August 3, 2015

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Jena Malone In Costume as Batgirl, Stan Lee vs. Jim Henson vs. Walt Disney and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Supercut of the Day:

In honor of Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation, Cinema Blend has compiled every mask removal from the M:I franchise:

[embedded content]

Movie Character Super Karaoke of the Day:

Let’s be thankful that there are people with so much extra time on their hands that we can have videos where movies are cut together so their characters help sing a cover of “Uptown Funk.” The best part is actually the use of dance scenes from Napoleon Dynamite, Mac and Me and others for the instrumental moments.

[embedded content]

Celebrity Good Deed of the Day:

The cast of the new Ghostbusters movie — Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones and Kate McKinnon — paid a visit to a children’s hospital in their new costumes:

Creator Clash of the Day:

Who is responsible for more of your favorite movie characters, Stan Lee, Jim Henson or Walt Disney (all of them now a part of Disney, of course)? Root for your pick as the icons go up against each other in a rap battle:

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

Quickly after news came of Jena Malone‘s role as Barbara Gordon, aka Batgirl, in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, artist BossLogic made this piece depicting the portrayal (via Heroic Hollywood):

Movie Mashup of the Day:

For a new series titled “Soundtrack Swap,” Sean Blevins of House By the Video Store mashed up It Follows and Psycho, exchanging their scores (via The Playlist):

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

Would you know this clean cut gentleman is Mick Jagger if we didn’t tell you? It’s a publicity shot from his performance in Donald Cammell and Nicolas Roeg‘s Performance, which turns 45 today.

Classic Cartoon of the Day:

Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck and Goofy star together as fire fighters in Mickey’s Fire Brigade, which hit theaters on this date 80 years ago. Watch it below.

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

It’s not Halloween yet, but here’s an early reminder that you can make any character and costume into a “sexy” version. Here’s a cosplayer as a “sexy” No Face from Hayao Miyazaki‘s Spirited Away (via Fashionably Geek):

Classic Trailer of the Day:

On this day 60 years ago, Alfred Hitchcock‘s To Catch a Thief, starring Cary Grant and Grace Kelly, had its world premiere in Los Angeles. Watch the original trailer for the movie below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Wanted: More Bulls With No Horns

One of the hornless Holsteins at Steve Maddox's California dairy farm. Maddox is beginning to breed hornless cattle into his herd, but it's slow going.

One of the hornless Holsteins at Steve Maddox’s California dairy farm. Maddox is beginning to breed hornless cattle into his herd, but it’s slow going. Abbie Fentress Swanson for NPR hide caption

itoggle caption Abbie Fentress Swanson for NPR

The next time you’re in the dairy aisle at the supermarket, take a moment to imagine the animals that produced all that milk. Do these cows have horns? Chances are they do, or at least they did at birth.

About 85 percent of milk sold in the United States comes from Holstein cows born with horns. But it’s standard practice for farms to remove horns from cattle to prevent injuries to workers, veterinarians and other cows in the herd.

“Horned cattle: You get them on the truck, you get twice as many bruises when you get to the slaughterhouses. Bruises have to be cut out and thrown away,” says Colorado State University professor and well-known animal advocate Temple Grandin. “In the dairy industry, removing horns improves safety for the stock people and the farmworkers.”

But not everyone agrees with the practice of dehorning cattle. In recent years, animal welfare groups including The Humane Society and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) have called for an end to horn removal in cattle.

Their research shows it causes animals significant pain and stress, and that painkillers are rarely used during these procedures.

In the United States, there are no national rules regarding how farms should remove horns from cattle. Many farms follow the guidelines of the American Veterinary Medical Association and the National Milk Producers Federation, which recommend a practice called disbudding. Disbudding halts the growth of horn tissue in very young calves before pointy horns start to grow. Other dehorning techniques, like excising developing horns with metal scoops, are arguably harder on the cows and the workers.

Grandin is in favor of disbudding, as long as it’s done quickly and with pain relief. “It’s just like the dentist — you’ve got to wait for the drugs to take effect,” she says.

But PETA and The Humane Society are pushing for a different approach. They want dairy farms to breed more hornless, or polled, animals into their herds. Thanks to advances in genomic selection and DNA testing, farmers can more easily find animals that carry naturally occurring hornless genes and breed the best of these animals with horned cattle. To be clear, this isn’t genetic modification but breeding, since the polled gene occurs naturally in cattle.

“What’s really exciting is that the polled gene is a dominant gene. Right away you get at least 50 percent of offspring born without the horn gene. Right off the bat, 50 percent of animals are spared from this cruel procedure,” says PETA spokesman Dave Byer.

Until recently, selecting for the hornless gene hasn’t been a top priority for the dairy industry, which is more interested in traits like superior milk production, cow health and fertility.

“In the past, there weren’t very many polled bulls for farmers to choose from, so the ability to find one with good genetics for milk production and all the other traits was low,” says Virginia Tech genetics professor Ben Dorshorst. That’s changed now: “It is easier to find a good one, and that gets even more farmers interested in using polled genetics,” he says.

Dorshorst recently conducted an analysis that revealed there are now twice as many polled dairy bulls for farmers to buy semen from than there were two years ago.

Bryan Quanbury, whose company, DairyBullsOnline, specializes in polled dairy breeding, says he’s seen that uptick in demand firsthand. “Five years ago, people hardly knew polled dairy cattle existed. Today farmers are asking for polled bulls,” he says. “With increased awareness, there is increased demand.”

Aurora Organic Dairy, which milks 19,000 cows in Colorado and Texas, began using polled genetics in its herd more than three years ago. Now nearly 70 percent of the farm’s newborn calves are hornless.

“The main reason that we do a lot of these things at Aurora is because cow care, animal wellbeing, is our no. 1 priority. And we share what we’re doing with our customers, and they love it,” says Aurora’s vice president, Juan Velez.

Most of the milk sold in the US comes from Holstein dairy cows that are born with horns. To protect animals and workers, it's standard practice for farms to remove horns from calves soon after they're born.

Most of the milk sold in the US comes from Holstein dairy cows that are born with horns. To protect animals and workers, it’s standard practice for farms to remove horns from calves soon after they’re born. Abbie Fentress Swanson for NPR hide caption

itoggle caption Abbie Fentress Swanson for NPR

Responding to calls from PETA, the Humane Society and concerned customers, many food manufacturers, retailers and restaurants are asking their suppliers to integrate more polled cattle into their herds. In July, the nation’s largest supermarket, Kroger, became the latest retailer to get on board. Other companies with animal welfare policies that address dehorning and polled genetics in the supply chain include Starbucks, Sodexo, Dannon, Aramark, Nestlé, General Mills, Chipotle, Dunkin’ Brands and Wal-Mart.

But these companies aren’t requiring suppliers to act, and farms aren’t exactly chomping at the bit to make their herds 100 percent polled. Fair Oaks Farms milks 15,000 cows in Indiana and is one of Kroger’s largest milk suppliers.

“We use very little polled breeding,” says Fair Oaks president Mike McCloskey, because there aren’t enough polled dairy bulls that carry the most desirable Holstein traits.

“As soon as bulls start catching up, you’ll see dairy producers across the country using polled breeding, because we all would like to eliminate the process of dehorning,” he says.

There’s also the question of cost. A recent study from Purdue University and the U.S. Department of Agriculture found adopting polled genetics and phasing out dehorning may save farmers money in labor and veterinary costs. But polled genetics could also cost farmers lost profits if their hornless cattle produce less milk. Farmers may also have to pay a premium for hornless bull semen – a concern that keeps many farmers from making the jump to polled bulls, says Mark Kerndt, an analyst with the cattle reproduction company Select Sires.

Even if all of America’s dairy farms adopt polled genetics, it will be a while before all the milk we buy comes from cows born without horns. Since polled genes in Holsteins occur at a relatively low frequency, farmers and breeders fear inbreeding if they move too quickly.

Steve Maddox, who has 3,200 milking cows on his California dairy, is working hard to identify genetically polled animals in his herd. But he says it’s slow going.

“We’re trying to stay away from inbreeding, and we’re trying to maintain the genetic levels we’re at,” Maddox says. “You don’t want to do it overnight, and you don’t want to go back in genetics 20 or 30 years.”


Abbie Fentress Swanson is a journalist based in Los Angeles. She covers agriculture, food production, science, health and the environment.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Ultimate Frisbee Recognized By Olympic Committee

1:54

Download

The official recognition by the International Olympic Committee means that disc sports are now eligible for future Olympic Games.

Transcript

AUDIE CORNISH, HOST:

The International Olympic Committee has formally recognized the World Flying Disc Federation. Translation – Ultimate Frisbee is one step closer to being included in the Olympics at some point in the future. Here’s NPR’s Brakkton Booker.

BRAKKTON BOOKER, BYLINE: This is what Ultimate Frisbee sounds like at the highest level.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED ANNOUNCER: Deep huck down the field. With a step, it’s LaRouche, and she’ll make the catch. Good grab, and here comes Fierry on the attack.

BOOKER: This is from ESPN’s broadcast of the women’s U.S. Open Ultimate Championship semifinal earlier this year. Nob Rauch is the president of the World Flying Disc Federation, or WFDF, and he says the Olympic governing body recognizing disc sports is an incredible milestone.

NOB RAUCH: It’s very exciting. It’s something we’ve been working on for the last four years or so.

BOOKER: Rauch says he believes his organization was selected as one of the sports federations to receive official recognition because the Olympics wants to attract younger audiences.

RAUCH: So I think they’re setting the stage to be able to introduce new sports that are youth-oriented, gaining in popularity, exhibiting gender equality and the like. And so we’re pretty excited about prospects over the next decade or two.

BOOKER: Ultimate Frisbee, or simply Ultimate to those who play, combine aspects of football, soccer and basketball. Tom Crawford heads USA Ultimate, the national governing body for Ultimate Frisbee.

TOM CRAWFORD: So the goal, just like in football, is you score by catching the disk in the end zone.

BOOKER: Nob Rauch of the World Flying Disc Federation says while the U.S. is a major contender in Ultimate, it has lots of competition. But when could we see Ultimate Frisbee make its Olympic debut?

RAUCH: At this point in time, 2024.

BOOKER: Ultimate Frisbee organizers say one of the things that will be popular about the game is that teams will be made up of men and women. Brakkton Booker, NPR News.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Calls To Cut Off Planned Parenthood Are Nothing New

Protesters rally on the steps of the Texas state capitol on July 28 to condemn the use of fetal tissue for medical research.

Protesters rally on the steps of the Texas state capitol on July 28 to condemn the use of fetal tissue for medical research. Eric Gay/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Eric Gay/AP

Updated at 6:52 p.m. ET

Republican calls to defund Planned Parenthood over its alleged handling of fetal tissue for research are louder than ever. But they are just the latest in a decades-long drive to halt federal support for the group.

This round aims squarely at the collection of fetal tissue, an issue that had been mostly settled — with broad bipartisan support — in the early 1990s. Among those who voted then to allow federal funding for fetal tissue research was now-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

McConnell made no mention of his previous position when he announced that the Senate would take up a bill to cut off Planned Parenthood’s access to federal funds before leaving for its summer break. The Senate blocked the legislation from moving forward Monday night, but the issue may come back with spending bills in the fall.

Videos shot by members of an anti-abortion group posing as fetal tissue middlemen “absolutely shock the conscience,” McConnell said at a news conference last week. Those videos purport to show Planned Parenthood officials discussing the sale of tissue from aborted fetuses in strikingly casual terms. It is illegal to profit from the sale of fetal tissue, though not illegal for expenses involved in its collection to be reimbursed.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has voted in support of fetal tissue research in the past.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has voted in support of fetal tissue research in the past. Susan Walsh/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Susan Walsh/AP

Planned Parenthood says the videos are heavily edited and take discussions out of context.

“These videos are hard for anyone to defend and hit at the moral fabric of our society,” said the bill’s lead sponsor, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa. “Planned Parenthood is harvesting the body parts of unborn babies.”

Ernst’s bill would have not only made Planned Parenthood ineligible for federal grant programs like the federal family planning program, but also would have banned it from receiving reimbursement from Medicaid for other health services it performs for eligible men and women, such as testing and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases.

According to the group’s most recent annual report, 41 percent of the $1.3 billion received by the national group and its affiliates came from government sources. Under a series of laws including the Hyde amendment, none of the federal funds can be used for abortions, which account for 3 percent of the services Planned Parenthood provides.

Yet even though abortion is a small part of what Planned Parenthood does, the group’s enormous size makes it the nation’s largest single provider of the procedure.

The debate is in fact all about abortion, according to Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of Planned Parenthood. “They don’t care about fetal tissue research,” she says of the groups targeting the organization. “It is just an angle to go after safe, legal abortion.”

Asked if the goal was to eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood, fetal tissue research or both, David Daleiden, the head of the Center for Medical Progress, the group that took the videos, said in a statement: “The goal of our investigation is to reveal the truth about Planned Parenthood’s trafficking and sale of aborted baby body parts for profit, which is illegal and unethical. Taxpayers should not be paying for these atrocities against humanity.”

But while the tie to fetal tissue is new, the fight to separate Planned Parenthood from its federal funding is, in fact, older than the 26-year-old Daleiden.

In 1982, when Ronald Reagan was president, his administration issued the so-called squeal rule, which sought to require family planning providers, including Planned Parenthood, to notify parents when providing contraceptives to minors or lose their funding. Planned Parenthood sued and won in federal court, where the rule was found to be a violation of patient privacy.

In 1987, the Reagan administration issued what came to be known as the “gag rule,” which barred recipients of federal family planning funds from counseling or referring patients for abortion, and which required physical and financial separation between contraceptive and abortion services.

Planned Parenthood and others sued again, and the case eventually went to the Supreme Court. This time the government won, but the rules remained mired in lower courts and were never fully implemented. President Bill Clinton erased them on his first day in office in 1993 by executive order.

Planned Parenthood was back on the hot seat in the 2000s, as new “direct action” groups decided to take the fight in a different direction.

In 2011, the anti-abortion group Live Action released a series of videos charging that Planned Parenthood was failing to act in apparent cases of sexual abuse leading to abortion in minors. Republicans in the House helped use those videos (which were later found to have been edited to make them misleading) to pass an amendment to defund Planned Parenthood. The Democratic-led Senate never acted on the measure.

But even those inclined to support Planned Parenthood say the allegations around the sale of fetal tissue may represent a turning point.

“The imagery is terrible,” said Alta Charo, a professor of law and bioethics at the University of Wisconsin.

This is also ironic, she says, because there has been a fairly broad bipartisan consensus in favor of using tissue from aborted fetuses in research for many years.

A panel appointed during the Reagan administration in 1988 voted overwhelmingly that such research was ethical.

“They went through all of the arguments, like ‘Does it make you complicit and evil if you take advantage of what had been a legally aborted fetus and you think that abortion was evil?’ And the answer was, ‘Well no, because we have transplants of organs of homicide victims all the time,’ ” Charo said. “So even if you call it a homicide, we take advantage of it.”

Meanwhile, groups looking for possible cures for devastating diseases, and seeing potential breakthroughs in other countries, urged Congress to cancel a federal funding ban on fetal tissue research imposed by Reagan and continued under President George H.W. Bush.

That support was demonstrated in a bill to update programs at the National Institutes of Health. Among the Republicans who joined the overwhelming support for the measure in 1992 were not only McConnell, but also Sens. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and John McCain, R-Ariz.

Bush vetoed that bill, as promised, and while the Senate voted almost as overwhelmingly to override the veto, the House fell 10 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed.

President Bill Clinton overturned the ban by executive order in 1993, and federal funding for fetal tissue research was formally authorized in a similar NIH bill passed later that year.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.