November 6, 2015

No Image

Best of the Week: First Look at the New 'Harry Potter' Spinoff, Another 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Trailer and More

The Important News

First Look: The Harry Potter spinoff Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them dropped a whole bunch of pics.

Sequelitis: Dennis Kelly is now writing the World War Z sequel. Mark Waters will direct Bad Santa 2. The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is finally sort of getting a sequel. The Lego Movie 2 will feature Doctor Who. Jurassic World 3 has been confirmed. Daniel Craig might do another James Bond movie.

Remake Report: French horror film Inside is getting an English-language remake. The Crow remake is happening again. Ricky Gervais will voice a character in the animated Blazing Saddles remake.

Casting Net: Nicole Kidman will co-star in Wonder Woman. Paul Rudd and Alexander Skarsgard will star in Duncan Jones’s Mute. Elizabeth Banks will star in Rita Hayworth With a Hand Grenade. Noomi Rapace will star in an Amy Winehouse biopic.

Video Game Movie Fever: StarCraft, Diablo and Call of Duty cinematic universes are in the works. The Witcher is headed for the big screen.

Amusement Park Plans: The Hunger Games rides are hitting theme parks starting next year.

New Directors, New Films: Damián Szifrón will direct Mark Wahlberg in The Six Billion Dollar Man.

Box Office: The Martian continues to be a huge hit in theaters.

The Videos and Geek Stuff

New Movie Trailers: Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Warcraft, In the Heart of the Sea, London Has Fallen, Alice Through the Looking Glass, The Hateful Eight, The Brothers Grimsby, Anomalisa, Concussion, Risen, Christmas Eve, 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi and Chi-Raq.

Watch: An honest trailer for Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

Meet: The Star Wars fan who got to see the new movie early.

See: The best celebrity Halloween costumes.

Watch: A side-by-side comparison between Mad Max: Fury Road and the previous three movies.

See: The emotion designs that didn’t make it into Pixar’s Inside Out.

Learn: How hoverboards work.

Watch: An animated recap of the James Bond movies. And a supercut of every James Bond gadget. And some James Bond parodies.

See: Every James Bond movie statistic you need to know.

Learn: The four basics of a Paul Thomas Anderson movie.

See: This week’s best new movie posters. And new Star Wars: The Force Awakens character posters.

Watch: Iconic movie posters come to life.

Our Features

Montly Movie Guide: See our November movie calendar above.

New Movie Guide: Why you should see The Peanuts Movie.

In Memoriam: We remembered all the reel-important people we lost in October.

Comic Book Movie Guides: What other characters might we see in Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2? Could we see Miles Morales’s Spider-Man on the big screen?

Sci-Fi Movie Guide: 5 reasons to love Moon.

Home Viewing: Here’s our guide to everything hitting VOD this week. And here’s our guide to all the new indie and international movies you need to see.

and

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Photos Emerge Of A Woman's Injuries, Allegedly Inflicted By Cowboys' Greg Hardy

Dallas Cowboys defensive end Greg Hardy was arrested and charged with assaulting his former girlfriend Nicole Holder in May. He was found guilty but appealed, and then when Holder stopped cooperating, the case was dropped.

Dallas Cowboys defensive end Greg Hardy was arrested and charged with assaulting his former girlfriend Nicole Holder in May. He was found guilty but appealed, and then when Holder stopped cooperating, the case was dropped. Brandon Wade/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Brandon Wade/AP

Today Deadspin published 47 graphic photos of a woman’s bruised body.

The body belongs to Nicole Holder, the site says. The man who allegedly left the bruises? Dallas Cowboys star pass rusher Greg Hardy.

The photos came to light Friday, a year and a half after Hardy was arrested and charged with assaulting Holder, his ex-girlfriend. He allegedly pushed her against a bathroom wall, threw her onto a couch containing several guns, and choked her. Hardy, who was then playing for the Carolina Panthers, was found guilty by bench trial last year, but he appealed and eventually the case was dropped when Holder stopped cooperating with the prosecutors. This week, a judge granted his request to have the incident expunged from his record.

All in all, Hardy missed the 2014 season on the NFL’s exempt list before signing a one-year, $11.3 million deal with the Cowboys in March of this year. The NFL suspended him for 10 games of the 2015 season, but the punishment was reduced to four games during arbitration.

Last month Cowboys owner Jerry Jones called Hardy a “real leader.”

There was contained outrage among some NFL fans and from talking heads like Terry Bradshaw and Katie Nolan about the fact that Hardy was back playing in the NFL, but his strength and speed on the field soon dominated the conversation.

Cue photos.

Black and blue, red and swollen, the photos of Holder’s battered body elicited a visceral reaction. Sports talk shows and social media exploded, shocked by the physical evidence. Shocked, but not surprised, because the previously known facts supported the conclusion Hardy had beaten Holder on that night in May last year. As the conversation progressed throughout the day, the same questions surfaced time and again: Why do we need these photos? If we knew Hardy had beaten Holder, what do these photos change? The answer, of course, is nothing. Nothing changes, and we shouldn’t need these photos to know that a crime was committed.

If it seems like this discussion has been had before, it’s because it has. In February 2014, Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice was arrested for assaulting his then-fiancee, Janay Palmer. He was shown on surveillance video dragging her unconscious body out of a hotel elevator. The public outrage flared up and then died down. Over the course of the summer, Rice applied to a diversionary program for first-time offenders, publicly apologized and accepted a two-game suspension from the league.

Cue video.

Released Sept. 8, 2014, the video from inside the elevator shows the strike that knocked Palmer out. The response was as swift as it was fierce. By the end of the day, Rice had been cut from the Ravens and indefinitely suspended from the league. Though his suspension was overturned, Rice will most likely never play in the NFL again. The video didn’t change our understanding of the situation, but it did change people’s reactions. Grantland’s Brian Phillips wrote this at the time:

“The Rice video transformed the public response to the assault, but it was able to do so only because we knew that it hadn’t transformed the assault itself. [NFL Commissioner] Roger Goodell, who extended Rice’s suspension indefinitely after the tape’s release, famously said that the video ‘changed everything,’ but it changed everything because it changed nothing. The tape was so powerful because it showed us that we shouldn’t have needed a tape in the first place.”

Now the question is: With photos published, will anything change for Greg Hardy? So far, it doesn’t look like it. He’s still on the team, and ESPN reports both Hardy and the Cowboys declined to comment on the release of the pictures.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Confused Over How To Save For College? Here Are Answers

To pay for college, experts say it's impossible for most parents to save all the money they'll need. They say it's reasonable to tap a mix of resources: a 529 plan, some home equity and some student loans.
3:51

Download

To pay for college, experts say it’s impossible for most parents to save all the money they’ll need. They say it’s reasonable to tap a mix of resources: a 529 plan, some home equity and some student loans. ImageZoo/Corbis hide caption

itoggle caption ImageZoo/Corbis

Many American parents face a tug of war over trying to save enough for retirement and saving for college.

Some, like Lisa Carey, a 44-year-old high school history teacher in Tampa, Fla., and her husband, Peter, a minister, haven’t yet started saving for their three kids’ college education. (Carey joined NPR’s Your Money and Your Life Facebook group. If you’re on Facebook, you can join the group, too.)

“I find it a struggle to save really much at all. I think we’re doing decently well with retirement because I have a 403(b) through the school, and I’m good about contributing the maximum that they will match but we haven’t started saving for our kids’ college education, which sounds terrible,” she says.

But Carey is doing something right. If your employer offers to match money you put into your retirement plan, do that above all else.

“You should always contribute up to your match because that’s free money,” says Scott Weingold, a financial adviser who specializes in planning for college. Basically this is one of the best investments you could ever possibly make. You put thousands of dollars into your retirement account and immediately earn a 100 percent return on that investment because it’s a match. So it’s like burning free money not to take advantage of that.

FinAid, a guide to financial aid, including scholarships, loans, savings and military aid

Big Future, the College Board’s guide to affording college

College Savings, a guide to 529 college savings plans

But beyond that, are you better off putting everything you can afford into retirement savings or should a chunk of that money go into a 529 college savings plan? People wonder whether having money set aside for college hurts the family’s chance for financial aid.

“Oftentimes you hear conventional wisdom that you should save only for retirement and not save for college,” says Mark Kantrowitz, who writes books on how to pay for college. But he says for the vast majority of people, it’s good to save in a 529 plan.

“You will end up with more money for retirement if you save for college in addition to saving for retirement instead of just saving just for retirement,” Kantrowitz says.

That’s because unless you are very wealthy, if you don’t set aside money for college you or your kids will have to borrow more money. And the interest on that can get expensive — or you’ll have to pull money out of retirement savings, which is also costly.

And many people don’t understand this key point: Saving money in a 529 plan does mean colleges expect you to pay more for tuition but not very much more.

“You’re better off saving the money,” says Sandy Baum, a higher education economist with George Washington University. She says when it comes to the amount a college expects a family to pay for tuition, the parents’ income level counts up to eight times more than an asset like the money in a college savings plan.

“If you save the money, even if it’s considered as an asset, the amount that it would reduce your aid is minimal compared to the benefit you’ll get from having saved that money,” Baum says.

At the end of the day, many parents will have to use a mix of resources: a 529 plan, some home equity, some student loans. But the takeaway is it’s a good idea to sock away a bunch of money in a 529 plan.

Plus, if you have a 529 plan, you might get grandparents to chip in with extra money. There are websites to use with kids’ birthday parties so instead of getting plastic toys and junk, guests can make contributions to a college fund.

Two quick pitfalls to avoid: Make sure you put the 529 in the parents’ name, not in the grandparents’ name. The latter can hurt you in a significant way on financial aid eligibility in the following year. And watch out for big fees that gobble up your returns in a 529 or any kind of investment account.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Supreme Court Will Hear More Religious Objections To Obamacare

The Supreme Court will hear another challenge to the Affordable Care Act about religious objections to providing contraception.

The Supreme Court will hear another challenge to the Affordable Care Act about religious objections to providing contraception. Jonathan Ernst/Reuters /Landov hide caption

itoggle caption Jonathan Ernst/Reuters /Landov

The U.S. Supreme Court justices said Friday they would hear a group of cases brought by religious hospitals, schools, and charities that object to the system devised under Obamacare to spare them from paying for birth control coverage for their employees and students.

NPR’s Nina Totenberg reports:

“To accommodate religious groups that object to contraception, the Obama administration promulgated regulations that allow religious non-profits to opt out of birth control coverage by notifying the Department of Health and Human Services of their religious objection. That in turn triggers an independent system of birth control coverage for those employees or students who want it. A variety of religious non-profits contend that the opt-out notification itself burdens their religious faith. The Obama administration counters that the refusal to notify would amount to a religious believer’s veto of the rights of others who do not hold the same beliefs.”

The decision to hear yet another challenge to the Affordable Care Act — the fourth since 2010 — follows a 2014 decision in the Hobby Lobby case, which allowed “closely held” companies to opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s provisions for no-cost prescription contraception in most health insurance if they have religious objections.

Hobby Lobby is an arts and crafts chain owned by the Green family, who are evangelical Christians. The Supreme Court validated their objection to the contraception mandate saying it violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.