March 30, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Movie Villains Assemble for 'Suicide Squad' B Team, the Many Faces of Superheroes and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mashup of the Day:

See all your favorite villains, incluidng Dr. Evil, Gollum and the Wet Bandits from Home Alone, assembled in Funny or Die’s Suicide Squad parody trailer:

Superhero Movie Truth of the Day:

PBS’s Idea Channel attempts to answer who should pay for all the destruction seen in superhero movies and how it would happen in real life:

[embedded content]

Superhero Movie Infogram of the Day:

Keep track of which superheroes have been portrayed by which actors and how many times in this handy infogram (via Geekologie):

Superhero Supercut of the Day:

It’s Batman versus Superman in terms of who gets referenced more in movies and TV shows:

Adorable Star Wars Cosplay of the Day:

More cute cosplay out of WonderCon this week, here’s a family dressed as Rey, Finn and baby BB-8 from Star Wars: The Force Awakens (via Fashionably Geek):

Star Wars Trivia of the Day:

There are a lot of things we know the names of in the Star Wars universe, even though they’re never named in the movies. Here is a video highlighting 23 such things (via /Film):

[embedded content]

Adorable Vintage Image of the Day:

In honor of Warren Beatty‘s birthday, here’s a photo of him and sister Shirley MacLaine as kids:

Movie Comparison of the Day:

Couch Tomato shares 24 reasons why Christopher Nolan‘s Inception and Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince are the same movie:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker Comparison of the Day:

David Lynch is linked to Maya Deren with a side-by-side comparison between many of his movies, plus Twin Peaks, and her experimental film classic Meshes in the Afternoon:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 15th anniversary of the release of Spy Kids. Watch the original trailer for Robert Rodriguez‘s family film below.

[embedded content]

and

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Obama Task Force Director On The Cancer 'Moonshot' Initiative

NPR’s Audie Cornish talks with Greg Simon, executive director of the Obama administration’s Cancer Moonshot Task Force, about the barriers to advancements in treating cancer.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

Back in January at the president’s State of the Union address, there was one ambitious announcement that stood out.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BARACK OBAMA: Let’s make America the country that cures cancer once and for all. What do you think, Joe?

(CHEERING)

CORNISH: President Obama put Vice President Joe Biden in charge of what is now called the Cancer Moonshot Task Force. The mission is as ambitious as putting a man on the moon used to be – eliminate cancer as we know it. The task force now has an executive director – Greg Simon. He’s been on the job for a week and a half, and he joins me now. Greg Simon, welcome to the program.

GREG SIMON: Thank you.

CORNISH: So talk about exactly what this task force is supposed to do, especially in so short a period of time, right? President Obama’s tenure’s coming to a close.

SIMON: Well, it is a short period of time, but there are very few problems that are holding us back in cancer research that are unknown. We know what the problems are, and now we need to start the action to deal with those problems because the overarching goal of this initiative is to achieve 10 years of progress in five years.

Now, there are some things that can’t be speeded up. You can’t do a three-minute egg in one minute, but you don’t have to spend six weeks setting it up. And that’s often what we do in science. So we’re looking at, how can we share data from cancer centers to cancer centers to accelerate knowledge transfer? We’re looking at how to communicate with the public the importance of being in clinical trials. We’re looking at the importance of the pharmaceutical industry of opening up their compound libraries for more people to explore possible therapeutic agents in those libraries.

CORNISH: You mentioned this idea of getting different cancer center databases to share information. What are the obstacles to that right now?

SIMON: Well, there are cultural obstacles. People tend to want to keep the data in their institution because that data is valuable. It can lead to new therapies. It can lead to new ways to treat patients, and people want them to come to their center.

Our technology for sharing has improved faster than our attitude about sharing, and that’s part of what the vice president is doing – is helping change that attitude so that people realize the more you share, the more you have.

CORNISH: Now, you have worked with the medical company Pfizer. You’ve worked with nonprofits in the cancer care industry. Fundamentally, this is still business, and people are competing with each other.

SIMON: That’s true, but this is sort of the tragedy of the commons example. If people don’t take care of a common space, it deteriorates, and everybody suffers. The common space here is people surviving cancer. Academia is not very good at taking a drug to market, and they’re not very good, and they shouldn’t be that good at raising billions of dollars for those clinical trials and the cost of bringing a drug to market.

The pharmaceutical industry is very good at clinical trials and marketing, but they tend not to often have the trust of the people they’re trying to help. There are many foundations that want to partner with the pharmaceutical industry to do research into a rare disease that would otherwise not be funded. And the foundations bring money, and they bring patients. But what they don’t have are the scientists to develop the drug.

And those collaborations are a way that we can link patient community and the pharmaceutical community for both people’s benefits.

CORNISH: Do you worry about overselling what can accomplished here? I mean, it’s called the Cancer Moonshot Initiative. Do you think people think you’re going to cure caner altogether?

SIMON: Well, we try to avoid giving the impression that in between now and the end of term we’re going to cure cancer now and forever, but what we can do, is we can identify what needs to be done and put the power of the vice president and the president behind it while we’re here and create a blueprint for any next administration to take this forward because the kind of issues we’re dealing with are things that can ease the path for the scientist out there to do their job better.

You know, I always say that the people who are in the system don’t have the time to fix the system. They’re too busy trying to save our lives with new drugs and therapies. But those of us on the outside – it’s our job to fix the system. And there are plenty of things in the system that are totally amenable to being improved this year and over the next several years that will save lives.

CORNISH: Greg Simon is executive director of the White House Cancer Moonshot Task Force. Thank you so much for speaking with us.

SIMON: Thank you.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

UConn Women's Basketball Team Confronts Consequences Of Being 'Too Good'

The University of Connecticut women’s basketball team is destroying the competition. In fact, this year, there hasn’t been any competition. But as the Huskies are closing in on their fourth consecutive title, the lack of competition is hurting the women’s game. NPR’s Audie Cornish talks to David Ubben of the website “Sports on Earth.”

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

This year’s University of Connecticut women’s basketball team is the stuff of video games, not real life. The Huskies are beating teams by an average of 40 points. The three-time defending champion is undefeated heading into this weekend’s final four, and they’re on a 73-game winning streak. And as everyone expects UConn to win its record fourth consecutive title, there’s some that wonder if being this good is actually a bad thing for women’s basketball. Joining us now is David Ubben. He covers college sports for the website Sports on Earth. Welcome to the program.

DAVID UBBEN: Thanks. I’m glad to be here.

CORNISH: So Dan Shaughnessy of the Boston Glove riled up the Internet when he tweeted during UConn’s 60-point victory over Mississippi State in the Sweet 16. He said, quote, “hate to punish them for being great, but they’re killing women’s game. Watch? No thanks.” OK, so, David Ubben, this is a seriously backhanded compliment. What’s going on here?

UBBEN: I think a lot of people do believe, when you have teams that are this far out in front of the pack, it’s like running a marathon where the guy that’s ahead is, you know, five miles ahead of anyone else that’s on the track. It’s kind of pointless to watch.

CORNISH: What? We love that guy. That guy’s the greatest runner ever. That’s why we watch it.

UBBEN: In theory. You know, this is not a dynamic that’s limited to women’s basketball. I think when you have things that are this dominant, when they aren’t unprecedented, people tune out.

CORNISH: All right. Well, coach Geno Auriemma was asked about Shaughnessy’s comments after another recent tournament rout. Here’s how he responded.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

GENO AURIEMMA: When Tiger was winning every major, nobody said he was bad for golf. Actually, he did a lot for golf. He made everybody have to be a better golfer.

CORNISH: So what’s your answer to this?

UBBEN: It’s not a great argument. Tiger Woods isn’t recruiting the best golf balls and the best golf clubs to come play for him. Tiger Woods is the golfer. And when he plays, he’s not preventing anyone else from getting better. But Geno Auriemma has to recruit, every single year, the best women’s players in the country. So when he gets a good player, somebody else doesn’t get a good player. And so when you’re asking everyone to improve your game, well, you could start by handing off some of those good players to other programs. And that’s a ludicrous request, but UConn’s still going to be out in front as long as Geno keeps getting the best players and developing the best players. It’s a credit to them, but it’s still not helping the women’s game.

CORNISH: What do you say to women, especially young women players, who hear this and may think that this kind of argument from Shaughnessy and others is essentially sexism passed off as sports opinion, right? I mean, the idea being that women – we don’t want to watch them. They’re not as good, until they’re really good, and then we say we don’t to watch them because they’re really good. I mean, this is – this is seeming very much like a catch-22.

UBBEN: Yeah, I think there’s certainly something to that. And I think it’s a tough line because I think that it’s hard to sort out. And a lot of times, it’s hard to have honest conversations about, how do we improve the women’s game? How do we fix these issues without sort of being drowned out by, well, you’re being a sexist.

CORNISH: In the meantime, is there any chance that UConn could use lose this weekend to Oregon State in the national semifinals or in a title game?

UBBEN: No.

CORNISH: Are you still going to watch?

UBBEN: (Laughter). I’ll probably tune in. That’s one thing that Geno Auriemma is unbelievable about doing. He keeps his team invested. They’re competing against themselves. We want to be as good as we can be. It’s incredible to watch. Geno Auriemma is a fantastic coach – one of the best in the history of the game.

CORNISH: That’s David Ubben. He covers college sports for the website Sports on Earth. Thanks so much.

UBBEN: Thank you, appreciate it.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)


No Image

Apple, Google Ordered To Unlock Smartphones Since At Least 2008

Apple and Google have been asked to unlock cell phones since at least 2008.

Photo Illustration: Ariel Zambelich/NPR

Throughout the fight over whether Apple should help unlock the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone was the understanding that this was not Apple’s first time at bat.

Now, documents show that Apple has been facing similar requests since at least 2008, and that the Silicon Valley giant is not alone, as Google, too, has fielded calls for help unlocking phones in court, for instance to bypass a lock screen and reset a password.

The documents came out of a request by the American Civil Liberties Union, which obtained court records from around the country on cases where the government invoked the All Writs Act — the broad 1789 law at the center of the Apple-FBI dispute — to compel a tech company’s help in retrieving contents of a locked device.

The documents reveal 63 confirmed cases where the government asked Apple or Google through courts to help get inside a locked device, predominantly in drug crime investigations, the ACLU says. Though disclosures in an ongoing Brooklyn case had confirmed that the Justice Department had about 70 existing All Writs orders, the documents show that Google is as involved in them as Apple.

Google said this in a statement to The Wall Street Journal:

“We carefully scrutinize subpoenas and court orders to make sure they meet both the letter and spirit of the law,” a Google spokesman said. “However, we’ve never received an All Writs Act order like the one Apple recently fought that demands we build new tools that actively compromise our products’ security…. We would strongly object to such an order.”

What the documents also show is the extent to which a legal precedent from the high-profile San Bernardino case could have had a far-reaching influence. More and more commonly, investigators are faced with complex digital locks that they believe hide important evidence. But what should be the role of the tech companies in unlocking them?

“The FBI wants you to think that it will use the All Writs Act only in extraordinary cases to force tech companies to assist in the unlocking of phones,” ACLU attorney Eliza Sweren-Becker said. “Turns out, these kinds of orders have actually become quite ordinary.”

Over the years, government agencies including the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives have requested a variety of types of help from Google and Apple in cases that span all regions of the country from New Mexico to Massachusetts, Oregon to Alabama, court records show.

Though the documents don’t show the extent of the companies’ compliance, we do know that in some cases, Apple did comply as has been disclosed before.

For instance, in the 2008 Secret Service investigation of a child exploitation case, United States v. Jansen, Apple helped bypass the lock screen of an iPhone at the court’s request.

In some of the cases in the ACLU records, the government plays out the arguments seen in the San Bernardino case. “The government is aware, and can represent, that in other cases, courts have ordered the unlocking of an iPhone under this authority,” U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag and Assistant U.S. Attorney Garth Hire write in a 2014 case in the Northern District of California. “Additionally, Apple has routinely complied with such orders.”

And then, the magistrate judge, Kandis Westmore, writes in response: “Apple shall not be required to maintain copies of any user data … all evidence preservation shall remain the responsibility of law enforcement agents.”

Naomi LaChance is a business news intern at NPR.

Let’s block ads! (Why?)