June 5, 2015

No Image

Best of the Week: 'Aquaman' Officially Gets a Director, 'Star Wars' and 'Spider-Man' Updates and More

The Important News

James Wan is officially directing Aquaman.

Han Solo may also feature in the Boba Fett Star Wars movie.

More young actors are up for the role of Spider-Man. And more directors are up for the Spider-Man gig, too.

The Rock will star in a remake of Big Trouble in Little China. He also had his best opening ever with San Andreas.

Sister Act is also being remade.

Part of Fantasia is also being remade, as a live-action feature.

Tron 3 is not happening.

Jason Statham may star in a Layer Cake sequel. And he may play Bullseye in the Daredevil series.

Roger Christian’s Black Angel short is being turned into a feature.

Clint Eastwood will direct a movie about Captain Sully’s heroic Hudson River landing.

Michael Bay will direct a time travel movie.

Tom Cruise revealed another way he cheated death for Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation.

The Videos and Geek Stuff

New Movie Trailers: Mission: Impossible: – Rogue Nation, The Good Dinosaur, The Face of an Angel, Paper Towns, 99 Homes, Vacation, Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!, The Walk, Bridge of Spies, Macbeth and Everest.

Watch the Star Wars: The Force Awakens trailer dubbed by kids.

Watch a homemade version of the Jurassic World trailer. Now watch the Jurassic World trailer made with hot dogs.

See Superman fight Wonder Woman in concept art for George Miller’s cancelled Justice League movie.

Check out concept art for Vincenzo Natali’s cancelled movies of Predator, It, Neuromancer and more.

Watch Mad Max: Fury Road mashed with The General. And see Mad Max: Fury Road mashed with My Little Pony and Dr. Seuss. And see Mad Max: Fury Road mashed with Cars.

Now watch a video essay on the framing of Mad Max: Fury Road.

See how Ant-Man is empowering teen girls.

Watch Channing Tatum prank Magic Mike fans disguised as an old man.

See the new Scream mask and how it fits with other horror masks.

Watch San Andreas without the special effects.

Check out this week’s best new movie posters. And here’s a spotlight on the new Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2.

Our Features

Calendar: Your general guide to what to see in June.

Geek Guide: What geek stuff to look forward to in June.

Sci-Fi Movie Guide: Why you should watch Voyage to the Prehistoric Planet.

Discussion: Is San Andreas better than Earthquake?

R.I.P.: We remember the reel-important people we lost in May.

List: Top five movies that influenced We Are Still Here.

Movie Guide: When did Ferris Bueller take his day off?

Home Viewing: Here’s our guide to everything hitting VOD this week.

and

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Today in Movie Culture: 'Mad Max: Fury Road' Without the Special Effects, 'The Goonies' Remix and More

Here are a bunch of little bites to satisfy your hunger for movie culture:

Spy is so good that it’s now got an awesome retroy-style Mondo Poster (via Birth Movies Death):

See what Mad Max: Fury Road looks like without special effects in this behind-the-scenes video:

[embedded content]

Cosplay of the Day: Speaking of Mad Max: Fury Road, check out these two Furiosas (via Fashionably Geek, first and second):

Watch kids learn that Transformers is originally from their parents’ day:

[embedded content]

It would be cool enough to have a life-size remote-control R2-D2, but it’s even cooler to have one that’s also a beer fridge (via Topless Robot):

[embedded content]

Here’s a video essay on a bit of symmetry within Alfred Hitchcock‘s Rear Window (via The Film Stage):

[embedded content]

5 reasons that a movie will bomb:

[embedded content]

Catch clips from Entourage, Anchorman, Guardians of the Galaxy and more in this slow-motion walk supercut:

[embedded content]

This Sunday marks the 30th anniversary of The Goonies. Watch the original trailer from 1985:

[embedded content]

Also, in celebration of the anniversary, here’s a mash-up of The Goonies and the Nicki Minaj song “Truffle Butter” (via Geek Tyrant):

[embedded content]

Send tips or follow us via Twitter:

and

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Halibut Dumping Stirs Fight Among Fishing Fleets In Alaska

Pacific Halibut caught in Cook's Inlet, Alaska.
3:54

Download

Pacific Halibut caught in Cook’s Inlet, Alaska. via Wikimedia hide caption

itoggle caption via Wikimedia

If you’ve ever encountered halibut, it was probably as a tasty — and pricey — entree. But in Alaska, it’s the subject of a fierce fish battle. On one side are small family-owned fishing boats. On the other, an industrial fleet delivering seafood to the world. This weekend, federal managers are trying to decide how both sides can survive.

In the middle of the Bering Sea, a fishing vessel is hauling in a 50-foot net. It looks like a stocking packed with fish, their mouths wide open and gasping for breath. John Nelson has been the captain of the Rebecca Irene for 20 years. His 35-man boat is part of a Seattle-based fleet that fishes these waters around the clock, January through December.

“We’re talking about a tremendous amount of jobs. We’re talking about a tremendous amount of a low-cost protein source that is utilized worldwide,” Nelson says.

The Rebecca Irene is a trawler — it tows a net along the ocean bottom, scooping up everything in its path. Most of the fish then goes to China for processing — and from there, around the globe. Some makes it back to the U.S., landing in the frozen food aisle.

But here is the controversy. Mixed in with the cheap yellowfin sole and arrowtooth flounder is expensive halibut, one of the iconic species of the North Pacific. At the store, it can go for $24 per pound.

The Rebecca Irene can’t keep that halibut: Trawlers aren’t supposed to catch it, and the law requires any halibut that are caught be thrown overboard.

“We have no control over that,” Nelson says. “We’re forced to discard halibut. It’s a prohibited species for us. We can’t even eat it.”

That accidentally caught halibut is called bycatch. Last year, almost 9 million pounds of bycatch was dumped, dead, in the Bering Sea and Gulf of Alaska. And this is a point of contention with those who actually do fish for halibut.

Simeon Swetzof Jr. has been a halibut fisherman for more than 30 years. He’s also the mayor of St. Paul, a town of about 500 people, mostly Alaska Native Aleuts, in the remote Pribilof Islands.

“You meet people on the street, talking to people anywhere, Seattle, other places in the country here, [and they say,] ‘Oh, halibut! I love halibut.’ Well, guess what? It comes from where we live, out in the Bering Sea, and down here in the Gulf of Alaska,” Swetzof says.

There isn’t much of an economy in St. Paul. Most families rely on halibut for a big chunk of their income. They’re part of Alaska’s thousand-strong commercial halibut fleet, small boats that fish with longlines and hooks. The vast majority of those boats are family-owned.

But in recent years, because of concerns about halibut numbers, the amount that fishermen are allowed to catch has dropped. Meanwhile, the amount of bycatch the big boats can take — and discard — has stayed essentially the same.

In the Bering Sea, halibut fishermen have seen their share cut so low that last year, there was more halibut thrown overboard by the big boats than was caught by the small boats. If the trend doesn’t change, fishermen in St. Paul face the potential of a complete shutdown.

With his community’s future on the line, Swetsov choked up as he testified this week before the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, which regulates bycatch in federal waters off of Alaska. “I’m extremely angry that we’re here today,” he says.

Swetzof and others asked the council to cut the amount of bycatch allowed in the Bering Sea by 50, calling the status quo unacceptable.

“We live right out in the richest ocean in the world, practically, and we’re going to see this happen to us, in our own backyard? No! We’ll fight it!” Swetzof says.

But the industrial fleet says they’ve already done a lot to reduce bycatch, and anything more would be devastating, putting their boats — and crews — out of work for most of the year.

The council is expected to vote on the issue this weekend.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

NCAA Tests Out Flat-Seamed Baseballs To Boost Batting Averages

3:22

Download

NPR’s Robert Siegel interviews physicist Alan Nathan, a professor at the University of Illinois, about how homeruns are up by 40 percent after using flat-seamed balls this season.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Irish Soccer Details $7 Million FIFA Payment Over Handball

Robbie Keane scored in Ireland's controversial World Cup qualifying match with France on Nov. 18, 2009 — but the country was eliminated by the aggregate score of 2-1. Ireland's soccer association says FIFA paid 5 million euros — $7 million at 2010 exchange rates — over a blatant breaking of the rules by France.

Robbie Keane scored in Ireland’s controversial World Cup qualifying match with France on Nov. 18, 2009 — but the country was eliminated by the aggregate score of 2-1. Ireland’s soccer association says FIFA paid 5 million euros — $7 million at 2010 exchange rates — over a blatant breaking of the rules by France. Michael Steele/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Michael Steele/Getty Images

A day after news emerged that soccer’s world body paid Ireland not to protest a blatant handball by France’s Thierry Henry in 2009, the Football Association of Ireland is releasing more details about the arrangement — including a copy of a signed deal.

FIFA paid the FAI more than 5 million euros — equal to around $7 million at the time of the transaction in January 2010 — so that the Irish would quit their plans for a legal appeal.

“We felt we had a legal case against FIFA because of how the World Cup play-off hadn’t worked out for us with the Henry handball,” FAI CEO John Delaney tells Irish broadcaster RTE.

It’s the latest report of millions of dollars changing hands over FIFA and the World Cup. While earlier news has alleged hefty bribes over the awarding of the tournament, this case centers on a pivotal play in a World Cup playoff game that played in a key role in Ireland staying home for the 2010 Cup.

The play in November of 2009 was immediately controversial — particularly after Henry admitted that he used his hand to guide the ball shortly before a crucial goal. Ireland was eliminated on aggregate goals, 2-1.

Ireland loudly protested and demanded to play France again. But FIFA offered a different accommodation: a confidential payment to the country’s soccer association that was initially called an interest-free loan. Last summer, the loan was forgiven, in a note that cited Ireland’s failure to qualify for the 2010 and 2014 World Cups.

FIFA acknowledged the arrangement Thursday. And today, saying that the rules of confidentiality no longer were in play, the FAI published an agreement signed by FIFA Secretary General Jerome Volcke, his deputy Markus Kattner, and FAI’s CEO, John Delaney.

The first page provides some details:

The first page of a four-page agreement between FIFA and Ireland's soccer association outlines the terms of a 5 million euro payment.

The first page of a four-page agreement between FIFA and Ireland’s soccer association outlines the terms of a 5 million euro payment. FAI hide caption

itoggle caption FAI

The FAI says it used the FIFA payment for a new stadium, and that its leaders kept the organizations board informed about the FIFA money, which was kept in its central account.

The Irish group also released several bank records, including one showing a transfer of 5 million euros from FIFA. The group included a letter from Kattner to Delaney written in 2014 which concludes, “the credit position vis a vis the FAI stands at nil.”

“All of the information above is contained in our audited accounts,” the FAI says.

The organization says its board “acted at all times in the best interests of Irish football, and in full compliance with Irish company law.”

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

More Preventive Health Services Approved For No-Cost Coverage

If you're at high risk of hepatitis B infection, your insurance company should pay for testing for the virus without passing any of the cost on to you.

If you’re at high risk of hepatitis B infection, your insurance company should pay for testing for the virus without passing any of the cost on to you. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine/Science Source hide caption

itoggle caption London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine/Science Source

The Affordable Care Act says that preventive health tests or services recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force have to be available to most insured consumers without any out-of-pocket cost.

Since the law was enacted, the list of services that people are entitled to has grown. In 2014, the task force recommended two new services and tweaked a handful of others that had previously been recommended.

Under the health law, preventive care that receives a grade of A or B on the recommended list by the nonpartisan group of medical experts must be covered by health plans without charging consumers. Only grandfathered plans are exempt from the requirement.

The newest recommended services are hepatitis B screening for adolescents and adults at high risk for infection and low-dose aspirin for pregnant women who are at high risk for preeclampsia, a condition characterized by an abrupt increase in blood pressure that can lead to serious complications for the woman and baby.

In its hepatitis B screening recommendation, the task force said there was new evidence that antiviral treatments improved outcomes in people at high risk for the liver infection, including those from countries where the infection is common, people who are HIV-positive and injection drug users.

Although it’s not a big cost from an insurance perspective, the March of Dimes welcomes the task force recommendation regarding use of low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in high-risk women, says Dr. Siobhan Dolan, an OB-GYN at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, who’s a medical adviser to the March of Dimes.

“What’s exciting about this is that now we have something to offer women that’s a low-risk strategy,” says Dolan. Preeclampsia accounts for 15 percent of all preterm births.

The task force also issued a recommendation for gestational diabetes screening after 24 weeks in asymptomatic pregnant women. That service, however, is already being offered at no cost by health plans following an Institute Of Medicine study commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services that identified gaps in existing coverage guidelines.

In its review of screening for gestational diabetes, the task force found sufficient evidence that it reduces the risk for complications such as preeclampsia, large birth-weight babies, and shoulder dystocia, when the baby’s shoulders become stuck inside the mother’s body during delivery.

The task force recommendations take effect for the plan year that begins one year after they’re issued so for many consumers, these provisions won’t take effect until 2016.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Apple's Cook Takes Rivals To Task Over Data Privacy

3:31

Download

Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks in New York on April 30. This week, he said some of Silicon Valley’s most prominent companies have “built their businesses by lulling their customers into complacency about their personal information.” Richard Drew/AP hide caption

itoggle caption Richard Drew/AP

Apple CEO Tim Cook made headlines this week when he lashed out at rival tech companies for selling people’s personal data. He didn’t mention Google, Facebook or Twitter by name, but it’s pretty clear those were the companies he meant. But is Apple faultless on privacy issues?

Cook’s been beating the drum on the issue for a while. Last fall he told PBS’s Charlie Rose, “When we (Apple) design a new service we try not to collect data,” Cook said. “So we’re not reading your email. We’re not reading your iMessage. If the government laid a subpoena on us to get your iMessages we can’t provide it.”

At a cybersecurity summit this fall he made a similar point in front of an audience that included President Obama.

Some groups are applauding Cook for speaking out. The Electronic Privacy Information Center honored Cook at its annual “Champions of Freedom” event in Washington, D.C.

“It is a recognition that he has spoken out about the importance of protecting privacy for consumers,” says EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg. “And he spoke out in support of protecting a value that many people today are justifiably concerned is at grave risk.”

Recent events sure make it look that way. Once your data is out there, hackers don’t seem to have much trouble getting their hands on it.

At the EPIC Awards ceremony, Cook told the audience that some of Silicon Valley’s most prominent companies have “built their businesses by lulling their customers into complacency about their personal information.”

But, it’s easier for Apple to take this position. Most of its profits come from selling devices. Google, Twitter and Facebook sell ad-supported services. You get them largely for free because you’re willing to watch ads.

Take Google’s Gmail. “Google has made a decision to use a form of encryption that basically breaks the communication in the middle,” says EPIC’s Rotenberg, “and allows them to see what you’ve said and determine whether there’s some advertising value in your text that they can then sell to an advertiser and profit from your email.”

Neither Google nor Facebook would talk on the record. But Mike Zaneis, general counsel for the Interactive Advertising Bureau, says these companies don’t sell your name to advertisers, just your profile of interests. And Apple products are expensive. Ads make products accessible to people of all incomes.

“They wouldn’t be able to afford it if they had to pay out of pocket, but because it’s all supported by advertising that’s a wonderful tradeoff for them and one that they eagerly engage in,” Zaneis says.

And it’s not like Apple is 100 percent pure. “They do still ultimately collect lots and lots and lots of data,” says Fatemeh Khatibloo, an analyst at Forrester Research.

Though Khatibloo says Apple does do more to protect the data even with ad driven products like iTunes Radio. But, it doesn’t do much about companies, like Uber, that have apps on its mobile devices.

“Even if you’re not running the app, they’re collecting your location information. And even if you turn off location tracking services they can still sort of triangulate where you are based on IP address,” Khatibloo says.

And on Monday, Apple is expected to reveal a streaming music service; chances are at least part of it will be ad supported.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Teens Hoping For More Jobs, Higher Wages This Summer

José Moncada, 16, signed up for a summer youth employment program in New York City. He said hopes to earn enough to help his family, which lives on less than $30,000 a year.

José Moncada, 16, signed up for a summer youth employment program in New York City. He said hopes to earn enough to help his family, which lives on less than $30,000 a year. Kaomi Goetz/NPR hide caption

itoggle caption Kaomi Goetz/NPR

Recipe for a good summer-job market: First, hire a lot of people in May. Second, give workers raises, and third, push down gasoline prices. Mix it all together — and pour out hope for teen workers.

“Having a job makes me feel really excited. I can put my own money in my pocket instead of asking my parents for money all the time,” said José Moncada, a 16-year-old job seeker in New York City.

Moncada and other teens may have caught a break Friday when the economy followed that seasonal employment recipe precisely.

The Labor Department said employers added 280,000 new jobs in May, exceeding economists’ expectations. May brought a burst of hiring in leisure and hospitality, with 57,000 new jobs. Retailers added 31,400 jobs.

Typically, those are the sectors that hire a lot of younger workers. And those are the sectors that benefit when workers have more cash to spend. The May jobs report showed average hourly earnings rose by 0.3 percent — which translates to an annual growth rate of nearly 4 percent, far exceeding inflation.

Here’s another factor that may encourage summer hiring:

On Friday, OPEC announced it will keep oil production unchanged this year, even though supplies are plentiful. That helped lower the U.S. benchmark price to less than $58 a barrel, down from around $106 at this time last year.

AAA, the auto club, is predicting gasoline prices will fall this summer. The average national price of a gallon is $2.75, way down from $3.66 last year at this time. “This could be the year of the summer road trip,” AAA spokeswoman Avery Ash said.

That’s all positive for young workers. “Seasonal hiring is expected to take a nice jump this summer,” according to a report from CareerBuilder, an online jobs site.

Based on a Harris survey of more than 2,000 hiring managers, the company concluded that 36 percent of private-sector employers will be hiring summer workers, up from 30 percent last year and an average of 21 percent from 2008-2011.

“Many summer jobs went away completely during the recession as companies eliminated internship programs and as households cut back on vacation and recreation spending,” CareerBuilder CEO Matt Ferguson said in a statement.

Not only did many summer jobs disappear during the Great Recession, but competition increased for those that remained, according to professor Ruth Milkman, a labor expert at the City University of New York.

“It used to be that minimum-wage jobs were mostly for very young people, either teenagers or people just entering the labor market permanently,” Milkman said. “What’s happened with the deterioration of the wage structure in recent decades is that more and more working adults are in minimum wage jobs.”

All of that competition has discouraged many teens from even looking for work. As recently as 2000, 52 percent of teenagers were in the labor force. Today, it’s down to less than a third.

So here’s where things stand heading into summer: The national unemployment rate is 5.5 percent, but for workers ages 16-19, it’s 17.9 percent. That’s much lower than the 27.2 percent peak most recently hit in 2010, but it’s still painfully high.

And there’s a big unknown in this summer’s labor market. While the demand for workers has been growing, so have wages. At least 29 states and many cities have passed laws raising the minimum wage well above the federal minimum of $7.25 an hour. Many private employers, such as Wal-Mart, McDonald’s and Target, have raised their wage floors to well above the federal minimum.

These wage increases will disproportionately affect young workers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says more than half of all minimum-wage workers are 24 or younger.

So teens who do land jobs may make more money, which they could then spend at malls and restaurants and amusement parks. But their higher wages could dampen hiring.

Whether the bigger paychecks for young people will translate into a better economy — or just less hiring — remains to be seen.

For now, Moncada, the job seeker at the Henry Street Settlement on Manhattan’s Lower East Side, just wants to get working. Last summer, he cleaned streets at the state minimum of $8.75 an hour. He wants the same gig this summer.

He said his family of six lives on less than $30,000 a year, so he needs money for his school uniform and sneakers. Also, “I go to the store to get food that we need for the house,” he said.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

Why Wal-Mart's Labor Issues Run Deeper Than Too Much Justin Bieber

Wal-Mart employee Dayngel Fernandez stocks shelves in the produce department on February 19, 2015 in Miami, Fla. Activists say the company's recent corporate policy changes don't address systemic labor and environmental problems.

Wal-Mart employee Dayngel Fernandez stocks shelves in the produce department on February 19, 2015 in Miami, Fla. Activists say the company’s recent corporate policy changes don’t address systemic labor and environmental problems. Joe Raedle/Getty Images hide caption

itoggle caption Joe Raedle/Getty Images

On Wednesday, in advance of a Friday shareholder meeting, Wal-Mart executives told employees they’d turn up the heat and mix up the music in stores — after complaints that workers were chilly and subjected to endless repetition of Celine Dion and Justin Bieber songs.

“Taking care of our customers begins with taking care of you,” U.S. COO Judith McKenna said in a statement. “It’s that simple. My commitment to you is that we will continue to listen, and, more importantly, act on what we hear.”

Activists say they applaud the company’s efforts to improve working conditions for U.S. employees — policy changes that also include raising their pay to at least $9 per hour.

But a report out Thursday highlights a series of ways that Wal-Mart is neglecting commitments it has made to maintaining labor and environmental standards throughout its supply chain.

The report, published by the Food Chain Workers Alliance, highlights cases in
which suppliers have failed to uphold the company’s compliance standards and Wal-Mart has neglected to enforce its own standards and goals.

Ultimately, the report calls the company’s commitments to improving labor and environmental impacts “mostly a PR stunt.” Wal-Mart did not reply to The Salt’s request for comment.

Over the years, Wal-Mart has made a series of pledges that now fall under the umbrella of a “Responsible Sourcing” code of ethics. It requires suppliers to abide by standards including “labor protections, such as hours of work, pay, and health and safety, as well as environmental policies, such as complying with local and international laws and regulations and reducing pollutants and waste,” the report notes.

Many of these standards are already required by law. But the report finds that the company as a whole, and its suppliers, are falling short in many places.

For example, two investigations cited Wal-Mart as a major buyer of shrimp from farms known to use slavery and forced labor. And two of Wal-Mart’s major packaged lettuce producers, Taylor Farms and Ready Pac, have been repeatedly cited by OSHA for failing to protect laborers from injuries, thus violating Wal-Mart’s labor code of conduct. The same is true for some baked good suppliers.

On the environmental front, Wal-Mart announced in 2010 that it would
cut 20 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions out of its supply
chain by the end of 2015. As of March 2015, though, Walmart had reached only 38 percent of that goal, the report finds.

But Jose Oliva, co-director of the FCWA, says a perhaps even bigger problem is that the company isn’t transparent about its adherence to its code.

“There is absolutely no way of verifying their claims or of ensuring that the claims are systemic and creating the kinds of conditions, in terms of workplaces and environment, that we need for food to be healthy and procured without suffering,” Oliva tells The Salt.

What the company could do, he says, is hire a third-party verification entity to ensure that the code of ethics is being followed and implemented. “And Wal-Mart would have to abide by the recommendations that independent entity puts out,” he says.

Wal-Mart also set a goal of purchasing $1 billion worth of “local” food from area farmers by 2015. But, the report says, it’s not clear that the commitment is much more than “corporate greenwashing.”

Farmers “receive inconsistent prices for their produce, depending on whom they work with, and in some instances, when the person they work with leaves the company, their replacement is no longer interested in buying from a farmer or a cooperative,” according to the report.

Oliva says the FCWA’s research revealed that Wal-Mart needs to work harder to fulfill its local food goals so that the benefits to farmers are more just.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.


No Image

California Women Can Soon Go Right To The Pharmacist For Birth Control

Amil Patel (left) and Bob Dunn run the front desk at this Walgreens pharmacy on the campus of the University of California, San Francisco. The store will be one of the first to take advantage of a new California law expanding pharmacists' scope of practice.

Amil Patel (left) and Bob Dunn run the front desk at this Walgreens pharmacy on the campus of the University of California, San Francisco. The store will be one of the first to take advantage of a new California law expanding pharmacists’ scope of practice. April Dembosky/KQED hide caption

itoggle caption April Dembosky/KQED

Think of how often you stop by Walgreens or CVS. You run in and grab some Band-Aids or restock your ibuprofen supply. Maybe you even get a flu shot on your way to work.

Soon, it will be that easy for women in California to get birth control, too. Under a new state law, women will be able to go to a pharmacy, get a prescription for contraceptive pills, the ring, or the patch, get it filled and walk out 15 minutes later.

“For a woman who can’t get in to see their doctor, the pharmacist will be able to furnish that for them now,” says Lisa Kroon, a professor at University of California, San Francisco’s school of pharmacy who oversees students who work at the Walgreens store on campus.

That pharmacy will be one of the first to take advantage of a new law in California allowing pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraception. The law, SB 493, was passed in 2013. State health officials are now finalizing the regulations for the law to take effect. The California pharmacy board met Thursday to review them. The law is expected to be fully implemented later this year.

But the law goes beyond birth control pills. It also authorizes pharmacists to prescribe medications for smoking cessation and travel abroad. Pharmacists can administer routine vaccinations to children ages 3 and older. They can even order lab tests and adjust drug regimens for patients with diabetes, hypertension, or other conditions. Kroon says the idea is to make it easier on patients.

“Maybe a working parent can now come after work because the pharmacy is open later,” she says.

The law was passed amid growing concern about doctor shortages. As more baby boomers hit age 65, and millions of people get health coverage under the Affordable Care Act, there aren’t enough primary care doctors to go around.

Advocates says California is the first state to recognize that pharmacists can help fill the gap.

“The pharmacist is really an untapped resource,” Kroon says. “We are graduating students that are ready for this, but the laws just haven’t kept up with what the pharmacist training already is.”

But there’s a big drawback for pharmacists. Now they can perform all these services once reserved for the doctor’s office. But, they won’t get paid for the extra time it takes to provide them.

The law does not compel insurance companies or Medi-Cal, the state’s version of Medicaid, to reimburse these services, says Jon Roth, CEO of the California Pharmacists Association.

In the long run, Roth says the law could ultimately save money, because reimbursement rates for pharmacists will inevitably be lower than what doctors charge.

“We are working to try and identify where it makes sense to pay pharmacists as opposed to other more expensive providers in the health care delivery system,” he says.

Pharmacists’ growing power has some physicians bracing for a turf war. The California Medical Association opposed an early version of the law, citing patient safety concerns. It later withdrew its opposition after lawmakers added a special licensing procedure and continuing education requirement for pharmacists.

Still, some doctors are concerned that if women don’t come to the clinic for their birth control, they won’t get screened for cervical cancer or tested for sexually transmitted diseases.

“Family planning for women is often an access point to assessing other health issues,” says Amy Moy, vice president of public affairs for the California Family Health Council, an advocacy group that supports the law. “Women accessing birth control through the pharmacist would be faster and more convenient. But they will also not have the comprehensive care available in another health care setting.”

Studies of women living on the border of Texas and Mexico found that women who get their birth control over the counter in Mexican pharmacies are less likely to go to the doctor for other preventive care, compared with women who get contraception at clinics. But women at the clinics were also more likely to stop using their birth control, in part because of having to schedule a doctor’s visit to get it.

Moy’s group and other women’s advocates say the benefits of improving access to birth control and reducing unintended pregnancies are critical to women’s health and outweigh the potential risks.

Pharmacy professor Kroon says the plan is for pharmacists to communicate regularly with patients’ doctors. “We are not a lone ranger out there doing something,” she says.

If things go well with the pharmacists law, it could bode well for efforts to expand the scope of practice for other health care practioners. Sen. Ed Hernandez, who led the effort on the pharmacist law, has also proposed bills to increase authority for nurse practitioners and optometrists. Both are working their way through the legislature.

Other states are watching California to see how the pharmacist law plays out. Lawmakers in Oregon and in Congress are considering similar laws.

“They are all watching what happens in California,” Kroon says.

This story is part of a reporting partnership with NPR, KQED and Kaiser Health News.

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.