October 19, 2015

No Image

Oscar Pistorius Released From Jail

Oscar Pistorius was found guilty of culpable homicide, which is equivalent to manslaughter, in the 2013 shooting death of his girlfriend. After less than a year in jail, he was released to house arrest.

Oscar Pistorius was found guilty of culpable homicide, which is equivalent to manslaughter, in the 2013 shooting death of his girlfriend. After less than a year in jail, he was released to house arrest. Themba Hadebe/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Themba Hadebe/AP

South African sprinter Oscar Pistorius has been released from prison nearly a year after he was jailed for killing his girlfriend in 2013.

He will spend the remainder of his five-year sentence under house arrest.

NPR’s Ofeibea Quist-Arcton reports for the Newscast unit:

“Oscar Pistorius’s release on parole a day earlier than expected, under cover of darkness, means he’s now under what South Africa calls correctional supervision – at his uncle’s house in Pretoria, South Africa.

“Pistorius was convicted of the culpable homicide of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp, who he shot through a locked bathroom door on Valentine’s day in 2013. The athlete, who sprints on prosthetic legs, says he mistook her for an intruder. Prosecutors are seeking to have the manslaughter conviction converted to murder, which would carry a lengthy sentence and see Pistorius return to prison. South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal is due to hear the case in two weeks.”

As we previously reported, “Pistorius said he fired his gun because he wrongly believed a burglar had broken into their Pretoria home.” Prosecutors, however, maintain he shot Steenkamp during an argument.

A lawyer for the Steenkamps told South African media that Pistorius’ release does not affect their lives.

“Reeva is still not coming back. Whether Mr. Pistorius remains incarcerated or whether he is released, Reeva isn’t coming back so it doesn’t make a difference to them,” Koen said.

Pistorius, nicknamed “blade runner” for the carbon fiber prostheses that he uses during competition, attained global fame during the 2012 London Summer Olympics when he competed against able-bodied athletes and even qualified for the semifinal in the 400-meter race.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

What's Funny About The Business of Monkeys Picking Coconuts?

On Thailand's Samui Island, a macaque picks coconuts from a tree top. Captive monkeys are trained to help harvest coconuts on the island's plantations.

On Thailand’s Samui Island, a macaque picks coconuts from a tree top. Captive monkeys are trained to help harvest coconuts on the island’s plantations. Christophe Boisvieux/Corbis hide caption

itoggle caption Christophe Boisvieux/Corbis

If you’ve consumed coconut oil or coconut meat lately, there’s a reasonable chance it was imported from Thailand. And if it was, there’s an even better chance the farmer who grew that coconut had a monkey fetch it from a tall tree.

Thailand has been raising and training pigtailed macaques to pick coconuts for around 400 years. Coconut farmers in Sri Lanka, Malaysia, India and other countries in the region sometimes rely on monkeys, too.

Why monkeys? Turns out a male monkey can collect an average of 1,600 coconuts per day and a female can get 600, while a human can only collect around 80 per day. It’s also safer for a scampering, height-savvy monkey to pluck and drop the fruit from the trees — up to 80 feet tall — than a human, according to the National Primate Research Center at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

We weren’t aware that monkeys were key to the Asian coconut industry — until Animal Place, a farm sanctuary in Grass Valley, Calif., contacted us in early October claiming that monkeys are being “exploited” on coconut plantations there. “Animal-aware people are increasingly avoiding coconut products that come from monkey slavery,” the group, which advocates a vegan diet, said.

[embedded content]
YouTube

While Animal Place says it has not actually visited any coconut plantations allegedly abusing monkeys, Marji Beach, the group’s education director, tells The Salt that YouTube videos are evidence enough that the animals are cruelly shackled and forced to work.

“What I find most distressing is that they take them from wild, keep them tethered and keep them that way their whole life,” says Beach. “Monkeys should stay in the wild.”

After making the monkey-coconut discovery on YouTube, Beach asked several companies that sell coconut oil or other products containing coconut in the U.S. if their suppliers used monkeys. Beach says all of the companies she contacted replied that they do not.

Monkey trainers in Thailand tell The Salt they find that hard to believe.

“It would be difficult to find a coconut product made in Thailand that wasn’t picked by a monkey,” Arjen Schroevers tells The Salt by email. Monkeys pick 99 percent of the Thai coconuts sold for their oil and flesh, he says.

A male monkey can collect up to 1,600 coconuts per day and a female can get 600, while a human can only collect around 80 per day on average.

A male monkey can collect up to 1,600 coconuts per day and a female can get 600, while a human can only collect around 80 per day on average. iStockphoto hide caption

itoggle caption iStockphoto

Schroevers runs the Monkey Training School in Surat Thani, Thailand, a Buddhist-inspired school founded 50 years ago to teach monkeys how to pick coconuts without the use of force or violence. He says Animal Place has it all wrong when it comes to how most monkeys that work on coconut farms are treated.

“It is always relaxed, no shouting, no punishing,” he says. “Every few trees the monkey hugs his owner, who then checks the monkey for red ants (who live in the trees) and the monkey gets a massage. Outside working hours the monkeys are kept as a pet (only for the family owners, to strangers they are not friendly).”

And as for the tethering, Schroevers says it serves a variety of purposes including guiding the monkeys up the tree and preventing them from escaping.

What’s more, says Schroevers, the alternative would be a human poking a long pole with a knife up into the tree to cut the coconuts. “Because the trees are so high, you must stand straight under the coconuts you want to collect,” he says. “They drop 6-12 at a time. Very dangerous!” (He adds that coconuts kill around 600 people per year worldwide.)

Of course, the working monkeys of Thailand have many similarly industrious counterparts in the animal world. Think oxen plowing fields, sheepdogs herding livestock, rottweilers guarding houses or beagles sniffing for drugs in airports. (Archaeologists say baboons once picked tree nuts in ancient Egypt.)

Others familiar with the coconut-picking monkeys of Thailand are also skeptical of the allegations of abuse. Leslie Sponsel is a professor emeritus of anthropology at the University of Hawaii who, with his wife, Dr. Poranee Natadecha-Sponsel, studied monkey-human relationships in Thailand and published papers on the topic.

“During our time in southern Thailand, we never observed or heard of cruelty or abuse of the monkeys,” Sponsel says. “Indeed, the monkeys are very similar to family pets, and for some households, even like family members to some degree. Young ones are trained, and they are kept on a chain tethered to the handler or to a shelter when not working. They are fed, watered, bathed, groomed and otherwise cared for. They often ride to the coconut palm plantation on the back of a motor bike or in a cart driven by the handler.

“That is not to say that there is never any cruelty or mistreatment,” Sponsel adds. But overall, he says he respects “the poor farmers and others who are just trying to survive and prosper in support of their families.”

What do you think? Let us know in the comments.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Suing A Nursing Home Could Get Easier Under Proposed Federal Rules

Proponents of arbitration say the system is more efficient than going to court for both sides, but arbitration can be costly, too. And a 2009 study showed the typical awards in nursing home cases are about 35 percent lower than the plaintiff would get if the case went to court.
3:53

Download

Proponents of arbitration say the system is more efficient than going to court for both sides, but arbitration can be costly, too. And a 2009 study showed the typical awards in nursing home cases are about 35 percent lower than the plaintiff would get if the case went to court. Heinz Linke/Westend61/Corbis hide caption

itoggle caption Heinz Linke/Westend61/Corbis

As Dean Cole’s dementia worsened, he began wandering at night. He’d even forgotten how to drink water. His wife, Virginia, could no longer manage him at home. So after much agonizing, his family checked him into a Minnesota nursing home.

“Within a little over two weeks he’d lost 20 pounds and went into a coma,” says Mark Kosieradzki, who was the Cole family’s attorney. Dean Cole was rushed to the hospital, says Kosieradzki, “and what was discovered was that he’d become totally dehydrated. They did get his fluid level up, but he was never, ever able to recover from it and died within the month.”

Kosieradzki says that Virginia Cole had signed a stack of papers when her husband was admitted to the nursing home. As is often the case, one of the forms was a binding agreement to go to arbitration if she ever had a claim against the facility. So instead of taking the nursing home to court, her claim for wrongful death was heard by three private arbitrators. They charge for their services.

“The arbitration bill for the judges was $60,750. That was split in half between the two parties,” says Kosieradzki.

Virginia Cole won her claim, but after paying the arbitrators, expert witnesses and attorney’s fees, she was left with less than $20,000.

The federal government is now considering safeguards that would regulate the way nursing homes present arbitration agreements when residents are admitted.

But more than 50 labor, legal, medical and consumer organizations have told the government that’s not enough. They want these pre-dispute arbitration agreements banned entirely. Thirty-four U.S. senators and attorneys general from 15 states and the District of Columbia also have called for banning the agreements.

“No one should be forced to accept denial of justice as a price for the care their loved ones deserve,” says Henry Waxman, a former congressman from California. Arbitration agreements keep the neglect and abuse of nursing home residents secret, Waxman says, because the cases aren’t tried in open court and resolutions sometimes have gag rules.

“None of the systemic health and safety problems that cause the harm will ever see the light of day,” he says.

The proposed federal regulation would require nursing homes to explain these arbitration agreements so that residents or their families understand what they’re signing. It would also make sure that agreeing to arbitration is not a requirement for nursing home admission.

The American Health Care Association, which represents most nursing homes, is against this proposed change in the rules. Clifton Porter II, the AHCA’s senior vice president for government relations, says that’s because “they’re prescribing us to do things that we, frankly, already do.” Porter acknowledges, however, that practices vary from facility to facility, depending on state law.

Arbitration agreements, he says, are common throughout the health care industry — in hospitals, surgery centers and doctors’ offices. “Why aren’t rules being promulgated to eliminate arbitration in those settings?” he asks.

In any case, Porter says arbitration is more efficient for both sides than going to court would be.

“It actually allows consumers to get an expedited award,” he says. “And you have the benefit of not having to use the courts and go through the entire process.”

But that expedited award is about 35 percent lower than if the plaintiff had gone to court. That’s one conclusion of a study commissioned by Porter’s organization in 2009.

If the federal government does regulate or ban the signing of arbitration agreements for new nursing home residents, Porter says the American Health Care Association will probably fight the move in court.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.



No Image

Songs We Love: Jus Now Feat. Bunji Garlin & Ms. Dynamite, 'Cyah Help It'

Jus Now's Cyah Help It EP is out Oct. 23.
3:08

Jus Now’s Cyah Help It EP is out Oct. 23. Elliot Francois/Courtesy of the artist hide caption

itoggle caption Elliot Francois/Courtesy of the artist

Jus Now, Cyah Help It (Feel Up Records)

Jus Now, Cyah Help It (Feel Up Records) Courtesy of the artist hide caption

itoggle caption Courtesy of the artist

Jus Now is a production duo split between the UK and Trinidad & Tobago, 4500 miles apart but with a long legacy of musical exchange. The credit for modern dance music defined as “multicultural” often goes to the communicative power of digital media, but the Jus Now link-up speaks to an older tradition. As far back as 1948, the fresh-off-the-boat Lord Kitchener — Aldwyn Roberts, at the time one of Trinidad’s top calypsonians — was voicing “London Is the Place For Me” on the quayside of Tilbury Docks. Fast forward through decades of Notting Hill Carnivals, punks making roots-reggae records, plus the 2 tone ’80s, and we arrive at the Caribbean’s biggest influence on contemporary British music: the cross-pollination of acid-house raves, West Indian shebeens and sound-system dances which begat jungle (aka drum & bass). This music’s early ’90s birth marked the beginnings of a wild lineage that would morph into a continuum of British street-rave sounds of the coming decades — garage, grime, dubstep —leading to today’s constantly mutating “bass music” tag. Which brings us back to Jus Now.

Sam Interface, the English half of the duo, is a drum & bass producer from Bristol, a place known for its long line of junglists, with heavy hitters like Roni Size, Krust and Die all hailing from the city. (Interface has worked with the latter.) LAZAbeam (born: Keshav Chandradath Singh), a Port of Spain-based soca producer, makes up the Trini part of the team. And on “Cyah Help It,” each brings top-drawer vocal talents from their respective scenes, with Ms. Dynamite repping for the UK and Bunji Garlin for Trinidad.

The track opens with dramatic filtered chants, expectant percussion and stabs, the intro peaking with overdriven power chords and a lick of almost operatic synth pomp that begs the question, “What if Phantom Of The Opera had been re-imagined with autotune and daggering?” Yet before that debatable idea can settle in, the drums drop, and Ms. Dynamite and Bunji Garlin take turns riding a rhythm that switches up between low-end badman stagger and UK Funky-inflected syncopation. A mixture of soundbwoy killing and party starting, it’s a combination of style and pattern that keeps things unexpected, an uninhibited bruk-out destined to shell down bashment parties that are not limited by tempo or genre. If a carnival parade was to trample across the Atlantic, all the way from St. Pauls to Independence Square, this could be its 2015 anthem.

Cyah Help It EP is out on Oct 23 on Feel Up.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.