November 21, 2015


No Image

When A Stranger Leaves You $125 Million

3:58

Download

Bryan Bashin, CEO of the LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired, in San Francisco, started losing his sight in his teens. “Don’t just hide,” he advises others. “This is not some kind of deep loss. This is just another side of being human.” Jeremy Raff/KQED hide caption

toggle caption Jeremy Raff/KQED

One morning last year, when Bryan Bashin sat down to check his email, a peculiarly short note caught his attention.

“A businessman has passed away. I think you might want to talk to us,” it read.

Bashin directs a nonprofit in San Francisco called the LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired, so he gets a lot of email about donations. But this one felt different. It came from a group of lawyers handling the estate of a Seattle businessman who had died, Donald Sirkin.

When Bashin and the LightHouse’s Director of Development, Jennifer Sachs, checked the LightHouse’s donor database, they found no record of him. Don Sirkin had never donated to the LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired before, or used its services.

And yet, in his will, Don Sirkin had left almost his entire estate to the LightHouse, with no explanation.

In the end, the gift totaled over $125 million, more than 15 times the LightHouse’s annual budget. Bashin believes it’s the largest single gift ever given to a blindness organization.

“It’s one of those experiences where time stands still, where you know that every little bit of what you’re experiencing will be engraved in your memory,” Bashin says. “This is the moment that everything is going to change.”

He’s 60 years old, tall and almost always smiling. His eyes are cloudy; he walks with a cane. He gives off the impression of being an entirely functional, confident blind person.

But this Bryan Bashin is a relatively recent incarnation, because for a long time, Bashin didn’t identify as blind at all.

“I didn’t say the “B” word,” Bashin says. “Instead I used euphemisms if I had to. I used the lingo of the day: ‘visual impairment,’ ‘low vision,’ ‘visual challenge,’ that kind of thing.”

Bashin’s vision began to falter when he was in his teens, and gradually got worse. By his 20s, he was legally blind. Today, he says, he sees the world “as if through wax paper.” He can make out some light and color, but not faces or words.

Yet through his 20s and most of his 30s, Bashin squeezed by on the little vision he had, relying on magnifiers and special lamps to read what he could. He memorized the map of his daily route so as to not get lost. He only went out during daylight, to avoid the confusion of navigating in complete darkness.

Bashin says that a lot of blind Americans use work-arounds like these.

“Most never use a cane, or a dog, or Braille or any of the things that are identifiably blind,” he says. “In the blind community we say we’re in the closet, and it is just like being in the closet in the gay community. You try to pass and you try to be somebody that you’re not.”

But as Bashin’s vision declined, these work-arounds became harder to pull off. They were time-consuming and exhausting. Finally, when Bashin was 38, with his vision at about 10 percent of normal, he realized he couldn’t hide anymore. He decided to learn to be a blind person in public.

A friend took Bashin to a local blindness agency that Bashin found dishearteningly shabby. Stuffing was coming out of the chairs. The air conditioners buzzed. The office hadn’t been painted in decades.

For Bashin all of this was symbolic. The place lacked dignity. “None of that period made me feel like I could be a cool blind person and do stuff in the future,” Bashin said. “I felt ashamed. I felt confirmed in my suspicion that blindness would be a diminishment of my potential.”

But he did get something out of it. He learned how to navigate with a cane. He started learning the technologies that make life vastly simpler for blind people than it was a generation ago: the smart phone, text readers and pocket recorders.

And suddenly, everything got easier. For example, using text-to-speech was “vastly quicker” than trying to make out giant letters on a screen.

Since then, Bashin has made it his life’s mission to help other blind people make the leap he did. He got a job at the agency with the ripped up couches. And in 2010, he became the Executive Director of the LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired in San Francisco.

Bashin says that with the right tools and training, blindness can be reduced to the level of inconvenience. “Don’t just hide,” Bashin said. “This is not a tragedy or shame. This is not some kind of deep loss. This is just another side of being human.”

Despite enormous technological gains that have made life vastly easier for blind people in the last decade, there are still significant obstacles to independence. The unemployment rate among working-age blind people is 50 percent — ten times the national average. Job training is expensive, and learning to live independently as a blind person takes time and resources. It’s often easier to get disability checks than to find and pay for necessary training.

Bryan Bashin says Don Sirkin's bequest can help change the way blindness is perceived, by providing more people who have diminished vision with training and skills to achieve self-reliance at work and at home. The money, Bashin says,

Bryan Bashin says Don Sirkin’s bequest can help change the way blindness is perceived, by providing more people who have diminished vision with training and skills to achieve self-reliance at work and at home. The money, Bashin says, ” is about … feeling like we can dream and have options and be proud of who we are.” Jeremy Raff/KQED hide caption

toggle caption Jeremy Raff/KQED

To really master walking around using a white cane, Bashin says, requires 200 to 400 hours of training with somebody who is being paid to work with you. Learning to use a computer requires that same kind of training.

Through constant fundraising, Bashin’s organization has the resources to provide basic services to their clients.

But what Bashin wants is bigger than that: a change in how blindness is perceived. He wants to to encourage more blind people to come “out of the closet,” to embrace and celebrate blindness as a difference, and get the skills they need to pursue their ambitions.

Now, suddenly, thanks to this mysterious businessman in Seattle, Bashin and the LightHouse are looking at a different scale of ambition.

“When you get right down to it, the Sirkin bequest is about … feeling like we can dream and have options and be proud of who we are,” Bashin says.

LightHouse for the Blind and Visually Impaired is just beginning its strategic planning process, to decide how to spend the Sirkin money, but Bashin has some ideas.

One major project — which had begun well before the Sirkin grant – is a new headquarters in San Francisco. The building will have expanded facilities, including a dormitory where blind people can stay while they receive training in blind tech, cane navigation, and other necessary skills.

There’s also the idea of an award for blind people who do extraordinary things — say, travel around the world independently, or invent some kind of game-changing tool for blind accessibility.

For now, Bashin wants to understand the man behind the donation: This mysterious Seattle businessman, Donald Sirkin, left $125 million to an organization that had never heard of him, with no explanation — just a few legal sentences in a three-page will.

Last year, to try to reconstruct this man from the dead, Bashin made a trip to Seattle, where Don Sirkin had lived. He took a tape recorder and interviewed everyone he could find who had known Sirkin, including Sirkin’s ex-girlfriend, a half dozen of his colleagues and good friends.

The interviews reveal a charismatic, idiosyncratic businessman. Sirkin built a hugely successful insurance company from the ground up. He was on a caloric-restriction diet that consisted of large quantities of pomegranate juice and seaweed. He refused to eat in public. His ex-girlfriend Sue Tripp remembers going on a trip to New York with him. But while Sue went to see the Statue of Liberty, Sirkin stayed in the hotel and exercised for hours.

Don Sirkin commanded attention. If left too long in a waiting room, he would walk around on his hands to catch the eye of the receptionist, as change and keys flew out of his pockets. He loved a big gesture, handing out $100-bills to his staff after closing on a big client.

The interviews also reveal a man estranged from his family. Missing from Bashin’s tapes are Don Sirkin’s children. He had two – a daughter and son. Neither of them wanted to be interviewed. The kids received relatively little from his will: $250,000 apiece, compared to the LightHouse’s $125 million.

In May, Sirkin’s daughter Anna sued her father’s estate. Her complaint says that her father hit her and touched her sexually. She says this happened dozens of times. If she wins, she could get a small percentage of what would otherwise go to the LightHouse. Anna Sirkin told us through her lawyer that she didn’t want to talk to us for this story.

As part of the Sirkin bequest, the LightHouse inherited Sirkin’s private residence on the edge of the Puget Sound. Last year Bashin and Jennifer Sachs, the LightHouse’s Director of Development, went to see it.

Sachs recalls that the house was in disrepair. Crows had pecked away at the shingles. The roof was crumbling. And inside, it was packed with stuff: thousands of books suggesting a vast range of interests; piles of old papers; paintings; plastic clocks stacked on top of each other.

What Bashin wanted, of course, were clues. And pretty quickly, he found them.

“As we wandered through [Sirkin’s] house,” Bashin said, “we saw all these gadgets: giant light boxes, magnifiers, enormous plasma TVs in his kitchen and throughout his house.” Bashin recognized these clues because he’d used them himself, back when he was trying to hide his blindness.

It appeared that Sirkin, too, had lost his sight. He kept it a secret from almost everyone he knew.

Instead of getting help, or learning to use a cane, it seems he’d tried to bring his eyes back with special diets, the pomegranate juice and the caloric restriction.

Sirkin’s colleagues said that in his final years, he became more reclusive than ever. He holed up in his house — in a little room off the side of his kitchen.

In that room, Sirkin’s heart gave out on him. His body wasn’t discovered for days.

To Bryan Bashin, Don Sirkin is a black box, a mystery. Estranged from his family, reclusive, even to those who worked with him. A guy who also made this dramatic, final gesture – this extravagant gift– to people he had never met.

What Bashin found in Sirkin’s home reminded him of his own difficulty in “coming out” as blind. Sirkin couldn’t make the leap Bashin did. Instead, he hid. But he also did something else. He left his entire inheritance to a group of people who could have helped him, but didn’t get the chance.


This story was produced for KQED’s new podcast The Leap, co-hosted by Amy Standen and Judy Campbell. You can subscribe to the podcast through iTunes or Stitcher.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

The Week In Sports

4:31

Download

NPR’s Scott Simon and ESPN.com’s Howard Bryant talk retirement news for David Ortiz, Tony Romo’s broken clavicle and Bryce Harper’s new MVP status.

Transcript

SCOTT SIMON, HOST:

I wait all week to say time for sports.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

SIMON: And the cycle of sports life this week – retirements, returns and the prospect of breaking records with a kapow (ph). Howard Bryant of espn.com and ESPN the Magazine joins us. Thanks for being with us again, Howard.

HOWARD BRYANT: Good morning, Scott. How are you?

SIMON: I’m fine, thank you. Big – how am I?

BRYANT: Easy (laughter).

SIMON: Jake Arrieta won the Cy Young Award. We’ll get to that. Howard, David Ortiz – Big Papi – retiring from baseball. Help us mark the significance.

BRYANT: Well, I think it’s self-explanatory if you’re from Boston and if you’re of a certain age where you remember the Red Sox not winning anything and also expecting to lose outside of the 617 area code. Now, David Ortiz is a phenomenal, phenomenal figure in Boston sports history. He is the guy who is the demarcating line until 2004, when the Red Sox hadn’t won a World Series since 1918. But it was really more of a culture shift for him. It was when he came and when the Red Sox beat the Yankees in 2004, down three games to nothing, greatest comeback in the history of professional – American professional sports. It didn’t just signal the end of an era for the Red Sox or generations for the Red Sox, but also, in a rivalry, it was no longer hammer and nail with the Red Sox being the nail against the Yankees. But now, the Yankees believed that the Red Sox were as good a team and the Red Sox believed that they were not just as good, but better. And now, three championships later, people don’t talk about curses anymore. They talk about the Red Sox essentially being a dominant, dominant team. He’s chiefly responsible for that.

SIMON: Quick question – slam dunk for the Hall of Fame or there is a complication.

BRYANT: No, that’s not a quick question. But – and it is complication because he was linked to the survey testing that he tested positive for PEDs back in 2003 when there was no sanction, when there was no penalty. It was simply survey testing. But his name was linked in a 2009 New York Times report. He never failed a drug test, but, of course, neither did Mark McGwire or Sammy Sosa or Alex Rodriguez. And they’re all paying a price – nor did Roger Clemens.

SIMON: Yeah.

BRYANT: But it’s going to be very difficult for him. In err of (ph) – it’s going to be a selective justice question because David Ortiz is one of my all-time favorites. Everybody loves him. We’ll see if he pays the same price that some of these other great players have paid, come Hall of Fame time.

SIMON: The New England Patriots are still undefeated. So if you were Bill Belichick, their coach – and I know they were close to picking you – would you say, hey, guys, hurry up and lose a game. I want to get this monkey off our back before we go into playoff and Super Bowl season?

BRYANT: No, I never understood that. There’s always pressure when you’re the Patriots. And there’s pressure to win no matter if you’re 15 and 1 or 16 and 0. Obviously, they would love to shut the Miami Dolphins up and finally be that undefeated team that they thought they were going to be in 2007. But I think when you’re the Patriots, and knowing Bill Belichick as he is, the goal is one thing – to be good on Sunday or, this week, Monday against Buffalo. And then to be good the next week and be better and better and better. I never believed that if you have a streak it’s a good thing to lose. I think when you’re playing well, you keep doing what you’re doing.

SIMON: Baseball post-season awards. The Cubs did very well. Modesty forbids me from ticking them off, one by one. Bryce Harper, the Washington Nationals, won the NL Most Valuable Player Award. Is this his – the first in a whole shelf?

BRYANT: Well, it should be. He’s a terrific player and we talk about the great players in the other sports who are just superstars in their own right. And Bryce Harper’s an exciting player. I know if you’re in the National League East, you would root against him. But it’s a – it really is a terrific time for baseball with a lot of young players out there doing things. Obviously, Jake Arrieta doing his thing in Chicago, Kris Bryant the National League Rookie of the Year and, of course, Bryce Harper with the MVP. This should not be the first one for him. And with Dusty Baker running show in D.C. next year, I think Nationals-Mets is going to be a very interesting battle all season long. And now with Bryce Harper being an MVP, as well, a lot of pressure is taken off of him and then more added to be great again.

SIMON: Quick question, I’m going to press this. Golden State Warriors defeated the Chicago Bulls last night 106 to 94. Are they playing not just for another championship, but to win…

BRYANT: No, they’re playing to win 70 games. They’re playing to beat that Michael Jordan team that won 72 games. And they’re trying to tell everybody that we are not a fluke. We’re great. And Steph Curry is proving it as well. So much fun to watch.

SIMON: Howard Bryant from espn.com and ESPN the Magazine. Thanks so much, Howard.

BRYANT: Thanks, Scott.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Ford Workers Approve Contract With UAW By Slim Margin

Ford workers narrowly approved a new four-year contract, wrapping up five months of negotiations between the United Auto Workers union and Detroit automakers.

The UAW said late Friday that Ford’s contract passed with a 51.4-percent vote. The agreement covers 53,000 U.S. hourly workers at 22 plants.

“There is no higher authority than the membership. Through a fair and democratic process UAW-Ford members have delivered job security and strong economic gains for their families and communities,” said UAW Vice President Jimmy Settles, the union’s top Ford negotiator, in a statement.

Union leaders held a press conference earlier this week to push for the Ford agreement when they feared workers would reject it. Some workers said the union didn’t push hard enough to win back things they lost in previous agreements, including annual wage increases. They also wanted a two-tier wage system eliminated immediately instead of over eight years, as the contract promises.

But union leaders warned that they might not get a better deal from Ford if workers rejected the agreement and sent them back to the bargaining table.

“If we thought there was another dollar on the table, we would have got it the first time,” said Bernie Ricke, the president of Local 600, a large union in Ford’s hometown of Dearborn.

The contract raises wages for all workers and gradually eliminates the two-tier system, which currently pays newer workers less than veteran ones. It promises bonuses of up to $10,250 per worker this year and annual profit-sharing checks and other bonuses each year after that.

The contract also guarantees $9 billion in investments at Ford’s U.S. plants over four years.

Ford said it was pleased with the vote.

“This agreement provides a good foundation for Ford Motor Company, our employees and our communities as we work together to create an even stronger business in the years ahead,” Ford’s labor chief, John Fleming, said in a statement.

Ford was the last of the Detroit automakers to win approval for its contract.

Fiat Chrysler workers approved their contract in October. General Motors’ contract was approved earlier Friday after extended negotiations with skilled trades workers like electricians, who had initially rejected it. The contracts cover around 142,000 workers in all.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.