April 15, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Marvel Phase Two Recap, 'The Force Awakens' Jakku Escape FX Breakdown and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Franchise Recap of the Day:

With Captain America: Civil War coming out soon, get a reminder of what’s happened in Phase Two of the Marvel Cinematic Universe in this retrospective (via Live for Films):

[embedded content]

Cosplay Reality of the Day:

Want to have the best, most spot-on Darth Vader cosplay? This infogram indicates that might be a bit pricey (via Fashionably Geek):

VFX Reel of the Day:

Watch a breakdown of the visual effects of the Jakku escape from Star Wars: The Force Awakens (via Devour):

[embedded content]

Studio Showcase of the Day:

The revolutionary studio A24 is celebrated in this supercut of their films, all of them interesting releases that most distributors wouldn’t touch (via Film School Rejects):

[embedded content]

Cinematographer in Focus:

Check out some of the greatest shots from the lens of Roger Deakins in this supercut showcase (via Cinematic Montage Creators):

[embedded content]

Actor in the Spotlight:

Jeffrey Dean Morgan, who currently can be seen briefly in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, is the focus of the latest episode of No Small Parts:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Emma Watson, born on this day in 1990, with Rupert Grint and Daniel Radcliffe during the making of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone about 15 years ago:

Supercut of the Day:

In this “Color Theory” video, see the best shots in movies representing each color of the rainbow (via Cinematic Montage Creators):

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

The Film Theorists looks into the scientific possibility of the titular storm from Sharknado:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

With the live-action remake now in theaters, here’s the original trailer for Disney’s 1967 animated feature The Jungle Book:

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Obama Urges Opening Cable TV Boxes To Competition

President Obama said he supports making it easier for viewers to buy cable TV boxes instead of renting them.

iStockphoto

President Obama is throwing his weight behind a plan that would lead to competition in the market for set-top cable and satellite TV boxes. Most viewers now rent the boxes from their TV providers. The Federal Communications Commission wants to make it easier for viewers to buy the devices.

The FCC estimates it costs subscribers $231 a year on average to rent the bulky boxes that enable them to watch cable or satellite TV. Earlier this year the agency proposed a way to make it easier for viewers to buy the boxes outright.

In essence it would require TV channels to sell their content to third-party groups, like Google and others who would sell their own devices. In an interview with Yahoo News, President Obama says a little competition is a good idea:

“The cable or satellite box is just one example of an area where because it’s been tied to the provider and you rent it and consumers spend billions of dollars on this every single year, there hasn’t been much innovation. And so the FCC is looking, independently of anything we do here at the White House, at whether it makes sense to open that up to competition.”

The president’s backing of the FCC proposal is part of a broader White House initiative to spur competition. In the Yahoo News interview, Obama compared the cable box issue to earlier moves by the government to open up the telephone system in the 1980s.

“Across the board, if we have more players who can potentially participate, fewer barriers to entry, the rules aren’t rigged, then you get more people trying to get your business and you get better products at cheaper prices,” Obama said.

The cable TV industry denounced the president’s endorsement of the FCC action. Former FCC Chairman Michael Powell now heads the National Cable and Telecommunications Association. In a blog post, he accused the White House of injecting “politics and inflammatory rhetoric into a regulatory proceeding by what is supposed to be an independent agency.”

The FCC’s final decision on the matter could come later this year.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

New York Legalizes Professional Mixed Martial Arts Fights

Gov. Andrew Cuomo (center) signed into law a measure that will allow professional mixed martial arts in New York. Behind him are UFC athletes Chris Weidman (left) and Ronda Rousey.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo (center) signed into law a measure that will allow professional mixed martial arts in New York. Behind him are UFC athletes Chris Weidman (left) and Ronda Rousey. Mark Lennihan/AP hide caption

toggle caption Mark Lennihan/AP

New York has ended its ban on professional mixed martial arts — the last state in the U.S. to do so — and the Ultimate Fighting Championship wasted no time in announcing a match at Madison Square Garden.

The league said it will host a major pay-per-view event at the storied venue on Nov. 12.

“Our commitment to bringing incredible live events to New York starts immediately,” UFC Chairman and CEO Lorenzo Fertitta said at Thursday’s bill-signing event with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

The governor echoed that sentiment.

“It’s time to bring mixed martial arts competitions to the New York stage. With venues like Madison Square Garden, New York truly is the international icon for great sporting events, and we’re excited to begin a new chapter of MMA in the Empire State,” Cuomo said in a statement.

Hey @TheGarden: Let’s do this ? pic.twitter.com/SnbB82PzqZ

— UFC (@ufc) April 14, 2016

Ending the 1997 ban on pro MMA fights will also “close a statutory loophole under which unregulated and unsupervised ‘amateur’ mixed martial arts competitions had been occurring in New York State,” the statement read.

With mixed martial arts contests newly under the purview of the New York State Athletic Commission, the governor’s office touts that the industry will bring in $137 million, once it is operating at “full programming capacity.”

The law also ensures the athletes’ safety — at least to the extent that a sport where competitors kick and punch each other into submission can be safe.

In New York’s semiregulated amateur MMA circuit, fighters were allowed to compete without being tested for blood-borne illnesses like HIV or hepatitis C, as Deadspin wrote when it reported on the MMA legalization bill in 2014.

In a sport where blood is nearly as inevitable as winning and losing, not testing athletes for such illnesses is a concern.

Deadspin wrote:

“The problem is that while these fights are nominally regulated by private organizations, some of them are, in practice, not regulated at all. That’s why fighters can compete in New York with HIV, hepatitis C, and other conditions that would prevent them from getting in a cage anywhere else in the United States.”

It also noted that some of the amateur events did not have doctors on scene, instead relying “on paramedics, acupuncturists, or calls to 911 operators.”

After citing the number of jobs MMA will create and the revenue dollars it will draw, Senate Majority Leader John Flanagan said in the statement from the governor’s office: “More than that, this bill will help safeguard the health and welfare of these professional athletes.”

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Doctors Unsure About How To Talk With Patients About End-Of-Life Care

Talking about end-of-life care may be difficult, but the stakes make the conversations worth the effort.

Talking about end-of-life care may be difficult, but the stakes make the conversations worth the effort. Sam Edwards/Getty Images/Caiaimage hide caption

toggle caption Sam Edwards/Getty Images/Caiaimage

Doctors know it’s important to talk with their patients about end-of-life care.

But they’re finding it tough to start those conversations. When they do, they’re not sure what to say, according to a national poll released Thursday.

Such discussions are becoming more important as baby boomers reach their golden years. By 2030, an estimated 72 million Americans will be 65 or over, nearly one-fifth of the U.S. population.

Medicare now reimburses doctors $86 to discuss end-of-life care in an office visit that covers topics such as hospice, living wills and do-not-resuscitate orders. Known as “advance care planning,” the conversations can also be held in a hospital.

Payment for such discussions was initially included in the Affordable Care Act, but removed because of the controversy over so-called death panels. Medicare ultimately changed its policy, independently of Obamacare, to allow reimbursement for the end-of-life planning sessions.

The poll of 736 primary care doctors and specialists, including 202 in California, examined their views on advance care planning and end-of-life conversations with patients. Among the findings:

  • While 75 percent of doctors said Medicare reimbursement makes it more likely they’d have advance care planning discussions, only about 14 percent said they had actually billed Medicare for those visits.
  • Three quarters also believe it’s their responsibility to initiate end-of-life conversations.
  • Fewer than one-third reported any formal training on end-of-life discussions with patients and their families.
  • More than half said they had not discussed end-of-life care with their own physicians.

The survey was commissioned by The John A. Hartford Foundation, the California Health Care Foundation and Cambia Health Foundation. (California Healthline is an editorially independent publication of the California Health Care Foundation.)

The general survey has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.6 percentage points. For the internist/primary care provider sample, margin is plus or minus 4.5 percentage points. For specialists, plus or minus 6.0 points.

Patients and their families increasingly want to talk about end-of-life care with their physicians well before facing a terminal illness, studies have shown. Most also want to die at home rather than in a hospital, although cultural differences influence end-of-life preferences.

Policy analysts are urging more end-of-life conversations not just to accommodate patients’ desires, but to save money on aggressive medical interventions that patients and their families don’t want and that won’t prolong life.

A recent study found nearly 40 percent of American patients dying with cancer received at least one chemotherapy treatment in the six months before they died, more than in six other countries studied. An average of about $18,500 was spent on U.S. hospital costs for patients in their last six months.

Nearly a quarter of the physicians in the national poll said that the electronic health records they’re required to use don’t have a place to include patients’ end-of-life preferences. Even when electronic health records signaled that a patient had an advance care directive, nearly a third of doctors reported they couldn’t access its actual contents.

And doctors who received their medical training years ago say they rarely focused on how to talk to patients about end-of-life care, although medical education is improving in that regard.

Physicians in large medical systems may find more support than those in private practice. At Kaiser Permanente in Northern California, physicians receive training in end-of-life discussions and have time to carry them out, said Dr. Ruma Kumar, the HMO’s regional medical director of supportive care services.

Kaiser Permanente looks to nurse practitioners, registered nurses and social workers to work with patients on various stages of what the HMO calls “life care planning.” The HMO also offers a website to guide people through the process.

Kumar said Kaiser encourages both doctors and patients to think of end-of-life planning “as a routine part of care, just like you’d get a mammogram or colon cancer screening.”

This story was produced by Kaiser Health News, which publishes California Healthline, a service of the California Health Care Foundation. Follow Barbara Feder Ostrov on Twitter: @barbfederostrov.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)