October 22, 2015

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Disney Characters React to the Final 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' Trailer and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Trailer Reaction of the Day:

You’ve seen the Star Wars: The Force Awakens actors react to the new trailer. Now watch other Disney characters watch it:

Trailer Remix of the Day:

Watch another version of the final Star Wars: The Force Awakens trailer in which Han Solo flashes back to scenes from the original trilogy (via Live for Films):

[embedded content]

Tattoo of the Day:

And you thought nobody liked Jar-Jar Binks.

View post on imgur.com

Movie Comparison of the Day:

Critic Michael Mirasol sees similarities between part of Star Wars: The Force Awakens and Hayao Miyazaki‘s Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind:

Only JJ knows. But I can dream of a connection between #StarWarsTheForceAwakens and #Nausicaa. pic.twitter.com/XIVUR5H8iZ

— Imperator Obesiosa (@flipcritic) October 20, 2015

Movie Mashup of the Day:

Batman, Mad Max and Rey from Star Wars: The Force Awakens come together in this clever piece of fan art by Messy Pandas:

Film Preservation Promotion of the Day:

Famous movie characters try to escape film deterioration in this neat video produced for the British Film Institute (via Cinematic Montage Creators):

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

Whoispablo showcases the universe of Quentin Tarantino in this great supercut of the filmmaker’s work:

[embedded content]

Dessert of the Day:

Hopefully you’re not sick of celebrating Back to the Future yet, because this massive DeLorean time machine cake looks delicious (via Toyland):

Cosplay of the Day:

If you’re still in the Back to the Future spirit at the end of this month, you might want to copy this guy’s clever idea for Back to the Future Part II cosplay of Marty McFly on a hoverboard (via Geekologie):

Classic Trailer of the Day:

On this day 15 years ago, Charlie’s Angels had its world premiere in Hollywood. Watch the original trailer for the TV series adaptation starring Drew Barrymore, Lucy Liu and Cameron Diaz below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Insider Trading Charges Dropped Against Former SAC Official, Six Others

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara mounted a high-profile investigation of insider trading, but an appeals court has made convictions harder to get

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara mounted a high-profile investigation of insider trading, but an appeals court has made convictions harder to get Kathy Willens/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Kathy Willens/AP

U.S. officials have dropped insider trading charges against former hedge fund manager Michael Steinberg, after an appeals court ruling struck down convictions in a related case.

Prosecutors also dropped charges against six cooperating witnesses who had pleaded guilty in the same case.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement that the charges against the witnesses “would no longer be in the interest of justice.”

Today’s decision blows a big hole in the government’s high-profile investigation of insider trading on Wall Street.

Steinberg, a top official at SAC Capital, was convicted in 2013 and sentenced to three and a half years in prison.

But last year, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the convictions of hedge fund managers Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson, ruling that prosecutors had overreached in their case against the men.

Newman and Chiasson traded on the basis of inside information about technology company earnings.

But the court ruled that the insiders who originally passed on the information hadn’t received any personal benefit for doing so.

Such a conviction requires “proof of a meaningfully close personal relationship that generates an exchange that is objective, consequential and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature,” the court said.

The court said “the government must also prove that the defendants — in this case, several steps removed from the initial disclosure — knew they were trading on information of this sort.”

After the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review the ruling, Bharara said he decided to drop the charges:

“These prosecutions were all undertaken in good faith reliance on what this office and others, including able defense counsel for all those who pled guilty, understood to be the well-settled law before Newman.”

Bharara said the ruling would make it much harder to pursue insider trading cases, and was a “potential bonanza for friends and family of rich people with access to material nonpublic information.”

Steinberg’s attorney, Barry Berke, expressed satisfaction about today’s decision:

“Michael Steinberg did not commit any crime and is an innocent man. We hope that his vindication will receive as much attention as his wrongful prosecution.”

“We are pleased that the ordeal for Mike Steinberg and his family is over,” said Mark Herr, a spokesman for Point72 Asset Management, the company formerly known as SAC.

Roland Riopelle, the attorney for one of the cooperating witnesses, Danny Kuo, said Bharara “chose to do the right thing, even if doing so was not the politically easy thing to do. With this matter behind him, Mr. Kuo looks forward to getting on with the rest of his life.”

The other witnesses were Spyridon Adondakis, Sandeep Goyal, Jon Horvath, Hyung Lim and Jesse Tortora.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

How Generic Drugs Can Cost Small Pharmacies Big Bucks

Maryland pharmacist Narender Dhallan often has to decide whether to fill a prescription and lose money or send a customer to another store.
5:20

Download

Maryland pharmacist Narender Dhallan often has to decide whether to fill a prescription and lose money or send a customer to another store. Cindy Carpien for NPR hide caption

itoggle caption Cindy Carpien for NPR

Pharmacist Narender Dhallan winces as he looks at a computer screen in his drugstore on a recent morning. For the second time in two hours, he has to decide whether to fill a prescription and lose money or send his customer away.

This time it’s for a generic antifungal cream that cost him $180 wholesale. The customer’s insurance, however, will pay Dhallan only $60 to fill it.

“This used to be something that would happen once in a rare, rare while,” Dhallan says. “Now it’s becoming routine.”

If the losses keep coming, Dhallan says his store, RiverRx in Bethesda, Md., won’t be in business two years from now.

The scenario at RiverRx is repeating itself at independent drugstores across the country, says Doug Hoey, president of the National Community Pharmacists Association.

Nearly 9 in 10 prescriptions filled in the U.S. are for generic drugs. And while generic drugs are typically cheaper than brand-name medicines, the prices for generics have been on a tear.

The problem for RiverRx and other independent pharmacies is that reimbursements haven’t been keeping up with the pace of price hikes. As a result, the pharmacies are losing money simply by filling prescriptions.

Hoey flips through a 3-inch stack of spreadsheets from his members detailing losses on generic drugs. “Here’s a generic Prozac, loss of $26,” Hoey says. “A generic used for rheumatoid arthritis, $83 loss. This one store lost $4,800 in one month.”

Hoey, Dhallan and other pharmacists say the problem lies with pharmacy benefit managers. The PBMs are middlemen in the medical world who influence what drugs you get, where you can get them and at what price. The biggest are Express Scripts and CVS Caremark.

PBMs negotiate deals with employers to run the part of their insurance plans that covers prescription drugs. The managers extract discounts from drugmakers on medications and also contract with pharmacies like RiverRx to fill prescriptions for the people served by PBMs. If Dhallan wants to be included in a PBM’s network, he has to sign on to its terms.

In the past, PBMs reimbursed drugstores pretty much in line with market prices. However, in the past two years, generic drug prices have risen on average 40 percent. When they spike like that, Hoey says, PBM reimbursements often don’t keep up.

“When those prices go up, our cost to buy the drug can go up 100, 500, 1,000 percent overnight,” Hoey says. “While we’re paying 1,000 percent more than we had paid the day before, our reimbursement — the payment to the pharmacy — often stays the same for an average of three months.”

Chain pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens also sometimes lose money filling generic prescriptions. However, they have more revenue and profit than the independents as well as other business lines to cushion the blow.

It’s hard for small pharmacies like RiverRx to demand more money from the PBMs because they hold the trump cards. CVS and Express Scripts dominate the industry. CVS Caremark is the 10th-largest company in the U.S. by revenue and it manages prescriptions for 70 million people. It also owns nearly 10,000 retail stores and the Caremark mail-order pharmacy. Express Scripts has a huge mail-order pharmacy of its own.

The PBMs aren’t just setting reimbursement for River RX, they’re also competing for its customers.

“We feel that’s a conflict of interest,” says Hoey.

A CVS Caremark spokeswoman said in an email that the pharmacy benefit manager deals “at arm’s length” with the retail side of the company.

“Our pricing with CVS/pharmacy is very competitive to similarly situated providers,” she said.

Benefit managers like CVS and Express Scripts say they save money for their clients and keep drug prices low overall. A 2011 study by the PBM’s trade group estimates it will save its clients and Medicare $2 trillion over 10 years.

“We save about 35 percent over what businesses would pay if we weren’t in the picture, and they were doing all of this themselves,” says Mark Merritt, president of the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, which represents CVS Caremark and Express Scripts. “It’s billions if not trillions of dollars.”

Not everyone is so sure.

Analyst Richard Evans, who heads up the health practice at Sovereign and Sector Research LLC, says pharmacy benefit managers do extract discounts from drug companies for their clients. But as an industry, the PBMs haven’t managed to take all the air out of inflating drug prices.

He agrees that independent pharmacies are in trouble, in part because PBMs, in an effort to cut costs even more, have been narrowing their lists of approved pharmacies.

Laura Ard, a regular customer at RiverRx, has seen that firsthand. She takes a medication for a chronic condition and has been able to get the prescription for it filled with a modest copay at Dhallan’s store. Then her drug plan changed. Now she has to go to CVS or pay entirely out of pocket.

“It’s irritating because they’re telling me where I have to go, and where I have to shop, and at what price I have to get things,” she said on a recent day standing at the cash register at RiverRx.

On principle, she’s continued to pay out of pocket for the past six months — a total of more than $800. “This is my own personal private picket, at my expense,” she said with a laugh.

But Dhallan can’t count on many people doing what Ard does. He says he’s lost about 20 percent of his customers in the past year.

“Last year was the first year that we had a decrease in profit, even though we had an increase in the number of prescriptions,” Dhallan said. “I don’t know how long we can continue.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

See Michael J. Fox Try On the New Self-Lacing Nike Shoes Inspired By 'Back to the Future'

UPDATE: Well, today is the day Nike promised us a pair of self-lacing sneakers just like the ones Marty McFly wore in Back to the Future II. So where are they?

When reached for comment, Nike did confirm to ABC News that the first pair of self-lacing sneakers does indeed exist and they are in New York City today. Why New York City? Most likely to coincide with an anniversary celebration tonight featuring a cast reunion followed by a Q&A and a screening of Back to the Future II.

There’s no word on whether the sneakers will be available to the public or if they were created solely to show off on Back to the Future Day, but good news is we’ll have those answers by the end of the day.

UPDATE 2: Michael J. Fox has revealed a letter sent to him today from Nike designer Tinker Hatfield, confirming the sneakers are on their way.

The letter I received from Tinker today. Thanks @Nike pic.twitter.com/UIolXrkUVC

— Michael J. Fox (@realmikefox) October 21, 2015

UPDATE 3: And here’s Michael J. Fox trying them on. If you want your own pair, you’re going to have to have a ton of money to throw down: They are making more, but they will only be available through an auction, with proceeds going to the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research.

Michael J. Fox models the first self-lacing @Nike Mag pic.twitter.com/bgPWM5CKBE

— michaeljfox.org (@MichaelJFoxOrg) October 21, 2015

Previously…

As soon as the clock struck midnight and 2015 strolled into our lives, various sites and news media were all over the connection between the year and the Back to the Future sequel in which Marty (Michael J. Fox) and Doc (Christopher Lloyd) travel from the ’80s to the year 2015 because, as Doc warns Marty, “Something’s got to be done about your kids!”

Not surprisingly, director Robert Zemeckis’ vision of 2015 is a bit different from the real 2015 — most notably there are no flying cars and the Jaws franchise is (thankfully) not releasing its 19th installment. But some stuff is close to actually happening, and of course we’re talking about those spiffy power-lacing Nike shoes that Marty rocks out in the movie.

[embedded content]

Fans have been on Nike for years to create a power-lacing sneaker, and the company promised it would deliver one in the year 2015 to coincide with the year the movie is set in. So… where is it?

Well, give it another month. Max Erdenberger, a former art director with ties to Nike, posted this image to Twitter seeminly revealing Nike’s plans to finally release the power-lacing sneaker this October 21, 2015, which also happens to be the exact date Marty McFly travels to in the Back to the Future sequel.

October 21, 2015 pic.twitter.com/uOCp5L8BXz

— Max Erdenberger (@thebetamax) September 9, 2015

Erdenberger followed up this tweet with one saying he doesn’t have much to report, but knowing Nike has been working hard to make these sneakers a reality in 2015 means chances are good they will be available to own this October.

How many will be available and how hard will it be to obtain a pair? The word is still out, but last time Nike did this — using a replica pair minus the power laces — they only made 1500 pairs available with all proceeds going towards the Michael J. Fox Foundation.

Earlier this year Nike’s Tinker Hatfield (pictured above, via NikeKicks.com) addressed this very topic at a trade show, saying they’re working real hard on getting the self-lacing shoes on the market as soon as possible, but that they still have “11 and two-thirds months left in 2015.”

So Nike is definitely planning on delivering you Back to the Future nerds (raises hand) your precious power-lacing sneakers (yes!) at some point this year, and October 21 seems like the choice date for such a reveal. In the meantime, check out some of the Nike MAG 2015 US Patent Papers to see what the shoes will look like and how they’ll work, with additional patent images here.

Who’s buying a pair?

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.