January 12, 2016

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Leonardo DiCaprio in 'The Oregon Trail,' The Best of 'Star Wars' Cosplay and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Parody Trailer of the Day:

Vulture reworked the trailer for The Revenant so it’s a trailer for an adaptation of the classic video game The Oregon Trail:

[embedded content]

Movie Takedown of the Day:

In anticipation of Michael Bay‘s latest historical blockbuster, 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi, Honest Trailers drops bombs on Pearl Harbor:

[embedded content]

Cover Song of the Day:

Through the magic of editing, watch characters from 183 movies cover Linkin Park‘s “In the End” (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Movie Science of the Day:

For Because Science, Kyle Hill explains why the movies are wrong about how things are “sucked” out into space from a hole in a spaceship:

[embedded content]

Alternate Poster of the Day:

The Lost Boys got an awesome new postcard-inspired poster by Matt Ryan Tobin for Hero Complex Gallery’s “Quattro With a Shotgun” exhibit (via /Film):

Cosplay of the Day:

See the best Star Wars cosplay of the past five years from various conventions in this remix from Beat Down Boogie:

[embedded content]

Movie Trivia of the Day:

After 27 years, is there anything you could still not know about Tim Burton‘s Batman? CineFix is here to try to stump you:

[embedded content]

Supercut of the Day:

The people at Pixar love movies as you can see in Jorge Luengo’s new video on their many homages to cinema:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

In the new episode of Frame by Frame, juxtaposition is argued as being the method to Martin Scorsese‘s madness:

[embedded content]

Classic Trailer of the Day:

This month marks the 15th anniversary of the debut, at Sundance, of Wet Hot American Summer. Watch the original trailer for the cult comedy below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

NFL Votes To Move Rams To Los Angeles, With Option For Chargers To Join Them

The St. Louis Rams will be moving to Los Angeles. It will be the first NFL franchise in the city since the Rams and Raiders left the city two decades ago.

The St. Louis Rams will be moving to Los Angeles. It will be the first NFL franchise in the city since the Rams and Raiders left the city two decades ago. Christopher Lee/The FA via Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Christopher Lee/The FA via Getty Images

After months of planning, maneuvering and dealing, NFL team owners have voted 30-2 in favor of relocating the St. Louis Rams to Los Angeles, while leaving open the option for the San Diego Chargers to share the facility.

Three teams — the Rams, the Chargers and the Oakland Raiders — have spent the past year vying to move to Los Angeles. Not only do the team owners say their stadiums are out of date, but they claim their current cities are unwilling to allocate enough public money to help build new ones. Plus, Los Angeles offers a much larger, greener media market than any of the other cities.

Ultimately, after a long day of presentations, debate and voting in a Houston hotel, Rams owner Stan Kroenke’s proposed $1.86 billion stadium in Inglewood, a suburb of Los Angeles, won 30 votes, surpassing the requisite 24-vote threshold. The funding for the Inglewood stadium will come from Kroenke and other private donors.

The approved plan also leaves room for the Chargers, owned by Dean Spanos, to share the stadium in Inglewood.

The compromise was struck after two previous plans failed to garner enough support. Kroenke’s plan to move the Rams alone to Inglewood fell short, as did the proposal from the Chargers’ Spanos and Raiders owner Mark Davis to build a shared stadium in Carson, Calif., another Los Angeles suburb.

The city of St. Louis had offered $150 million in public money to go toward a new $1.1 billion riverfront stadium, with the rest of the money coming from the state, team owner and NFL. In all, 40 percent of the stadium would have come from public money. Kroenke, however, was not satisfied with the deal, and the league evidently agreed with him. NFL rules stipulate against relocation if a viable stadium proposal has been presented in the team’s current city.

San Diego also had offered money for a new stadium to keep the Chargers in the city. San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer said: “The more San Diego has done the less engaged the Chargers have become. San Diegans deserve better.”

In fact, of the three teams, Oakland — unwilling to allocate more taxpayer money toward a stadium — was the only one not to offer the NFL a plan for financing a stadium in its current city.

The current deal gives the Chargers the ability to continue to negotiate with the city of San Diego for a more advantageous stadium-financing plan, while keeping the option of moving to the shared stadium in Inglewood. The other team owners also win, as it is expected that the moving teams will each pay a $550 million relocation fee. The real loser of the deal is the Raiders’ Davis, who is left with little leverage for a better stadium deal in Oakland.

Upon the Rams’ return to Los Angeles (they played in the area from 1946 to 1994), the team will play in a temporary facility until the new stadium is ready, most likely for the 2019 season.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

NFL Votes To Move Rams To Los Angeles, With Option For Chargers To Join Them

The St. Louis Rams will be moving to Los Angeles. It will be the first NFL franchise in the city since the Rams and Raiders left the city two decades ago.

The St. Louis Rams will be moving to Los Angeles. It will be the first NFL franchise in the city since the Rams and Raiders left the city two decades ago. Christopher Lee/The FA via Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption Christopher Lee/The FA via Getty Images

After months of planning, maneuvering and dealing, NFL team owners have voted 30-2 in favor of relocating the St. Louis Rams to Los Angeles, while leaving open the option for the San Diego Chargers to share the facility.

Three teams — the Rams, the Chargers and the Oakland Raiders — have spent the past year vying to move to Los Angeles. Not only do the team owners say their stadiums are out of date, but they claim their current cities are unwilling to allocate enough public money to help build new ones. Plus, Los Angeles offers a much larger, greener media market than any of the other cities.

Ultimately, after a long day of presentations, debate and voting in a Houston hotel, Rams owner Stan Kroenke’s proposed $1.86 billion stadium in Inglewood, a suburb of Los Angeles, won 30 votes, surpassing the requisite 24-vote threshold. The funding for the Inglewood stadium will come from Kroenke and other private donors.

The approved plan also leaves room for the Chargers, owned by Dean Spanos, to share the stadium in Inglewood.

The compromise was struck after two previous plans failed to garner enough support. Kroenke’s plan to move the Rams alone to Inglewood fell short, as did the proposal from the Chargers’ Spanos and Raiders owner Mark Davis to build a shared stadium in Carson, Calif., another Los Angeles suburb.

The city of St. Louis had offered $150 million in public money to go toward a new $1.1 billion riverfront stadium, with the rest of the money coming from the state, team owner and NFL. In all, 40 percent of the stadium would have come from public money. Kroenke, however, was not satisfied with the deal, and the league evidently agreed with him. NFL rules stipulate against relocation if a viable stadium proposal has been presented in the team’s current city.

San Diego also had offered money for a new stadium to keep the Chargers in the city. San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulconer said: “The more San Diego has done the less engaged the Chargers have become. San Diegans deserve better.”

In fact, of the three teams, Oakland — unwilling to allocate more taxpayer money toward a stadium — was the only one not to offer the NFL a plan for financing a stadium in its current city.

The current deal gives the Chargers the ability to continue to negotiate with the city of San Diego for a more advantageous stadium-financing plan, while keeping the option of moving to the shared stadium in Inglewood. The other team owners also win, as it is expected that the moving teams will each pay a $550 million relocation fee. The real loser of the deal is the Raiders’ Davis, who is left with little leverage for a better stadium deal in Oakland.

Upon the Rams’ return to Los Angeles (they played in the area from 1946 to 1994), the team will play in a temporary facility until the new stadium is ready, most likely for the 2019 season.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Experts Consider Economics To Speed Up Ambulance Response Times

4:02

Download

The Planet Money team takes a look at how ambulances use principles of economics to get to patients fast.

Transcript

ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:

When you need an ambulance you need it now, but having enough ambulances at the ready can cost a lot of money. As Audrey Quinn of our Planet Money team reports, a former high school English teacher seems to have solved this ambulance problem with economics.

AUDREY QUINN, BYLINE: It was a busy intersection in Jersey City, rush hour, pouring rain. The light changes, and a pickup truck turns suddenly, according to the police report. It sideswipes a sedan in the next lane. The driver is 61. She sits motionless. A bystander calls 911. And just three minutes and 47 seconds later, first responder Sabrine Elcomey (ph) was at the car window.

SABRINE ELCOMEY: Hello, are you OK? It’s EMS, we’re here.

QUINN: In a lot of cases, response time is the difference between life and death. And three minutes and 47 seconds is fast. Elcomey’s an EMT with Jersey City Medical Center. Ten years ago, their average response time was twice as long. Twice as many patients died from cardiac arrest.

At the scene, Elcomey checks the woman – no blood, but she’s shaken up, so Elcomey drives her to the hospital just to be safe. Elcomey’s swift response came not because she drove fast but because her ambulance had been waiting just a few blocks away, right where her dispatchers told her to be.

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: You fell – Wells Fargo – 40 Journal Square – OK. All right. We’re on our way. Seven, head over to Journal Square at the west park (unintelligible).

QUINN: They sit in a dark room on the upper floor of the hospital. A screen in front of them looks kind of like a satellite weather map over Jersey City. The darker parts of what seem like a cloud are where history says the next call is most likely to happen. That’s where ambulances should wait. Often, they choose a coffee shop. Lorraine Mallis has worked in this dispatch room since the ’90s. She has a name for the system.

LORRAINE MALLIS: I call this Hal. I don’t know if you ever saw that sci-fi movie…

QUINN: “2001: A Space Odyssey.”

MALLIS: Yeah, that’s it. That’s it. That’s how smart they – he is very smart. They should be proud of this system. It’s very good.

QUINN: They would be Jack Stout. He started thinking about ambulance response in the early ’80s. Back then, he says it was a total mess.

JACK STOUT: It was very, very difficult to hook up the person with the nearest ambulance to the person that needed it.

QUINN: Ambulances sat at station houses in one location, and when calls came in, they drove real fast.

STOUT: That’s right. That was the best tool they had.

QUINN: He’d gotten into ambulances through a winding career path. English teacher, government consultant and then the University of Oklahoma offered him two jobs at once – Emergency medical systems researcher and part-time professor of economics.

STOUT: Then that kind of tipped me off really looking here about supply and demand, which is the foundation of microeconomics.

QUINN: Staffed ambulances were the supply and 911 calls were the demand. So he started plotting out on a blackboard the pattern of that demand.

STOUT: You could look up there and you could say, oh, this is Tuesday 4 p.m. to 8 p.m.. Here’s where the calls tend to come from, and this is how many of them there tend to be.

QUINN: Stout said take the ambulances out of the station houses, put them near where the calls are going to come from, have fewer ambulances during quiet hours, more during busy. Stout’s style of ambulance response systems was a radical idea at the time. He spent decades spreading it around the country.

STOUT: And we did about half of the United States.

QUINN: How’d you get it around so fast?

STOUT: Well, it wasn’t fast. I’m old (laughter).

QUINN: Most of the places where Stout first brought his system saw immediate improvement in their ambulance response. But Stouts says a lot of departments liked the way they were doing things, all waiting together at the station. It was only in the last few years with trust in data on the rise that Stout’s method has become the norm. Audrey Quinn, NPR News.

Copyright © 2016 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.