June 9, 2015

No Image

Today in Movie Culture: Honest Trailer for 'The Lost World: Jurassic Park,' Sesame Street Parody of 'Jurassic Park' and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Supercut of the Day:

See how many of the 100 most iconic movie lines of all time you can quote along with this video:

[embedded content]

Mash-Up of the Day:

Maybe the key to defeating the dinosaurs in Jurassic World is to try to eat them. Let’s learn from Cookie Monster in this Sesame Street parody of Jurassic Park called “Jurassic Cookie” (via /Film).

[embedded content]

Trailer Mix of the Day:

We all love to knock The Lost World: Jurassic Park, but nobody makes fun of it better than Honest Trailers.

[embedded content]

Vintage Image of the Day:

As we celebrate 30 years of The Goonies this week, we learn of the loss of Mary Ellen Trainor to cancer. Rest in piece, Mrs. Walsh.

Filmmaker in Focus:

Speaking of movies co-starring Mary Ellen Trainor, here’s The Goonies director Richard Donner analyzing the opening chase scene from Lethal Weapon 2 (via Filmmaker IQ):

[embedded content]

Here’s part of that opening scene:

[embedded content]

Fan Art of the Day:

We’ve seen a lot of detailed Furiosa art out there, but this stick-figure piece for Mad Max: Fury Road, part of a Buzzfeed movie quiz, is also pretty cool.

Study of an Actor:

Check out the trailer for the hot new documentary Listen to Me Marlon, which profiles the life of Marlon Brandon in his own words. It opens next month before hitting Showtime.

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day:

This family staged a heroic rescue with Dad as Batman and son as Robin and Mom as damsel in distress. Hopefully those railroad tracks aren’t in use and this was all in good, safe fun. Photo by Thiele Photography (via BuzzFeed)

Daily Dose of Star Wars:

Who cares if there’s less room for all your remotes and snacks and large picture books? This carved wood and glass X-Wing coffee table is too cool to be practical (via Geekologie):

Today’s Special Anniversary:

20 years ago, Congo opened in theaters, disappointing any fans of Michael Crichton‘s novel hoping for a Jurassic Park-level hit. Watch the original trailer:

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Giants Pitcher Chris Heston Throws First No-Hitter Of The Season

San Francisco Giants catcher Buster Posey prepares to embrace Chris Heston after Heston threw a no-hitter against the New York Mets Tuesday in New York. The Giants won 5-0.

San Francisco Giants catcher Buster Posey prepares to embrace Chris Heston after Heston threw a no-hitter against the New York Mets Tuesday in New York. The Giants won 5-0. Frank Franklin II/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Frank Franklin II/AP

Chris Heston couldn’t recall ever throwing a no-hitter, not in youth baseball, not in the minor leagues and certainly not in the majors. Now he was three outs away.

“I definitely threw more in the backyard than I have in real life, that’s for sure,” he said.

He plunked Anthony Recker on the left shoulder with his first pitch in the ninth inning. Then the 27-year-old rookie right-hander, filling a gap this year on the San Francisco Giants’ pitching staff, settled down again, working the strike zone in and out, up and down, just as he had with catcher Buster Posey all night long.

Making the 13th start of his big league career, Heston threw called third strikes past pinch-hitter Danny Muno, Curtis Granderson and Ruben Tejada, completing a 5-0 victory over the New York Mets on Tuesday night and the major leagues’ first no-hitter since Washington’s Jordan Zimmermann on the final day of the 2014 regular season.

Heston didn’t jump, didn’t raise his arms in triumph.

He walked calmly off the mound toward home plate and was hugged by catcher Buster Posey.

“I wasn’t too sure where to go after that last out,” Heston said in an aw-shucks manner, looking boyish despite a day or two of stubble.

Heston allowed three baserunners – all on hit batters. He also had a two-run single for his first big league RBIs and finished with two hits more than the injury-depleted Mets.

He took the ball from the final out with him, but didn’t have any designated place to display it. He doesn’t have a trophy case.

“I don’t have enough stuff for one,” he said.

The pitching-rich World Series champions have thrown a no-hitter in four straight seasons, with Heston following Matt Cain’s perfect game against Houston in 2012 and hitless gems by Tim Lincecum in 2013 and ’14. The only other team to accomplish that feat was the Los Angeles Dodgers – all by Sandy Koufax – from 1962-65.

And in an era of radar gun worship, Heston didn’t throw a pitch faster than 91 mph.

“It’s not always how hard you throw,” Giants manager Bruce Bochy said. “It’s your command. It’s your ability to mix up your pitches, keep them off balance, hit your spots, pitch to your defense. Sure, it’s nice to have that 95-99 (mph), but if you’re off a little bit, hitters are going to catch up with that, trust me.”

Heston (6-4) struck out 11 – six looking – and allowed just two balls into the outfield, flyouts by Wilmer Flores in the second inning and Michael Cuddyer in the seventh. The last pitch was a 91 mph sinker that froze Tejada.

As the Citi Field crowd of 23,155 gave Heston a standing ovation, Giants teammates came out of the dugout and bullpen to mob him.

Heston had been extra nervous going into the ninth.

“Attack the zone. Don’t let the nerves get to me. Just throw quality strikes,” he recalled. “Taking a little more deep breaths out there.”

Brandon Crawford made a backhand stop deep at shortstop and threw to first to retire Eric Campbell for the final out of the eighth.

“It took kind of an in-between hop. It wasn’t an easy one, for sure,” Crawford said. “That was about the toughest play of the game. Usually, there’s a really good play that saves a hit, or maybe some hard line drives right at somebody. But there really weren’t a lot of balls squared up.”

Heston hit Tejada just below the left shoulder with one out in the fourth, then grazed Lucas Duda’s uniform near his right thigh. Despite leading the NL East, the Mets are 25th among the 30 teams in runs, a dearth partly due to injuries to David Wright, Daniel Murphy and Travis d’Arnaud.

“Obviously, those guys would have helped tonight, there’s no question of that. But you don’t want to take anything away,” Cuddyer said. “He had a really good sinker and he kept everybody off balance with a couple of different kinds of breaking balls, curveballs, one obviously slower and one a little quicker, good slider.”

Heston threw 72 of 110 pitches for strikes in the 35th complete-game no-hitter by a rookie in major league history, according to STATS, the first since Boston’s Clay Buchholz in 2007.

Heston hit a two-run single in the fourth off Noah Syndergaard (2-4) and added another single in the eighth.

Angel Pagan hit an RBI groundout in the first, Matt Duffy homered in the sixth and Joe Panik hit a leadoff homer in the seventh off Dillon Gee, making his first relief appearance since 2011.

Heston had a long and slow path to the majors. A graduate of Bayside High School in Palm Bay, Florida, he went to Seminole Community College and East Carolina University, declining to sign when Minnesota selected him on the 47th round in 2007 and Washington on the 29th round the following year. San Francisco got him on the 12th round in 2009.

He was 1-5 that year for the Arizona Rookie League Giants and didn’t advance past Class A until 2012. He made his big league debut last Sept. 13 against the Los Angeles Dodgers but was sent to the minors on March 20.

“The numbers really got him more than anything,” Bochy said.

But when Cain started the season on the disabled list, Heston was brought up April 7. Before Tuesday, his only complete game was a two-hitter against Houston on May 12. Heston was knocked out in fourth inning against Pittsburgh in previous start.

“Honestly, I think it’s just a matter of him just kind of trying to find his way right now,” Posey said. “He’s still early in his career in establishing what type of pitcher he’s going to be. And it’s something that we all go through when we first get here.”

Bochy, who won his 700th game as Giants manager, had an easy night in the dugout through eight innings. Then Heston plunked Recker.

“I said, ‘Well, what’s going to happen if he hits the first three? Do I get him with a no-hitter?'” Bochy remembered.

No way. Old-school Bochy was going to let him keep on going.

“I think you know about my pitch count,” the manager said. “I watched Timmy throw close to 150, so he probably could have thrown 50 the last inning.”

When Heston returned to the Giants’ clubhouse, he was met by one last ovation, this time from all his teammates.

“It was awesome, to walk in and having the whole team sitting there, congratulating me,” he said. “Definitely a special moment. I’ll remember that forever.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

How Apple Hopes To Take A Bite Out Of The News Business

Susan Prescott, Apple vice president of product management and marketing, demonstrates the News app during the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco on Monday.

Susan Prescott, Apple vice president of product management and marketing, demonstrates the News app during the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco on Monday. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

What if there were an app where a user could have all of the news he was interested in, from the outlets he trusted, all in one place?

That’s the goal of Apple’s new iOS 9 feature, called, simply, News. It will be a permanent fixture on the iPhone and iPad home screen, just like Calendar, Maps and Weather.

If that app sounded familiar before it was unveiled Monday, that’s because other apps are already doing the same thing — Facebook, Flipboard, Twitter, Yahoo News and NYT Now are trying to become the gateway between news consumers and information.

Apple, which announced the app during its debut of iOS 9, is just the latest company to throw its hat into the ring, and it has a distinct advantage over the competition: The News app will automatically be an undeletable part of any Apple mobile device running iOS 9 starting in the fall.

News will be on the radar of millions of Apple users, making it one of the most salient apps on the market. As the Washington Post points out, News could quickly become a contender.

“If the algorithm is good and expansive enough, this could eat market share from Flipboard, Twitter and even, theoretically, those daily newsletters people send around. Not to mention from those outside the ecosystem.”

News won’t necessarily be a big success. Its predecessor, Newsstand, turned out to be unpopular with publishers.

Instead of making a home for news apps, as Newsstand did, Apple is partnering with publishers including BuzzFeed, CNN, Conde Nast, The New York Times, Time Inc. and more, displaying their content within the News app in a customizable wrapper. (NPR is among the media organizations that intend to make news available for the News app.)

In an article for NiemanLab, Joshua Benton explained this new relationship between Apple and publishers:

“Individual news apps and individual news brands aren’t the primary point of contact with news any more. They’re raw material, feeding into broader platforms. The loss of power for publishers in that exchange is obvious; the potential benefits remain mostly undiscovered.”

Publishers are trying to keep up as these platforms explore new ways to distribute information to consumers, but the future of News (the app, and the content) has yet to be determined.

Paige Pfleger is an intern with NPR Digital News.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

First 'Mockingjay – Part 2' Trailer Teases the Return of 'The Hunger Games'

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 left a lot of people salivating for what would happen next in the saga of Katniss Everdeen and the oppressed people of Panem, and now we have our answer.

Love! War! Despair! More war! More despair! Revolution! Welcome to the first trailer for The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2.

Once again directed by Francis Lawrence, Part 2 obviously picks up where the last movie left off, with the revolution practically knocking on the door of the villainous capitol. This first trailer is more of a teaser stacked with eye-popping imagery and less step-by-step plot specifics (hey, if you want those, the books have been out for years), so there’s no risking of watching it and feeling like you’ve just seen the whole thing.

That said, there is definitely a risk that November 20, 2015 is going to suddenly seem 10,000 times farther away.

[embedded content]

Follow @PeterSHall Follow @MoviesDotCom

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Obama Defends Health Care Law As Supreme Court Ruling Nears

3:53

Download

President Obama defends the health care reform law as the Supreme Court prepares to issue a ruling in a case that could dismantle it. The law still remains controversial politically.

Transcript

ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

President Obama is defending his signature health care law. He says it’s helped millions of Americans who used to live in fear of costly medical bills. The president’s remarks come as the Supreme Court is considering another serious challenge to the Affordable Care Act. The president says he’s optimistic the high court will leave the law as is, but congressional Republicans are preparing to jump in if the court’s ruling goes against the administration. Here’s NPR’s Scott Horsley.

SCOTT HORSLEY, BYLINE: President Obama told a group of Catholic hospital operators today the health care law is working even better than supporters hoped, extending coverage to more than 16 million people and helping put the brakes on runaway medical bills.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

BARACK OBAMA: When you talk to people who actually are enrolled in a new marketplace plan, the vast majority of them like their coverage. The vast majority are satisfied with their choice of doctors and hospitals and satisfied with their monthly premiums. They like their reality.

HORSLEY: Obama also dismissed what he called Chicken Little warnings that the health care law would be a job killer.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

OBAMA: America has experienced 63 straight months of private sector job growth, a streak that started the month we passed the Affordable Care Act.

(APPLAUSE)

HORSLEY: But the health care law still faces a serious legal challenge. The Supreme Court is set to rule this month on whether a single phrase in the law bars the federal government from subsidizing health coverage in up to 34 states that didn’t set up their own insurance exchanges. More than 6 million people in those states could lose their subsidies. Sister Carol Keehan, who heads the Catholic Health Association the president was addressing today, says that would be devastating for those families.

SISTER CAROL KEEHAN: We can’t be a nation that lets so many people go without one of the most basic services needed to preserve life.

HORSLEY: Obama warns ending the subsidies could also have far-reaching ripple effects, de-stabilizing health insurance markets well beyond the federal government’s exchanges. Yevgeniy Feyman, of the free-market Manhattan Institute, is no fan of Obamacare. But he’s surprised the White House isn’t doing more to get ready.

YEVGENIY FEYMAN: They really don’t have a plan B. The president’s defense appears to be that, you know, it’s hard because you have interconnected parts. But even if you have interconnected parts preparing for what they consider to be the worst-case scenario would seem to be a smart idea.

HORSLEY: A high court ruling against the subsidies would be a mixed blessing for Republican lawmakers. They’ve long wanted to get rid of the health care law, but they’re wary of a sudden disruption in the market. Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson has drafted a bill that would preserve the subsidies, but only temporarily.

RON JOHNSON: It’s basically a two-year transition that sets up 2016 as the election to really have the American people be involved in the decision of what our health care system ought to look like.

HORSLEY: But while Johnson’s bill would initially maintain the subsidies, it would do away with the requirement that individuals carry health insurance. Backers of the Affordable Care Act say without that requirement the law doesn’t work. Supporters have always described the health care law as a package deal in which popular provisions, such as guaranteed coverage regardless of one’s health, must be coupled with other features, like the individual mandate. You have a model where all the pieces connect, the president said this week, and today, he added we are not going back.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

OBAMA: This is now part of the fabric of how we care for one another. This is health care in America.

HORSLEY: That fabric could still unravel, though, with an adverse ruling from the Supreme Court. Scott Horsley, NPR News, the White House.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

A Gender Revolution Hits The Streets, Two Wheels At A Time

Fatima Haidari, second from the right, and her bike riding club caught the attention of Humans of Kabul — the Afghanistan version of the popular Humans of New York blog.

Fatima Haidari, second from the right, and her bike riding club caught the attention of Humans of Kabul — the Afghanistan version of the popular Humans of New York blog. David Fox/Courtesy of Humans of Kabul hide caption

itoggle caption David Fox/Courtesy of Humans of Kabul

When Fatima Haidari got her first bike at age 9, she rode it all the time. But when she became an teenager, the rules changed.

“I used to bike outside because I was a kid, and nobody cared,” Haidari says. “But when I got older, it got kind of weird so I stopped.”

By “weird,” she means people aren’t used to seeing a young woman outside, by herself, on the streets of Kabul, Afghanistan. It’s even more uncommon to see women out on the streets on wheels. Haidari says she would have attracted unwanted attention from passersby — disapproving stares and even taunts.

In the 1990s, the Taliban imposed many restrictions on women’s rights. They couldn’t go to school, walk on the streets alone or speak publicly.

Since the militant group was ousted from parts of the country in 2001, the Afghan government has been working with advocacy groups to improve women’s rights. But progress has been slow. And some people still believe that women belong inside the house.

Haidari, now 18, decided to challenge that thinking.

While studying in the U.S. last spring, she met representatives from Girl Up, a campaign from the U.N. Foundation that funds clubs for girls around the world. Haidari noticed that Afghanistan didn’t have one.

So she thought, why not?

With funding from Girl Up, Haidari returned to Kabul and created a bike-riding club just for girls. She and her friends met weekly, sometimes to watch and discuss movies starring women, like Gravity. Every Friday, they went biking around the city.

The club got an extra boost after the girls impressed Shannon Galpin, the first woman known to mountain bike in Afghanistan. Her nonprofit Moutain 2 Mountain, which advocates for women in conflict zones, donated 10 bikes to club members. For each of the girls, it was her first bike. Before then, they had to borrow from a male friend or relative.

“It’s really new for our society to see women outside their house because we usually think women are supposed to be home to raise the children or take care of the husband,” Haidari says. “We’re trying to push women to have equal presence in society, and biking is just part of it.”

This spring Haidari has been studying at St. Timothy’s School, a boarding school for girls in Baltimore, Md. And she has put the club in the hands of a good friend while she’s away. The club is still going strong, she says. It started out with just five girls. Now, more than 20 get together each week to go cycling.

After a brief introduction from Girl Up, we caught up with Haidari as she was preparing for her finals. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Why did you focus on bike riding?

It’s kind of cliche, but it’s really important for a woman to be able to get somewhere without a male’s help.

There are so many girls in Afghanistan who can’t afford to drive to school so they walk for hours. But they can use a bicycle. First, it’s not that expensive, and second it’s a kind of sport. There aren’t many opportunities for women to exercise. So biking serves multiple purposes. I don’t know who said this, but I think women on wheels is the start of women’s independence.

What were some obstacles in starting the club?

There were so many girls who wanted to come riding with us. They would be super passionate, but their families wouldn’t let them come. I understand where they’re coming from — they were scared for their daughter’s security. So we started with five girls. When the other girls saw that nothing [bad] really happened, and that it was successful, I think that convinced the other girls’ families.

Were you nervous about the first bike ride?

We never felt that our lives were in danger, but we weren’t sure what the reaction was going to be. One of my friends said that we should call a cop to watch over us, but we wanted to send a message that girls have the freedom to go outside and bike. And having that cop next to us would have totally ruined that message.

Did anyone try to get in the way?

There was an instance when this guy tried to stop one of my friends and made her fall from her bike.

It was right in front of the Ministry of Education, where there were guards. And they didn’t do anything!

The Ministry of Education is supposed to inform people about human rights and that women should use their freedom. But the guards were just staring. It was really ironic that there was nobody to protect us — or at least to call the person out.

When things like that happen, what inspires you to keep going?

I had a friend who didn’t know anything about biking. She had never rode a bike, and she wanted to join. I told her the bike ride is tomorrow, and she was like, “Well I’m going to learn tonight.” So she learned it overnight, and she came and joined us the next day. It was really inspiring to see that much dedication.

What’s next?

I don’t know how to drive, but I want to learn this summer. On the streets in Afghanistan, you see mostly men behind the wheel. When I came to the U.S., it was the first culture shock I got: There were so many women behind the wheel. They all knew how to drive! I was like, “That is absolutely something I should know. I should know how to get somewhere by myself.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

To Beat Insomnia, Try Therapy For The Underlying Cause Instead Of Pills

Ikon Images/Corbis

Ikon Images/Corbis

Lots of people say they have trouble sleeping. And 1 in 10 Americans has chronic insomnia.

Most often, sleep disorders are treated with medication. Between 6 and 10 percent of adults in the U.S. use sleeping pills.

But a review of the medical evidence has found that therapy might help people with chronic sleep troubles just as much — or even more — than pills.

Evidence that cognitive behavioral therapy — a form of talk therapy that focuses on changing how a person reacts to specific situations — can help people with chronically bad sleep has been growing over the past decade, says Dr. David Cunnington, director of the Melbourne Sleep Disorders Centre in Australia, and the senior author of the recent study.

“We wanted pull together all the smaller studies that have been done on cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia,” Cunnington says. “to really get a bigger pool of data and a better idea of how effective this is.”

The results were published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

A typical treatment plan for insomnia includes four to six sessions with a sleep psychologist. Therapists help train patients to wake up at the same time every day and develop good sleep habits , such as avoiding alcohol or caffeine near bedtime and reserving their bed for sleep (rather than watching TV, for example). They also teach relaxation techniques and challenge people’s negative attitudes toward sleep.

After completing therapy, on average, patients fell asleep almost 20 minutes faster and were awake in the middle of the night almost half an hour less, the study found. And the time they spent sleeping soundly increased by nearly 10 percent.

“Based on other studies, we know that these results from therapy are very similar to what you’d see with patients who take medication,” Cunnington says.

In many cases, therapy is a better treatment option, since it treats the underlying anxieties that cause insomnia. “A medication just puts a blanket over that anxiety and helps people get rest,” Cunnington says. “But cognitive behavioral therapy addresses the core problems, challenging people’s thinking around sleep. It can actually break the cycle of chronic insomnia.”

Plus, medications can come with side effects — like feeling sedated all day. And most sleeping pills lose their effectiveness over time, Cunnington notes.

So why don’t more doctors recommend therapy for sleep problems?

“I think it’s an issue of awareness,” says Kelly Baron, a clinical psychologist at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine who specializes in sleep disorders.

“This review definitely gives us some hard and fast numbers on the efficacy of therapy,” says Baron, who wasn’t involved in the recent study.

But primary care doctors often don’t know where to refer patients with chronic sleep issues, Baron says. And there’s a shortage of therapists who are trained to treat insomnia, especially outside of big cities.

Proponents of therapy for insomnia are working to develop a better certification program for sleep psychologists, Baron says. “What we really need to focus on at this point is increasing accessibility, so more people with sleep disorders have the option to choose therapy if they want it.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Here's How Inflation Has Eroded American Workers' Overtime Eligibility

Sheila Abramson serves customers of Langer's Delicatessen in Los Angeles in 2013.

Sheila Abramson serves customers of Langer’s Delicatessen in Los Angeles in 2013. Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

President Obama is once again poised to go it alone on labor policy, this time on overtime. The Labor Department is expected in the coming weeks to release a rule making millions more Americans eligible for overtime work — currently, all workers earning below $455 a week, or $23,660 a year, are guaranteed time-and-a-half pay for working more than 40 hours a week. The law may raise that as high as $52,000, Politico reports.

The rule would also change the regulations outlining which employees earning above that threshold are eligible — currently, employers can exempt some employees above that threshold if those workers could be considered “white-collar.”

This would add to a series of workplace policies that, failing congressional approval, the president has expanded in limited form through executive order — upping the minimum wage among federal contractors and attempting to shrink the gender wage gap among federal contractors. He also mandated paid leave for federal workers.

This particular rule change would be a long time in coming — Obama had in March 2014 directed the Labor Department to overhaul the overtime regulations.

The overtime threshold has only been changed once since 1975. At that time, it was set at $250 per week. Then in 2004, President George W. Bush updated it to $455. And that means inflation has slowly diminished the share of Americans who are guaranteed eligibility.

When you adjust for inflation, you can see how much the threshold has fallen — data from the St. Louis Federal Reserve (going back to 1979) shows that, as of the late 1970s, the threshold was right at or slightly above the median worker’s pay level. Today, it’s at around half.

The income line in the chart — that top one — represents the exact middle wage, with half the full-time working population above and below it at any given time. So while the threshold fell away from the median pay level, so did the number of workers legally guaranteed overtime pay.

Indeed, according to the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute, as of 2013, only 11 percent of full-time workers were guaranteed overtime. Bumping the threshold up to around $50,000, for example — roughly where it was in 1975, adjusted for inflation — would bring 47 percent of workers under the threshold, making around 6 million more workers eligible, by one estimate.

The debate over the overtime threshold sounds remarkably similar to the minimum wage debate — in that debate, opponents in the business community say a higher wage would cost jobs. In the debate over overtime, the fear is that it could cost workers hours as employers decide they don’t want to shell out time-and-a-half pay.

And as in the minimum wage debate, advocates of higher overtime thresholds say lawmakers should simply index the level to inflation — not only would it save lawmakers from periodic fights over how much to change the law, but it would also help lower-paid hourly workers by making sure they’re all paid fairly by keeping wage policies consistent with where prices go.

“The original notion was that the people who don’t control their own hours, who don’t need the protection of the law, get paid overtime,” says Ross Eisenbrey, vice president at EPI. “Where the law set the threshold in 1975, that’s really supposed to demarcate the people about whom there’s no question — they are not the most powerful people.”

Tying the level to inflation, he says, would ensure that the workers who need the overtime are consistently eligible for it.

The threshold has never been tied to inflation, and advocates like Eisenbrey and the liberal Center for American Progress have long pushed for such a change.

But opponents see reason to keep the level static. One reason, says one economist, is that an indexed overtime level doesn’t give businesses enough leeway to deal with high inflation.

“I think it’s a bad idea [to index the overtime threshold to inflation] because you want to preserve some flexibility,” says Michael Strain, a resident scholar at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute. “We have been in a low-inflation environment for some time, and we’re kind of used to that in how we look at things. But it’s entirely conceivable that 10 years from now, we may be in a different environment.”

And without that flexibility, employers might further restrict hours, or they might pressure employees to get even more work done in their 40 hours.

Another argument is that inflation isn’t uniform everywhere. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce argued in a February letter to Secretary of Labor Tom Perez that the price index used to adjust wages is based on prices in urban areas — it could distort labor markets in rural areas.

But then, inflation will still happen, and the threshold would still periodically have to rise. So how do you ensure that Congress does it? Strain says one solution could be including a provision in the overtime law that forces Congress to revisit the policy every few years. That way, the policy isn’t on “autopilot,” he says, but it still changes regularly.

Even then, however, there’s no guarantee Congress would actually regularly change the law. After all, they have an annual deadline to pass a budget. They haven’t passed all their spending bills on time in almost 20 years.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.