November 13, 2015

No Image

International Governing Body Suspends Russian Track And Field

3:20

Download

Russia has been provisionally suspended by international track and field’s governing body. The decision could keep Russian athletes out of next year’s Olympic Games in Brazil.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

We are following the developing story in Paris, where up to 60 people have been killed in shootings around the city and people have been taken hostage. We’ll update that story as we get information. Right now we’re going to talk to NPR’s Moscow correspondent Corey Flintoff about the Russian doping scandal. Russia’s athletic federation has been suspended from world competitions. It’s being called provisional, and it takes effect immediately.

And, Corey, how did this decision come about?

COREY FLINTOFF, BYLINE: Well, of course, this week we had a report from an independent commission that reported that Russia was involved in state-supported doping. The most damning allegation in that report was that the top Russian sports officials, up to and including the sports minister, had to have known about this program and may in fact have supported it. So the International Association of Athletic Federations – that governs world track and field events – voted 22-1 to suspend Russia. And this is huge for them. It’s something that this organization had to do. The independent report was extremely critical of the International Association. It said it allowed Russian athletes to compete in things like 2012 Summer Olympics when they were known to have suspicious doping profiles. So the International Association and its chief, Sebastian Coe, are under a lot of pressure right now to show that they can deal with a huge scandal like this in their sport.

MCEVERS: I mean, does this mean that Russia will be able to participate in the Olympics, going forward?

FLINTOFF: Well, the provisional suspension means that as of now Russian athletes won’t be allowed to compete in next year’s summer Olympics or in another big track and field competition, the World Athletics Series. And that was the big fear among Russian sports officials. You know, some of them have been making conciliatory statements over the past couple of days saying that they would do anything, basically, to get themselves into compliance. The sports minister, Vitaliy Mutko, said that he would fire anyone who was involved in this, he’d start a new anti-doping program. But I don’t know whether he realized how serious this was going to be. This also means that Russia won’t be allowed to host important competitions, and they were slated to host the 2016 World Junior Championships next year.

MCEVERS: And what about now, I mean, will Russia refuse to accept this suspension?

FLINTOFF: Well, the international body says if Russia rejects this punishment it can be turned into a full suspension, and that would guarantee that Russian athletes wouldn’t be allowed to compete in Rio this summer. If it does accept the suspension then there’s a list of criteria that Russia will have to meet to get reinstated, and that will likely mean completely revamping its anti-doping program that was found to be noncompliant with the international rules today. The question is whether Russia can clean up its act in time to send athletes to Rio. You know, one issue is that many of the Russian sports officials who were named in the commission report are still in charge, and they show no signs of voluntarily leaving.

MCEVERS: Very quickly, Corey, how are Russians reacting to this news?

FLINTOFF: Well, judging from what we’ve heard from Russian officials before the decision, there may well be some pushback. President Putin called for an independent investigation, but he said explicitly that clean athletes shouldn’t be punished for the actions of those who use drugs, and that’s widely seen as a warning that Russia might not accept a blanket suspension.

MCEVERS: That’s NPR’s Corey Flintoff in Moscow.

Thanks so much.

FLINTOFF: Thank you Kelly.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

How Do You Start Saving? Your Tax Refund May Be The Answer

Alex Browning works at a farm in Hamilton, Mass. The 26-year-old says that unlike some of her friends who work at places with retirement plans, she knows she has to figure out how to save for herself.
4:15

Download

Alex Browning works at a farm in Hamilton, Mass. The 26-year-old says that unlike some of her friends who work at places with retirement plans, she knows she has to figure out how to save for herself. Chris Arnold/NPR hide caption

itoggle caption Chris Arnold/NPR

Many Americans feel they can’t save any money for the future. Yet if an employer automatically enrolls workers in a 401(k) plan and matches some of their contributions, 90 percent of people stick with it and save and invest for retirement.

Now, what if your employer doesn’t do that for you? What can you do? People in NPR’s new Your Money and Your Life Facebook group wanted to know.

Alex Browning, 26, works at Green Meadows Farm in Hamilton, Mass. “There isn’t a savings benefit plan and there isn’t a lot of room to breathe financially,” she says.

Both she and her co-worker Erin Feeney said they joined the Facebook group because they know they have to figure this out for themselves. “I’ve always had short-term, nonprofit work since I finished college and none of those jobs offer any kind of savings benefits at all,” Feeney says. “That’s kinda scary. I know I have to start a Roth IRA but what do I have to do to do that? I don’t know.”

On Your Own

We decided to answer this question: What’s the best way to set up a retirement account on your own — and in a way that you’re likely to keep contributing money to it?

“The most important thing is to get started,” says Brigitte Madrian, a behavioral economist and professor at Harvard University. “The biggest mistake that people make is procrastination.”

But the most important thing is also the hardest thing. This is why it’s such a huge advantage if an employer enrolls you automatically. Left to our own devices, we humans have a bunch of what are called “behavioral biases” that get in the way.

‘We’re Focused On The Present’

“The term that I think applies best is ‘present biased,’ ” Madrian says. “We’re focused on the present and less focused on things that will make us better off in the future.” That’s a big reason that we tend to be so bad at saving. More than half of U.S. households have precariously low savings.

Another problem is there’s no deadline to give us a kick in the pants to set up a retirement account, like there is with paying our taxes, for example. We’d never get around to doing that if we didn’t have the federal government forcing us to do it by April 15.

But, Madrian says there are good ways to nudge yourself into starting a good retirement account.

“There’s a lot of research that plan-making can help people follow through on their good intentions,” she says. “And the research suggests that the more concrete is your plan, the more likely you are to be successful.”

Make A Plan

Madrian says people should make a plan about when they’re going to open, for example, an IRA or a Roth IRA and exactly how they are going to do that. Telling friends about it, too, creates some social pressure. Research shows that helps your chances of following through.

She suggests taking all or half of your tax refund when it comes to open your first retirement account — or for that matter your first 529 college savings plan. That’s a great way to make a plan with a deadline, Madrian says.

Another issue is how much money you need to have saved up in order to open a retirement account. What’s the minimum investment?

“The good news is things have modernized tremendously,” says Stephany Kirkpatrick, a vice president at LearnVest, a low-cost online financial advice company.

Set It To Automatic

Kirkpatrick says some companies require a minimum of $1,000 or $3,000 to get started. But, she says, others have much lower minimum investments. She says that’s “more on the roboadviser side of things to enable you to put in a very minimum amount — sometimes $10 a week, $25 a month — on an automated basis.”

Kirkpatrick and Madrian both say that whatever account you set up, making the savings automatic is key. That makes your do-it-yourself IRA feel a lot more like a 401(k), Kirkpatrick says. “That’s why we like it. It’s automated. We don’t have to think about it.”

And she says that makes it much more likely we’ll keep squirreling away money each week or month. “The behavioral economics here are really key,” Kirkpatrick says.

All of the investing experts and economists we interviewed for this series also stressed the importance of finding investments with low fees. Many said you should try to keep total annual fees below 0.5 percent in any investment account (401(k), IRA, 529, etc.). There’s more information about that in our profile of investment guru Jack Bogle and our sample portfolios page.

If you want more help with all of this, you can join the NPR Your Money and Your Life Facebook group. Madrian says she’ll help nudge people to follow through on a pledge to set up smart, successful investment accounts.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Supreme Court Agrees To Hear Texas Abortion Law Case

3:34

Download

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge to a Texas law that requires abortion providers to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital and requires abortion clinics to have the facilities of an outpatient surgical center.

Transcript

KELLY MCEVERS, HOST:

The U.S. Supreme Court is once again entering the debate over abortion. The court said today it will hear arguments later this term testing the constitutionality of a sweeping abortion law in Texas. If upheld, it would allow the kind of major abortion restrictions not permitted in more than 40 years. NPR legal affairs correspondent, Nina Totenberg, reports.

NINA TOTENBERG, BYLINE: Texas set the gold standard for tough abortion statutes two years ago. And this summer, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, based in New Orleans, upheld the law. The Supreme Court by a 5 to 4 vote temporarily blocked the ruling from going into effect. But if the High Court follows suit, the number of clinics in Texas would drop from the 40 that existed when the law was passed to just nine or 10 clinics in major cities. That would leave some 900,000 women of childbearing age to drive more than 300 miles round-trip to get an abortion. And nationally, it would give the go-ahead to dozens of similar provisions that until now have been blocked by the lower courts. The Texas law has two key provisions. First, it requires that all doctors who perform abortions have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of where the abortion takes place. But because the complication rate from abortion is so miniscule, most abortion providers cannot meet the minimum number of admittances that hospitals require in order to grant privileges. Second, the law requires that abortion clinics be retrofitted to meet elaborate hospital-grade standards that do not apply to all other outpatient facilities, where procedures like liposuction and colonoscopies take place. The provision also applies to doctors who provide medication abortions, which involve giving patients two pills and sending them home. The state of Texas defends the statute, containing it was enacted to protect women’s health and safety. That assertion is disputed by the American Medical Association, which does not usually take a position in abortion cases, and the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, as well as other major medical groups. In a brief filed in the case, they contend the law not only fails to enhance safety, it impedes it. The Texas case represents the most comprehensive challenge to the court’s rulings on abortions since 1993, when the justices cut back on their 1973 Roe versus Wade decision and allowed states greater leeway in regulating abortion. Back then, the court said states could try to persuade women not to have an abortion by requiring a 24-hour waiting period and counseling before an abortion. But at the end of the day, the High Court said states may not place an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate a pregnancy. And on the subject of health care regulation specifically, the court said that unnecessary regulations that present a substantial obstacle to a woman exercising her abortion right amount to an undue burden. The Fifth Circuit in upholding the Texas law said it did not consider a 300-mile roundtrip for nearly a million women of childbearing age to be a substantial burden because that number of women potentially affected was nowhere near a large fraction of the state’s 5.4 million women of childbearing age. It also said that under the Supreme Court’s prior decisions, it was required to defer to the state’s asserted rational justification for the law – protecting women’s health – even if that assertion is not supported by empirical evidence. Nina Totenberg, NPR News, Washington.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.