July 7, 2015

No Image

Obama Administration Aims To Expand Access To Solar Power

Solar panels gather sunlight in Florida.

Solar panels gather sunlight in Florida. John Raoux/AP hide caption

itoggle caption John Raoux/AP

The Obama administration hopes to make solar power more affordable for low- and middle-income Americans. It’s announcing a series of moves, including installing more solar energy units in federally subsidized housing, low cost loans for homeowners and a program to help renters.

The White House recently pledged that the U.S. would get 20 percent of its total electricity from renewable sources by 2030, about three times what it does now. The Washington Post reports the administration is concerned about what might be called energy inequality:

” ‘It’s very important not only that we achieve that goal, but how we get there as well,’ noted Obama senior adviser Brian Deese on a media call. ‘We know there are significant challenges in the scope and geographic reach of solar.’

“More and more voices of late are airing concerns about equal access to solar energy. ‘The rapid decline of solar panel costs in recent years has ushered in a solar boom that has not spread uniformly across the spectrum of U.S. household incomes,’ notes a recent paper from the George Washington University Solar Institute. ‘Despite being more vulnerable to energy costs, lower income Americans have lagged behind more affluent households in adopting solar and realizing its numerous benefits.’ “

The administration plans to train some 200 low-income people to get jobs in the solar industry. And states, local governments, industry and charities have pledged $520 million for investments in community solar programs.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.



No Image

More Mammograms May Not Always Mean Fewer Cancer Deaths

Mammogram

iStockphoto

Here’s more evidence that mammograms don’t always deliver the results that women want. They find more small cancers, but don’t lower a woman’s risk of dying of breast cancer, a study finds.

The study looked at data from 547 U.S. counties that reported the percentage of women over age 40 who had a screening mammogram between 1998 and 2000. More than 16 million women lived in those counties, and 53,207 were diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000.

Over the next 10 years, 15 percent of the women died of breast cancer.

There was a lot of county-to-county variation in the number of women who got screening mammograms, from 38 percent to 78 percent. So you’d think that the counties that did a better job at screening would have fewer breast cancer deaths.

That wasn’t the case. The risk of death from breast cancer over 10 years was pretty much the same.

But the scanning did find more cancers. For every 10 percent increase in screening, the number of cancers found rose by 16 percent, the study found. The results were reported Tuesday in JAMA Internal Medicine. This, the authors write, means “the most prominent effect of screening mammography is overdiagnosis.”

By that they mean identifying abnormalities that will never cause illness or death in the patient’s lifetime. Overdiagnosis has become an issue in screening for breast, prostate and thyroid cancer.

So what’s a woman supposed to do with this information? After giving a big fat dis to mammography, the authors write, “Nonetheless, we do not believe that the right rate of screening mammography is zero.” Focusing screening on higher-risk women would help, they say, as well as more watchful waiting instead of immediate treatment.

The study has its limitations, because it’s comparing large groups of people, rather than tracking the health of individual women from mammogram on. Or it may be that even with this large number of cases, deaths are still rare enough that they’re missed in this sort of study. Other studies have found a 20 percent reduction in breast cancer deaths as a result of mammography.

This is just the latest study pointing out the problem with overdiagnosis of breast cancer.

“This study shows that the more we look, the more you find,” says Joann Elmore, a professor of medicine at the University of Washington who wrote a commentary accompanying the study. “The more you screen, the more likely you are to detect early precancerous abnormalities like ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage cancer.”

It’s not clear how many women are overdiagnosed; Elmore says 10 to 20 percent may be a good estimate. But with the current tests, there’s no way for a woman to know if she’s in that 10 to 20 percent or if she really does have a dangerous cancer. Thus most women who get a diagnosis of DCIS or early-stage invasive cancer opt for treatment, which can mean surgery, radiation or chemotherapy.

“That is so hard,” Elmore says. “I really feel for those women. I need help both figuring out how to explain this to women, and I need better research helping me look at the tissue and figure out whether these women are overdiagnosed or not.”

Elmore studies the reliability of breast cancer screening, and published a study in March that found that pathologists often misidentify DCIS and early-stage cancers when reading biopsies.

The medical community has come to accept that overdiagnosis exists, Elmore says. “This is something that wasn’t even considered when I was in med school years ago. We’re slowly realizing that we are taking healthy people and maybe potentially giving them harm.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Stocks Fall Amid Persisting Greek Uncertainty

FOX Business: The Power to Prosper US equity markets fell on Monday, a day after the Greek people voted overwhelmingly in opposition of economic reforms demanded by the nation’s eurozone creditors. The Dow Jones Industrial…


No Image

Mayweather Is Stripped Of WBO Belt He Won From Pacquiao

Floyd Mayweather Jr. missed a deadline to decide which title belt he wants to keep, says the World Boxing Organization.

Floyd Mayweather Jr. missed a deadline to decide which title belt he wants to keep, says the World Boxing Organization. Al Bello/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Al Bello/Getty Images

Saying that Floyd Mayweather missed a deadline to pay a fee related to his May 2 win over Manny Pacquiao, the World Boxing Organization has stripped Floyd of the welterweight title he won in that fight.

Mayweather “let come and go the 4:30 p.m. ET Friday deadline by which he had to pay a $200,000 sanctioning fee from the May 2 fight (for which he earned more than $220 million),” reports ESPN’s Dan Rafael, who also notes that the WBO is also trying to enforce its rules against boxers holding titles in different weight classes.

Representatives for Mayweather, who remains undefeated in his pro boxing career, tell ESPN that they’re weighing their options.

The WBO title will now go to Timothy Bradley Jr., who had been named the interim title holder after he won a June 27 fight for the welterweight belt.

The status of that June bout was thrown into uncertainty after Mayweather seemed to change his mind about vacating his titles — something he pledged to do after defeating Pacquiao.

“Give other fighters a chance,” Mayweather said back in May. “I’m not greedy. I’m a world champion in two different weight classes. It’s time to let other fighters fight for the belt.”

ESPN’s Rafael says that Mayweather, 38, “plans to next fight Sept. 12 — the opponent has not been announced — to complete his six-fight contract with Showtime/CBS. After that, the 38-year-old has said, he plans to retire.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.