January 13, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: The Meanest 'Star Wars' Spoiler Ever, Wes Anderson Directs the State of the Union and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Jerk of the Day:

It’s no longer safe to leave the internet to avoid spoilers, thanks to a guy who probably ruined Star Wars: The Force Awakens for many by writing out a big plot point on the back of his SUV. Below is the blurred version in case you haven’t seen the movie. See it uncensored at Upvoted.

Music Video of the Day:

Watch a LuHan music video officially tied to Star Wars: The Force Awakens promoting its Chinese release (via /Film):

Cosplay of the Day:

And here’s one more Star Wars thing: Chewbacca doing his laundry (via Fashionably Geek):

Filmmaker Parody of the Day:

The latest “if Wes Anderson directed…” spoof comes from CNN and is for the President’s State of the Union Address:

[embedded content]

Vintage Short Film of the Day:

Today is the 80th anniversary of Basil Wright and Harry Watt‘s classic British documentary Night Mail. Watch the essential film in full here:

[embedded content]

Movie Poster Parody of the Day:

The iconic poster for The Breakfast Club gets another redo, this time with music stars of the 1980s (via Popped Culture)

Musical Tribute of the Day:

Mad Max: Fury Road gets a rap parody/tribute titled “We On the Fury Road” from MovieSongs:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

This video showcasing Paris in the movies is almost all shots featuring the Eiffel Tower, of course (via Cinematic Montage Creators):

[embedded content]

Movie Marketing Takedown of the Day:

Now You See It addresses the problems with movie trailers today:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This month marks the 15th anniversary of the debut, at Sundance, of Super Troopers. Watch the original trailer for the cult comedy below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

U.S. Treasury Cracks Down On Luxury-Home Money Laundering

Downtown Miami by night.

iStockphoto

Want to launder $20 million in illicit drug money? Buy a fancy penthouse in Miami with cash. It turns out secretively purchasing luxury real estate is a popular way for the world’s super-criminals to clean their dirty money.

“You can spend a lot of money to buy a house and sell it a year later,” says Heather Lowe, a lawyer with Global Financial Integrity. “All of a sudden, all that money is completely clean money.” Her group tracks the transfer of illicit money out of developing countries.

The Treasury Department has a new approach to step up oversight of such cash sales.

Drug kingpins from South America or organized crime figures from places like Russia — when they buy these luxury properties with cash, they set up “shell companies” to purchase them. So nobody knows who is actually buying that luxury penthouse overlooking Central Park in New York.

“That shell company might be owned by another shell company — might be a Panamanian shell company — which is owned by a Singapore trust,” Lowe says. She adds it’s often easy to conceal who is buying these properties. And she says, “That is a very common way to move illegal money and assets around the world.”

Now, at least in Manhattan and Miami-Dade County, Fla., during this temporary and exploratory phase of the program, the government will require that title insurance companies involved in real estate sales get the shell companies to reveal who are the actual owners of the shell companies. The title companies will then report that to the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). That’s the plan. But will it work?

“Well, that’s what we’re going to find out through this process,” says Michelle Korsmo, the head of the American Land Title Association. She supports the effort. But she acknowledges that if a major drug kingpin is buying a mansion through a string of shell companies all over the world, that might be a bit much for a title insurance company to figure out. “We’re not sure we’re going to be able to get access to enough information,” she says. “But we’re going to give [the government] the information that we have.”

Heather Lowe says it would be a good thing if investigators get more information than they have now, even if it’s just loose bits that still need to be pieced together.

For its part, the National Association of Realtors is supporting the move by the Treasury Department as a “reasonable” approach to combat the problem of money laundering.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Willie Mays Remembers Mentor Monte Irvin

Monte Irvin poses during spring training in this 1952 photo. The Hall of Famer died Monday at age 96.
  • Playlist
  • Download
  • Embed
    <iframe src="https://www.npr.org/player/embed/462945783/462950469" width="100%" height="290" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" title="NPR embedded audio player">
  • Transcript

Monte Irvin poses during spring training in this 1952 photo. The Hall of Famer died Monday at age 96. AP hide caption

toggle caption AP

Hall of Fame center fielder Willie Mays was once quoted as saying, “I think I was the best baseball player I ever saw.”

But when it came to life off the field, the legendary player credits his former teammate and fellow Hall of Famer Monte Irvin with being his teacher. Irvin died Monday at his home in Houston at the age of 96. Mays, now 84, spoke to NPR’s Kelly McEvers about the man he described as a father figure.

“He taught me a lot things about life,” Mays said. “I already knew how to play the game, but sometimes you need a little more. You need to know how to treat people. You need to know how when you hit a home run, you run around the bases — you don’t stop and show anybody up. Thinking was more important to him than just playing the game.”

For much of his career, Irvin played in the Negro Leagues with the Newark Eagles. When he finally reached Major League Baseball in 1949, two years after Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier, he was already 30 years old. Still, his skill was undeniable.

“He had what I call a very good arm, ran very good, good hitter and most of all thinking,” Mays said. “He was a good thinker in the outfield and that sometimes is overlooked.”

When Mays entered MLB in 1951, he joined Irvin on the New York Giants, where, he said, the older man’s guidance was invaluable.

“When I came up in ’51, Monte taught me a lot of things about life in the big city — well, I call it the Big Apple, New York. I learned very quickly because I had to play the games in the Polo Grounds,” he said. “So Monte was there playing alongside of me at all times, and it was just a wonderful feeling to have someone in the outfield with me to make sure I didn’t make a lot of mistakes out there.”

Willie Mays pictured in 1967.

Willie Mays pictured in 1967. AP hide caption

toggle caption AP

Mays, Irvin and Hank Thompson went on to form the first all-black outfield in Game 1 of the 1951 World Series against the Yankees. It was a huge moment for baseball. For Mays? Not so much.

“To me it wasn’t, because I knew those guys … it wasn’t anything different. It made me proud to be a part of that particular unit at that particular time.”

When Irvin was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1973 he acknowledged that he “wasted [his] best years in the Negro Leagues.”

But he added: “I’m philosophical about it. There’s no point in being bitter. You’re not happy with the way things happen, but why make yourself sick inside? There were many guys who could really play who never got a chance at all.”

It was this thoughtfulness that stuck with Mays. When asked about what he will miss about Irvin, Mays said simply, “the man.”

“He was a guy that was sort of like my father. … There was a park by his house there, we would go out and just talk, nothing specific, just talk, mostly about life.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Doctors Respond To Obama's Ambitious Moonshot To Cure Cancer

3:57

Download

NPR’s Kelly McEvers talks to Dr. William Nelson, director of the Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, about Obama’s ambitious plan to end cancer and why we haven’t found a cure.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

President Obama’s State of the Union address did not include a lot of big, ambitious projects. Here was the one major exception.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BARACK OBAMA: For the families that we can still save, let’s make America the country that cures cancer once and for all. What do you say, Joe? Make it happen.

(APPLAUSE)

MCEVERS: Medical professionals, of course, have been trying to cure cancer for decades. And to learn why they haven’t so far and what it would take to make it happen, we reached Dr. Bill Nelson. He’s director of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins. Welcome to the show.

BILL NELSON: Good to be here.

MCEVERS: What did you think when you heard President Obama say that in his State of the Union address?

NELSON: I was thrilled and excited. I think to have the president of the United States throw out a bold challenge to cancer researchers, physicians and one that, you know – delivered directly to the American people, many of whom have been touched by cancer, confronting the disease directly or with family members affected by it, I think it’s just a great day for us.

MCEVERS: He compared this to the U.S. sending a man to the moon, you know, something that, at the time, seemed crazy but was eventually doable. Do you think there are similarities here between these two challenges?

NELSON: I think that’s a reasonable metaphor. And of course, he named the vice president of the United States, Joe Biden, as manning mission control because he’s someone who’s been personally affected by cancer in his family and, I think, the notion that we have learned a lot about the nature of cancer. And I think we can see the kinds of things that we need to do, what needs to work out to begin to control more of the disease in more people.

MCEVERS: OK. Without sounding too simplistic here, I mean, why haven’t we found a cure for cancer yet?

NELSON: It’s not so much why we haven’t cured it. But I think – first of all, we have, for a number of people, probably cured some cancers. But why haven’t we benefited as many people as we need to? I think one of them is that just within the last decade or so, technologies have enabled us to learn the nature of cancer itself, right? All cancers are fundamentally disorders of acquired defects in genes. There’s 20,000 genes. This is what’s encoded, is the jargon term, by DNA, and the DNA science and technology can now look at all the defects and all the genes that cancers acquire. And there’s probably more than a thousand to 10,000 in each cancer in each person. And knowing that gives us a better sense of what we’re going to need to do to control it.

MCEVERS: You sound optimistic. But what are some of the big challenges? What’s in the way right now of us not getting to a cure?

NELSON: I am extremely optimistic (laughter).

MCEVERS: Yeah.

NELSON: But what are the kinds of things that are going to be challenging? Well, one of them is just individuals, except for identical twins – right? – are different from each other. They’re born with different genes. When the cancers arise in these people which have a lot of acquired gene defects, these gene defects are also different. So is it any wonder, in a sense – there’s maybe 3 million or something differences in the DNA between you and me – if each of us developed the same cancer, there’s no chance it’s going to be identical?

How different are cancers? Are we going to need a different treatment for every individual’s cancer? Are we going to be able to have them grouped into ways in which treatment will be benefited? I think that’s one challenge – the individual natures of cancers. And then the other is that as we deploy some of our most effective treatments – surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy – they’ve had side effects with them, and that’s another kind of thing. As we eradicate cancer, we’re going to want to eradicate it in such a way that people don’t have durable complications of treatment, durable side effects and the like. So I think both of those things are going to be a challenge, but it’s one that we should take on.

MCEVERS: That’s Dr. Bill Nelson, director of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins. Thanks a lot for your time today.

NELSON: Thank you so much for having me.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.