resolving a clash between religious objectors and the law, the Court said there’s the possibility of a compromise, so it unanimously booted the case back down to the lower courts. The justices gave instructions to take sufficient time for the two sides to work it out.

To talk through what happened, NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg is in the studio. And Nina, if you had to write a headline for this story, what would it be?

NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE: The justices punted. You know, Audie, I don’t want to be flip about this, but they said to the parties, you folks negotiate for now, and the appeals courts below can deal with this problem for now; and then you can come back here later – much later.

CORNISH: So give us a little more detail. What was this case all about?

TOTENBERG: Well, the Affordable Care Act, among other things, seeks to deal with one of the major health care costs for women – birth control. It requires all employers who provide health insurance to include free contraception coverage for their employees. Religiously affiliated nonprofits like universities, hospitals and charitable organizations can opt out by notifying either the government or their insurer of their objections. The government then works with the insurer to provide the coverage independently.

The opt-out provision was added to the health care law as an attempt to accommodate the objections of some religious nonprofits, but it didn’t go far enough for them. They contended that notifying the government or the insurer of their objections would make them enablers of birth control via a different route. They want to be completely exempt, to be treated the same way that houses of worship are treated, meaning that their employees and, in the case of universities, their students would have no birth control coverage.

CORNISH: So those religious nonprofits that rejected this go to the court, and they lost in most places, right?

TOTENBERG: They lost in 8 out of 9 appeals courts. But one ruled in their favor, so there was a conflict. And the Supreme Court agreed to resolve the issue. After the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, however, that turned out to be very difficult, and the court looked as though it might be headed for a 4 to 4 tie.

Less than a week after the oral argument in the case, the justices floated a compromise idea – no written notification and a package of free birth control coverage from the same insurer. The court asked the two sides to file briefs responding to its suggestions.

What it got back was less than totally enthusiastic, especially from the government which warned of important practical problems. Nevertheless, today, in an unsigned unanimous opinion, the court chose to treat those responses in the rosiest of fashions. The court then sent all the birth-control cases – and I think there are now 17 of them – back to the lower courts with the instruction to look for a way to better reconcile religious objections with the need to provide free birth control coverage for women who work at religiously affiliated universities, hospitals, charities…

CORNISH: Wow.

TOTENBERG: …Et cetera.

CORNISH: Sounds like a tall order.

TOTENBERG: Uh-huh.

CORNISH: So is there another agenda here?

TOTENBERG: Well, probably there are many agendas. First is the court’s desire to avoid a 4 to 4 tie which lets stand the judgment of the lower court, meaning that in this case, for instance, there would not have been one legal rule for the whole country.

Another is Justice Anthony Kennedy, who would’ve been a fifth vote if he sided with the court’s liberals in this case or, if he went the other way, a fourth vote for a tie. And he seemed very torn at oral argument. And third, this is an eight-justice court with a big, fat vacancy. And today’s action ensures that nothing will be decided by the time of the election.

CORNISH: Wait, so what does that mean – that really nothing will be decided before the election?

TOTENBERG: Well, in the starkest terms, if Donald Trump wins, he says he’ll fill the ninth seat with a conservative, and the court likely would strike down the birth control mandate as a violation of religious rights. If, on the other hand, the Democratic nominee wins, then the pendulum swings to women’s reproductive rights and the government’s right to legislate to protect women’s health.

CORNISH: So what did the court actually decide today?

TOTENBERG: It was extremely explicit about that. It said it was deciding nothing. And in the meantime, the coverage continues as it is today.

CORNISH: That’s NPR’s Nina Totenberg. Nina, thanks so much.

TOTENBERG: Thank you, Audie.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

ESPN Site 'The Undefeated' To Explore Intersection Of Sports And Race

ESPN is set Tuesday to launch “The Undefeated,” a digital site and news team focused on the intersection of race, sports, politics and culture. NPR profiles “The Undefeated” and its new editor, former Washington Post managing editor Kevin Merida.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

A new ESPN website goes live tomorrow. It’s called The Undefeated, and it’s dedicated to the intersection of sports, race, culture and politics. The small staff carries big aspirations, and lots of swagger. But as NPR’s David Folkenflik reports, The Undefeated almost lost the game before it started.

DAVID FOLKENFLIK, BYLINE: Kevin Merida works these days in an abandoned suite of radio offices of the Washington Bureau of ESPN’s corporate sibling ABC News. Merida was previously managing editor of The Washington Post, which he announced in October he would be leaving after 22 years.

KEVIN MERIDA: There wasn’t a whole lot to lose, right? I mean, I felt like I had done a lot. And so I had either reported on or supervised, you know, seven presidential campaigns, so this would have been the eighth.

FOLKENFLIK: Merida’s now editor-in-chief of The Undefeated. Some of his newspaper colleagues were incredulous. But Merida, a sports fan, proved open to a very different path.

MERIDA: When I began to think about this and I took the job, it was like my brain’s on fire, you know? I’m thinking of all kinds of things, different ideas and different things to create.

FOLKENFLIK: As one example, Merida points to the threat of a boycott by black football players at the University of Missouri that toppled their campus’ president.

MERIDA: It’s certainly a story that African-Americans in this country know very well. The history of struggle is one of just incredible overcoming of obstacles and people doubting you and thinking you’re not as smart as you are, as special as you are.

FOLKENFLIK: In recent years, ESPN has encouraged a lot of reporting that deviates from pure sports coverage. The Undefeated’s newsroom now includes a former White House reporter for The Washington Post, a former BuzzFeed editor to cover entertainment, a fashion and style writer, too. The death of Prince – yeah, that would be a story for The Undefeated or this…

MERIDA: The discussion around Serena Williams. Amazingly, there’s more discussion about her body, and she’s the greatest tennis player in the history of the world and one of the greatest athletes. She would have an argument to be the greatest athlete in the history of the world.

FOLKENFLIK: Initially, the site’s name could’ve been the Vanquished. The Undefeated had been the brainchild of the fiery former ESPN commentator Jason Whitlock. Whitlock had never managed a newsroom. Staff rebelled. He was ultimately fired last summer.

RAINA KELLEY: I didn’t want to do it.

FOLKENFLIK: Raina Kelley had a job she liked. She was, until recently, senior editor at ESPN The Magazine. As an an African-American journalist, Kelley watched The Undefeated closely, but kept her distance.

KELLEY: Everything was in a black box, so there was no real information about what the future was going to be.

FOLKENFLIK: Kelley is now managing editor at The Undefeated, and when she speaks of her aspirations, she’s unvarnished, thanks in large part to the hiring of Merida.

KELLEY: We get along so well. We thought so similarly about what we wanted the project to be that I knew we were going to be able to do it and kick it’s [expletive].

(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “THE UNDEFEATED”)

DEE-1: (Rapping) Black is beautiful. Beauty is black. Our blemishes apparent, but the beauty intact.

FOLKENFLIK: The site has its own anthem by the New Orleans rapper Dee-1.

(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, “THE UNDEFEATED”)

DEE-1: (Rapping) Sports, music, struggle, it’s all in the black experience.

FOLKENFLIK: ESPN’s television shows have a disproportionately large African-American following compared to the population at large. It’s black digital leadership by contrast is disproportionately small, according to the network. Senior executives say ESPN is especially pursuing male African-American readers between 18 and 34 years old.

As Merida and I talk, he glances through a studio window at Aaron Dotson, a new African-American colleague at the outset of his career.

MERIDA: And we have some young people that are really just in the beginning. And to help them develop, you know, I often get emotional about that just, you know, kind of seeing the young people.

FOLKENFLIK: You’re getting emotional right now.

MERIDA: Yeah because whether it’s him or Justin Tinsley or…

FOLKENFLIK: Here, Merida is weeping unabashedly. I ask him why this project means so much to him.

MERIDA: It’s run by journalists of color, you know? And to be able to do that that hasn’t happened a lot – right? – in big places. People really think about that. And hey, you know, I’m just, you know – particularly when you’re looking at people who – they still have so much of their career ahead of them, so you want to, you know, be part of helping them achieve what they want to achieve.

FOLKENFLIK: Merida’s not so secret hope is to land an exit interview with the nation’s first black president, like Merida, an ESPN fan. David Folkenflik, NPR News, Washington, D.C.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by Verb8tm, Inc., an NPR contractor, and produced using a proprietary transcription process developed with NPR. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)