June 10, 2015

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Wolverine Vs. Deadpool, 'Jurassic Park' Redone in 8-Bit Graphics and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Mash-Up of the Day:

Ahead of the release of Jurassic World, revisit Jurassic Park — only this time watch it redone in 8-bit video game graphics.

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

D.W. Griffith made the first known live-action movie featuring dinosaurs, 1914’s Brute Force, aka The Primitive Man. See a still below.

Supercut of the Day:

Inspired by the new Poltergeist remake, Slate highlights the scariest clowns in movies and TV in a video called “Do You Want a Balloon?”

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

It’s not certain that Hugh Jackman will appear as Wolverine in Deadpool, but artist Dave Paget gives us a look at their necessary fight scene anyway (via Geek Tyrant):

Toy Time:

Never mind a regular old Peter Venkman figure for Ghostbusters fans; Funko has unveiled this slimed Peter Venkman figure for Comic-Con 2015 (via Topless Robot):

Study of an Actor:

Here are the best performances by Joaquin Phoenix according to Watch Mojo:

[embedded content]

Filmmaker in Focus:

This 20-minute documentary, titled Lost Kubrick, focuses on the unfinished features of Stanley Kubrick (via The Playlist):

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

Slave Leia cosplay (based on Return of the Jedi) is a common sight at conventions, but bearded Slave Leia is not. Nor is balloon-art Jabba the Hutt (via Fashionably Geek):

Daily Dose of Star Wars:

Speaking of Princess Leia, now that Star Wars is a Disney property, she is technically a Disney princess, and cosplayers are happy to make the connection (via Neatorama):

Today’s Anniversary:

Woody Allen‘s Love and Death opened 40 years ago on this date. Watch the original trailer below.

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

New 'Regression' Trailer: Ethan Hawke Saves Emma Watson From a Satanic Cult in the '80s

Update 6/10/15: The first American trailer is now online. Find it below.

Previously: You may recall that Regression was on our list of “2015 Movies That Need to Be on Your Radar.” The reason it was on there was simple: Alejandro Amenábar (Thesis, Open Your Eyes, The Others, The Sea Inside) has yet to make a bad movie, and Ethan Hawke and Emma Watson meant the cast was sure to be reliable as well.

But when we put Regression on that list, we hadn’t seen a trailer, or even stills, from the movie. We were going off the talent involved and the vague premise that it was about a father who is facing jail for committing a crime he has no memory of. Now that we’ve seen the actual trailer, it’s rocketed even further up our list of most anticipated 2015 movies.

We were looking forward to it, sure, but we were expecting a crime thriller. This looks more like a boiling, sinister occult thriller, with Emma Watson being the key witness in a police investigation to some unsavory, and potentially supernatural, doings.

The New American Trailer:

[embedded content]

The Older, International Trailer:

[embedded content]

And check out this killer poster.

Follow @PeterSHall Follow @MoviesDotCom

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Toews Ends Scoring Drought In 2-1 Win As Chicago Ties Stanley Cup Finals

Anton Stralman, left, and Andrei Vasilevskiy of the Tampa Bay Lightning watch a shot by Jonathan Toews of the Chicago Blackhawks cross the line Wednesday night in the second period of Game Four of the Stanley Cup Finals in Chicago

Anton Stralman, left, and Andrei Vasilevskiy of the Tampa Bay Lightning watch a shot by Jonathan Toews of the Chicago Blackhawks cross the line Wednesday night in the second period of Game Four of the Stanley Cup Finals in Chicago Bruce Bennett/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Bruce Bennett/Getty Images

Update, 11 p.m. ET:

Chicago captain Jonathan Toews did in fact break out of his scoring drought and, with a second goal by left wing Brandon Saad that was assisted by Patrick Kane, propelled the Blackhawks to a 2-2 series tie Wednesday night against the Tampa Bay Lightning.

Tampa Bay center Alex Killorn scored for the Lightning, which had hoped to have Chicago on the brink of elimination when the Stanley Cup finals return to Florida on Saturday night at 8 p.m. ET. It was his second goal of the series and eighth of the playoffs.

Original Story:

Chicago Blackhawks Jonathan Toews (19) and Patrick Kane (88) confer during Monday's Stanley Cup Final game against the Tampa Bay Lightning.

Chicago Blackhawks Jonathan Toews (19) and Patrick Kane (88) confer during Monday’s Stanley Cup Final game against the Tampa Bay Lightning. Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

While the Chicago Blackhawks are down two games to one in their best-of-seven Stanley Cup Final against the Tampa Bay Lightning, they are far from out.

But two straight losses have pointed to some areas that do need to change if the Hawks want to turn this series around. Not least is the performance of their two top players, team captain Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane. They are arguably two of the best power forwards in hockey today, but so far in this series, they have produced exactly 1 point, an assist by the 27-year-old Toews. In Game 2, Kane didn’t even get a shot on net.

Before Game 3, Kane admitted to some frustration. “As an offensive guy, you want to be helping produce, especially at this time of year,” he said.

Blackhawks goalie Corey Crawford also needs to up his performance. After a stellar Game 1, giving up only an early goal, he had a lackluster Game 2, giving up four, on just 24 shots. He bounced back for Game 3 but still wasn’t good enough to stop a Tampa attack that has been relentless throughout most of this series.

There are still plenty of upsides for Chicago, the most interesting one being the performance of 20-year-old rookie forward Teuvo Teravainen. In Chicago’s opening game victory in Tampa, the young Finn scored the game-tying goal and set up the winner. He also scored in Game 3, briefly giving the Hawks the lead. This season, he netted just four goals in his first 34 games. He’s scored three in the last five games of the playoffs alone.

“Every chance he’s getting, he’s making big plays,” Toews said. “He’s already doing it in the Stanley Cup Final, so it’s pretty amazing to watch.”

On defense, Chicago’s Duncan Keith continues to be a dominant force, averaging a staggering 31 minutes a game on the ice, with a playoff-leading 18 assists.

And the Blackhawks do have history on their side. Since coach Joel Quenneville took over behind the bench in 2008, Chicago has had a 30 and 30 win-loss record in Games 1 to 3 in the playoffs, but it has produced a dominant 40 and 14 record in Games 4 through 7. This is why the Hawks are in their third Stanley Cup Final in six years.

For its part, Tampa Bay isn’t taking its 2-1 Final lead against Chicago for granted.

“This is going to be a good test for this group,” Tampa Bay captain Steven Stamkos said. “Obviously they have the experience. But we’re going through it. You have to go through these situations to gain that experience. We seem to rise to the occasion every round.”

And incredibly, Tampa Bay has been rising to the occasion in this series without production from Stamkos, another highly skilled power forward. He has no points in this Final so far. If he starts to contribute more, Chicago could be in real trouble. But for now, Tampa’s second line, the so-called Triplets line of Tyler Johnson, Ondrej Palat and Nikita Kucherov, has carried the load. Combined, they have 30 goals and 51 assists in the playoffs. Johnson is the playoff scoring leader. Kucherov is second.

Goalie Ben Bishop’s health is still a question mark. He was removed late in Game 3 for undisclosed reasons, possibly an injury. But he played Monday and only seemed to get stronger as the game progressed, and there has been no talk of him being benched tonight.

As long as Tampa’s players don’t make the mistake they made in Game 1, when they sat on a one-goal lead in the third period and were punished with two quick Chicago goals, the Lightning should be fine. Their solid, attacking style play of the last two games suggests they’ve learned their lesson.

Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final is Wednesday night at 8 p.m. EDT.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

EPA Takes First Step In Limiting Aircraft Emissions

The EPA has taken a step toward regulating greenhouse gases created by aviation.

The EPA has taken a step toward regulating greenhouse gases created by aviation. Mike Groll/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Mike Groll/AP

The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday started what could be a lengthy process: making rules to limit the amount of climate-warming pollution that comes from aircraft engines.

In a statement, the EPA said it’s “proposing to find” that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from commercial aircraft contribute to “pollution that causes climate change endangering the health and welfare of Americans.” The agency hasn’t outlined any limits yet; this statement is just an announcement that it has begun the process that would lead to limits down the road.

The EPA pointed out that any rules would not apply to military aircraft or the types of planes used for recreational purposes. Once the EPA’s “action” is published in the Federal Register, it will be open for a 60-day public comment period.

The EPA also said it is releasing details of the work by the United Nations’ International Civil Aviation Organization to develop international carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions guidelines for aircraft. Those are expected to be adopted in early 2016. The EPA and the Federal Aviation Administration have been involved in that process on behalf of the U.S., and the EPA says it’s working to make sure any standards reached “are equitable across national boundaries.”

NPR’s Christopher Joyce told our Newscast Unit that EPA rules on airplane emissions will likely parallel any rules coming out of the U.N. Joyce also said the aviation industry has previously fought regulations proposed by international authorities.

But in a statement released in response to Wednesday’s EPA news, Airlines For America, the industry’s trade group, didn’t explicitly oppose any of the work of the EPA or the U.N. Rather, it argued that U.S. aviation already has an “exceptional environmental track record.” A4A says the industry has improved fuel efficiency more than 120 percent since 1978, and saved “over 3.8 billion metric tons of CO2, the equivalent to taking 23 million cars off the road each of those years.” Nancy Young, vice president of A4A said, “U.S. airlines are green and we are getting even greener.”

The EPA says U.S. aircraft emit about 11 percent of the U.S. transportation sector’s greenhouse gas emissions, and 29 percent of those emissions from all aircraft across the globe.

The New York Times says this push for action on aircraft emissions is “the latest of Mr. Obama’s major initiatives to combat global warming.” The Times says next week, the Obama administration will propose rules on emissions for heavy-duty trucks, and in August, it will announce new rules on power plant pollution.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Some Insured Patients Still Skipping Care Because Of High Costs

Renee Mitchell says even though she has health insurance she'll have trouble paying for the eye surgery she needs to save her vision.
2:47

Download

Renee Mitchell says even though she has health insurance she’ll have trouble paying for the eye surgery she needs to save her vision. Jim Burress/WABE hide caption

itoggle caption Jim Burress/WABE

A key goal of the Affordable Care Act is to help people get health insurance who may have not been able to pay for it before. But the most popular plans – those with low monthly premiums – also have high deductibles and copays. And that can leave medical care still out of reach for some.

Renee Mitchell of Stone Mountain, Georgia is one of those people. She previously put off a medical procedure because of the expense. But as the threat of losing part of her vision became a real possibility, she sought an eye specialist at Emory University, who told her she’d need surgery to correct a cataract procedure gone wrong.

That’s not the scariest part, she says. Cost is: “further copays [and] more out-of-pocket expenses.”

Mitchell is generally pleased with her insurance — a silver-level Obamacare plan. It’s the most popular level plan with consumers because of the benefits it provides for the money. But she still struggles to keep up with her part of the bills.

“If not for having availability on my credit card, we’d probably be in the poorhouse,” Mitchell says.

She still owes more than $20,000 for several years of medical expenses, with more debt accruing in interest each month. If she undergoes that eye surgery, she says, she’ll owe another $4,000 – the deductible for the operation.

“It’s a very big burden,” Mitchell says.

A recent study released by the nonprofit Families USA shows that a lot of folks with coverage like Mitchell’s feel a similar burden, and a poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation finds the same thing. The majority of people who buy insurance on state or federal exchanges pick silver-level plans, which often carry a lower monthly premium, but have a high annual deductible – $1,500 or more.

“Consumers are still struggling with unaffordable, out-of-pocket costs,” says Lydia Mitts, a senior policy analyst with Families USA. “One in four adults who were fully insured for the whole year still reported they went without some needed medical care because they couldn’t afford it,” Mitts says.

Many people in that situation skip follow-up care and don’t fill prescriptions. Mitts says that only adds to long-term complications and costs.

But it doesn’t have to be that way, she says. Plans in some states, including Pennsylvania, Texas, Florida and Arizona, have recently done away with deductibles on some silver-level insurance plans. And for certain basic services, including doctors’ visits and generic prescriptions, other states are requiring only a small copay.

Still, while copays, deductibles and co-insurance weigh heavy on Renee Mitchell’s mind, they’re not her only insurance concern. Her monthly premium is also getting more expensive. This year, she says, it jumped by about $100 a month.

Mitchell wants to be clear, though: She’s not looking for a handout.

“People seem to think that we just want something for nothing,” she says. “I worked a lot of years. I took an early retirement to take care of my family. It’s not my fault, so to speak, that I’m here.”

This story is part of NPR’s reporting partnership with WABE and Kaiser Health News.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Amid Corruption Scandal, FIFA Delays Bidding On 2026 World Cup

FIFA Secretary-General Jérôme Valcke (right) and FIFA President Joseph "Sepp" Blatter attend a news conference in 2014.

FIFA Secretary-General Jérôme Valcke (right) and FIFA President Joseph “Sepp” Blatter attend a news conference in 2014. Victor Caivano/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Victor Caivano/AP

Still reeling from a corruption scandal that has ensnared some of its top officials and led to the resignation of its president, FIFA said it was delaying the bidding process on the 2026 World Cup.

“Due to the situation, I think it’s nonsense to start any bidding process for the time being,” Jérôme Valcke, FIFA’s secretary general, said during a news conference on Wednesday.

In a separate statement, FIFA said the organization’s executive committee will discuss the process at a later date.

The BBC reports:

“The vote to decide who will host the 2026 World Cup is due to take place in Kuala Lumpur in May 2017.

The United States are front-runners to stage the tournament, but Canada, Mexico and Colombia are also thought to be interested. Russia and Qatar were selected to host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups by a secret ballot of Fifa’s 22 executive members in December 2010.

“But Swiss prosecutors are now investigating alleged financial irregularities surrounding the bidding process. Both Russia and Qatar have denied any wrongdoing.”

Bloomberg reports that during the news conference, Valcke was defensive. If you remember, Valcke was not named in the U.S. bribery investigation, but subsequent reporting linked him to a $10 million payment that was allegedly part of a bribe to help South Africa secure the right to host the 2010 World Cup.

Wednesday’s news conference was Valcke’s first since those reports surfaced, and he said he had done no wrong. Bloomberg adds:

“The money involved came from South African authorities and not FIFA, and the transfer was in line with FIFA regulations, Valcke said.

” ‘You have decided that after [Sepp] Blatter I am the head to be cut, fine, but don’t use this $10 million because I haven’t made any mistake with this,’ he said.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Amid Corruption Scandal, FIFA Delays Bidding On 2026 World Cup

FIFA Secretary-General Jérôme Valcke (right) and FIFA President Joseph "Sepp" Blatter attend a news conference in 2014.

FIFA Secretary-General Jérôme Valcke (right) and FIFA President Joseph “Sepp” Blatter attend a news conference in 2014. Victor Caivano/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Victor Caivano/AP

Still reeling from a corruption scandal that has ensnared some of its top officials and led to the resignation of its president, FIFA said it was delaying the bidding process on the 2026 World Cup.

“Due to the situation, I think it’s nonsense to start any bidding process for the time being,” Jérôme Valcke, FIFA’s secretary general, said during a news conference on Wednesday.

In a separate statement, FIFA said the organization’s executive committee will discuss the process at a later date.

The BBC reports:

“The vote to decide who will host the 2026 World Cup is due to take place in Kuala Lumpur in May 2017.

The United States are front-runners to stage the tournament, but Canada, Mexico and Colombia are also thought to be interested. Russia and Qatar were selected to host the 2018 and 2022 World Cups by a secret ballot of Fifa’s 22 executive members in December 2010.

“But Swiss prosecutors are now investigating alleged financial irregularities surrounding the bidding process. Both Russia and Qatar have denied any wrongdoing.”

Bloomberg reports that during the news conference, Valcke was defensive. If you remember, Valcke was not named in the U.S. bribery investigation, but subsequent reporting linked him to a $10 million payment that was allegedly part of a bribe to help South Africa secure the right to host the 2010 World Cup.

Wednesday’s news conference was Valcke’s first since those reports surfaced, and he said he had done no wrong. Bloomberg adds:

“The money involved came from South African authorities and not FIFA, and the transfer was in line with FIFA regulations, Valcke said.

” ‘You have decided that after [Sepp] Blatter I am the head to be cut, fine, but don’t use this $10 million because I haven’t made any mistake with this,’ he said.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Consumers In 'Grandfathered' Health Plans Can Face Higher Costs

Health plans begun under the Affordable Care Act are required to cover FDA-approved contraceptive methods without cost to members. Older plans are exempt from that rule.

Health plans begun under the Affordable Care Act are required to cover FDA-approved contraceptive methods without cost to members. Older plans are exempt from that rule. iStockphoto hide caption

itoggle caption iStockphoto

Judy Naillon called her insurer several months ago to find out why she was being charged $35 every month for birth control pills. Her friends said they were getting their pills free under the federal health law.

Why wasn’t she getting the same deal?

The insurance representative explained that was because the plan Naillon and her husband had through his job was “grandfathered” under the health law. In other words, unlike other health plans, Naillon’s insurance policy, which existed before the health law was enacted, doesn’t have to cover many preventive services, including contraception.

Naillon would have to continue to pay a share of the cost of her pills, the insurer told her. The plan also wouldn’t pay if she wanted to switch to an intrauterine device, and there’s no coverage for an annual physical.

“I’m just really frustrated,” says the Wichita, Kan., music teacher. When her husband took a new marketing job last fall, she says, “I thought that surely all these insurers must now be covering these benefits.”

About a quarter of insured workers today are enrolled in grandfathered plans, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, and these plans haven’t significantly changed their benefits or costs to consumers since 2010.

Old Plans Not Subject To New Rules

These older plans differ in other ways, too. They don’t have to guarantee a member’s right to appeal a decision by the insurer, for example, and may charge consumers higher copays or higher co-insurance for out-of-network emergency services. The plans also aren’t required to comply with the law’s limits on a policy-holder’s annual out-of-pocket spending (currently $6,600 for someone in an individual plan and $13,200 for families). So, consumers who have these health plans may be on the hook financially for more of their medical care than people with Obamacare policies.

When the health law passed, President Barack Obama sought to reassure anxious consumers by promising that “if you like your health care plan, you can keep it.” Since then, the number of grandfathered plans has steadily declined.

In 2011, about 72 percent of companies that offered health insurance included at least one grandfathered plan; by 2014 that number had declined to 37 percent, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation’s annual survey of employer health benefits.

Smaller employers are more likely than large ones to offer the older policies, says Steve Wojcik, vice president of public policy at the National Business Group on Health, which represents the interests of large employers. Small firms typically buy a plan from an insurer that pays their claims. Larger companies, in contrast, often design their own plans and are self-insured — they pay their employees’ claims directly.

Individual plans can also be grandfathered.

Some people who study the insurance market have two words for the demise of grandfathered plans: Good riddance. These policies lack many consumer protections and are generally subject to weaker regulation, so aren’t necessarily good options for people who have health problems.

“Grandfathered plans are more likely to hang onto people who are low risk,” says Sarah Lueck, a senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Some Upsides

On the other hand, the grandfathered policies may come with lower monthly premiums, and in some ways can be a good deal for people who are young and generally healthy.

In order to retain their grandfathered status, the older plans are limited in how much they can increase a policyholder’s copayments and deductibles. So, if someone covered by such a plan had a $20 copayment in 2010, for example, the copayment today could be no more than $26 next year, says Joe Kra, a partner and actuary at Mercer, a human resources consulting firm. Likewise, a $500 annual deductible for such a health policy could rise to no more than $652.

“If an employee is in a grandfathered plan, they’re one of the fortunate minorities,” Kra says.

But Naillon probably wouldn’t agree with that statement.

“Even though my doctor would like to do a physical and run labs,” she says, “I can’t afford to have those services.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.