December 7, 2015

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Rekindling the Flame for 'Star Wars,' How to Live Like a Hobbit and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Star Wars Parody of the Day:

You’re giving Star Wars another shot after it broke your heart in the past? The following video spoofs our cultural forgiveness with the franchise using film language:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Jar Jar Binks might not be in Star Wars: The Force Awakens, but nobody has confirmed if Olaf from Frozen isn’t indeed one of the new Stormtroopers (via Edgar Wright):

Fan Build of the Day:

The DIY Prop Shop shows us how to make our own X-Wing Helmet, just in time to wear it to screenings of Star Wars: The Force Awakens:

[embedded content]

Classic Cartoon of the Day:

Today is the 70th anniversary of the Disney animated classic Canine Patrol, featuring Pluto as a member of the Coast Guard. Watch it in full below.

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

Artist Isaiah K. Stephens likes to depict Disney Princesses in their old age, and he’s probably right about elderly Ariel from The Little Mermaid becoming a hoarder. See others at Design Taxi.

1980s Movies Tribute of the Day:

The gang from It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia pay homage to wild ’80s ski comedies in this promo for their 11th season:

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Tom Hanks looks less lonely on his desert island in this photo of Robert Zemeckis giving direction from the set of Cast Away. The movie had its Hollywood premiere on this day 15 years ago.

Filmmaker in Focus:

Channel Criswell has a new essay on the films of Japanese master Yasujiro Ozu, spotlighting his symbolism-fueled style:

[embedded content]

Fan Dwelling of the Day:

Fans of the Lord of the Rings movies can now live like a Hobbit thanks to special pre-fabricated homes (via Geekologie):

Classic Trailer of the Day:

Today is the 25th anniversary of the release of Tim Burton‘s Edward Scissorhands. Watch the original trailer for the movie, which stars Johnny Depp and Winona Ryder, below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

U.S. Women's Soccer Team Cancels Game Over Poor Field Conditions

Abby Wambach of the U.S. women's national soccer team (right) stands with teammates during a practice in October. The team canceled a friendly match against Trinidad and Tobago on Sunday because of the poor state of the artificial turf.

Abby Wambach of the U.S. women’s national soccer team (right) stands with teammates during a practice in October. The team canceled a friendly match against Trinidad and Tobago on Sunday because of the poor state of the artificial turf. Elaine Thompson/AP hide caption

toggle caption Elaine Thompson/AP

The World Cup-winning U.S. women’s national soccer team abruptly canceled a friendly soccer game against Trinidad and Tobago, scheduled for Sunday, because of poor field conditions.

The players and coaches, along with the U.S. Soccer Federation, decided to call off Sunday’s game in Hawaii after inspecting the artificial turf field, parts of which were peeling away from the ground.

“There were sharp rocks ingrained all over the field. They were everywhere. The artificial turf was actually pulling up out of the ground, and the turf itself was both low-grade and aging. This was a playing surface that looked like it hadn’t been replaced in years,” the team wrote in The Players Tribune.

Former U.S. soccer star Julie Foudy tweeted a photo of the turf being lifted away from the ground.

One of the reasons @ussoccer canceled today’s game in Hawaii. #USWNT pic.twitter.com/uKJUMmOCA5

— Julie Foudy (@JulieFoudy) December 6, 2015

The cancellation of the game, which would have been the seventh on the team’s 10-game World Cup victory tour, is the latest in a series of events that highlight the disparities between men’s and women’s soccer in the U.S.

Players have protested playing on artificial turf fields for years, citing bad ball bounces, painful turf burn and delayed recovery time for injuries. The complaints have been especially loud since it was announced last year that the women’s World Cup would be played on artificial surfaces instead of natural grass, prompting some international female players to file a lawsuit against FIFA, alleging gender discrimination. The men’s World Cup is played on grass.

Though the players eventually dropped the suit, they continued to be outspoken about the disadvantages of artificial turf. U.S. captain Abby Wambach called playing on it “a nightmare.”

The U.S. women’s team went on to win the World Cup, despite playing only on artificial surfaces, and shattered TV ratings for soccer in the U.S. in the process. The triumph did little to change protocol regarding field conditions for the women’s team, though; eight of the 10 victory-tour games were scheduled for artificial turf. And, according to Foudy, the field at Aloha stadium in Honolulu wasn’t inspected before the match.

That field should have been vetted months ago. And now players have to act to protect their careers and livelihood. Shaking my head. #uswnt

— Julie Foudy (@JulieFoudy) December 6, 2015

Being told @ussoccer is working w the team & coaches to get a protocol in place similar to men’s. How not already in place is beyond me.

— Julie Foudy (@JulieFoudy) December 6, 2015

In explaining their decision to sit out Sunday’s game, the players wrote: “Soccer is our job. Our bodies are our jobs. And nothing should ever be put in competition with our protection and safety as players.”

“Player safety is our number one priority at all times and after a thorough inspection throughout the day, we determined it was in the best interest for both teams to not play the match,” U.S. Soccer spokesman Neil Buethe said in a statement. “We regret not being able to play in front of our fantastic, loyal fans.”

The statement also said the federation would refund all tickets.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

FTC Sues To Block The Merger Of Office Depot And Staples

The planned merger by Staples and Office Depot faces opposition from federal regulators, who say it would hurt competition for businesses buying office supplies.

The planned merger by Staples and Office Depot faces opposition from federal regulators, who say it would hurt competition for businesses buying office supplies. Steven Senne/AP hide caption

toggle caption Steven Senne/AP

The Federal Trade Commission has taken the first step toward blocking the proposed $6.3 billion merger of Staples and Office Depot, saying the deal would hurt competition in the market for office supplies sold to large corporations.

The commission filed an administrative complaint charging that the merger between Massachusetts-based Staples, the world’s largest seller of office supplies, and Florida-based Office Depot would violate antitrust laws.

“The Commission has reason to believe that the proposed merger between Staples and Office Depot is likely to eliminate beneficial competition that large companies rely on to reduce the costs of office supplies,” said FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez.

Many large business customers buy office supplies by contract, the FTC said. That provides them with a wide range of office supplies at competitive prices, fast and reliable nationwide delivery, dedicated customer service and customized online catalogs, among other things, it said.

“That business-to-business market is distinct from the more competitive retail markets for office supplies sold to consumers,” Ramirez said.

The FTC blocked a merger between the companies in 1997, but the companies were hoping the changes in the market since then would persuade regulators to see this deal differently. Big-box stores and Internet retailers play a much bigger part in the business.

Staples and Office Depot issued a joint statement saying the FTC’s vision of the office supply market is outmoded and “based on a flawed analysis and misunderstanding of the intensely competitive landscape in which Staples and Office Depot operate”:

“The FTC underestimates the disruptive effect of new competitors in the digital economy. It also ignores the vigorous existing and expanding competition Staples and Office Depot face from numerous strong competitors, including office products dealers supported by large national wholesalers, manufacturers selling office supplies directly to business customers, dealers in adjacent categories, cooperatives of regional players, Internet resellers, big-box chains, and club stores.”

In addition to the administrative complaint, the FTC has authorized its staff to seek an injunction against the merger. An administrative trial will begin on the FTC’s complaint on May 10, 2016.

The FTC conducted its investigation with the Canadian Competition Bureau, which has also sued to block the merger.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Marijuana Extract May Help Some Children With Epilepsy, Study Finds

A strain of high-cannabidiol marijuana is used to create extracts used in experimental epilepsy treatments.

A strain of high-cannabidiol marijuana is used to create extracts used in experimental epilepsy treatments. GW Pharmaceuticals hide caption

toggle caption GW Pharmaceuticals

Parents of children with severe epilepsy have reported incredible recoveries when their children were given cannabidiol, a derivative of marijuana. The drug, a non-psychoactive compound that occurs naturally in cannabis, has been marketed with epithets like Charlotte’s Web and Haleigh’s Hope.

But those parents were taking a risk; there has been no clinical data on cannabidiol’s safety of efficacy as an anti-epileptic. This week, doctors are presenting the first studies trying to figure out if cannabidiol actually works. They say the studies’ results are promising, but with a grain of salt.

The largest study being presented at the American Epilepsy Society meeting in Philadelphia this week was started in 2014 with 313 children from 16 different epilepsy centers around the country. Over the course of the three-month trial, 16 percent of the participants withdrew because the cannabidiol was either ineffective or had adverse side-effects, says Dr. Orrin Devinsky, a neurologist at the New York University Langone Medical Center and lead author on the study.

But for the 261 patients that continued taking cannabidiol, the number of convulsive seizures, called grand mal or tonic-clonic seizures, went down by about half on average. Devinsky says that some children continued to experience benefits on cannabidiol after the trial ended. “In the subsequent periods, which are very encouraging, 9 percent of all patients and 13 percent of those with Dravet Syndrome epilepsy were seizure-free. Many have never been seizure-free before,” he says. It’s one of several [at least four. checking] papers on cannabidiol being presented this week at the American Epilepsy Society meeting in Philadelphia.

Twenty-five of those patients were followed for a yearlong study also presented at the meeting. Some of those patients did better, but one ended up doing worse. “A drug can induce an increase in seizures,” says Dr. Maria Roberta Cilio, a pediatric neurologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital who led that study. This happened with one of her patients. “For one particular child, the more the dose of [cannabidiol] was increasing, that increase was paralleled with an increase in seizure frequency,” she says.

Some patients in Devinsky’s trial also did worse while on cannabidiol, but he thinks there’s no way to tell if it was because of the drug or something else. He says we won’t know until a full clinical trial has run its course. Without that, the perceived effects of the drug might be a placebo effect or it could be some other confounding factor that hasn’t been caught in the study. What’s more, a few hundred patients isn’t a lot of patients, and doctors still need to see what will happen when a patient is on cannabidiol for more than a few months.

Epilepsy can be one of the most difficult syndromes to treat. About a third of patients have an intractable form of epilepsy. It’s common for children and adults with treatment-resistant epilepsy to exhaust the list of anti-seizure medications to little or no effect.

Jaren Hansen is a 7-year-old boy with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome, a form of treatment-resistant epilepsy. When he was 2, he started having seizures. His doctors diagnosed him with epilepsy and started him on one anti-seizure medication. Then they added another, and then another.

Jaren Hansen, here with his mother, Nicole Hansen, has had seizures since he was 2.

Jaren Hansen, here with his mother, Nicole Hansen, has had seizures since he was 2. Courtesy of Nicole Hansen hide caption

toggle caption Courtesy of Nicole Hansen

None of them seemed to be working. “He tail spun again and had a tonic-clonic seizure every day. At that point, he was on three seizure medications, and we weren’t seeing any control. Things were just tumbling downward,” says his mother, Nicole Hansen from Necedah, Wisc. “At one point, blood levels of Depakote [an anti-epileptic medication] were toxically high. We needed to try something else. We were scared for his long-term health based on just the side effects of the medicine.”

Hansen, who works as a cranberry grower in Wisconsin, started researching her son’s illness. She found an online chat group with other parents who were discussing medical cannabis, and decided to try one of the commercially available cannabidiol products. But it was difficult. States like Wisconsin do allow the shipment of cannabidiol supplements and oils that don’t contain tetrahydrocannabinol or THC, the psychoactive compound in marijuana, but most doctors won’t touch it. “They won’t even prescribe it because there are too many loopholes and too much work,” Hansen says.

Lack of physician input often leaves parents on their own, Hansen says. That presents more challenges. “You have to make sure the company can replicate the same product over and over. A small change in the ratio of THC to cannabidiol can cause the child’s seizures to increase or come back. You have to make sure there are no microbial issues like molds or funguses or pesticides.”

That people are treating themselves or their children with cannabis products is troubling to physicians. “It’s a very worrisome time. People go off and do their own thing, if things go wrong, you don’t know why. You want data, and you don’t have it, and all the families are just trying things,” says Dr. Brenda Porter, a pediatric neurologist at Stanford University School of Medicine who was not involved in the study.

Devinsky says parents either have to purchase the cannabidiol from an artisanal distributor of hemp products or compound the drug themselves. Either way, “the consistency from batch to batch is quite uncertain,” he says.

And people sometimes try different formulations from several companies in the hope one will work. “As a practitioner, I have had families move to Colorado, and many tried multiple different products,” Devinsky says. That makes it really difficult to tell what is or isn’t working. “As a doctor, I often don’t feel like I know which of many factors is contributing to a patient doing better or worse. We absolutely need rigorous, scientific data on this,” he says.

Even though the results presented at the American Epilepsy Society meeting look encouraging, researchers caution that there’s no promise cannabidiol is really going to work for many of these treatment resistant epilepsy syndromes. Until there is a full clinical trial done with a placebo-controlled element, Devinsky and others say it’s impossible to tell if cannabidiol is having a real effect on epilepsy. That takes time and puts parents in a difficult position, he says. “Parents are desperate and they feel the medical community has failed them, which is true in many cases.”

Hansen agrees with Devinsky; she feels that the clinical trials need to be finished as fast as possible. “There are parents out there doing whatever they can and experimenting with cannabis. We need the medical professionals so they can help make the proper recommendations,” she says. “But I can’t blame them for trying. When you are seeing your child dying, and knowing that you could do something to help them, how can you not do something as a parent?”

After Hansen put her son on cannabidiol he continued to have seizures, but the number of convulsive seizures went down. Then he caught a stomach flu, and things spiraled out of control. The tonic-clonic seizures came back, violently, and he nearly died. “They put him into am medically induced coma in hopes that it would reset his brain.” she says. “By God’s grace, truly, and by a miracle it did.”

Jaren is not on cannabidiol anymore. He’s on three different medications now, including a benzodiazepine and a barbiturate. “Both in the long-term can cause brain atrophy,” Hansen says. “At some point, we have to start weaning him off, and nothing else has worked. And he needs more than just cannabidiol.” She’s hopeful that cannabis research will bring the science to a point where doctors can begin looking into mixtures of cannabidiol and THC together.

Full on, randomized clinical trials testing cannabidiol for epilepsy are already underway, but it will still be some time until the results are out. Until then, Devinsky says, “Wait.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.